1. Easy (1.45 stars, 121 notes)
2. Hard (2.94 stars, 216 notes)
3. Insane (4.16 stars, 286 notes)
4. Milan-'s Normal (1.99 stars, 151 notes)
5. Six Paths (4.63 stars, 339 notes)

1. Pretty polish, no issues I could find

1. 00:03:215 (5) - Not a fan of this, doesn't look very attractive. Consider this: http://puu.sh/igPIB/4a97f7f1ed.jpg
2. 00:03:215 (4,5) - Consider this instead: http://puu.sh/igPK6/09ce030c66.jpg
3. 00:12:900 (3,1) - Fix stack
4. 00:20:841 (2,3,4) - snap to grid, make it a perfect triangle
5. 00:47:699 (5) - try this here: http://puu.sh/igPO1/d98707a41b.jpg

1. 00:25:781 (1,1) - Not a fan of this overlap, please fix.
2. 00:42:032 (3,4,5) - snap to grid, fix shape

1. 00:08:849 (1,3) - Fix stack
2. 00:33:738 (4,2) - Fix stack
3. 00:59:678 (1) - Holy shit I love this

1. 00:30:738 (3,4,5) - This shape looks a bit off, try fixing
2. 00:42:385 (5,3) - Fix overlap/stack
3. 01:07:360 (3,4) - curve these, provides fun flow to 01:07:625 (5) - onwards.

Kuki wrote:

Easy

1. Pretty polish, no issues I could find

Milan-'s Normal

1. 00:03:215 (5) - Not a fan of this, doesn't look very attractive. Consider this: http://puu.sh/igPIB/4a97f7f1ed.jpg
2. 00:03:215 (4,5) - Consider this instead: http://puu.sh/igPK6/09ce030c66.jpg
3. 00:12:900 (3,1) - Fix stack
4. 00:20:841 (2,3,4) - snap to grid, make it a perfect triangle
5. 00:47:699 (5) - try this here: http://puu.sh/igPO1/d98707a41b.jpg

Hard

1. 00:25:781 (1,1) - Not a fan of this overlap, please fix. Fine imo
2. 00:42:032 (3,4,5) - snap to grid, fix shape fixed

Insane

1. 00:08:849 (1,3) - Fix stack Fixed
2. 00:33:738 (4,2) - Fix stack Fixed
3. 00:59:678 (1) - Holy shit I love this <3

Six Paths

1. 00:30:738 (3,4,5) - This shape looks a bit off, try fixing okay fixed
2. 00:42:385 (5,3) - Fix overlap/stack Not trying to overlap here.
3. 01:07:360 (3,4) - curve these, provides fun flow to 01:07:625 (5) - onwards.I like the linear pattern here, but i can see where you're coming from. I'll change this if someone else brings this up.

Mapset's awesome, good luck on ranked!

Misure wrote:

Hihi~
M4M from your queue~

Misure wrote:

Misure wrote:

Hihi~
M4M from your queue~

Well, I modded for about 2 hours, in which time you have changed something...
Hope my mod directs to the right time point and objects

furywolf wrote:

Hey monstrata, doing m4m for your queue t/274775
I'm still not very experienced at modding so feedback would be appreciated and sorry if I wasn't very helpful

[Easy]
00:04:274 (2) - Stacking here may be too short a window for easy diff, try moving it to the side like 00:05:686 (2) This is fine imo.
00:36:385 (2,3) - Flow may be confusing for new players, they may see the 1 and miss the 3 You're absolutely right. fixed for all 3.
00:39:208 (2,3) - ^
00:42:032 (2,3) - ^
00:50:522 (2,1) - I think this overlap is too close, it should have another object between them like 00:52:702 (2). You could try blanketing 1 around 2 to fix this This is fine imo.

[Milan-'s Normal]
Match up the hitsound volume to the other difficulties?
00:44:679 (5) - Consider using this rythm instead

SPOILER

00:56:841 (1) - Try having it slightly different from 00:59:678 (1)

[Hard]
00:48:228 - Add a circle here? It feels a little empty without it I prefer the empty rhythm. it's not an Insane
00:49:640 - ^ ^
00:52:467 - ^^

[Insane]
00:34:356 (2) - Slider end not perfectly stacked, move the end point to x:231 y:215 Fixed from previous mod.
00:39:208 (2) - x:401 y:331 if you want an equilateral triangle, I'm fine with either. If you do change it, consider 00:36:385 (3,4,5) for consistency I prefer this.
00:56:841 (1) - x:191 y:233 for perfect stack Fixed

[Six-Paths]
00:43:444 (3) - I would try and stack these with 00:42:385 (5) but it may be a nightmare adjusting all the blankets I'm not trying to stack them
01:05:331 (1) - x:178 y:265 for perfect stack Fixed.

giantzarz wrote:

From your M4M queue
I like your mapping style!

