Rivals_7 wrote:

Hi~ from my mania queue I will mod your 4K here. No kudos if this isn't helpful to you
1|2|3|4

[Fanatic's 4K Hyper]
Some of the notes in the beggining, seems unsnapped. or is that because the BPM Change? (I can't find the correct snapping in any beat snap divisor ;w;) that's because of BPM changes, fixed some inconsistencies already tho

00:21:161 (21161|2) - seems uncomfortable, move to 1? and how is that beneficial lol, changed pattern a bit tho
00:23:711 (23711|2,23786|1,23861|0) - move to left one step for balance ok
00:26:111 (26111|0,26186|1,26261|2) - move to right one step ^ok
00:27:311 (27311|2) - to 4? ok
00:34:886 - a cymbal, consider to add note in col 1 ok
01:36:247 (96247|2,96309|1,96372|0) - move to right one step. for balance ok
01:45:372 (105372|0) - to 2? ok
01:54:059 (114059|1,114059|2,114184|1,114184|0) - ctrl+g? better playability I don't think it hinders playability enough to change it

Adtw_ wrote:

From

|1|2|3|4|

Fanatic's 4K Hyper

00:19:361 - add note ok
00:19:886 - ^ ok
00:20:486 - ^ ok
00:51:086 (51086|2,51161|3) - ctrl+g breaks pitch
00:54:536 - delete 1 note ok
00:56:336 - add note nah
01:30:247 - delete 1 note nah
01:30:497 - add note nah

[MOD END]

it's just my suggestion, feel free to reject
Goodluck

_underjoy wrote:

Monochrome

Mod

00:34:902 (34902|1,34902|0) - 3-chord tutaj bo finish jest słabszy od następnego finishu który jest 3chordem
00:39:627 (39627|1) - przesuń do 1, ten [24] nie pasuje do całości patternu
00:41:577 - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3674170 hmm te dwa [24] chordy są użyte tylko w tym miejscu, może zrób coś w stylu tego screena dla consistency? tu też 00:31:977 - więc consistency już jest
00:47:277 (47277|0) - do 2? ten anchor trochę dziwny a dźwięk się różni. Możesz nawet dać obie do 2
00:58:602 - brakuje notki pod pianino (a je mapujesz)
01:15:355 (75355|1,75492|2) - nie jestem tego pewien ale można tu dać 2-chorda
01:15:628 (75628|0,75765|2) - tutaj też
01:19:306 (79306|2) - tu też
01:42:434 (102434|1,102559|2,102684|3,102809|1) - zmapuj tutaj pianino bo te notki są trochę randomowe. Co do akcentów, w tej części dawałeś 2-chordy na beat (nie pianino), więc można zastąpić pojedynczymi to orginalnie było 1/3 pod pianino, kami spierdolił snaping, fixd
01:45:122 (105122|0) - to co w 00:47:277
01:52:247 (112247|2,112309|1,112372|3,112372|2,112372|0) - offsync! (ogólnie ten fragment czuć że notki nie są IDEALNIE tam gdzie powinny, niestety bardzo trudno to zsyncować :/ )
01:59:578 (119578|0) - ogromny anchor na 1, pls fix

Nie cierpię modować twoich diffów, bo 90% z tego co napisałem to czepianie się na siłę dobrej mapy xD

Shoegazer wrote:

Kamikaze blackmailed me and told me that he'd stop doing that if I mod Monochrome.

