Wasted Penguinz - Wistfulness

posted
Total Posts
4
Topic Starter
CrazyrabbitKGE
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2014년 6월 24일 화요일 at 오전 6:09:59

Artist: Wasted Penguinz
Title: Wistfulness
Tags: Hardstyle Wasted Penguinz Euphoric Wistfulness Desert 2014 Happy Scantraxx Electronic EDM Festival Dance
BPM: 150
Filesize: 7589kb
Play Time: 02:58
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (2.98 stars, 344 notes)
  2. Insane (4.51 stars, 740 notes)


Download: Wasted Penguinz - Wistfulness
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
First map ever for the song that I sincerely cherish. Hardstyle FTW!
*Hard difficulty WIP; Need more moddings!
_DG
Checking this out because I am wondering how did it get so many stars without mods. Wait no, don't tell me.

So, what I think about your map is that this kind of circle size is not really that liked in my opinion,the approach rate in my case is a bit too high for this(you could probably reduce the approach rate by 0.2~0.5), and that sometimes the distance snap is kind of weird in feeling. For example:

00:25:695 - to 00:38:495 -

The distance between each beat in a set combo is kind of small, then the jump to the next combo is too big(for me, it's not even a good thing at all). It is also almost to repetitive in the direction it is moving in.

00:40:695 (6) - I don't find this at all fitting to the music. With the current slider velocity, I do not enjoy moving my cursor too much for this "thin and somewhat -long-" slider.

00:44:695 (7,1) - For this one and any other pattern similar to this before and after, the movement is weird, maybe?

00:50:495 (8) - Ugh, just a bit too ugly for this map.

00:51:295 - Mind comfirming if this part has almost a similar form of pattern as 00:38:495 - ?

00:52:495 (3,4) - This movement is awkward to me and not really nice to look at.

00:56:595 (5) - This on a blue tick doesn't sound well. I'd prefer having a slider stream starting from 00:56:295 - and then it ends with 00:56:895 (6) -

00:57:495 (7,8,1) - If the cursor has to make an awfully sharp turn at this speed, is not really as good as you think.

01:03:895 (9,10,1) - Same applies for this one.

01:04:095 (1,2,3) - Boring to have the cursor stop where it is, and this overlap is what I do not like(when slider 3 passes on top of beginning of slider 2).

01:06:195 (2) - Same opinion as 00:56:595 (5) - but maybe you could change it somehow.

01:12:295 (1,2,3,4) - Okay. What the actual shit is this.

From this point I just realized how the SV is multiplied. You are going to give people a hard time to adjust their speed.

01:16:295 (5,1) - The overlap here is just..ughh.

01:21:795 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Not a fan of this, especially under the slider velocity and distance spacing conditions at this very moment.

01:26:495 (1,2,3) - Again with this. Why.

01:48:895 - I won't suggest a need to have an SV multiplier here. If you wish to do so, at least slowly increase the SV in stages, not so immediately as the difference between this current SV and the previous SV is so "amazing" I think I'd throw myself in the trash bin.

01:58:495 - From this point, I am seeing a lot of straight sliders which makes the map so ugly and not interesting to play.

02:10:295 (12,13,14) - Opinion of awkward sharp turn.

02:16:295 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - This distance spacing is way worse.

02:18:895 (3) - Nope. Just a lot of nope. The difference of the speed of the previous slider is so large from this current slider. Not only that, but the slider looks ugly as well.

02:44:495 (4,5,6) - The volume is so low you are going to make people confused to which part of the song you are mapping to. Before I increased the volume at 02:44:895 - I thought you were mapping to the sound in the music. But then I see that you mapped it 1/2 from each other so I got suspicious. After increasing the volume, the beats sound so wrong and the distance spacing is way to far for this.

The music and the beats should sound like 02:51:295 (6,1,2) -

All kinds of beats must be able to be heard properly, unless you intend them to be quiet... but this will only apply if you are mapping to something in the song itself.

02:54:895 (2,3,4) - This is ugly, being an overlap, and how the movement of the cursor would be.

02:59:295 - What is wrong with you. The circular motion of everything makes this part boring. And then 03:05:561 (16) - a stream? Why.

03:37:695 (2,3,4) - Distance spacing.

