quotation of the missing DQ postOnosakiHito wrote:
Reason for Disqualification
- Disqualified for the Background, after having a discussion with the team.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Modding
[General]
- Another problem we have here is the amount of barlines most of the difficulties provide. Especially in Kantan this is noticeable. Because of that, I recommend you to use BPM145 with SV multiplier x2.00. Of course, that means you can't have x1.20 in the Inner anymore. But dunno if it is that important compared to the amount of barlines. Or you just wait for this: p/3578338 (In this way barlines are fixed, and you have your acceleraiting part.)
Note: I didn't put this into the disqualify reason since it isn't your fault but rather the fault of the editor. Else, it would be there. - Lower diffs could use just some deletions. Not much, so no worries. But there should be some.
- SV in Kantan should be also higher like in the other diffs if you ask me. At least 0.70.
- SV in Kantan is 0.80 instead 0.70, that means it is like SV 1.60. Any reason for this? Maybe because it looks better and not too slow? Just wanna make sure.
- 01:45:109 - This note isn't snapped correctly. Though, it is in general hard to have a proper snapping here. Yet, I think on the blue tick it is more accurate.
[ Kantan]
- 00:33:213 (27) - Such notes should be deleted. The song is intense indeed, which is why I'm fine with sections like 00:15:834~00:30:730 . But you should have at least some more breaks at certain places (e.g. at transition from one section to another).
- 00:39:834 - Do the same here or delete note at 00:41:489, so in this way it might sound nicer.
- 00:53:075 - ^
- 00:59:696 - ^
[ Futsuu]
Actually similar to Kantan, so I won't mention above said points. If you didn't like the suggestion, please try something else.
- 00:15:834~00:30:730 - Note like 00:20:385 (37,38) - and 00:27:006 (58,59) - I recommend to delete. The spread is overall fine, indeed. The jumps from diff to diff are high, which is fine. But since the BPM here is pretty high and mapping continuous in this way for 15 seconds, having at least two rest moments is really important, so Futsuu player can rearrange them self and prepare for the next pattern.
- 00:43:971~00:50:592 - ^
- 01:05:075 - Oh, maybe delete this note? So 01:08:385 this note would work as "rise of notes". Just an idea from me.
- 01:31:971~01:45:109 - Same like above.
Futsuu is actually pretty hard, now when looking at it. But will check it once again later.
I would have come up with the disqualification much earlier, but I thought to give a mod as well. Though, christmas stuff is helding me back of this, so I will do the move now before it's too late.
Really sorry that it took me so long TKS. m(_ _")m
Will check the others diffs and Futsuu once again really soon (hopefully today).
I think here is some misunderstanding which I should probably clear because, it seems that people didn't read my post properly or might not have understand the difference between
DQ post and
mod post. Let me explain the situation, starting with your post TKS:
1.) First of all, I censored what you said TKS. That's exactly the reason
why the DQ post has no details. Because it
is NSFW talk. A silencable behavior. In this forum are underaged audiences who do not have to read these kind of topics. And especially because of these audiances, the picture is seen as unsave due to suggestive sexuality. And since many people quotet me wrong, I will do it once again:
OnosakiHito wrote:
Disqualified for the Background, after having a discussion with the team.
It is also said by some people that there are other maps which have such suggestive BGs, too. Maybe in osu, that's right. But not in Taiko(please do not take maps as example which are ranked before the new modding system). I have nothing to do with the modding process in osu or the other game modes. But to be honest... I wonder why it's such a big deal to change a background?
2.) Now about the BPM - You didn't read my post properly, and it starts at the very first line:
OnosakiHito wrote:
Additional Modding
It's put under
additional modding, which means you are
free to disagree with it.
I never -and you guys forgot it
since I'm QAT-
force anyone to do what I say, beside rule breaks or real no-go stuff. If you disagree with me that's fine! It shows me that you are really thinking about what you are doing, which is good. But if you didn't give it a real second thought, please do not wonder if another QAT should disqualify your maps because of possible said concerns by me. I want to prevent a second DQ under any certainumstance, which is why I give sometimes additional modding (
which you rage sometimes about when I can't find time to add, and now you rage because I added one. What do you guys want from me? lol)
The examples you gave do not provide the same conditions like your set, TKS. One of the sets has no Taiko. The other one is not a set. The BPM concern
lies in the lower difficulties(Kantan, Futsuu) due to bar-line issues which appear way to often but can be fixed easily with the recommendation I provided.
Same here, I do not understand what the big problem is. The maps remain -with exception of the x1.2 in inner-
exactly the same, and the barlines would have been
fixed in this way. Did you forgot everything what people like lepidopodus and wmfchris tought us back then? Has that no value anymore?
One last thing...
As I said in my DQ post before, I had not much time. So I disqualified it as soon as possible, so it doesn't happen at the very last day(
even then people would probably rage at me *sighs*). Maybe something else has been missed, which is why I said I will check the diffs one more time properly to make sure it doesn't get DQ again. But well, if you rather wanna keep going in this way without my mod that's fine. But then again: Do not wonder if another QAT disqualifies it.
Note: In case the post imply I'm angry, I'm not. Don't forget that english isn't my motherlanguage. lol