SPOILER

[Tidek's 4K Monochrome]
OD9 please. 8 seems rather low for something as hectic as this. Agree, honestly idk why it was OD8 lol
00:08:559 - Same chord as the previous one, perhaps make this the same chord. fixd
00:12:627 - Very minor complaint, but I'd prefer to see something like this instead of the pattern you currently use. If you follow this, you'd have to do the same for 00:16:377 - , 01:10:583 - and other similar rhythms. fixd
00:26:127 - 00:43:077 - Any reason for the jumpstream to be unbroken? The music in 01:27:372 - (which is an unbroken run) is basically the same thing, only more intense and with minor differences. I think you can accent the chords just fine even if it's an unbroken stream, since you didn't place any consecutive doubles that are the same (e.g. [34][34]) for the parts where the chords are very different. actually u are right, I wanted to make it easy on beginning, but when i look at this now, that js should be unbroken, because next is already faster lol
00:29:577 (29577|0,29577|3,29727|2,29727|1) - Both doubles should be the same, but considering what you'd have to do to make both chords to be the same, it's fine if you don't do that. Regardless, I'd like to see the second chord being [12] instead for fluency.
00:31:977 (31977|2,31977|0,32127|0,32127|2) - Unnecessarily rigid transition, I'd prefer [34] but if the rigidity is intentional then by all means go ahead. If you're planning to make the stream unbroken however, [14] would be ideal for a balance of rigidity and other things. [34] is just a personal preference.
00:39:177 (39177|0,39177|3,39327|2,39327|1) - refer to 00:29:577 (29577|0,29577|3,29727|2,29727|1) -, but mirrored.
00:41:502 - refer to 00:31:977 (31977|2,31977|0,32127|0,32127|2) -, but mirrored.
00:44:577 - I wouldn't seeing some 1/3 and 1/2 polyrhythms here, I'd prefer to see that instead of just 1/4s. A 1/3 and 1/4 polyrhythm would be too difficult. fixd it in own way (to keep consistancy with other pattern)
00:48:627 - Try a pattern like this., would capture the melody falling well. looks nice, fixd
01:00:852 (60852|3,60852|2,61152|3,61152|2) - You should probably make these chords different, it creates an unnecessary accentuation that you didn't do for the exact sounds in this section. true, fixed
01:02:652 (62652|2,62652|1,62652|0,62952|0,62952|1,62952|2,63252|0,63252|1,63252|3,63252|2) - Think you should remove one note from each chord, but keep the [123]s [12] and the [1234] as [124]. I understand that you're trying to emphasise the sound but I don't think the sound is loud enough to warrant triples and quads, especially since the triples before it have cymbal crashes and other things that are louder than the first two chords. ok, fixed it, agree that its not that intense to put 3-4chords.
01:09:672 - would prefer a pattern like 23[124] for much easier transitioning, also gives a better emphasis on the triple since you're using your wrist to hit that part instead. fixed
01:24:356 - Don't think quads are necessary here, they can just be triples. If you want to keep the quads though, you should make the first triple of each gallop [123], [124] and [234] respectively to capture the pitch going up. If you don't want to keep the quads, [123][124], [124][134], [134][234] is how I'd do it. removed quads.
01:27:372 - 01:43:372 - The ending would be so hard that I think you can layer this more. It's mainly just adding doubles more than anything else, though. Adding every sound like 01:27:497 - and 01:28:372 - (doesn't have to be the same chord like [34][34] since you're already accentuating one part, but that would be a plus) would work. Here I have to disagree (finally lol). In my opinion it will break consistancy of that map, most of my doubles in whole map are for piano sounds, not gonna break it for one jump stream
01:39:497 - Should use the same trilly pattern you used for the rest of the stream for consistency. fixd
01:34:872 - 01:35:372 - There are pretty prevalent 1/2 chords here, I feel that it'd be best to capture them. Maybe use a [34] chord and make something like this. fixd
01:41:247 (101247|3,101247|0,101309|2,101372|0,101372|1,101434|2,101497|0,101497|3) - Rather rough pattern and it does stand out from the rest of the patterns used. I used similar pattern before and I think it doesnt play really bad, Its pretty basic JS pattern
01:42:872 - Again, would prefer a 1/2 and 1/3 polyrhythm here. Seems better than a 1/4 jumptrill. Will stay with that jump trill, for me those sounds are a lot more significant than 1/2 and 1/3 polyrhythms (fixd for 1/4 jump trill previous pattern to keep consistancy)
01:47:622 - Personal preference, but I'd prefer 23232[134] instead. Creates more emphasis than 13131[234], and I find it a more comfortable pattern overall. fixd
01:59:925 - 02:02:582 - Going to try and find ways to make this easier, it's hard to make something relatively reasonable given its density though.
01:59:925 - 02:00:938 - I feel that the easiest way of making handstream like that more manageable is by reducing as many one hand trills and possible and emphasising more on the handjacks. It's manageable if the jacks are on a particular hand, like [12] or [34]. I think it'd transition nicely into the handjacks/jumpjacks as well. Something like this maybe. Fixed, I had better pattern before, i really have no idea why i changed it to something that hard lol
02:01:047 - Very distinct lack of [12] or [34] doubles, which makes the handglut section as a whole pretty difficult to nail. It's not so much an issue for lower BPMs like 270-295, but I think it'd be nice for you to make the patterns progressively easier for the section before the 1/6s. By the time it hits 300 BPM I think some [12] or [34] doubles (the triples unchanged) should be necessary so that the player has more leverage on his wrist to hit the jacks properly. Not really sure how you'd do that though.. fixd, it has more 12 and 34, hope its better now
02:02:581 - Have the first triple be [234], then the second being [134], third being [124], fourth being [123] and repeat for the rest of that section. It'd make the last chord [123], which captures the lowest chord possible. fixed

