Well, seems you decided about it already. Anyway I would welcome a reasonable counterargument on the thread I opened to prove the way of romanization I recommended is wrong or why is more wrong than TicClick's. I want to see this ranked as badly as you guys want, yet the explanation would be appreciated before this is re-qualified.
Read, threw another and hopefully the last opinion on "dyo", I feel it's getting solved: p/4230941
We agreed with TicClick on everything after many arguments - I accepted yo after d, because 'dh' or d'o would look pretty non-aesthetic. TicClick agreed we could use the BGN/PCGN chars apart from ë thus replacing i with y. All explained in last 2 posts of thread. New name should be uydyosh'
You can wait for further confirmation from Cyrillic knowledge staff members, tho I guess this can be called closed. Sorry if caused more confusion, we did not really understand each other, now should be fine.
Read, threw another and hopefully the last opinion on "dyo", I feel it's getting solved: p/4230941
We agreed with TicClick on everything after many arguments - I accepted yo after d, because 'dh' or d'o would look pretty non-aesthetic. TicClick agreed we could use the BGN/PCGN chars apart from ë thus replacing i with y. All explained in last 2 posts of thread. New name should be uydyosh'
You can wait for further confirmation from Cyrillic knowledge staff members, tho I guess this can be called closed. Sorry if caused more confusion, we did not really understand each other, now should be fine.