1. Resurrection Butterfly -100% Reflowering- (5,01 stars, 1298 notes)

1. Make sure all the spacing for the triples that you use to begin sliders are consistent.
2. Some combos seem to include too many notes. I don't think I pointed out all of them. I would try to stay under 15.

aznskittlez wrote:

M4M hopefully this helps

Flower-viewing party

General Remarks

1. Make sure all the spacing for the triples that you use to begin sliders are consistent. I don't really understand this, are you saying the notes that form one triple before a slider must have the same DS or that all triples before sliders must have the same DS?
2. Some combos seem to include too many notes. I don't think I pointed out all of them. I would try to stay under 15. I know that the NCs aren't perfect right now, I'll try to find a solution

Specific Times

00:08:200 (9,10) - Maybe space out more for a more consistent jump? I guess it was okay, but changed anyway
00:32:714 (5,6) - This jump seems too large for a fast slider/stream pattern. Nerfed a little
00:34:257 (4,6) - Blanket? Fixed
00:35:629 (12,13,14) - Fix the triangle spacing. This is a trapeze with 00:36:143 (1) -
00:39:572 (3,4,5) - Geometric shape here or just random? Fixed it to make a rectangle
01:07:514 (6,7) - This stack seems to encourage ending the slider prematurely when playing. I'm just using the lenient slider ball, you don't have to give up the slider
01:10:257 (7) - NC here or, Like I said, I'll redo all the NCs
01:10:429 (8) - here. ^
01:13:000 (7,8) - Do you want this jump to be this small? This isn't a jump, just normal DS
01:13:514 (11,12) - Blanket It's fine like this. Not everything has to be blankets, but bad blankets must be fixed I agree
01:28:772 (3,4) - This spacing seems a tad larger than the other ones. Yes probably, does it feel weird or something?
01:36:314 (1,2) - Blanket? There's already one with the previous stream
01:37:686 (7,8) - ^ Nope, this is intentional
01:54:143 (4,5,6,7) - Pattern isn't aesthetically pleasing. I think it's okay, what makes you say this?
01:54:143 (4,5,6,7,8) - Blanket Are you talking about this 01:55:000 (7,8) - ? This is intentional too
02:25:686 (13,1) - Fix blanket Fixed
02:40:772 (5,7) - Blanket? Intentional too
02:41:629 (8,9,10) - Is the spacing intentional? Yes
02:55:000 (9) - NC ^
03:18:829 (7,8) - Jump might be too large. I think it's okay, plus I want to make the solo harder than the rest, but I'll see
03:19:343 (2) - NC on this note instead of note 1. ^
03:22:172 - Consider adding a circle note here to begin the series of triples. I'll look into this. I originally removed it because it felt too much
03:50:200 (10) - NC ^
03:54:829 (7) - Try ending slider on 03:55:172 instead. I prefer it this way
04:12:829 (1,3) - Fix blanket Fixed
04:28:772 (8,1) - Blanket? Intentional
04:30:486 (10) - NC ^
04:49:857 (10) - NC ^
04:51:057 (1,2) - Not in same line. Fixed
05:05:457 (6,7) - This jump is slightly larger than the jumps between sliders 5 & 6 and sliders 7 & 8. Fixed
05:06:143 (10) - NC this or previous note. ^
05:16:600 (9,10) - This jump in this stream seems too large. It's actually okay. Playtesters passed it without much difficulty
05:16:772 (10,1) - Blanket Intentional
05:25:514 (7) - NC ^
05:28:429 (10,11,12,13) - Consider fixing shape lol it's not a shape it's a line. Kinda confusing when you're looking at it from the editor but I wanted to make 10 and 11, 12 and 13 by group of 2 and not 3
05:31:172 (10) - NC ^

I really enjoyed this map. Good luck getting it ranked

Peachtrees wrote:

o/~

00:01:000 (3,1) - nazi stack :c Fixed

00:04:257 (5,1) - try increasing the distance between those? 1 feels powerful enough to justify a bigger jump Changed

00:07:000 (5,1,3) - ^ Changed, tried something so I don't know if it'll stay there

00:10:429 (2,3) - these feel REALLY close. I don't think spacing them out like the rest of the pattern is neccessary but maybe see if you can space these out a little more? I'll need more energy to introduce the following jumps so changed

00:17:800 (5,1) - very minor, but why not stack those for extra neatness? I like them how they are