It plays generally well, most of these are nitpicks and just ways to improve playability while keeping musical relevancy intact. I'll mod burn this moment eventually when I'm not feeling like garbage

Julie wrote:

"Mélodie de tristesse"

Kudo plox~! *runs*

Kyousuke- wrote:

[Whagwha Victus' 4K Another]

00:08:037 - 00:08:559 - i would like to suggest this http://puu.sh/kvQpS/f662570107.jpg it's more balance imo. also it's following the pitch like the first 00:08:558 (8558|2,9521|2) - done

00:22:977 (22977|1) - move to 3 for raising pitch done
00:25:527 - isn't this 2 notes? like 00:24:327 - , i'm suggesting to move 00:25:677 (25677|1) - this to 00:25:527 - here at the same col (on 2). so it'll make a consistent pattern 00:24:177 (24177|0,24327|0,25377|1,25527|1) - if you don't agree with this, just move that and don't make it jack I added a note for bass, didn't delete anything else
00:28:977 (28977|0) - move to 3 according to your pattern 00:26:577 (26577|2,26802|2,27777|0,28002|0,30177|1,30402|1) - done

00:33:677 - 00:33:777 - add for 1/6 piano sound like 00:33:927 (33927|2,33977|1,34027|0) - this? ok
00:39:627 - add note at 1, you make it trinotes every chord. and 00:39:927 - add at 2. done
00:40:227 (40227|2) - move to 2, like 00:30:477 (30477|2,30627|2,37677|2,37827|2) - this too much anchors here

00:42:927 (42927|1) - how about move this to 2? bcs it's high pitch and different with the notes before okay
00:46:377 - add note at 1 for the chords done
00:56:352 - add note. there's a drum sound like 00:55:152 - 00:57:552 - 00:58:152 - etc okay
01:04:070 (64070|0,64070|1,64206|1,64206|0,64592|0,64592|1,65092|1,65092|3,65217|1,65217|3) - remove one note for that faint sound only removed on 01:04:592 - because rest is pretty prominent imo

01:05:803 - 01:06:694 - isn't this the same sound? nope, first one has a little snare and diffrent pitch
01:13:037 (73037|2) - move to 1 would more balance imo did a 13 chord instead
01:13:992 - remove one note like the others made in the same way as tidek's diff (almost)
01:10:583 - add notes like 01:16:583 - ^

01:30:309 - add note for snare? at 3 and move 01:30:372 (90372|2) - this to 2 oki
^ if applied, 01:30:497 (90497|3) - move this to 3 done
01:33:247 (93247|0) - move to 2 would be better sure

01:47:934 - add note for crash okay

sorry for the delay m4m xd also i only mod one diff ;w;
dat bpm changes and weird bgm lol

goodluck!

Takane6 wrote:

hi o/

SPOILER

[General]
a... somehow some of the bpm's offest are miss placed (although its less than 5ms)... idk i just... feel it... try to ask the others about the timing tho~

[8K Melodie de tristesse]
00:20:952 - add note (same as 00:20:877 - ) :877 has a kick, :952 doesn't
00:35:727 (35727|7,35727|5,35727|1,35802|4,35877|3,36027|6,36027|5,36027|2,36177|3,36327|4,36327|6,36327|1) - its different pattern 00:36:927 (36927|5,36927|7,36927|2,37002|3,37077|4,37077|1,37152|5,37227|6,37227|7,37227|2,37302|3,37377|4,37452|5,37527|4,37527|1,37527|6) - ?
00:39:327 (39327|6,39327|4,39327|2,39402|5,39477|6,39627|1,39627|3,39627|7,39777|5,39927|7,39927|2,39927|4) - ^
00:41:727 (41727|1,41727|3,41727|6,41802|4,41877|2,41877|5,42027|4,42027|7,42027|6,42177|3,42327|5,42327|4,42327|2) - ^ Yeah ignoring that piano roll was kinda meh, so I added notes to make it a constant 1/4 stream