04:06:895 (2,3,4,1) - Why would I not be surprised of how ugly these sliders look.

04:34:228 (3,4) - Please do not overlap like this. It's kind of hard to tell where ends at where.

My lord, this is the end of mod. Took me a while. phew.

btw are you using the right offset and BPM? I see some notes that doesn't look as if their snapped at the right spot on the timeline.
Topic Starter
CrazyrabbitKGE
Thank you very much for modding!

N1ghtRabb1T wrote:

Checking this out because I am wondering how did it get so many stars without mods. Wait no, don't tell me. lol

So, what I think about your map is that this kind of circle size is not really that liked in my opinion,the approach rate in my case is a bit too high for this(you could probably reduce the approach rate by 0.2~0.5), both reduced by .5 and that sometimes the distance snap is kind of weird in feeling. For example:

00:25:695 - to 00:38:495 -

The distance between each beat in a set combo is kind of small, then the jump to the next combo is too big(for me, it's not even a good thing at all). It is also almost to repetitive in the direction it is moving in. good point; revolutionized!

00:40:695 (6) - I don't find this at all fitting to the music. With the current slider velocity, I do not enjoy moving my cursor too much for this "thin and somewhat -long-" slider. changed.

00:44:695 (7,1) - For this one and any other pattern similar to this before and after, the movement is weird, maybe?^

00:50:495 (8) - Ugh, just a bit too ugly for this map.fixed.

00:51:295 - Mind comfirming if this part has almost a similar form of pattern as 00:38:495 - ?]Uh... yup. maybe I should change it someday.

00:52:495 (3,4) - This movement is awkward to me and not really nice to look at.fixed.

00:56:595 (5) - This on a blue tick doesn't sound well. I'd prefer having a slider stream starting from 00:56:295 - and then it ends with 00:56:895 (6) - k, fixed!

00:57:495 (7,8,1) - If the cursor has to make an awfully sharp turn at this speed, is not really as good as you think.got it. fixed

01:03:895 (9,10,1) - Same applies for this one.^

01:04:095 (1,2,3) - Boring to have the cursor stop where it is, and this overlap is what I do not like(when slider 3 passes on top of beginning of slider 2).fixed

01:06:195 (2) - Same opinion as 00:56:595 (5) - but maybe you could change it somehow.yup.

01:12:295 (1,2,3,4) - Okay. What the actual shit is this.geez ok I got it calm down

From this point I just realized how the SV is multiplied. You are going to give people a hard time to adjust their speed.was that a really horrible timing to change SV considering the song?

01:16:295 (5,1) - The overlap here is just..ughh.good point. fixed and it certainly looks better.

01:21:795 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Not a fan of this, especially under the slider velocity and distance spacing conditions at this very moment.ne neither... it took some time to come up with something but fixed it anyway.

01:26:495 (1,2,3) - Again with this. Why.back to basicsfixed as well!

01:48:895 - I won't suggest a need to have an SV multiplier here. If you wish to do so, at least slowly increase the SV in stages, not so immediately as the difference between this current SV and the previous SV is so "amazing" I think I'd throw myself in the trash bin.yikes, I knew it. fixed!

01:58:495 - From this point, I am seeing a lot of straight sliders which makes the map so ugly and not interesting to play.fixed...? for now. I'll have to improve it further later.

02:10:295 (12,13,14) - Opinion of awkward sharp turn.fixed!

02:16:295 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - This distance spacing is way worse.yup, you're right. didn't like the stream anyway so i just used something else.

02:18:895 (3) - Nope. Just a lot of nope. The difference of the speed of the previous slider is so large from this current slider. Not only that, but the slider looks ugly as well.fixed. that one took some time.

02:44:495 (4,5,6) - The volume is so low you are going to make people confused to which part of the song you are mapping to. made it increase the volume gradually. I'll have to adjust them again later.Before I increased the volume at 02:44:895 - I thought you were mapping to the sound in the music. But then I see that you mapped it 1/2 from each other so I got suspicious. After increasing the volume, the beats sound so wrong that the heck was I thinking? fixed!and the distance spacing is way to far for this.

The music and the beats should sound like 02:51:295 (6,1,2) -

All kinds of beats must be able to be heard properly, unless you intend them to be quiet... but this will only apply if you are mapping to something in the song itself.