00:34:429 (5,1) - I kinda feel like continueing the triangle-movement would feel more natural Changed this part

00:36:829 (3,4,5) - any reason why these 1/4 are spaced out like this while the others are a lot closer to each other? I feel like there's a lot of energy from the previous jump sliders so I don't to stop it. This might change tho I'll see

01:09:743 (4,5,6,7) - hmm not sure if this is overdone or not. maybe nerf this a tiny bit? It actually feel okay while playing, testers didn't have much difficulty on this either, so for now it'll stay that way

01:13:000 (7,1,2,3) - try spacing these out a little more? Done

01:15:057 (4,5,6,7,1) - I feel like the music would call for gradually increasing jumps instead of having the circle rather close together like this. It looks decent, I'm just not sure about how fitting this it There's jumps in this pattern where the highest notes are played, so I think this is fitting too. I might change it

01:38:886 (10,1) - increase the distance between this like you did in previous patterns Done

01:58:086 (7,1) - minor cosmetic suggestion: See if you can slightly curve 7 to match 1? Changed

02:12:143 (9) - put a circle here and have the break on the circle instead. (possible add a finish on said circle) Good suggestion, added

02:25:257 (4,2) - stack for extra neatness? Changed

02:37:514 (4,5,6) - already commented on this earlier ^

02:41:629 (4,5,6) - spacing seems kinda random to me. I don't really see why 6 would stand out like that Jumps on highest notes, this might change later

03:14:029 (2,4) - nazi stack :c Fixed

03:41:114 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't this feel kinda boring during such an intensive part? Interverted 2 and 3, but I don't feel like doing more since there isn't much going on here

04:35:800 (9,1) - I feel like this would support a more intense jump Changed

04:40:086 (1,2) - - I'm guessing that you were tryng to have 2 blanket aounrd 1's body? it doesn't really work if not done perfectly >< eh probably just me being picky Tried to fix it, welp

04:44:200 (9,1) - these feel way to close with the downbeat feeling pretty powerful Interverted 8 and 9

05:04:429 (7,8,9) - see if you can put these into a more creative pattern? just having them go in a slightly curved line feels kinda of boring. I guess you wouldn't want these to be too jumpy, so maybe smth like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3016451? ^, thanks for the suggestion tho

05:13:000 (9,1) - this might feel awkward to play because of the very sharp angle the player has to move in to properly follow the slider Made a curve slider instead

Looks very promising~

Near wrote:

hey! hi o/

Flower-viewing party

00:20:031 (2,3) - Quite a low spacing here if you compare with the others. The emphasis on (3)'s white tick is high and an anti-jump would be pretty bad :c Moving it to somewhere near x288 y332 woul be a great idea. Same happens with 00:25:174 (1,2) - . Good point, changed the spacing of those parts

00:21:402 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This whole section is 1/3, you can't put 1/4 there. Try listening at 25% playback rate and you will hear 1/3 sounds. Probably adding 1/4s instead of 1/3s is unrankable. I changed this part into 1/3

01:11:974 - Are you sure about this empty red tick? It breaks all the flow you were following. Would be really better to add something there to keep the transition. The break here 01:22:774 (1) - is really cool because the song actually "stops". I guess you're right, changed

01:27:745 (7,8) - I guess the players aren't expecting this kind of rhythm, it's really confusing. You can either add NC on (7) and (8) to warn the players or add a a slider. Though, the slider would be better, in my opinion. I think they're far enough that players can guess pretty easily they're not following the expected rhythm, I like the idea of the NCs but I'll wait for more mods on this part

01:50:202 - The hitsounds on this section are barely audible. Soft hitsounds are really really low compared to Normal. Increasing the volume 15~25% would be really better. Increased to 40%

02:22:688 (2,3) - Same unexpected pattern I mentioned above. You can fix with NC or slider. Same as before

02:55:002 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Same about the 1/3 rhythm mentioned above applies here.

04:12:316 (4,5) - And these aren't 1/3. They're the same as 01:27:745 (7,8). woops indeed, I must have placed them like that after some resnap, fixed

04:33:059 (12,13,14,15) - The Distance Snap should be increasing here, not decreasing, since this part is getting stronger and stronger. Wouldn't make sense to decrease the DS :c I guess that's not very noticeable but changed anyway

That's all! Good luck.

