-Dave Strider- wrote:

from my queue

Advanced:
+00:52:536 (1) - move this a little so that its not going off of the grid
+00:57:336 (5) - move this up a teeeny tiny bit like this?: | Nah, it's fine like that.

SPOILER

Hyper:
+01:20:650 (4) - same as in Advanced; too far off the gird
+02:02:993 (6) - ^

didn't mod beginner because it looks super good, no issues that i can see!
sorry this mod is so short, finding mistakes is a weak point i have to work on
this is a really cool map, the song is really nice as well. good luck!

Example

1. Looks good~

1. 00:30:936 (3) - Add a clap at the end this slider as well? It would be a lot more consistent, and not having one will make the note feel out of place compared with the rest of this diff's beginning section.
2. 01:06:250 (1,2,3) - The pattern's flow and aesthetics would be better if you made (1) identical to (3) but make it curve towards (2). The pattern will look and play a lot nicer, since the cursor doesn't have to change direction in such a drastic way in order to hit (2).
3. 01:22:707 (1,2,3) - See above ^. This pattern is pretty much exactly the same.
4. 01:47:393 (3) - Why is the end of this slider nearly silent? osu! is a rhythm game, so it doesn't make sense just to silence notes, and will probably just throw players off beat. The music doesn't really call for it either.

1. 01:18:593 (4,1) - Minor, but this blanket could be improved a bit. A bad blanket could cause issues with aesthetics, making it look untidy.
2. 01:48:079 (2) - Like I said in Beginner, the near silent hitsound totally doesn't fit.

1. 00:50:822 (4,5,7) - The space between each slidertrail is inconsistent; the space between (4,5) is different to the space between (5,6). Although it seems minor, people will notice this, and it doesn't look very nice.
2. 01:24:079 (5,6) - Minor, but this blanket could be improved. Bad blankets could make the map look untidy, so I suggest fixing this.
3. 01:26:479 (5,1,2,3,4,5) - Linear flow here is boring, considering that the two stacks are literally in a straight horizontal line. You should make things more interesting by moving one of the stacks so that the line is at a slightly different angle.
4. 01:41:907 (1,2,3) - You should move (2,3) so that the pattern is a nice oval shape, right now that top side is located slightly too far to the left, making the shape look odd.

1. 00:41:222 (1,2,3,4,5) - The spacing throughout this stream, the first two and the last two notes are spaced 0.70x away from each other, whereas all the other notes are 0.80x away from each other. Although this seems minor, it is still quite noticeable and you should fix this.
2. 00:55:279 (1,2,3) - Although the pattern looks nice, you could make it look even better by having the start of (3) blanketed as well.
3. 01:56:993 (5,6) - Both slider blankets are off, making it look untidy. You should fix this somehow, like moving (5) a bit to the right, curving the sliders a bit more or going with a different pattern instead.
4. 01:58:364 (1) - It's weird how the strong beat has been skipped in this slider, causing it to sound very weird and out of place, since the strong sound comes 1/4 after the repeat. You should adjust by extending it so that it ends on the beat, getting rid of the repeat, and adding a circle to fill the gap.
5. ^

1. 01:30:936 (1) - The way this slider changes direction seems a bit too sharp, you can actually see a sharp corner from it. You should make it less intense, so that there's a wiggle that still fulfils both blankets instead.
2. 01:38:479 (1,3) - Minor, but the blanket over the end of (3) is a little off, making the map look untidy. You might want to fix that.

[ Faded ] wrote:

Hi, from the Faded Modding Queue~

[General]

1. Looks good~

[Beginner]

1. 00:30:936 (3) - Add a clap at the end this slider as well? It would be a lot more consistent, and not having one will make the note feel out of place compared with the rest of this diff's beginning section. | Fixed it. The clap hitsound and the clap from the song sounds so similar, I didn't noticed that.
2. 01:06:250 (1,2,3) - The pattern's flow and aesthetics would be better if you made (1) identical to (3) but make it curve towards (2). The pattern will look and play a lot nicer, since the cursor doesn't have to change direction in such a drastic way in order to hit (2). | I like it, but I guess I fixed it.
3. 01:22:707 (1,2,3) - See above ^. This pattern is pretty much exactly the same. | ^
4. 01:47:393 (3) - Why is the end of this slider nearly silent? osu! is a rhythm game, so it doesn't make sense just to silence notes, and will probably just throw players off beat. The music doesn't really call for it either. | It DOES makes sense to silence notes, when the music call for it, just like you said. And this wouldn't throw off players, because the LAST hit of the slider is silent. Anyway... I fix it.

[Advanced]

1. 01:18:593 (4,1) - Minor, but this blanket could be improved a bit. A bad blanket could cause issues with aesthetics, making it look untidy. | Fixed.
2. 01:48:079 (2) - Like I said in Beginner, the near silent hitsound totally doesn't fit. | Changed.

[Hyper]

1. 00:50:822 (4,5,7) - The space between each slidertrail is inconsistent; the space between (4,5) is different to the space between (5,6). Although it seems minor, people will notice this, and it doesn't look very nice. Fixed.
2. 01:24:079 (5,6) - Minor, but this blanket could be improved. Bad blankets could make the map look untidy, so I suggest fixing this. | Fixed.
3. 01:26:479 (5,1,2,3,4,5) - Linear flow here is boring, considering that the two stacks are literally in a straight horizontal line. You should make things more interesting by moving one of the stacks so that the line is at a slightly different angle. | Yea, but I don't see a problem here. I'll fix it when more people have the same opinion.
4. 01:41:907 (1,2,3) - You should move (2,3) so that the pattern is a nice oval shape, right now that top side is located slightly too far to the left, making the shape look odd. Changed.

[Another]

1. 00:41:222 (1,2,3,4,5) - The spacing throughout this stream, the first two and the last two notes are spaced 0.70x away from each other, whereas all the other notes are 0.80x away from each other. Although this seems minor, it is still quite noticeable and you should fix this. | Fixed.
2. 00:55:279 (1,2,3) - Although the pattern looks nice, you could make it look even better by having the start of (3) blanketed as well. | Changed.
3. 01:56:993 (5,6) - Both slider blankets are off, making it look untidy. You should fix this somehow, like moving (5) a bit to the right, curving the sliders a bit more or going with a different pattern instead. | Fixed.
4. 01:58:364 (1) - It's weird how the strong beat has been skipped in this slider, causing it to sound very weird and out of place, since the strong sound comes 1/4 after the repeat. You should adjust by extending it so that it ends on the beat, getting rid of the repeat, and adding a circle to fill the gap. | SB hitsounds... I forgot to delet it in this diff. I leave the pattern like this.
5. ^

[Extreme]

1. 01:30:936 (1) - The way this slider changes direction seems a bit too sharp, you can actually see a sharp corner from it. You should make it less intense, so that there's a wiggle that still fulfils both blankets instead. I leave it like this, because I like this sharp.
2. 01:38:479 (1,3) - Minor, but the blanket over the end of (3) is a little off, making the map look untidy. You might want to fix that. Fixed.