00:41:877 - 2 note? > 00:39:477 - 1 note Added a note on the 1 note one
00:43:077 (43077|7,43077|6,43077|1) - the consistency kinda ruined here because it has a piano rather than LN only... added some 1/2s
00:48:027 - drum + piano = 2 note ... 00:49:527 - drum + piano = 3 note? I find the 3 note chord 's piano sound much stronger than the 2 note one, if that's an issue I will change it I guess
01:04:508 - 3 note? deleted one
01:09:412 (69412|2) - delete Drum note, it speeds up here
same sound 01:12:355 - and 01:12:492 - but different amount of note? deleted that one note
01:12:628 - ^ ^
01:11:674 - 4 note >> 01:15:083 - 5 note? Added a note
01:28:684 (88684|4) - delete piano note
01:30:184 (90184|6) - ^ okay
01:34:497 - 2 note > 01:34:747 - 1 note? the beat is playing alongside the piano on first one, but deleting a note made pattern smoother so yea used that
01:57:541 - add note oki
01:58:990 - ^ oki



[Rayz' 8K Hyper]
since u doing this >>00:24:777 (24777|1,24927|1) - make mini jack in one of these 00:25:977 (25977|1,25977|5,26127|7,26127|3) -
00:27:177 (27177|1,27177|5,27327|3,27327|7) - ^
00:28:377 (28377|5,28377|1,28527|7,28527|3) - ^
00:29:577 (29577|1,29577|5,29727|7,29727|3) - ^ Deleted second notes on those two minijacks because they made no sense imo
00:46:377 - too much for 3 note I think that piano is strong enough to allow a triple here
00:55:302 - delete 1 note okay
01:25:445 (85445|4,85565|7,85682|3,85800|6,85918|2,86037|5,86156|1,86276|7,86396|3,86516|6,86637|2,86758|5) - better make each of these 2 note (make 01:25:205 (85205|3,85205|1,85205|6) - as reference) I'd rather keep this because of the BPM shifts this pattern is actually really hard to read, so I don't want to make it too complicated (kinda worried about spread as well)

Good luck !
never seen this much kind of bpm :v

Elementaires wrote:

12345678

le noob mod

Rayz' 8K Hyper

01:42:455 - note missing on 5?
also why is this part on 1/16 when its 1/6 notes

Elementaires wrote:

12345678

le et mod

8K Normal+

00:22:677 (22677|6,22677|2) - move the two notes to 2 and 6 Okay
00:22:977 (22977|1,22977|5) - ^ but on 3 and 7 Done diffrently
00:23:577 - add on 7? There's exactly same amount of sounds I'm layering on all those chords, it's just that one of them is long here so I turned a note into LN. Not gonna change that.
00:35:127 (35127|5) - imake this LN start at 00:35:052 I've considered that but 1) that would be rather hard to play 2) the piano at 00:35:052 is less impactful than one at 00:35:127 so I used that as an excuse to start the second LN there (might just remove it later on anyway)

8K Melodie de tristesse

00:39:927 and 00:40:227 are same sound but why only one is triple notes Added one to the second one
00:41:727 - delete one note Same sound as triples before tbh, not changing
00:44:077 (44077|2,44127|5,44177|1,44277|6,44277|4,44377|3,44427|7,44477|2,44577|5,44577|1,44652|2,44677|4,44727|6,44777|3,44802|7,44877|1,44877|6,44952|2,44977|5,45027|3,45077|4,45102|5) - I dont get it, it would be so much better if its wasnt "broken" and if everything was in 1/3 rhythm I do want to accent both piano 1/3 and beat 1/2 speeding up to 1/4 so I'm not going to change that. Polyrhythms are kool mang B)

01:42:372 - ^ but maybe i really dont get it l0l same tbh


btw change the word to Mélodie pls HOLY SHIT I ACTUALLY THOUGHT THAT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO SUBMIT WITH UNICODE OR THIS E THING FOR 7-8 MONTHS PRAISE THE BAGUETTE!!!!!!