VINXIS wrote:

from mi mod q

ok dad demetori

general

uncheck countdown wtf m809
same with widescreen support because no sb
delete osb cuz no sb

fuk i thought i unchecked those rip

nice diff

1. 00:13:174 (2,3,4) - this jump looks like it's awkward to play because of how u spaced it ya (I'd recommend to space slider 2 and circle 3 farther) tru changed
2. 00:17:288 (3,4,5,6) - y did u use linear flow here only idk it just came to me here
3. 00:35:631 (7,9) - I'd say the ctrl+g of this flows better with the song so that the spacing between the triple and circle is more similar to the spacing of the two triples oh i see good point, changed
4. 00:42:831 (1,2,3) - looks like a very akward dropoff idk i think it's fine
5. 00:46:431 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - tbh if u made the slider andburst parallel to each other it'd look sik yeah why not changed
6. 01:25:345 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ewwww i dont like the aesthetic/flow in this tbh. idk I agree the slider looks bad and fixed but the rest seems fine imo
7. 02:03:916 (1,2) - bring them closer in case for some players to misread or smth idk (it also looks better imo) changed
8. 02:05:802 (7,8) - I'd put the slider above this circle imo that'd play/look better cuz sharp angles good point changed
9. 02:34:774 (3,4,5) -
10. I think stacking these fits better at this certain point cuz it looks odd imo. It'd also play better too ju tested and it does play better stacked so changed
11. 02:36:488 (4,5) - Ctrl+G fow sharp angle flow if u wanna oh nice, changed
12. lol dam the spacing difference between 02:36:831 (1,2) - and 02:37:516 (4,5,6) - is huge, even tho there's not much difference in terms of rhythmical impace within the song I agree but it plays well imo, and testers didn't have problems with it so idk
13. 02:57:059 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - y did u use this rhythm? its not consistent with the part right after either, i'd recommend changing it zzz well i don't really like being too consistent, and idk, this seems fine, i'll see if people keep complaining tho
14. 04:00:488 (1,2) - the flow looks ugly because of how u shaped these sliders. imo it doesn't aesthetically look nice either changed
15. 05:40:259 (9,1) - some people might misread this, u sud stack tbh well idk nobody had problems with it yet so I'll keep it like that

I think ur flow cud improve through some mods but yooo sik map

NolanM wrote:

Yay, a WIP! <3 It's finished but it won't let me update to pending because there's only one diff ;_;
00:05:288 (3,4,5) - Stack I think I'll leave it like this for now
00:10:431 (2,3,4) - Make this into an isoceles triangle, then make 00:10:774 (4,5,6,1) - Into a parallelogram (Slider's head and three cirles) Made an isocele triangle, i don't know if that was the kind you expected but it should be fine. and the parallelogram's already here
00:12:145 (3,4,5) - So here you would have to arrange it a bit to neatly stack like you did before (by changing ^) Changed this part too
00:16:259 (6,7) - I would just feel that this slider and circle would be better in just 3 circles. I don't know I think it's fine, will see if it keeps be pointed out
00:26:716 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Stack these two, or keep it the way it is but less linear I actually like this idea, changed to stacked
01:17:974 (3,4,5) - Stack Here tho I prefer it like this
02:55:574 (4,5,6,7) - Two sliders instead :3 hehe nope sorry I like my 1/3 streams
02:57:402 (4) - Should this be placed closer to the tail of 02:57:059 (3) - ? The SV got slower; DS should be closer. Yes, but those beats are quite strong so I wanted to emphasized that
02:57:745 (5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - ^ ^
03:39:345 (6,7,8,9,10) - Make into sliders instead :3 still nope heh
04:01:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - ^ ^


Omg, I LOVE THIS
Most of my mod were just recommendations. Actually, no. MY WHOLE MOD WERE JUST RECOMMENDATIONS
WHY DON'T YOU HAVE RANKED MAPS YET WTF ;W;
WHY ISN'T THIS RANKED YET WTF
oh ya it needs more mods
GOOD LUCK! I can't wait to see this ranked~!

happy30 wrote:

please use kiouclap as custom hitsound instead of the normal clap!
http://puu.sh/hoNYu/12e71a214d.rar nice, thank you!