Pretty nice map, each difficulty is done pretty well~ Thanks! :3

I shot a star, good luck! | Thank you VERY much! >u<

FaiVillager wrote:

Hi~~
from my queue~~
remember to read all the rules for any queue taker~:D | ~_~

[extreme]
00:23:736 (1,2) - a little bit unflow, but maybe this is your style and just take it | I leave it like that, until some more complain about it.
00:26:479 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - equilateral triangle? | I guess that's better. Changed.
00:30:250 (5,6,7,8) - a straight stream is better I think | Changed.
00:31:793 (6) - remove it? | I leave it like this because it sounds right to me.
00:32:822 (2,3) - too close | Moved it a bit further.
00:51:679 (4,5) - just take 4, 5 is not so nice for the BGM | I don't really understand what you mean.
00:54:250 (3,4,5,6) - 3,4,5 → kick slider, remove 6 | Nah.
01:23:222 (2,3,4,5,6) - can be more like a nice star | Fixed.

01:23:564 (5) - 172 312
01:23:907 (6) - 324 352
01:34:536 (4) - 136 296
01:34:707 (5) - 184 112
01:34:879 (6) - 256 288
01:56:136 (2,3,4,5,6) - same | Fixed
01:56:822 (6) - x200
02:10:279 (3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ ,and the track ends here:02:11:993 | No. It ends 02:12:079. If I move all sliders, then there's the Finish missing and it doesn't fit there 02:11:993. I leave it like this.
[another]
00:31:279 (3) - improve blanket | Improved.
00:59:993 (1,2,3,4) - for any reason I don't prefer 1/4 slider begin at blue line many time. Only a few tracks can use this. | So? It doesn't effect while playing so it's okay imo. I leave it like this.
01:06:250 (1) - improve blanket | Improved.
01:10:364 (1) - | Changed.

01:14:307 (8) - 200 276 | Nah, this overlap doesn't look nice. I changed it anyway.
01:27:507 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - streams after 1/4 slider place farther from slider end works well | Fixed.
01:41:736 (7,8,1) - this arrangement is a little weird | Fixed.
02:11:736 (1,2,3,4,5) - not a well curve | Fixed.
[hyper]
00:38:822 (6) - middle of the screen | Nah.
00:44:307 (1,2) - not on a line | Fixed.
01:01:793 (5) - on the same curve of 2,3,4 and replace notes after it | I don't understand. :c
01:18:593 (5) - improve blanket | Improved.
01:32:993 (3,4,5,6) - better in a curve well performed
01:38:479 (3,4,5,6) - ^
01:43:279 (1,2,3,4,1) - all x-2 | I like it like that, so no.
02:04:022 (1,2,3,4) - better in a curve well performed
[advanced]
recommend DS at 0.9x | Nah, it's fine like that.
00:46:364 (2,3,4) - using rotation is a nice idea but pay attention to 3's place | Fixed I guess.
01:11:736 (1) - improve blanket | Improved.
01:14:479 (1) - turn at the middle of slider | No.
01:30:250 (3) - y+2 | No. I don't even understand why.
01:48:764 consider add a spinner | a spinner doesn't really fit there imo.
02:00:422 (5) - y+4 | Here I understand why. Fixed.
02:11:736 (3) - the track ends here:02:11:993 | The same as above.
[beginner]
pretty fine for me~ | \°3°/

That's all~ hope useful to you~ | Some parts I don't understand what you mean, but it was useful. Feedback in general is useful. Thanks~! :3

1. Very nice map imo. I love this sort of music very much~

1. 00:23:736 (2) - Could you please rotate this slider a little (about -8°), and move 00:25:450 (1) - up a little to make a equilateral triangle? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   This looks much confortable imo
2. 00:56:650 (3,1) - Blanket could be improved, you can add a addition note at 00:58:193 - and check if you've made a perfect blanket or not by using the approach circle~Just like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   See that green circle? Use it to make a better blanket~~
3. 02:02:136 (2,3) - Move these two sliders up a little to make the flow smoother. See the picture:
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 02:01:107 (1,2,3,4) - This part looks not very comfortable and flow is a little strange. Why not make 02:01:107 (1) - parallel to 02:00:422 (5) - and move 02:02:479 (4) - up to make a better flow? Picture comes:
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:26:650 (6) - Shorten this slider to 00:26:822 - and add a note at 00:26:993 - ?
2. 00:30:593 (1,2,3,4) - Straight flow seems a bit rigid here. Try this maybe~
   
   Use this code

   72,52,30593,6,0,L|148:60,1,60.0000022888184,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   202,114,30936,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,63,31107,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   366,57,31279,2,0,P|360:102|339:134,1,60.0000022888184
   267,219,31622,2,0,P|273:174|294:142,1,60.0000022888184
   360,202,31964,1,2,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:36:079 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Just a suggestion. You could use sv changes to show the tension of music in this part. (Sry for my terrible English I don't know how to describe this feeling correctly... ). Anyway, let's try to communicate with codes LOL~
   
   Codes here

   256,96,36079,6,0,L|180:88,1,60.0000022888184,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   99,71,36422,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   96,82,36764,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   94,93,37107,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   91,104,37450,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   159,192,37622,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   131,307,37793,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   134,318,38136,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   137,329,38479,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   256,245,38650,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   375,329,38822,1,2,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:48:679 (2) - Add a note here? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:51:679 (6) - Move this note to the end of 00:51:164 (5) - ?
6. 00:56:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Ahh I love this part~~~
7. 01:00:764 (1) - This slider is a little strange because its direction is right but the flow of this part is to the left. Consider to change its direction by rotating. For example:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:450 (2) - Try to make this slider parallel to 01:25:107 (1) - and change other things behind like this:
   
