Yeah as mentioned 02:25:199 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,1,2,1) is definitely 1/3, not 1/4
Something "playing fine" does not mean it fits the song, 1/4s playing nice doesn't mean that it fits at all, and this is just plain wrong snapping. And 00:04:708 (2,1) just feels overdone, (1) is in no way significantly more intense than any other beat to justify that enormous spacing
Generally I like how you say "I don't think it's a good thing to overuse this technique" about the overmapped triplets (which I think got pointed out by SW bc they occured twice in 2/1 instead of just every now and then), but then just go ham with a stream that is 90% overmapped, like, in 02:21:315 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) there are 1/4s at 02:21:918 - 02:21:918 - 02:23:994 - and that's it. All of the other 1/4s are just ridiculously overmapped.
There's also not a single 1/4 at 02:04:842 (1,2,3,4,1) or 02:50:645 (4,5,6,7,1) -, and half of 03:10:065 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - is overmapped too.
And I see absolutely no reason for 01:46:092 (3,3,3,2,1,2) - being 1/8s, there's not even a single 1/4 on any of them, and just mapping some random sounds with 1/8 just bc you feel like it is just ?!
Is this extreme overmapping really being accepted nowadays? I don't see much relation to the song anymore, why choose a particular song to map when you could just overmap riciulous streams into every song?..
Also, minor but imo unfitting nonetheless, 02:16:628 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - the music is kinda going half-BPM but you just throw jumps around anyways, I don't think that represents the music very well
00:03:235 (3) - 00:07:520 (3) - For the rest of the intro you have NCs every 2/1 (which is insanely much tbh), these two not being NCd is pretty inconsistent - Either NC those too or just keep the general NCing to every measure, when you overdo it like that it doesn't really serve any purpose anymore imo
Something "playing fine" does not mean it fits the song, 1/4s playing nice doesn't mean that it fits at all, and this is just plain wrong snapping. And 00:04:708 (2,1) just feels overdone, (1) is in no way significantly more intense than any other beat to justify that enormous spacing
Generally I like how you say "I don't think it's a good thing to overuse this technique" about the overmapped triplets (which I think got pointed out by SW bc they occured twice in 2/1 instead of just every now and then), but then just go ham with a stream that is 90% overmapped, like, in 02:21:315 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) there are 1/4s at 02:21:918 - 02:21:918 - 02:23:994 - and that's it. All of the other 1/4s are just ridiculously overmapped.
There's also not a single 1/4 at 02:04:842 (1,2,3,4,1) or 02:50:645 (4,5,6,7,1) -, and half of 03:10:065 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - is overmapped too.
And I see absolutely no reason for 01:46:092 (3,3,3,2,1,2) - being 1/8s, there's not even a single 1/4 on any of them, and just mapping some random sounds with 1/8 just bc you feel like it is just ?!
Is this extreme overmapping really being accepted nowadays? I don't see much relation to the song anymore, why choose a particular song to map when you could just overmap riciulous streams into every song?..
Also, minor but imo unfitting nonetheless, 02:16:628 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - the music is kinda going half-BPM but you just throw jumps around anyways, I don't think that represents the music very well
00:03:235 (3) - 00:07:520 (3) - For the rest of the intro you have NCs every 2/1 (which is insanely much tbh), these two not being NCd is pretty inconsistent - Either NC those too or just keep the general NCing to every measure, when you overdo it like that it doesn't really serve any purpose anymore imo