00:16:259 (6) - Making this a normal beat would make it play much better. There's no need to go harder on your map if it doesn't make it play better. Other modders complained too about it and I guess it makes sense to put a circle here so changed
00:42:488 - There's a guitar stroke here that you should map to. Yep indeed
01:28:259 - get rid of the volume increase, it's not needed and the hitsounds get too loud imo Reduced to 50%

I don't really like the kiai here, too much forced streams :c I'll see what I can do about it
02:22:688 (2,3) - resnap these to 1/3 fixed
03:21:916 - another guitar stroke you should map Changed
03:54:659 (5,6,1) - this rhythm is messed up, please follow the song I don't know exactly what is wrong with it but I changed the triple by a double, it seems it fits better
04:29:374 (2) - remove this note? the triple sounds weird Removed

The map is not bad, but imn ot a fan of the kiai time parts
would you like to include my 2009 diff? Heh, don't know if this is a serious proposition but I think I'll decline, I wanna rank this alone :3
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/68251

Exahilosys wrote:

Modding done

[Flower-viewing party]

00:16:259 (6,7) - Awkward flow here. true, changed
00:17:631 (5,6) - I suggest you Ctrl+G here. I prefer the way it is, I like those back-and-forth jumps
00:22:259 (5,6) - Jump with no increased tension on the song, right after normal-spaced hitcircles. I get what you're saying but I think those jumps are necessary, or at least not a bad thing in this situation
00:29:802 - Awkward flow here as well, I suggest you do something like (http://i.imgur.com/914uO8G.jpg). I don't know, I guess you're kinda right on this one but while playing it doesn't really feel like it, testers didn't have any problems with it, and one even thought it was good, so I'm keeping it like it is
00:41:116 (6,7,8) - How about making this one a bit more curvy? Changed but in another way
01:32:545 - Try making the stream after that a bit more curvy, so it does not look forced to that direction. Changed
02:30:659 - Again, try going with a curvy stream. I prefer how it is here tho
02:41:802 (5,6) - Why change the spacing here all of a sudden? The only reason I see this happening for, is the background music, but then you focus too much on that. Changed
03:03:574 - Why not actually place a hitobject here? Changed
03:16:431 (7,1) - Awkward flow. Changed
03:37:174 -Not sure how I feel about this, when played it does not really match the songs pace. I don't know, it feels okay to me
04:27:574 (4,5) - Woah! Too big? Reduced a little but it doesn't feel that hard while playing
04:54:231 - Double clap, is this intentional? Yep, listen to the drums

Amazing song and perfect marathon. These are all the tings I could pick from your map. It's pretty much done and ready for ranking in my opinion.

Images may not be available after awhile.

Del05 wrote:

Hi hi! o/
From \o\ Recaro! Mania & Std Modding Team /o/

Sorry for the delay
And finally Finished

Mod

1. Change AR to 9 Please provide a reason, I think 9.2 is good here
2. 00:01:002 (1) - I can hear a beat at 00:01:174, So change slider to 3 hit circle I guess you're right, but I wanna map the guitar here, not the drums. This might change tho
3. 02:23:631 (3) - delete this and change with slider, start at 02:23:459 and end at 02:23:802 I don't understand why, beats are clearly audible and should be mapped
4. 02:57:059 (3) - end at 02:57:231 I'll keep it how it is for now, I'm considering your suggestion tho
5. 02:58:431 (7) - end at 02:58:602 ^
6. 02:59:802 (4) - end at 03:00:145 ^
7. 04:32:374 (4) - this stream how about make DS close until 04:32:888 then make DS more far ? Yep changed
8. 05:51:059 (1) - change with 3 hit circle I'm considering it, but it might suprise players too much, hitting this should be easier

Sorry for short mod with such long delay. I think you map is good. You can try call BN to check it. And good luck. Star for you ~~

