First DQQuality Assurance Team wrote:
Disqualification Notice
GeneralInappropriate spread.- Normal has a lot of constant 1/2 rhythms, so it's like a light hard difficulty, which makes gap from easy to normal a but large, because your Easy is almost 3/2 or 2/1 sliders with 1/1 rhythm gap, with only a few circles.
Haruru's Insane Inappropriate emphasis on patterns.- 01:03:971 (4,5,1) - The beat: 01:04:268 - in music is stronger than 01:04:120 - , we'd like to see the space of 01:04:120 (5,1) - is larger than 01:03:971 (4,5) -, which fits music more.
Readablility issues.- 01:19:417 (4,1) - This pattern is very hard to read due to the anti-jump on 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms, although you add an NC at 01:19:565 (1) - . We'd like you to split 01:19:417 (4,1) -out.
- 01:19:565 (1,2,3,4) - The distance space has a big mess here: 01:19:565 (1,2) - the 1/4's distance is almost same even larger than the 01:20:011 (3,4) - 1/2's, we'd recommend you use the distance snap more properly and make the pattern easier to read.
Second DQ.Quality Assurance Team wrote:
Disqualification Notice
Thanatos Overall mapping quality is below acceptable level
Due to a number of questionable patterns players get forced and unnatural feelings and unpleasant gameplay experience
- 00:16:595 (1,2,3) - unnatural and forced rhythm
- 01:10:951 (5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - overmapping with no support within the song
- 01:20:308 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as above
Haruru's InsaneOverdone patterns
The following patterns are not supported by the song and have nothing to do with the structure of the composition
- 00:09:466 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Pause into very fast stream is forced and feels awkward in gameplay
- 00:49:120 (1,2) - it has to be an 1/1 slider
Good luck!
###M
People always say that second or more disqualification should be avoided, and reasons for the second disqualification are clearly different from the first DQ.
Everyone almost know how DQs work, the mapper just fix what have been mentionned, nothing more. And "new issues" appear in future and that makes this map get DQed for a second time, and that could be avoidable if these issues were mentionned in the first DQ.
Could you explain me how you do your job please ?
Because step by step, i used to believe that you do a nice job... Althought people were saying bad things on you, QATs.
__________By the way, I won't let this mapset die, there are interesting things on this mapset, and this map is good. It's sad to see mappers giving up after DQs. You can call me, Homura-.
Edit : I just saw that some "overmapping issues" do not exist because notes on blue ticks are clearly audible, and this DQ could be easily contested, and this is probably the last thing you can do if the mapper doesn't have enough motivation to requalify this map. But i just remember that some people told me that they were waiting almost 1 months to get an answer, so, it's not a good deal afterall...
We are all trapped, is it over ? Or it's just this system is failing ?