02:54:895 (2,3,4) - This is ugly, being an overlap, and how the movement of the cursor would be. fixed!

02:59:295 - What is wrong with you. The circular motion of everything makes this part boring. And then 03:05:561 (16) - a stream? Why. you're right; changed the entire part and is plays way better.

03:37:695 (2,3,4) - Distance spacing. fixed!

04:06:895 (2,3,4,1) - Why would I not be surprised of how ugly these sliders look.fixed!

04:34:228 (3,4) - Please do not overlap like this. It's kind of hard to tell where ends at where.K, fixed!

My lord, this is the end of mod. Took me a while. phew. Yup, thank you very much!

btw are you using the right offset and BPM? I see some notes that doesn't look as if their snapped at the right spot on the timeline. Well I changed the audio file so I had to adjust the offset several times . It's gonna take a while to find the unsnapped notes though... I'll try my best.
Famous
M4M request from my Queue

It's hardstyle. Not my favorite genre but let's do this:

[Hard]

HP = 5
OD = 5 (not sure about it)

00:26:695 (5) - and 00:28:295 (5) - these two slider looks a little bit ugly. Make the curve smoother.


00:31:895 (6) - Add NC and 00:32:095 (1) - remove NC.

00:32:895 (4) - Move that circle up to y:56 or somewhere like this. Looks better.

00:33:495 (7) - Add NC and 00:33:695 (1) - remove NC.

00:34:495 (5) - Move that circle to x:120, same reason like above. Looks better.

00:35:095 (7) - Add NC 00:35:295 (1) - remove NC.

00:36:695 (7) - You could place that circle better.

00:39:695 (3) - Move that slider to x:156 ; y:332. Then 00:40:295 (1) - remove NC and move that circle to x:104 ; y:124.

00:42:895 (3,1) - Same as above, just use for the slider x:356 ; y:52 and for the circle x:408 ; y260.

00:46:095 (3) - Move that slider to x:364 ; y:288 and make it more smooth.


00:49:295 (3) - You used copy and past a lot, right? Same as above.

00:53:695 (3) - Move that slider more in the middle of 00:53:295 (2,4) -

00:56:895 (3) - ^

01:04:695 (3) - Move it to y:148

01:51:895 (5,1) - This don't look good. Try not to stack this circle with the slider.

02:18:895 (3,1) - Slider velocity multiplier difference is too big. I guess many people break their combo there.

02:44:495 (4) - You should make this slider fitting to 02:44:095 (3) - somehow like the picutre.


02:44:895 (5,1) - Again slider velocity muliplier diffence too big. 02:45:695 (1) - use there x1,25, 02:46:095 (2) - there x1,5 and 02:46:761 (1) - there you can use x1,75, but I think you shouldn't make the sliders that fast.

02:49:695 (1,2,3) - Spacing too different.

02:51:828 (2) - Stack it with 02:51:295 (1) - that's less confusing.

02:53:161 (1,3) - I'm not sure about it...

02:57:695 (1,2,3) - ^
[Insane]

00:29:095 (2) - Move that circle to x:328 ; y:296

01:03:895 (9) - Add NC and 01:04:095 (1) - remove NC.

01:13:495 (9) - Add NC and 01:13:695 (1) - remove NC.

01:54:095 (7) - You should add NC here.

01:55:095 (9) - Add NC and 01:55:295 (1) - remove NC.

01:57:095 (8) - Add NC.

01:59:895 (4) - ^

01:59:895 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This part is very confusing and hard to read.

02:03:495 (8) - Add NC.

02:06:695 (9) - ^

02:09:495 (6) - ^

02:10:895 (10) - ^

02:11:295 (1) - Remove NC.

02:12:695 (9) - Add NC.

02:16:295 (8) - ^

03:00:761 (8) - ^

03:04:495 (10) - ^

03:07:561 (10) - ^

03:10:895 (10) - ^

You used copy and paste too often, right? I'm honest: I don't like the Insane diff at all. The desing is too weird. There are a lot of things to change in both difficulties, but that's way too much for a mod. The rhythm is "perfect" though, there's nothing to change about it. The map following the beat. You should search some people that help you with your map.

That's it, hope I could help you.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply