lmfao
forum
Nero vs. After School - Sound In Motion vs. AH
posted
Total Posts
147
A bit unrelated, but does anyone know which song by "After School" is in this mashup?
As I understand, this song is a DnB mash between K-Pop girl band after school and UK Electronic music producer Nero.
The Nero song "Sound In Motion" can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNKS3yRcfYc
Does anyone know which "After School" song is used?
As I understand, this song is a DnB mash between K-Pop girl band after school and UK Electronic music producer Nero.
The Nero song "Sound In Motion" can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNKS3yRcfYc
Does anyone know which "After School" song is used?
Topic Starter
I don't know who is to blame.S A V E R Y wrote:
Wait...
http://soundcloud.com/fauxami/sound-in-motion-vs-ah
Genre: Electronic
Language: Korean
I know...galvenize wrote:
I don't know who is to blame.S A V E R Y wrote:
Wait...
http://soundcloud.com/fauxami/sound-in-motion-vs-ah
Genre: Electronic
Language: Korean
Anyway, I have some suggestions in this song.
[General]You should to add this tags.
New schoolgirl 애프터 스쿨 remix
Here.MintyMcFresh wrote:
A bit unrelated, but does anyone know which song by "After School" is in this mashup?
As I understand, this song is a DnB mash between K-Pop girl band after school and UK Electronic music producer Nero.
The Nero song "Sound In Motion" can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNKS3yRcfYc
Does anyone know which "After School" song is used?
The language was changed Japanese to Korean.
love the map... but PLEEASE FIX THE TIMING ISSUES IN IT!! it was fine until I updated just now T^T
Just redownload the map...
Probably my favorite map right now 
Can't wait until its ranked!
Can't wait until its ranked!Everything about this beatmap is really cool, bg,song,map....
Good map (redownloading helped) - I'm just an idiot 
yes, I remember about modding request, but can't do it now because I have serious keyboard issues
03:47:625 (10,11,1) - mistake about stream shape?
Wow... i really like this map, one of my favorites maps. The flow feels great.
Always love your maps, but the AR 9.3 map gets pretty repetitive. Not complaining about the difficulty, the pattern just gets really repetitive.
"Another"
Hey galv! Quite a nice map set here - I've decided to just mod the "Another" difficulty as this is the difficulty that a player of my level will most likely play. I saw only a few improvements that could be made. Most of the recommended changes concern inconsistencies in your use of flow and spacing to emphasize the vocal track. Overall, this is quite a fun difficulty that is neither too challenging nor boring. With that all said, let's jump into the mod!
- 01:38:315 (2) - Consider stacking this note on top of 01:38:488 (3) in order to emphasize the vocals. A similar style is implemented for similar reasons throughout the map. Examples include: 02:02:625 (4,5) , 02:57:798 (4,5) and 04:48:143 (4,5).
- 02:32:970 (6,7,1) - Increase the spacing between this series of notes to provide greater emphasis on the vocal track. This sort of technique is used extensively in the map (example: 04:15:384 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5), and I couldn't quite rationalize why these three notes were so close together. The easiest fix is to simply move 02:33:143 (7) further off to the right. This alteration will retain the flow you've created while increasing the intensity of that part of the map to a degree that more aptly fits the song.
- 04:00:729 (3,4) - A similar issue as described above exists between these two notes as well. The easiest fix would be to move 04:00:729 (3) further up and to the left so that the jump between it, the previous note and the next note becomes larger. If you choose to go through with that change, then consider pointing 04:00:901 (4) a little more to the right to increase the contrasting flow between the surrounding notes. Once more, this alteration will retain the flow you've created while increasing the intensity of that part of the map to a degree that more aptly fits the song.