[Easy]

Not much mod.

00:39:208 (2,3) - Ctrl + G maybe? Did something else

[Normal]

00:50:169 (4) - Try start at 00:49:993 and do reverse

00:53:173 (5) - Start at 00:52:996 would sound better imo

01:04:625 (4,5) - Why don't try do (4) as reverse instead of placing (5)

01:10:272 (4,5) - ^

01:18:743 (5,6) - ^

[Hard]

Not much mod too.

01:07:360 - Add a note here, I heard a drum in the music This is fine, fits with my rhythm

[Insane]

00:10:966 (2) - Move this to blanket 00:11:841 (2) Did something similar

00:20:135 (1,2,3,4,1) - Maybe too much spacing. Ehh, sure i'll take out one of the repeats

00:29:326 (2,3,4) - Try Ctrl+G (3) and (4) I like mine better

00:36:208 - Feel like this is too empty and not consistent gap between notes Added a slider here

00:36:914 - ^ This ones fine, it's a light insane

00:39:032 - ^ Fine

00:39:738 - ^ Fine

00:40:444 - ^ Also fine

00:42:208 (2) - Why add hitclap? Part of my hitsound rhythm

[Six Paths]

Not much mod again.

00:50:522 (3,4,5,6) - Try Ctrl+G (4) and (5) I like my way better

01:02:148 (3) - Why not try extend to 01:02:403 to be consistent with other diffs Good point. changed

Good Luck :3

Misure wrote:

Hihi~
M4M from your queue~

[General]

Insane and Six Paths have the same CS AR OD HP, maybe you can set a gap. Increased diff settings on Six Paths
[Six Paths]

00:08:849 (1) - maybe ctrl+G better for almost all the slides are in that flow in this part Wouldn't flow as nicely
00:10:966 (2) - how about turn to a slider and a note? I mean slider finish at 00:11:319 - I like slider better. Simpler
00:12:547 (5,6,7,1) - the same flow makes a little uncomfortable Really? :S I like this flow.
00:13:606 (2,3,4) - distance is sort of awkward Fine for me,
00:22:959 - maybe rhythm can be simpler for this part because of the violent part right now Hmm. I think this is fine. Hardest diff, so no need to hold back on difficulty imo. The rhythm is already simple enough
00:31:444 (1,3,1,3) - down more Looks fine for me
00:42:385 (5,2) - not stack? Nah
00:58:252 (1,2) - obviously you ignore some vocal... maybe follow them better Not following vocals here. Instruments
01:01:795 (1,2) - ctrl+G and keep away from 01:01:266 (2) - but this creates poor flow...
01:02:148 - I expect this when in my playing, but there is no ;_; This is better tho, theres no note later.

01:03:478 - add a note Triplet doesn't really fit here tbh
01:07:096 (2,3,4) - I think sort of far Did something
01:12:655 (3) - delete this one It fits though....
01:18:037 - No, theres no notes there ;c

01:24:213 (4) - Same... no notes

01:27:568 (2,3) - I think the position can be better although I don't know where Triangle~ its fine
[Insane]

00:10:260 - ×0.65 better Why :S
00:20:135 (1,2,3,4) - a little difficult to read the first, maybe closer better Yea fixed them
00:21:900 (3,4,5) - too close Nah they're fine
00:22:253 (5) - I think using 1/8 here is unnecessary... If you must do that, better not get empty around 00:22:870 - If I were you, maybe I'll do this: I like the 1/8. the purpose here is simply to hold.
00:22:606 -
00:25:076 (1,1,2) - too close Fixed
00:32:326 (3,3) - not stack? Not trying to stack
00:34:267 (1,2,3,4) - maybe flow not good Plays fine imo
00:36:385 (3,4,5) - and 00:39:208 (2,3,4) - I don't think they have the same rhythm according to vocal so you know what I mean I'm mapping to the drums
00:39:914 (1,2) - I think sort of close, maybe 00:40:620 (2) - ctrl+G is a choice Nah this is fine
00:40:620 (2) - rorate 40°, only when you ignore ^ mod
00:42:385 (3,1) - I prefer they keep a distance Theyre fine imo
00:56:841 (1,2,1,2,1) - slider slower one by one to make the slider shorter one by one Good idea, but this is already good enough ;P Unnecessary imo
01:01:089 (2) - close to 00:59:678 (1) - ; 01:01:266 (3) - far from 00:59:678 (1) - , I think This is fine.
01:02:148 (3) - maybe your can choose a silenter hitsound for it Yep fixed.
01:06:743 (1) - blanket can be better Fixed
01:11:684 (3) - ctrl+G prefer current flow better
01:12:037 (4) - ^ ^
01:12:390 (1,2,3) - 01:13:625 (8,9,1) - why not curve the stream? I think not beautiful for now This is fine. it doesn't matter if i curve it because its just 2 circles. the curve is barely noticeable whereas a straight line definitely is
01:13:449 (7) - to (235,120) and 01:13:625 (8) - to (84,280) or around to make flow better while blanket for 01:12:037 (4,1) - This flow is fine
01:27:568 (2,3) - stack and change a position This is fine honestly
[Hard]