   Oh so many codes

   104,248,85107,6,0,L|212:260,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   246,342,85450,2,0,L|153:332,2,80,0|0|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   323,294,85964,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   418,313,86136,2,0,B|416:367,2,40,0|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   471,230,86479,2,0,B|466:189,2,40,8|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   397,117,86822,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   397,117,86993,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   303,111,87164,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   303,111,87336,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   238,186,87507,2,0,B|242:225,2,40,8|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   164,133,87850,2,0,L|120:129,4,40,8|0|8|0|4,0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   And if you decide to use these codes, remember to change some details after this part as well~
9. 01:38:136 (2) - Also, make this slider parallel to 01:37:793 (1) -
10. 01:42:422 (2) - Move this note to the end of silder 01:41:907 (1) -
11. 01:55:279 (9) - Move this slider's tail to let it point to the head of slider 01:55:622 (1) - (Oh damn why my words looks so strange...See this picture if you don't understand )
    
    SPOILER

    
    That's it~~Also very nice diff~~

1. 00:25:107 (1,2,3) - Try to use larger sv~For example:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:26:993 (1) - oh why add a note here? Move this note to 00:26:822 -
3. 00:36:079 (7,1,2) - Too close imo. Try larger sv just like 00:34:707 (1,2,3) -
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:49:107 (6,7,8,9,1) - Just look at the image~
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:29:564 (1,2) - Use two 3/4 sliders seems better in Another diff:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:30:593 (5,6) - Use two 1/4 short sliders could be better imo~
7. 01:55:622 (1) - This slider is a bit overlapped. Consider making a little move? And also, the shape of this stream (01:54:936 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - ) is really strange imo. You'd better do some changes

Streliteela wrote:

Yoo hey my friend~~

[General]

1. Very nice map imo. I love this sort of music very much~

[Beginner]
Nice diff~:) Only a few tiny suggestions

1. 00:23:736 (2) - Could you please rotate this slider a little (about -8°), and move 00:25:450 (1) - up a little to make a equilateral triangle? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   This looks much confortable imo Rotated the slider and changed the shape a bit.
2. 00:56:650 (3,1) - Blanket could be improved, you can add a addition note at 00:58:193 - and check if you've made a perfect blanket or not by using the approach circle~Just like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   See that green circle? Use it to make a better blanket~~ | I know how to blanket! D: Fixed blanket and respaced the following notes.
3. 02:02:136 (2,3) - Move these two sliders up a little to make the flow smoother. See the picture: | Loled so hard at that picture! Ye the flow is really messed up, I don't know what I thought while mapping this. Fixed flow.
   
   SPOILER

   

[Advanced]
Also nice Just one tiny suggestion~

1. 02:01:107 (1,2,3,4) - This part looks not very comfortable and flow is a little strange. Why not make 02:01:107 (1) - parallel to 02:00:422 (5) - and move 02:02:479 (4) - up to make a better flow? Picture comes: | Because I'm dumb. No I don't know why. Fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   

[Hyper]

1. 00:26:650 (6) - Shorten this slider to 00:26:822 - and add a note at 00:26:993 - ? | Nah. I like it.
2. 00:30:593 (1,2,3,4) - Straight flow seems a bit rigid here. Try this maybe~ | Changed it in something similar.
   
   Use this code

   72,52,30593,6,0,L|148:60,1,60.0000022888184,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   202,114,30936,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,63,31107,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   366,57,31279,2,0,P|360:102|339:134,1,60.0000022888184
   267,219,31622,2,0,P|273:174|294:142,1,60.0000022888184
   360,202,31964,1,2,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:36:079 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Just a suggestion. You could use sv changes to show the tension of music in this part. (Sry for my terrible English I don't know how to describe this feeling correctly... ). Anyway, let's try to communicate with codes LOL~ | Really good idea. Changed that.
   
   Codes here

   256,96,36079,6,0,L|180:88,1,60.0000022888184,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   99,71,36422,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   96,82,36764,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   94,93,37107,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   91,104,37450,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   159,192,37622,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   131,307,37793,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   134,318,38136,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   137,329,38479,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   256,245,38650,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   375,329,38822,1,2,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:48:679 (2) - Add a note here? Like this: | Good suggestion. But I leave it like this, because I like it.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:51:679 (6) - Move this note to the end of 00:51:164 (5) - ? | I don't see the reason. It's actually the same.
6. 00:56:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Ahh I love this part~~~ | [color=#0000FF]\:D/[/color]
7. 01:00:764 (1) - This slider is a little strange because its direction is right but the flow of this part is to the left. Consider to change its direction by rotating. For example: | I see. Fixed it.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:450 (2) - Try to make this slider parallel to 01:25:107 (1) - and change other things behind like this: | But I like it. ;-;
   
   Oh so many codes

   104,248,85107,6,0,L|212:260,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   246,342,85450,2,0,L|153:332,2,80,0|0|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   323,294,85964,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   418,313,86136,2,0,B|416:367,2,40,0|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   471,230,86479,2,0,B|466:189,2,40,8|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   397,117,86822,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   397,117,86993,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   303,111,87164,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   303,111,87336,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   238,186,87507,2,0,B|242:225,2,40,8|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   164,133,87850,2,0,L|120:129,4,40,8|0|8|0|4,0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   And if you decide to use these codes, remember to change some details after this part as well~
9. 01:38:136 (2) - Also, make this slider parallel to 01:37:793 (1) - | But I like that! D:
10. 01:42:422 (2) - Move this note to the end of silder 01:41:907 (1) - | Same as above.
11. 01:55:279 (9) - Move this slider's tail to let it point to the head of slider 01:55:622 (1) - (Oh damn why my words looks so strange...See this picture if you don't understand ) | Changed.
    
    SPOILER

    
    That's it~~Also very nice diff~~

[Another]

1. 00:25:107 (1,2,3) - Try to use larger sv~For example: | I think it's fine like this, so I leave it.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:26:993 (1) - oh why add a note here? Move this note to 00:26:822 - |Fixed.
3. 00:36:079 (7,1,2) - Too close imo. Try larger sv just like 00:34:707 (1,2,3) - | Using the same spacing here I used 00:34:707 (1,2,3,1,2,3). I guess you don't like the stack?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:49:107 (6,7,8,9,1) - Just look at the image~ | There is not
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:29:564 (1,2) - Use two 3/4 sliders seems better in Another diff: | No, because 3/4 sliders are ugly and not necessary at most times.
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:30:593 (5,6) - Use two 1/4 short sliders could be better imo~ | Doesn't sound right to me.
7. 01:55:622 (1) - This slider is a bit overlapped. Consider making a little move? And also, the shape of this stream (01:54:936 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - ) is really strange imo. You'd better do some changes | Changed it.

Sorry the Extreme diff is too hard for me to play so I'm unable to mod it So just point out two places: | No problem :3
00:26:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Flow really strange here. especially 3->4 | Not for me~
02:05:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - oh this stream looks really strange. | But it plays well.