Rayz141 wrote:

kami forgot to snap maybe how could I ever forget that (^_^; )

puxtu wrote:

[Kaito's 8K Normal]
00:13:827 (13827|0) - you added double for your 4k here and I also think this should be a double chords 00:11:726 (11726|0) -
00:15:477 (15477|0) - 00:17:577 (17577|0) - 00:19:077 (19077|0) - 00:22:677 (22677|0,22977|0,23277|0,23577|0) - same, you have plenty of column more than in 4k :/
00:28:527 - 00:38:127 - kinda empty hmmm, pretty sure there's 3 sounds not 2
00:47:577 (47577|0,48327|0) - again witht the cymbal thingy, you might wanna use your 4k as reference. won't mention this issue again
About the cymbal thing, I planned on making it like that for some time, but if I make every cymbal a double (scratch + note), it would end up above 2*, which would fuck up the ranking criteria thingy saying a diff needs to be below 2* :v (unless I'm retarded and I don;t know how to distinguish cymbal from whatever other sound you may call it :v). I would need something more specific with this matter before doing something that further fucks up the diff more than it is, so no change regarding that for now.

Now, about the missing sounds, I know about that, it feels weird without notes and all, but the one who suggested it to me had a better argument than me back then, so I went with it, since this is my first GD ever and all, it may look retarded in some parts of some mods :v. Anyways, fixed the ones you pointed out, dunno if there are more tho and I'm in a rush atm :\

Blocko wrote:

[notice]4K

4K Column:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

[Kaito's 4K Normal]

Mod inside

00:11:726 - Some of the crashes you layered in the whole song are either single notes or 2-note chords. Some of the 2-note chords even have a LN before it instead of one note.
Only thing I can suggest here is to stick to a structure then be consistent with it. For crashes that come after an LN, stick to using 1 note so it provides just enough impact for them. For ones without LNs, stick with 2-note chords. Fixed, or at least the ones I found

00:19:602 (19602|3,20727|3,21552|1) - Might be better to extend these LNs to the next note for increased crash impact. ....Don't think so, I'll leave it as it is

00:25:977 to 00:43:077 - Structural consistency here is pretty lacking. On some measures, you have hammers, then on the other, they're a little denser than usual.
Again, stick to a structure, then be consistent with it. If you find that a little boring, then add a little twist on it, but be sure to stick to that structure for a while so it highlights which particular sounds you're charting on. I have been told this in the past, and I have yet to see the problem tbh, when I listen to the song, I see that the hammers should be there, since there's the exact sound there, and the rest isn't a hammer because it isn't the same. My ears may be shit, but that's what I hear, and wouldn't change it until I hear something different there or another point against it pops up. So, no change with this
Example: On 00:35:577 to 00:37:977 - you can use this structure and stick with it for a good amount of time so players can know what instrument you're accenting. Be sure to have some pitch relevance in those notes, though, as the piano plays a big part in this song.
01:27:372 to 01:43:372 - Same case for these guys. Same as above

00:52:902 (52902|3,53052|0,53202|1,53352|2,53502|3,53652|1,53652|0,53952|3) - Ctrl + H for the pitch. True, applied

00:57:402 (57402|1) - Move to 4, then 00:57:852 (57852|1,58002|2,58152|3,58302|2,58452|0,58452|1,58602|3,58752|2,58902|1,59052|0) - Ctrl + H for the pitch. Applied

01:02:352 (62352|0) - Move to 3 for slight pitch relevance. Applied, also moved 01:02:952 (62952|2) - to col 1 and 01:03:252 (63252|0) - to col 2

01:06:265 (66265|0,66480|1,66694|2,66908|3,67123|0,67323|1,67523|3,67710|2,67898|0,68074|1) - Ctrl + H, then 01:08:416 (68416|2) - move to 2 for pitch. Applied

01:47:372 - Add a note here for impact. meh, left it like that

02:02:582 - Instead of having just 2 LNs for the whole 4 seconds, why not 02:00:827 (120827|3,120827|0) - shorten these to 02:02:582 - then add 2 LNs ending at 02:04:026 - to highlight those descending piano chords? Well, I don't see any problem with this idea, so applied it