00:00:371 (1) - to 00:11:319 - the beginning part is gentle so I think you can delete some notesNah
00:13:782 - I know you want to show the rhythm like this
http://puu.sh/ih4VY/9a20389d41.jpg
but the tail of slider performs bad, I think when playing with Doubletime Its fine :S I don't see how 1/1 rhythm can be difficult
00:32:326 (2) - delete and move the slider, unnecessary note I think piano
00:36:385 (3) - use the similar form like previous ones This is fine
00:39:208 (2,3,4) - put them (440,232) betterI want to create a linear pattern with the slider-end of 1 tho
00:56:841 (1,2,3,4) - keep a distance for them better Its fine~ 2/1 spacing in between.
01:07:449 (2) - NC here is enough No to both
01:18:743 (2) - ^
01:12:390 - better for sure like this No . triplets play much better when they begin on red ticks.

01:25:096 (1) - ctrl+G better and change a position I dont like that flow...
[Normal]

well...

AiMod

00:10:966 (3,4,1) - keep in a line?
00:15:194 -

00:25:781 (5,6) - difficult for a Normal diff player so turn 00:27:033 (6) - to a note and place it at 00:27:209 -
00:27:914 (1) - NC here
00:33:385 (2) - curves in opposite side

Besides I think some use of short sliders makes it difficult to read for a Normal diff player, maybe
[Easy]

Slider tick rate 1 is enough I think, for when playing I see many white points on the long sliders, which makes me swim I agree, Slidertick 1 is good enough.
00:49:816 (1,2,1) - really awkward placing I think when playing with DTHRFL You should be considering the map only in NoMod . This is fine.
00:56:512 (2) - unnecessary note, delete it It's mapping the piano, but since this is Easy, sure why not.

besides, you can add more empty rhythm because some part is sort of tight in rhythm now.

OK, seems I just say some unnecessary things...
Well, good luck

DahplA wrote:

M4M ^_^

Six Paths

1. OD: 8.5 might be a little too much for a TV Size. I'd say something like 8.2 would do fine Nah this is fine ;3
2. 00:03:215 (1,2,3) - I think this part should have equal spacing, since it's a calm part here, there's no real need to space it too far I like the jump
3. 00:14:664 (2) - Fix stack slightly Fixed
4. 00:16:253 (2,7) - ^ Fixed
5. 00:20:135 (1) - ^ Fixed
6. 00:29:326 (3) This is a bit far for a 1/1 gap IMOk, 00:30:738 (3) - this fits betterNah this is fine

Insane

1. Likewise, you should also lower the OD here, because it's 4.1 star TV Size (you don't want it to difficult). I think 7.5 or 7.8 works fine. Reduced to 7.5
2. 00:27:209 (1) - I think a regular curved slider should be here. There's no need to have an angled slider if there's no emphasis on a specific note here I like it. also, piano
3. 00:44:679 (2,3,4) - Because of the stack here, 2 is very close to 1. I recommend moving this somewhere else. Maybe have 00:44:856 (4) - x:284, y:204, and move 00:45:561 (1,2) - accordingly This is fine imo.
4. 01:18:037 (1) - Improve blanket (towards the pointy end)Tried.