Really nice map and nice music~ Shoot a star for you~~Good luck~~ | Thanks!

OblivioN wrote:

From Lazy modding team(¦3[____]
so pro www
I know that maybe propose some suggestions will be good,but I prefer u to keep these sense as your 1st rank. (many mappers make maps by a lot of blanket、 stack or maped songs can't be played by most players and didn't suit the song which they maped)，but yours，this one，maybe hard for somebody but very appropriate the song and interesting enough in my opinion so I 'm going to shoot you star and on your side <3 /me runs

perhaps u couldn't understand what's my means cause my worst English . ;w;
good luck , hope the map will be ranked soon!

Secretpipe wrote:

you're almost there ! find some mods , I'm stalking this map bro <3

Dark Fang wrote:

Fang love this

zhengyuanhang wrote:

Hi, M4M

Beginner
1. The DSs are too large for easy diff. The DSs should be around 0.9x to 1.1x for easy diffs. | The DS is fine.

Advanced
1. The DSs you use in this diff is clearly unequal. Some of them are around 1.0x, and others are around 0.8x. All of them should be changed into around 1.0x. 01:48:079 (2,1) is the only exception. | Only the "streams" are spaced with 0.8x so it's easier for a new player to follow the short speed change. That's also fine and some people and a QAT proved this.
2. 00:23:050 (2,3,4) - No such triplets for a normal diff. Use other patterns instead. | Hm. Perhaps give a example? Looks totally fine to me.
3. 00:24:422 (2,3,4) - ^ | ^

Hyper
1. Change OD into 6. | Increased OD to 5.5 Edit: Increased OD to 6 and also increased the OD in Advance to 4.
2. 00:56:650 (1,2,4,5) - They are hard to read. You should change them into other patterns, or change AR into 8. | I'll leave this until more people complain about it since no one did it so far and Hard players played this part just fine.
3. 01:40:536 (1,2,4,5) - ^ | ^

Extreme
1. Some 1/4 stream combos are too long. You can consider divide these long combos, such as 00:48:422 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) and 00:56:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14). The long combos that contains 1/4 sliders should be divided especially, such as 01:15:850 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12). | Those combos are long, yes. It doesn't make it harder to read or play or anything like that. Since it's allowed to have a maximum combo of 25 (I guess) and it doesn't effect the playing I'll leave it like this.

handsome wrote:

https://soundcloud.com/fang-save/drizzle-fang-remix maybe follow this artist info.

hi

• General

1. bg size tho
   
   Extreme
2. reduce stack leniency so weird stacking inconsistencies won't occur. 00:26:479 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 01:12:250 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - (look at it ingame/cutting edge to see what i mean)
3. most of the things i point out are repeated in the map, so fix them all if you fix once.
4. 00:34:022 (3) - i wouldn't leave the loud clap on the repeat arrow. try to change it.
5. 00:45:679 (1,2) - spacing is too low here.
6. 00:49:107 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - you can change this stream to 1/4 sliders, since there is a change in the sound.
7. 00:56:393 - won't you map this? like 00:59:393 (1,2,3,4,5) -
8. 00:56:650 (1) - for the stream here, i suggest fitting in the 1/8 sounds where they are applicable, its too simple of a rhythm for what sounds like something so complex, don't you think? http://i.imgur.com/4Gpsafi.png
9. 01:02:136 - don't leave a sliderend on a loud sound+downbeat. its awkward to playhttp://i.imgur.com/GdSIqED.png
10. 01:05:393 (4) - move this one blue tick to the left, it fits the song much better.
11. 01:08:650 (3) - downbeat sliderend again.
12. 01:23:393 (3) - the star pattern should start here. listen to the music and you'll hear what i mean.
13. 01:24:593 (2) - can be spaced further
14. 01:43:107 (4,1) - ^
15. and most of the issues repeat from here on
    
    Another
16. 00:26:479 (7,1) - 00:27:850 (7,1) - 00:29:222 (5,1) - swap nc
17. 00:31:279 (3) - change to http://i.imgur.com/idl7xnT.png
18. 00:31:964 - spinner starts here.
19. 00:35:393 (1,7) - 00:36:250 (2,5) - 00:38:479 (1,5) - 00:39:164 (1,2) - 00:41:222 (1,5) - swap nc
20. 00:44:822 (2,3) - these 2 sldiers start on a red tick, while usually that's fine but white ticks sound much better in this music section. all the loud beats are landing on the sldierends.
21. 00:59:993 (1,2) - swap nc
22. 01:01:793 (4) - same as Extreme
23. 01:05:393 (4) - ^
24. 01:13:107 (5) - nc
25. 01:14:479 (9,1) - 01:24:079 (5,1) - 01:25:450 (5,1) - swap nc
26. and repeat lol
    
    before i continue and make a long list of NC this NC that, put a note here cuz downbeat etc. i'm just gonna say you have to relook at your diffs, make sure the rhythms make sense. many passive sliders and such doesn't really make for a good rhythm experience. and check your NCs, consistency is key.

good luck.

1. I think this 00:22:193 - green line is not really needed there's not even have spinner there and maybe this one 00:22:364 - not needed too, because you can simply use and adjust the red line with S:C2 80% sound http://puu.sh/gJ6Q3/a5b3174099.png, so I guess maybe it's better to delete those two green line
2. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare and might be applied to all diff
3. 00:30:936 (3) - NC? for consistency with 00:22:364 (1,2,1) - because you like to make nc every two downbeat
4. 00:36:079 (4) - NC also? same reason
5. 00:50:136 (4,1) - Swap nc I guess then this 00:52:536 (3) - should be nc?
6. 01:13:107 (1,2) - Swap nc? because nc should be on (2) instead then this 01:15:850 (1) - shouldn't be nc imo
7. 01:26:822 (3) - Delete nc? for consistency and maybe nc this one 01:28:193 (5) -
8. 01:36:422 (1,3) - 01:56:993 (1,2) - Swap nc? I guess no need to nc there 01:59:736 (1) -
9. 02:10:708 (1) - Shouldn't be nc imo
   
   Nothing really found any issue there, but in my point of view the nc not yet consistent, maybe at least you can fix some of them to make the diff neater XD