- 02:14:350 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I'm not too sure if the lack of hit sounds in this series of notes was intentional - but I would add some as you did here: 04:26:419 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5)
Heya, I mainly came here to tell you that the offset should be a bit less, like -4ms if not more; I also had a look at the Extra and Another so I'm actually contributing something too, I hope it helps ^^
[Extra]
[Extra]
- 02:24:350 (5,6) - Those are really close, might be easily confused with being only 1/4 apart as there are a lot of higher spaced 1/4s and 02:23:660 (1,2,3,4) is really high spaced and the song doesn't have any less intensity at 02:24:350 (5,6) so it seems confusing / unnatural imo, and it's inconsistent with 04:36:759 (5,6) too.
- 03:20:208 (1,1,1) - There are no beats at the end of these spinners so seperating them feels weird to me, escpecially since 03:28:483 is left out, so I'd rather put the into one long spiner, it's one continuous sound after all. Also, I'd let it end one white tick later at 03:29:518 -, the big gap feels weird to imo and in an Extra everyone can handle just one beat of recovery time ^^ You did both of this in the Insane so it would also be for consistency's sake I guess
- 03:38:139 (1,2) - All other main-downbeats are sliders, these is the only time it's mapped as circles and it feels rather empty too
- 02:12:621 (1) and 04:25:035 (1,2,3,4) are rather inconsistent too, choose one
- Not that much of an issue but after having very big jumps at 02:16:759 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) I kinda missed them at 04:29:173 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) where only (6,7,8) are that big
- 04:52:621 (1,2) - Is not mapped 100% to the vocals but it omits the upbeat on the slidertail - I'd either keep 1/2-slider but map the next two 1/4s clickable (circlecircle oder circleslider) or replace the 1/2-slider with a circle and a 1/4-slider to 100% fit the vocals, then it's more understandable why the upbeat is omitted
- 05:05:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) is unusually many closely-spaced notes, I'd at least space 05:05:380 (3,4,5,6) more as that's how it is in the rest of the map
- 03:35:384 (2) I'd let this end one 1/6 to be more accurate to the vocals
- Generally the way you space 1/4-gaps between two sliders is very inconsistent: Until the break 02:08:488 (1,2,3,4) is the only time where slidertail and -head are not touching, only there you spaced it the same as many other 1/2-gaps, so that's a bit confusing and I think it would help a lot if those were spaced so no default-followpoint is visible. After the break 02:08:488 (1,2,3,4) and 04:22:970 (5,6) are the same ecxeptions again, they suddenly become more and more afterwards and it's incredibly confusing - How is someone supposed to differentiate between 04:34:005 (3,4) and 05:00:039 (3,4) for example? I'd generally recommend to keep a certain DS between these 1/4s as those barely touching like 04:20:901 (1,2) look rather messy, and the blankets you create with the higher spaced ones aren't that beautiful either most of the time, especially 04:21:591 (3,4) lol. But then again that's rather subjective so dunno, I'd just like it to bee consistent
Please rank it...
나도 네가 맘에 들어 춤을 추겠니
나도 네가 맘에 들어 춤을 추겠니
!420 favs bro !
Blaze it!
Blaze it!
Sup man!
Used to love this map but since the latest update everything seems to be a bit off o:
Did you change anything in the offset?
Greets~
Used to love this map but since the latest update everything seems to be a bit off o:
Did you change anything in the offset?
Greets~
Topic Starter
Kim wrote:
Sup man!
Used to love this map but since the latest update everything seems to be a bit off o:
Did you change anything in the offset?
Greets~
Yeah, you have to (delete and) redownload the map.
ex
honestly with the way you mapped this OD 8.5 or OD 9 would work better since it's pretty jumpy throughout
also drain -1 cuz idk if this is passable with HR because of the spinners / slow part after the break imma check (edit: apparently it is and doesn't drain much at all but the suggestion still stands i guess)
01:43:143 (6) - curve this slider maybe so it flows better from 01:42:970 (5)
02:05:212 (9) - same thing here, flows a bit better even if it's CTRL+H'd and stays in the same spot
02:14:037 - useless green lines ew
02:16:246 (6) - move the sliderend upwards a bit so the flow is straight maybe?
02:30:470 (9,1) - not really a fan of how 02:30:556 (1) - isn't completely straight like the rest of the stream
02:40:212 (9) - NC this instead of the slider after it cuz downbeat
02:52:539 (9,1) - same thing as 02:30:470 (9,1)
02:58:143 - add a note here maybe? there's a soft sound here and it might be better with it there (you did it here 05:10:556 (6) - so idk)
03:38:143 (1,2) - you overlapped all the notes prior to these two with the notes before it and idk if it was intentional or not to not do these two but ehhh
03:47:625 (10,11,1) - stream looks ugly cuz 03:47:712 (11) - isn't straight like the rest of the notes aaa
03:47:970 (1) - remove NC since I don't really see a point in this being there
03:55:556 (6) - CTRL+H to make the note flow into the slider better
03:59:005 (1) - same thing as 03:47:970 (1)
04:11:246 (3) - this might be better with a NC here instead of 04:10:901 (1) - because downbeats
04:16:246 (3) - NC this for consistency with 02:03:832 (1) - also because the stop-and-go thing and readability and stuff
05:04:781 (4,5,6,1) - idk if I just have really crappy vision but from that note onwards the stream shifts left idk if you intended to do that or
these fucking jumps are so good holy shit
honestly with the way you mapped this OD 8.5 or OD 9 would work better since it's pretty jumpy throughout
also drain -1 cuz idk if this is passable with HR because of the spinners / slow part after the break imma check (edit: apparently it is and doesn't drain much at all but the suggestion still stands i guess)
01:43:143 (6) - curve this slider maybe so it flows better from 01:42:970 (5)
02:05:212 (9) - same thing here, flows a bit better even if it's CTRL+H'd and stays in the same spot
02:14:037 - useless green lines ew
02:16:246 (6) - move the sliderend upwards a bit so the flow is straight maybe?
02:30:470 (9,1) - not really a fan of how 02:30:556 (1) - isn't completely straight like the rest of the stream
02:40:212 (9) - NC this instead of the slider after it cuz downbeat
02:52:539 (9,1) - same thing as 02:30:470 (9,1)
02:58:143 - add a note here maybe? there's a soft sound here and it might be better with it there (you did it here 05:10:556 (6) - so idk)
03:38:143 (1,2) - you overlapped all the notes prior to these two with the notes before it and idk if it was intentional or not to not do these two but ehhh
03:47:625 (10,11,1) - stream looks ugly cuz 03:47:712 (11) - isn't straight like the rest of the notes aaa
03:47:970 (1) - remove NC since I don't really see a point in this being there
03:55:556 (6) - CTRL+H to make the note flow into the slider better
03:59:005 (1) - same thing as 03:47:970 (1)
04:11:246 (3) - this might be better with a NC here instead of 04:10:901 (1) - because downbeats
04:16:246 (3) - NC this for consistency with 02:03:832 (1) - also because the stop-and-go thing and readability and stuff
05:04:781 (4,5,6,1) - idk if I just have really crappy vision but from that note onwards the stream shifts left idk if you intended to do that or
these fucking jumps are so good holy shit
Looks like you put a new mp3 in again?
I downloaded this about 3 months ago for a tournament and now had to play it in another tournament again and got some very ugly desync after I clicked on update.
Would be nice if you updated your description accordingly so people will redownload.
I downloaded this about 3 months ago for a tournament and now had to play it in another tournament again and got some very ugly desync after I clicked on update.
Would be nice if you updated your description accordingly so people will redownload.
Topic Starter
But there hasn't been a mp3 change lately.
o.o
Okay in that case I probably got the map already before the change mentioned in your description. I could only recall the map from that situation 3 months ago and as I usually don't download unranked maps I assumed that I didn't have it earlier.
Might have got it at one of the very rare occasions I played multi then on the earlier version.
Okay in that case I probably got the map already before the change mentioned in your description. I could only recall the map from that situation 3 months ago and as I usually don't download unranked maps I assumed that I didn't have it earlier.
Might have got it at one of the very rare occasions I played multi then on the earlier version.
Instead of modding, I'm able just to shoot 1 STAR
just rank it already ((((
((((