1. 00:04:259 (5,1) - I'm not sure about this flowbreak. it doesn't play nice and I understand why you want to destroy the flow here but how about stacking those two instead? makes a little surprise and plays a bit smoother.
2. 00:05:631 (6) - this one's more of a ghost-note and not a real one and i'm not sure if it should be tapped. maybe make a slider out of 00:05:459 (5,6) -
3. 00:08:374 (5,1) - bad flow again. maybe ctrl + g this one. and then ctrl + g the one after too for better flow. this will be nice clockwise flow then
4. 00:09:402 (3,4,5) - i think you should make a triangle jump instead of this. plays weird, imo
5. 00:10:945 (5,6) - make this jump a bit smaller to get some kind of "recovery" from the one before.
6. 00:12:316 (4,5) - why a jump here? there's no emphasize and nothing in the song to suggest it. again recovery from the jump before please so maybe move 00:12:488 (5) - to make a triangle pattern with 00:12:316 (4,5,1) -
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:21:745 (3) - this is overmapped. the sound's ONE 1/3 not a 1/6 stream. this whole section of 00:21:402 (2,3,4,5) - plays weird. change it to something like this maybe:
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:27:574 (9,10) - i think you should make a slider out of this. plays better, imo
9. 00:28:602 (3,4,5,1) - too many sudden changes of direction. maybe ctrl + g 00:28:774 (4,5) - and rotate the triangle a bit
10. 00:39:574 (3,4,5) - again the sudden change of direction makes it uncomfortable to play.
11. 00:54:231 (1,2,3,4) - i dont know if it's good to first have a 1/4 stack and then 1/2 could be too confusing maybe change 00:54:316 (2) - into two circles because the sounds are pithily
12. 01:05:031 (2,3) - I don't understand. why stack here? don't stack here please. it's pointless and doesn't fit the song.
13. 02:22:431 (1,1,1) - i think soft hitfinish or normal hitfinish would be a better hitsoudn here
14. 03:09:745 (1) - this should be a slider. because the mood is changing a bit.
15. 03:54:659 (5,1) - don't do this. this plays weird. it's difficult to read. to understand. and a big slider on a blue tick is madness.
16. 05:01:088 (2,3) - dunno if you should stack them
17. 05:06:574 (2,3) - ^
18. 05:09:316 (2,3) - ^
    

Hard wrote:

Hello there.

Mod

1. 00:04:259 (5,1) - I'm not sure about this flowbreak. it doesn't play nice and I understand why you want to destroy the flow here but how about stacking those two instead? makes a little surprise and plays a bit smoother. Changed
2. 00:05:631 (6) - this one's more of a ghost-note and not a real one and i'm not sure if it should be tapped. maybe make a slider out of 00:05:459 (5,6) - That's a good point, changed
3. 00:08:374 (5,1) - bad flow again. maybe ctrl + g this one. and then ctrl + g the one after too for better flow. this will be nice clockwise flow then dam those flow suggestions are quite good, changed
4. 00:09:402 (3,4,5) - i think you should make a triangle jump instead of this. plays weird, imo Changed in another way
5. 00:10:945 (5,6) - make this jump a bit smaller to get some kind of "recovery" from the one before. Changed
6. 00:12:316 (4,5) - why a jump here? there's no emphasize and nothing in the song to suggest it. again recovery from the jump before please so maybe move 00:12:488 (5) - to make a triangle pattern with 00:12:316 (4,5,1) -
   SPOILER

   
   Changed in another way
7. 00:21:745 (3) - this is overmapped. the sound's ONE 1/3 not a 1/6 stream. this whole section of 00:21:402 (2,3,4,5) - plays weird. change it to something like this maybe:
   SPOILER

   
   I agree that it plays weird, but this is not overmapped, there are 1/6 notes. Changed
8. 00:27:574 (9,10) - i think you should make a slider out of this. plays better, imo Changed but might not stay, I'll see
9. 00:28:602 (3,4,5,1) - too many sudden changes of direction. maybe ctrl + g 00:28:774 (4,5) - and rotate the triangle a bit Changed in another way
10. 00:39:574 (3,4,5) - again the sudden change of direction makes it uncomfortable to play. Changed a little but otherwise I think this part is okay
11. 00:54:231 (1,2,3,4) - i dont know if it's good to first have a 1/4 stack and then 1/2 could be too confusing maybe change 00:54:316 (2) - into two circles because the sounds are pithily This part plays well, not changing
12. 01:05:031 (2,3) - I don't understand. why stack here? don't stack here please. it's pointless and doesn't fit the song. Yep changed
13. 02:22:431 (1,1,1) - i think soft hitfinish or normal hitfinish would be a better hitsoudn here idk, i'm just following the song, will try normal finishes to test but might come back
14. 03:09:745 (1) - this should be a slider. because the mood is changing a bit. I'll just keep it like that
15. 03:54:659 (5,1) - don't do this. this plays weird. it's difficult to read. to understand. and a big slider on a blue tick is madness. Changed
16. 05:01:088 (2,3) - dunno if you should stack them Consistency with the following triplet
17. 05:06:574 (2,3) - ^ ^
18. 05:09:316 (2,3) - ^ ^
    

I'm not that good with the difficult part so not many suggestions for the end stuff. hope it's okay.