1. I think this 00:22:193 - green line is not really needed there's not even have spinner there and maybe this one 00:22:364 - not needed too, because
2. you can simply use and adjust the red line with S:C2 80% sound http://puu.sh/gJ6Q3/a5b3174099.png, so I guess maybe it's better to delete those two green line
3. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare
4. 00:31:964 (3,4) - The rhythm on those two really not fit with the song imo, how about use rhythm like this http://puu.sh/gJ7af/4c71b09016.jpg that prety much same as 00:23:736 (1,2,3,4) - I think it's much better
5. 00:56:650 (3,4) - wrong spacing? I guess this diff categorized as Normal and there's a lot spacing inconsistency most like on on 1.00, 0.79, 0.83, you can double checked your spacing tho XD
6. 01:28:193 (7) - Better nc there imo then swap nc on these 01:29:222 (1,2) - because at least your nc most on the downbeat
7. 02:10:707 (1,2,3) - Pretty not comfortable especialy we move to (2), because (2) on red tick and make the movement to sudden to player, so it might be better if you follow this rhythm imo http://puu.sh/gJ7K4/c043a8e40c.jpg or http://puu.sh/gJ7Vu/4ff80675f0.jpg each single of them is begin on white tick, so it might be better on gameplay
   
   If this a Normal diff then there's some or a lot of spacing inconsistency

1. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare
2. 00:26:307 (5) - The rhythm kinda odd imo, delete that? Idk since you use clap so it might be have 1/1 diffrent with next note something same as 00:23:393 (5) -
3. 00:26:650 (7) - Then that kinda odd, well in my opinion you can insert note here 00:26:822 - for better rhythm instead insert 1/1 slider
4. 00:29:222 (3,4) - Ctrl+g that, based on beat I'm sure it'll better if we hit the slider first then the circle, because if not the 1/1 slider will begin on red tick and make the rhythm odd
5. 00:36:422 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - The song rhythm is still same not yet slow down but you sudden to have those anti jumps, kinda out of place imo
   
   The rest pretty much fine

Mako Sakata wrote:

Helloooo from my queue~
Some small sugestion before bubble soon, hope sooo :p

[Beginner]

1. I think this 00:22:193 - green line is not really needed there's not even have spinner there and maybe this one 00:22:364 - not needed too, because you can simply use and adjust the red line with S:C2 80% sound http://puu.sh/gJ6Q3/a5b3174099.png, so I guess maybe it's better to delete those two green line | That's true. These two aren't needed at all. I deleted them.
2. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare and might be applied to all diff | Added finish.
3. 00:30:936 (3) - NC? for consistency with 00:22:364 (1,2,1) - because you like to make nc every two downbeat | Added NC.
4. 00:36:079 (4) - NC also? same reason | Added NC.
5. 00:50:136 (4,1) - Swap nc I guess then this 00:52:536 (3) - should be nc? | Fixed NC.
6. 01:13:107 (1,2) - Swap nc? because nc should be on (2) instead then this 01:15:850 (1) - shouldn't be nc imo | Fixed NC.
7. 01:26:822 (3) - Delete nc? for consistency and maybe nc this one 01:28:193 (5) - | Fixed NC.
8. 01:36:422 (1,3) - 01:56:993 (1,2) - Swap nc? I guess no need to nc there 01:59:736 (1) - | Fixed NC.
9. 02:10:708 (1) - Shouldn't be nc imo | Fixed NC.
   
   Nothing really found any issue there, but in my point of view the nc not yet consistent, maybe at least you can fix some of them to make the diff neater XD | xD I fixed them all.

[Advanced]

1. I think this 00:22:193 - green line is not really needed there's not even have spinner there and maybe this one 00:22:364 - not needed too, because
2. you can simply use and adjust the red line with S:C2 80% sound http://puu.sh/gJ6Q3/a5b3174099.png, so I guess maybe it's better to delete those two green line | Same as above. I fixed it.
3. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare | Also the same as above.
4. 00:31:964 (3,4) - The rhythm on those two really not fit with the song imo, how about use rhythm like this http://puu.sh/gJ7af/4c71b09016.jpg that prety much same as 00:23:736 (1,2,3,4) - I think it's much better | Not really sure about it. It sounds fine to me. I leave it like that.
5. 00:56:650 (3,4) - wrong spacing? I guess this diff categorized as Normal and there's a lot spacing inconsistency most like on on 1.00, 0.79, 0.83, you can double checked your spacing tho XD | I used spacing x0.8 for the "streams" and everything else is x1.0. Due to the grid there's spacing such like 0.79, 0.81, ... I think about to fix them but I guess that's fine.
6. 01:28:193 (7) - Better nc there imo then swap nc on these 01:29:222 (1,2) - because at least your nc most on the downbeat | Added NC here 01:28:193 (1) and 01:29:564 (1). I didn't remove the NC 01:29:222 (1) because 01:28:193 (1,1) are stacked and it's easier to read imo.
7. 02:10:707 (1,2,3) - Pretty not comfortable especialy we move to (2), because (2) on red tick and make the movement to sudden to player, so it might be better if you follow this rhythm imo http://puu.sh/gJ7K4/c043a8e40c.jpg or http://puu.sh/gJ7Vu/4ff80675f0.jpg each single of them is begin on white tick, so it might be better on gameplay | Changed the last part like http://puu.sh/gJ7Vu/4ff80675f0.jpg.
   
   If this a Normal diff then there's some or a lot of spacing inconsistency | Just like I said above.

[Hyper]

1. 00:22:364 (1) - How about add finish on head? to emphize the snare | Added finish.
2. 00:26:307 (5) - The rhythm kinda odd imo, delete that? Idk since you use clap so it might be have 1/1 diffrent with next note something same as 00:23:393 (5) - | I fixed 00:26:307 (5) that part but 00:23:393 (5) sounds totally fine to me.
3. 00:26:650 (7) - Then that kinda odd, well in my opinion you can insert note here 00:26:822 - for better rhythm instead insert 1/1 slider | Already fixed it.
4. 00:29:222 (3,4) - Ctrl+g that, based on beat I'm sure it'll better if we hit the slider first then the circle, because if not the 1/1 slider will begin on red tick and make the rhythm odd | Fixed the rhythm.
5. 00:36:422 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - The song rhythm is still same not yet slow down but you sudden to have those anti jumps, kinda out of place imo | Fixed that part.
   