Hard

1. 00:22:959 00:34:267 I'd say for this slow part, you don't need to NC every fourth beat, but probably every eighth beat. No, that would create combo's over 10 on a slow section which isn't great imo.
   00:22:959 (1,2,1) - I feel it would flow better for examples like this, where you've only placed 2 objects in one combo. I don't mention in Insane and Six Paths, because it flows well there with higher SV and object count. Here it makes sense. Okay. removed NC from some combo's to make them longer
2. 01:02:148 (3) - Fix stack slightly Fixed
3. 01:26:495 (1) - Is this meant to have a sliderslide sound?Nice catch. Fixed

Milan-'s Normal

1. 00:13:782 (5,6,1) - IMO, I think this is positioned too close to the top.
2. 01:27:928 (3) - Fix stack slightly

Easy

1. 01:01:089 (1,2) - I think you can use 1/2 sliders here because the sound is great enough for a note. They'll still have about 1/1 gap so there is recovery time.Nah, 1/2 sliders are discouraged on Easy anyways. I've seen maps getting dq'ed just because there were 1/2 sliders in Easy.

Nice mapset. Very solid mapping. Good luck.

eeezzzeee wrote:

Hi, for m4m from your queue

LEGEND
BLUE = Suggestions/comments
BLACK = Real problems

FORMAT
Diff Name
Comments

00:00:00 - change - reason
If there is a reason, please read that before trying the changes!
----------------
Total time spent on mod

Final comments

[Six Paths]
Really good map, the flow works well

00:08:849 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - are you sure these whistles aren't supposed to be on 2 and 6? - the music is pretty much the same as before but suddenly the change in the hitsounds does not sound good This is to transition. i think the change in rhythm is fine.
00:35:238 - try adding a circle here - i think it sounds nice and since this parts is all single taps i think this will make it more interesting I don't really like adding triplets when its not in the music
00:37:797 (3) - missing a hitsound here? - maybe this was on purpose but then i think you need to adds something here Added
00:38:061 - add circle here - if you wanted to take my suggestion at 00:35:238 - (you'll have to move 4)
00:40:885 - add circle here - if you wanted to take my suggestion at 00:35:238 - (maybe move 3 down a little)
01:02:508 - are you making every two combos flow in the opposite directions on purpose? lol even if it wasn't thats really cool Yep
01:19:449 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ctrl+h this whole part - to alternate the flow from the previous pattern (it actually works very well without having to move anything except for the blanket at the end!) ahhhh i'd prefer not too, since that would mess up the structure i have here.

[Insane]
Very pretty patterns!

OD = 7 - 8 is pretty high for an easier insane This is fine~
00:08:849 (1,2,3,4) - whistles on the ends of the sliders - same reason as in Six Paths
00:10:966 (2) - remove whistle - i think you didnt have one here in Six Paths Good catch.
00:37:797 (3) - missing a hitsound ahhh hitsoundcopier rip
00:39:032 - add a circle here - i think it just plays better without a pause here since the previous verse has no pause I like the pause
00:39:208 (2,3,4) - maybe make this the same triangle shape as 00:36:385 (3,4,5) - aesthetic because its the same musicOkay sure
00:59:678 (1,2,3) - move 2 closer and 3 further - i think the jump to 3 should be bigger than the jump to 2 This is fine for me, theyre both strong right now.

[Hard]

00:05:862 (7) - delete - this just sounds better for me. lets not put so many doubles here lol (you'll have to move 1 further away too)Okay, i like this!
00:08:849 (1,2,3,4,5) - I would suggest the same thing as the other diffs about the whistles but because of the rhythm we can't really do anything about that lol
00:08:849 (1,2,3) - try a placement like this http://puu.sh/imU3t/e50b786af5.jpg - i notice the spacing is very small between 1,2,3 It's becoming calmer here though, so the spacing reflects that
00:24:370 (3) - missing a hitsound here added
00:37:797 (2) - missing hitsound added
00:56:841 (1,2,3,4) - really close? Yea this is fine~
01:02:508 - the blanketing during the kiai is so pretty! >///< Thanks

[Milan-'s Normal]
Looks ok

00:49:463 (3,4) - change 4 into a circle OR add a circle at 00:49:993- either map both of the red lines or none of them here because there is the same sound on both of them

[Easy]
Looks ok

00:01:804 (3) - NC - to be consistent with the rest of the map. though instead I think you should make all the combos in this diff longer since they are quite short, mostly only go up to 2 lol LOl wops, NC'ed. And yea well, it's an Easy, so low combo count is fine~
00:08:849 (1,2,1,2) - whistles on the circles added
00:37:091 (1) - missing hitsound added

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time spent on mod: ??? forgot to keep track

Sometimes the hitsounding seems a little messy to me because its using too many different sounds while in the song its a very simple pattern... But otherwise the mapping is very good.
That's all, good luck!

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Hello~ M4M from your queue
Really solid beatmap, I like it

Easy

Like I said, this map is nice Can't point out much.