   The rest pretty much fine | :3

[]
Do you mind to recheck your nc? but your map as good as always hahaha XD
See you on qualified section soon~

phaZ wrote:

love this map *-*

[Beginner]
00:44:307 (1,2,3) - make pattern/slider symmetric?

ctrl+h (2,3) -> ctrl+r (i did 33° here) -> stack on axis (the circle) I remapped the whole Beginner difficulty anyway... You modded the old version of this difficulty. ^^
[Hyper]
02:10:707 (1,2,3,4) - they were really surprising me as i expected 4x1/4-repeat sliders as always but then they are actually 3x1/4-repeat sliders. maybe use 1/2-sliders instead? http://puu.sh/kp1OY/58e19face1.jpg (i already see you declining..) | I'm not really sure about that, because it actually fit there. But I understand that this is a bit hard to read? I don't know.
[Extreme]
00:36:422 (2,3) - always think thats a jump D: i suggest moving (3) and the folllowing objects a bit more to the right | That's okay, since it's a Extreme diff. It should be harder to read and play.
01:57:507 (6) - make it "better"? | Changed it a bit but I'm not sure that this is "better". xD

create 1/3-sliders -> ctrl+r (e.g. 50°) -> stack heads on tails -> now you know the sliderpoints yey
02:06:593 (1) - meh, dont like that shape~ change the second red waypoint to a white one so the second half of the slider is shaped like 02:07:622 (4) (its (5) in the picture http://puu.sh/kp48R/8e71c8c2d0.jpg)? | No, I like this shape.

[]
i didnt found anything but that kind of nazi stuff or just trivial rhythm changes..
pls dont give kd >.<

Okoratu wrote:

the "fang" is not officially caps though :p

A r M i N wrote:

You've got a lot of SP i need to say that

^ = same

Easy

Nothing sorri

Normal

02:12:250 - spinner to 02:13:450 - | Adding a spinner there is question of tastse. Also I don't really understand why adding a spinner only in Normal.

Hard

00:25:622 - add circle
00:29:393 - ^
00:31:793 - ^
00:32:479 - ^
00:33:850 - ^
00:34:536 - ^
00:35:222 - ^
00:36:593 - ^
00:37:279 - ^
00:37:964 - ^
00:38:822 - strange new combo | It looks strange - yea, but it keeps the same Combo-Pattern.
00:46:193 - add circle
00:47:564 - ^
00:52:364 - ^
00:59:222 - ^
01:14:307 - ^
01:19:793 - ^
01:31:450 - ^
and you know so on.. i am a bit too lazy to list all of the circle adds
those changes are maybe optional people maybe like this change other dont, decide for you what you like best

I mapped in Hard less because it shouldn't be as much mapped as Hyper but still challenging. I just mapped on specific parts that are already emphasized from the song.

Hyper

nothing, played really smooth ^^

other 2 diffs also no issues found by me

overall, its a cool map ^^

RyoKazuka wrote:

dundun

mod

Beginner's good | Sounds good~ :^)

Normal

00:54:936 (6) - idk about you but, compared to the wubs here and the two wubs ( 00:54:250 (4,5) - ) here
this slider should be two notes instead of a slider | Well that's true. I already did that in both Kiai 01:16:879 (6,7) and 02:00:764 (4,5). Beside the Kiai I placed sliders instead of circles. (00:54:936 (6) and 01:38:822 (6)) I actually like it like that. I think about changing it.
01:58:364 (6) - you put this rhythm as a new combo before, why not here ? | Seems like I messed a bit up with the NCs. Added NC 01:58:364 (6) and removed NC 01:59:736 (1).

Hard

00:46:193 - I hear a snare here, but its up to you | It suppose to be empty, because I just wanted some space in the rhythm like 00:45:336 (4,1). I also don't wanted to map too much in hard to have some clickable increase to the Hyper diff. I guess that's fine but I'll ask some people about that.
01:26:136 (3,4,5,6) - I think a repeat quintet slider should be here, you can hear the wubs starting 01:26:136 here | It's acutally explained above. I don't wanted that much mapped in Hard.
01:30:079 - snareee | Already explained above.

Hyper

01:11:393 (1,2,3,4) - I have a feeling that this should be 1/4 sliders lol idk | I guess this doesn't matter. I leave it like that.
02:03:850 (1,2) - Im not sure about the stack, but I dont think its all that necessary, because the sound is snare | hat | Don't understand what's wrong with the stack. I guess that's okay.

I like hyper

cant seem to see the errors in Insane
its all good fewh | Good sign.

cant detect Extreme but I have a feeling that
02:06:593 (1) - this structure doesnt fit in with the music imo, maybe an L-shape is better, maybe remove the first red dot of the slider ( just the red, not white ) | Well I think about it changing it. I actually like the weird corner shape.

pic example

I feel lame with this mod lol
good luck on ranking !

very neat map
love the sliders

STAR

1. 00:52:193 (8,1) - The spacing here is pretty low and kinda breaks the nice flow imo, due to the slider leniency some players arrive at (1) very early and have to wait a bit until they can move with suddenly double the speed at 00:52:536 (1,2) - imo increasing the spacing here would play better
2. 00:54:936 (3,4,1) - I learned the hard from the jurors of the German Mapping Contest that such a big jump doesn't fit well in cases like these bc it gives (4) way too much emphasis, (4) is not an important note here, only (1) would be important.. ask Desperate if you have doubts :^) even more extreme at 01:38:822 (3,4,1) lol
3. 00:56:307 (5) - I already hear the sound from 00:56:479 (6) here too, maybe map this as a 1/4-slider too? same at 01:40:193 (4)
4. 00:57:164 (4,5) - The more prominent sound, the one that also has a few 1/8s, is holding at (4), so I'd recommend making this a 1/4-slider too, the stream seems a bit dull / ignoring the music a bit. Apart from that, did you think about mapping the 1/8s with kicksliders? Could fit pretty well imo, it's an Extra after all same at
5. 00:58:022 (1,2,3) - After having so many jumps and streams, this linear flow with low spacing seems pretty boring, and it ignores the sound at 00:58:364 which is mapped on a slidertail - I'd suggest making something like this
6. 00:59:393 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - wow these sounds are really bad for a rhythm game because their 'peak' is really late.. I don't really know what to do here though, have you got testplays on this and seen if players drop acc here? Bc I would imagine so, so maybe mapping this with sliders would be a bit better.. really stupid sounds lol
7. 01:00:764 (1,2) - again due to slider leniency there's not really much emphasis on the (2) since you're not changing direction much neither between these sliders nor at the head of the second one and the spacing isn't high either, I'd change that : \
8. 01:05:307 - leaving this empty is weird because that beat is as audible here as on all the other circles, so I'd at least make 01:05:222 (4) a kick-slider
9. 01:08:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is kinda mapped the wrong way around, there's no important beats on (2,3) but heads and tails of (5,6) are four distinct beats which, so it would fit waay better to map the two sliders first and then the four circles. same at 01:20:307 (2,3,4,5)
10. 01:17:907 (3) - make this two circles for the same reason as above
11. 01:36:422 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I can't really put it into words nicely but I feel 01:36:936 (2,1,2) play rather awkward, maybe because it goes from kinda left-rigth-left-right to kinda up-down-up-down and the transition isn't really nice or something like that, dunno, have you got any feedback on that?
12. 01:43:107 (4,1,2) - the absolute spacing here is almost exactly the same (x1,91 vs x1,97 when moving the last note back by one tick) although the timer interval is doubled, probably really hard to read, I'd lower all the 1/4-jumps of this pattern, they are higher spaced than a lot of normal 1/2-jumps lol
13. 01:45:679 (4) - Having a strong beat on a slidertail unfavourable, but if it's unavoidable then I'd at least not put the next note almost directly in the extended sliderpath, having to change direction between slidertail and the next note would at least give it a bit of emphasis opposed to none like this. I think this occurred before, dunno how the next note was placed there, better look at that too
    
14. 01:52:536 (7,8,1) - swap the spacing here, (7,8) shouldn't be higher spaced than (8,1) since there's nothing on (8) but (1) obviously the downbeat
15. 02:01:964 (4,5,1) - (4,5) is already spaced the most here, adding the 180°-turn is kinda overkill imo, and then the pretty sharp turn to (1) and the 180°-turn on (1)'s head is really awkward to play too imo, it's just too much ^^ I generally like these really sharp turns, like 02:07:622 (4,1) and 02:09:164 (4,1) - but I heard some people say that it's just a matter of taste so dunno, imo it breaks the flow too much

1. Just saying this as first thing here too, things like 00:26:993 (2,3) and 01:08:650 (7,8,1) play rather uncomfortable imo and should only be used to emphasize reeaally special beats or whatever, but you use it rather random and inconsistently : \
2. 00:23:393 (5) - I don't like how the 'clap' here is being 100% ignored by being mapped the same as all the surrounding circles, in the Extra you mapped it as a slider which differentiated it a bit, why not here too? If not, at least change the spacing so (5) gets more emphasis
3. 00:24:079 (2,3,4) - spacing seems very unreasonable here, (3) isn't important at all while (4) got that sound on its head and also a strong back-beat on its tail, so I'd suggest mapping this differently to do the music justice here
4. 00:27:164 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - I guess you don't have auto-stacking viewed in editor, ingame the spacing between (3,4) is rather low bc the stacking moves the notes on the top closer to the slider, either move it by a lot of pixels or just space it out with x0,2 or whatever
5. 00:33:336 (1) - The sound on the tail doesn't get emphasized at all suddenly, feels very off and it's just a continuous circular motion to (2) which makes it really weird to play
6. 00:34:022 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Why is this mapped completely different to the part until here? It's very nice but extremely inconsistent as nothing changes but you go from permanent movement to a lot of stacking and linear, low-spaced motion D:
7. 00:54:079 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this is something different and shouldn't be placed on the same spot as half of 00:52:536 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) and I'd also put a NC there, it just doesn't belong to the previous pattern anymore . same at 01:37:964 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
8. 00:57:164 (4,5) - same as in Extra, suggesting to make this a slider. 01:41:050 (4,5) too ^^
9. 00:58:022 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is kinda the same motion twice, feels weird as there's very different stuff happening
   
10. 01:01:793 (4,1) - same as the antepenultimate (lol is there not a better word for this in english, sollte 'drittletzter heißen ^^) point of the Extra, strong beat on slidertail + no special movement feels boring / doesn't give the right emphasis
11. 01:02:822 (3,4,5) - there's almost no movement at all here, why not space them in a certain direction? 01:02:307 (1,2) is not that much of an issue as it's just two sliders, but it's kinda weird too imo. Happens a few other times later on
12. 01:05:222 (4) - same as in Extra, suggesting kick-slider here
13. 01:19:964 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I was about to add to the point in the Extra that you did this really well in the Insane for the first two time this pattern occurs in the music, but here at the third time you suddenly mapped it the other way around again ^^ better make it slider-slider-4circles again
14. 01:25:793 (2,3) - few emphasis on (3) again bc of almost no change of direction. same at 01:58:022 (7,1) -
15. 02:10:707 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - mapping it as a 3/4-rhythm first and then switching to the 'normal' 4/4-rhythm startin on a red tick is very weird rhythmic-wise and doesn't make much sense anyways since nothing changes, stay consistent with one of them, it plays very differently / conveys something different. Or at least emphasize 02:11:393 (3) in some way, like with a change of direction and the NC here or smth

Bonsai wrote:

[Extra]

1. 00:52:193 (8,1) - The spacing here is pretty low and kinda breaks the nice flow imo, due to the slider leniency some players arrive at (1) very early and have to wait a bit until they can move with suddenly double the speed at 00:52:536 (1,2) - imo increasing the spacing here would play better | Well that's true. I increased the spacing.
2. 00:54:936 (3,4,1) - I learned the hard from the jurors of the German Mapping Contest that such a big jump doesn't fit well in cases like these bc it gives (4) way too much emphasis, (4) is not an important note here, only (1) would be important.. ask Desperate if you have doubts :^) even more extreme at 01:38:822 (3,4,1) lol
3. 00:56:307 (5) - I already hear the sound from 00:56:479 (6) here too, maybe map this as a 1/4-slider too? same at 01:40:193 (4) | Added the 2 1/4 sliders. Also changed 01:40:193 (4,5,1) a little bit.
4. 00:57:164 (4,5) - The more prominent sound, the one that also has a few 1/8s, is holding at (4), so I'd recommend making this a 1/4-slider too, the stream seems a bit dull / ignoring the music a bit. Apart from that, did you think about mapping th e 1/8s with kicksliders? Could fit pretty well imo, it's an Extra after all same at | I had 1/8 sliders before remapping this but I don't really like it and imo it doesn't really fit. I'm not really sure about 00:57:164 (4). The bass sound emphasize the circle, yes, but I wanted to emphasize the claps only.
5. 00:58:022 (1,2,3) - After having so many jumps and streams, this linear flow with low spacing seems pretty boring, and it ignores the sound at 00:58:364 which is mapped on a slidertail - I'd suggest making something like this | I changed that part into something similar.
6. 00:59:393 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - wow these sounds are really bad for a rhythm game because their 'peak' is really late.. I don't really know what to do here though, have you got testplays on this and seen if players drop acc here? Bc I would imagine so, so maybe mapping this with sliders would be a bit better.. really stupid sounds lol | I asked a lot people for playing this. Actually no one dropped their accuracy here, at least not for the sounds. They were more likely to break there because of the different spacing, not the hitsounds.
7. 01:00:764 (1,2) - again due to slider leniency there's not really much emphasis on the (2) since you're not changing direction much neither between these sliders nor at the head of the second one and the spacing isn't high either, I'd change that : \ | Moved 01:01:107 (2,3) a bit.
8. 01:05:307 - leaving this empty is weird because that beat is as audible here as on all the other circles, so I'd at least make 01:05:222 (4) a kick-slider | You're right, there is a audible sound but imo it plays really weird after changing that. I'll ask some people about the chagned part before updating it. I guess I'll have to change it anyways but first I leave it like that.
9. 01:08:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is kinda mapped the wrong way around, there's no important beats on (2,3) but heads and tails of (5,6) are four distinct beats which, so it would fit waay better to map the two sliders first and then the four circles. same at 01:20:307 (2,3,4,5) | Imo that's not that necessary but I changed both parts.
10. 01:17:907 (3) - make this two circles for the same reason as above
11. 01:36:422 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I can't really put it into words nicely but I feel 01:36:936 (2,1,2) play rather awkward, maybe because it goes from kinda left-rigth-left-right to kinda up-down-up-down and the transition isn't really nice or something like that, dunno, have you got any feedback on that? I don't understand why this is so awkward. 00:52:536 (1) is almost the same. And the testplayers never complained about that part.
12. 01:43:107 (4,1,2) - the absolute spacing here is almost exactly the same (x1,91 vs x1,97 when moving the last note back by one tick) although the timer interval is doubled, probably really hard to read, I'd lower all the 1/4-jumps of this pattern, they are higher spaced than a lot of normal 1/2-jumps lol | Decreased the spacing.
13. 01:45:679 (4) - Having a strong beat on a slidertail unfavourable, but if it's unavoidable then I'd at least not put the next note almost directly in the extended sliderpath, having to change direction between slidertail and the next note would at least give it a bit of emphasis opposed to none like this. I think this occurred before, dunno how the next note was placed there, better look at that too | I changed the spacing and skip the rest, because I think in that case it's okay to have a HS on slidertail.
    