1. 00:06:039 (1) - Why use a red anchor point when it can just be a smooth curve? variety~
2. 00:22:253 (2,1) - Since (2) is a curve, why not try to curve (1) at least a bit? No need to,

Milan-'s Normal

1. 00:00:371 (1,2,3) - IMO, but I think making this kind of trap in Normal is awkward.
2. 00:22:959 (1,2,3,4) - My opinion again, but I think this would be better if (1) and (2) were 1/1 slider. Same goes to (3) and (4).
3. 00:40:620 (2,3,4,5) - I don't like to put 4 circles consecutively in Normal, rather use 1/1 sliders.
4. 00:58:612 (3,4) - I woudl prefer if this was 2/1 slider, I think this fits the vocal well.
5. 01:25:096 (6) - This could be a 2/1 slider, to fit the vocals.

Hard

1. 00:32:326 (2) - This could be removed, so (3) can be following the vocals. But 2 is following the piano/
2. Notes from 00:39:914 to 00:43:973 - You can be following the previous notes, something like this: (couldn't expalin it) No, i like this 1/2 slider spam better . Your suggestion is too empty for a Hard imo.
   
   
3. 00:50:875 (4) - I think this should be a circle, to give players a bit of a break, and to follow the drum beat. It follows the rhythm well though...
4. 00:56:841 (1,2,3,4) - Yes, I know you make lots of fun jumps, but I think in Hard, jump should be constant. Furthermore, there is no pitch change of anything am I right? There is so much time between each circle that they cant even be classified as jumps xD. This is just stylistic.
5. 01:26:495 (1,2,3) - I think the vocals can be expressed well if you used two 1/1 sliders. I kinda prefer my current one because its the rhythm i've been using for the other diffs too. but i can change this if someone else points it out.
   

Insane

1. 00:16:076 (2,3,4,5,6) - Why not follow the flow and go with triplets? A bit of variety. also theres 5-circle stream here.
2. 00:39:208 (2,3,4) - I don't think a tringle like this fits, why not copy the triangular pattern from these? 00:36:385 (3,4,5) Ya fixed.
3. 01:26:495 (1,2,3) - Same thing like hard, two 1/1 sliders and leave the last circle be. Maybe i'll change it on Hard since that rhythm is slightly easier imo. But not Insane

Six Paths

[notice][list][*]00:22:429 (6,7) - I think this can follow Insane, where these can just be a 1/8 kick slider, or a stream. I would prefer a different rhythm here. The 1/8 repeat on Insane works as a "hold" but the rhythm and note placement i have on Six Paths is much more intense even though it only uses 1/4's.
[*]Really nice difficulty! I seriously cannot point out anything :/

Well... Since I couldn't help much, at least have a star
GL for ranked!

Sgord1 wrote:

M4M. The map looks fine. Everything listed below are just suggestions. Feel free to ignore anything

[Easy]
Imo better to add NCs 2 times more often Keeping, Easier for beginners lol
00:02:862 (2) - for beginners it's hard to catch this circle since cursor velocity vector changes its direction 2 times. Imo better to make the flow more oval, removing blanket or reconsider it I disagree, I don't see any difficult to this honestly
00:21:194 (2) - same goes for this
00:07:451 (1,1) - they are almost like the same, maybe copy - paste Having some variety here
00:36:747 (3,1) - I'd try to avoid stacks on Easy I don't see a problem with stacks on Easy
00:50:522 (2,1) - other overlaps are fine, but this one is too unintuitive Okay, changed up this pattern.

[Milan-'s Normal]
00:27:033 (2) - move it a bit up
00:38:503 (3) - this slider is looking straight. How about remove a red point from its middle


[Hard]
00:25:797 (1,3) - I would try to fix this overlap Did something. Still overlaps, but doesn't overlap as much.
00:32:503 (3,1) - the flow here can be improved imo This was intentional~
And I would try to add triplets at least somewhere I already use 1/4 repeat sliders. Using actual triplets would create a rhythm-difficulty gap between Normal and Hard

[Insane]
00:08:849 (1,2,3) - maybe better to do the same pattern as 00:09:554 (3,4,1) - it looks more pretty IMO Nah, i like this, it's different but flows well too.
00:55:278 (4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - ofc this jumpy pattrn is looking nice, but it makes it hard to read Ehh, i thought this was easy to read, i might change if some other people mention it.
Insane is fine

[Six Paths]
Flawless *_*

Good luck! Now I go and mod Oriens!

• 
  lame name