14. 01:52:536 (7,8,1) - swap the spacing here, (7,8) shouldn't be higher spaced than (8,1) since there's nothing on (8) but (1) obviously the downbeat Chaned spacing.
15. 02:01:964 (4,5,1) - (4,5) is already spaced the most here, adding the 180°-turn is kinda overkill imo, and then the pretty sharp turn to (1) and the 180°-turn on (1)'s head is really awkward to play too imo, it's just too much ^^ I generally like these really sharp turns, like 02:07:622 (4,1) and 02:09:164 (4,1) - but I heard some people say that it's just a matter of taste so dunno, imo it breaks the flow too much | Many things are matter of taste. Same with "weird" mapped parts. There are ranked maps using much worse visible or playable pattern. c: I skip this.

[Insane]

1. Just saying this as first thing here too, things like 00:26:993 (2,3) and 01:08:650 (7,8,1) play rather uncomfortable imo and should only be used to emphasize reeaally special beats or whatever, but you use it rather random and inconsistently : \ | I guess that's also matter of taste. I never knew this is such a big issue. Also I see many ranked maps using "random" pattern and they still got ranked.
2. 00:23:393 (5) - I don't like how the 'clap' here is being 100% ignored by being mapped the same as all the surrounding circles, in the Extra you mapped it as a slider which differentiated it a bit, why not here too? If not, at least change the spacing so (5) gets more emphasis Oh yea I guess I completely ignored that... Maybe because it's the beginning idk... Chaged that part.
3. 00:24:079 (2,3,4) - spacing seems very unreasonable here, (3) isn't important at all while (4) got that sound on its head and also a strong back-beat on its tail, so I'd suggest mapping this differently to do the music justice here | Also changed that part.
4. 00:27:164 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - I guess you don't have auto-stacking viewed in editor, ingame the spacing between (3,4) is rather low bc the stacking moves the notes on the top closer to the slider, either move it by a lot of pixels or just space it out with x0,2 or whatever | Fixed wrong spacing caused by stack.
5. 00:33:336 (1) - The sound on the tail doesn't get emphasized at all suddenly, feels very off and it's just a continuous circular motion to (2) which makes it really weird to play | To be honest, I don't understand the issue or what you even mean lol
6. 00:34:022 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Why is this mapped completely different to the part until here? It's very nice but extremely inconsistent as nothing changes but you go from permanent movement to a lot of stacking and linear, low-spaced motion D: | Because that part is more calm than before. I love parts like 00:34:707 (1,2,3) because they mostly happens before the strong part is coming. In that case it does. I really LOVE it when the map going slower and slower and then the real song is starting.
7. 00:54:079 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this is something different and shouldn't be placed on the same spot as half of 00:52:536 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) and I'd also put a NC there, it just doesn't belong to the previous pattern anymore . same at 01:37:964 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - | Well I'll ask some people about that before chaning it.
8. 00:57:164 (4,5) - same as in Extra, suggesting to make this a slider. 01:41:050 (4,5) too ^^
9. 00:58:022 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is kinda the same motion twice, feels weird as there's very different stuff happening | I like it and I don't think that this is such a big deal.
   
10. 01:01:793 (4,1) - same as the antepenultimate (lol is there not a better word for this in english, sollte 'drittletzter heißen ^^) point of the Extra, strong beat on slidertail + no special movement feels boring / doesn't give the right emphasis | Just spaced it a bit more. Seems fine imo.
11. 01:02:822 (3,4,5) - there's almost no movement at all here, why not space them in a certain direction? 01:02:307 (1,2) is not that much of an issue as it's just two sliders, but it's kinda weird too imo. Happens a few other times later on | Spaced the sliders at both parts.
12. 01:05:222 (4) - same as in Extra, suggesting kick-slider here
13. 01:19:964 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I was about to add to the point in the Extra that you did this really well in the Insane for the first two time this pattern occurs in the music, but here at the third time you suddenly mapped it the other way around again ^^ better make it slider-slider-4circles again | Changed that part.
14. 01:25:793 (2,3) - few emphasis on (3) again bc of almost no change of direction. same at 01:58:022 (7,1) - | I don't think that's that necessary to change.
15. 02:10:707 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - mapping it as a 3/4-rhythm first and then switching to the 'normal' 4/4-rhythm startin on a red tick is very weird rhythmic-wise and doesn't make much sense anyways since nothing changes, stay consistent with one of them, it plays very differently / conveys something different. Or at least emphasize 02:11:393 (3) in some way, like with a change of direction and the NC here or smth | Replaced the circles in 2 more reversed sliders.

too many diffs for me, gotta do other stuff too, hope I could help with these two diffs though, g ood luck!