ClariS - STEP [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
34
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2014年9月11日 at 21:22:03

Artist: ClariS
Title: STEP
Source: ニセコイ
Tags: opening nisekoi shaft ichijo raku kirisaki chitoge onodera kosaki tachibana marika tsugumi seishirou mayamoto ruri livetune false fake love kz Nardoxyribonucleic
BPM: 146
Filesize: 6709kb
Play Time: 04:10
Difficulties Available:
  1. Nardo's Taiko Kantan (1.96 stars, 404 notes)
  2. Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii (2.76 stars, 829 notes)
  3. Taiko Futsuu (2.16 stars, 552 notes)
  4. Taiko Oni (3.59 stars, 1119 notes)


Download: ClariS - STEP
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
My 5th Beatmap
Opening 2 from Nisekoi
Kantan:100% by Nardoxyribonucleic
Futsuu:100%
Muzukashii:100% by Nardoxyribonucleic
Oni:100%
Status: Ready for mod
Nardoxyribonucleic
Hi, the Kantan and Muzukashii difficulties have been finished.

http://puu.sh/9xqLe (please unify the diff names~)
KittyAdventure
Delete Taiko in diffname~
mliencheng
At last a full version song :)

00:38:998 k
01:06:738 k
01:32:012 k
01:35:300 d
02:12:697 k
02:25:848 k
02:59:135 k
03:30:779 k
03:38:177 k
00:21:327 k
00:22:971 k
00:35:300 k
00:56:259 add k
00:59:546 add k
01:09:409 add k
01:12:697 add k
01:15:163 add d
01:16:601 k
01:16:807 add k
01:50:505 k
01:52:149 k
02:20:300(367,368,369) ctrl G
02:26:670 add k
00:21:738 k
01:03:348 k
01:50:505 k
03:38:177 k
00:16:293 remove note
00:19:581 remove note
00:22:868 remove note
00:25:642 add k
00:30:574 add k
00:31:396 add d
00:36:738 add k
00:38:793 k
00:46:190 k
01:30:266 remove note
01:33:553 remove note
01:42:081 add k
01:44:546 add k
01:45:368 add k
02:29:957 k
02:34:683 k
03:07:766 d
03:08:588 k
03:24:204 k
03:27:286 k
03:47:012 remove note
Nardoxyribonucleic

mliencheng wrote:

At last a full version song :)

00:38:998 k The music is not as strong as 00:38:588 (62,64) - , so d could fit.
01:06:738 k no change as it has lower pitch than 01:05:916 (109) -
01:32:012 k The music is quite quiet, so d would be better.
01:35:300 d nope, it has a higher pitch than 01:34:889 (158) -
02:12:697 k keeping it as d could emphasize the high-pitched 02:12:286 (223) -
02:25:848 k ^
02:59:135 k It will become a bit boring as 02:58:725 (299,301,302,303) - are also k
03:30:779 k D could fit the vocal and the strong cymbal imo.
03:38:177 k fixed
00:21:738 k no change. The piano pitch keeps increasing in 00:21:738 (67,68,69,70) - , so it'd be better to keep 67 as d.
01:03:348 k nope, it does not fit quite well imo.
01:50:505 k similar reason to 02:59:135 in Kantan. 01:50:094 (380,381,383) - are mapped as k.
03:38:177 k fixed
Thanks for the mod~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/9AxbH
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

mliencheng wrote:

At last a full version song :)

00:21:327 k d fit better here
00:22:971 k OK
00:35:300 k OK
00:56:259 add k currently no as I prefer this pattern, may change depends on further modding
00:59:546 add k ^
01:09:409 add k ^
01:12:697 add k ^
01:15:163 add d ^
01:16:601 k OK
01:16:807 add k same as above
01:50:505 k I hear a drum here
01:52:149 k d is more fit due to the heavy beat
02:20:300(367,368,369) ctrl G current pattern fit better imo
02:26:670 add k same as above
00:16:293 remove note currently no as I prefer this pattern, may change depends on further modding
00:19:581 remove note ^
00:22:868 remove note ^
00:25:642 add k ^
00:30:574 add k ^
00:31:396 add d ^
00:36:738 add k ^
00:38:793 k d fit better imo
00:46:190 k d fit better as the music is going down in feeling
01:30:266 remove note same as above
01:33:553 remove note ^
01:42:081 add k ^
01:44:546 add k ^
01:45:368 add k ^
02:29:957 k I hear a drum here
02:34:683 k as music goes quiet, d seems fitting better
03:07:766 d OK
03:08:588 k OK
03:24:204 k I hear a drum here
03:27:286 k OK
03:47:012 remove note nope, it is used for transition
Thanks for your mod :)
Evening
Mod from queuhue

[Taiko Oni]

00:01:190 (4) - Move forward by 1/2 | I think this fits the music more due to it landing on the guitar
00:02:834 (10) - ^
00:04:683 (16) - ^
00:09:615 (39,41) - Swap | To fit to the violin on 00:10:026 (42) - also
00:29:341 (123) - d > k | I think 00:28:724 (119,121,123,124) - this kat rhythm sound better
00:30:984 (132,133) - Swap | End the kat rhythm on a white line here, it sounds nicer
00:33:142 (144) - d > k | There is too less kats here, I think you should add 1 kat here
00:50:300 (218,221) - kk > KK | Add some finishes here to emphasize the vocals ?
00:57:081 (252) - d > k | k for vocals here?
01:16:396 (359,360,361) - Invert colours | Maybe have a kat on the strong vocal here?
01:21:327 (386,388) - dd > kk | Pitch map? 01:21:944 (388,389) - these are of the same pitch
01:24:204 (399,404) - Add finishes to these?
01:43:519 (481) - d > k | For vocals? Since you have a kat on the vocal here
02:00:368 (563) - d > k | Since the vocals on 01:59:957 (561) - 02:01:190 (565) - are very similar in pitch, I think a k here is suitable
02:03:656 (573,577,580) - Add finishes to all of them?
02:45:574 (774,775,776) - Invert colours | Pitch mapping here
02:50:814 - AND 02:51:122 - Add dons | Follows the bass of the music
02:57:389 - ^
03:07:560 (33,34) - Swap | I think having the kat on 34 fits the music better
03:20:916 (88,92) - Change both to K ?
03:59:752 (4) - k > d | I think having a d here emphasizes 03:59:957 (5) - better

[Nardo's Taiko Muzu]

00:00:368 (1,2,3,6,7,8) - Not sure if this is intended but, the rhythms of these notes are not the same, even though it's following the same guitar
00:48:040 (156) - d > k | k here for vocals?
00:57:286 - Add a don here for vocals?
01:50:916 (383,384) - Swap | For vocals here
02:11:259 - Add a don for vocals
02:57:903 (601) - k > d | There is a 4/1 kat rhythm here, having a kat here sounds weird

[Taiko Futsuu]
00:34:889 (88) - k > d | I don't think 3 kats in succession is needed here
00:40:437 (103,104) - Move 1/2 forward, it fits the vocals better
00:43:930 (108,109) - ^
01:02:834 (156) - ^ AND 01:03:040 - Add a don here
01:15:779 - Add a k here for vocals?
02:03:451 - Add a k here and change 02:03:245 (321) - to a d | I think this fits the vocals better
02:07:766 (334) - d > k | For vocals
02:08:382 (336) - Delete | I don't think a note is needed here
02:40:437 (412,413) - Swap | Pitchmap?
02:46:807 - Add a note here for the sound in the music
02:52:149 (434) - d > k | For the clap in music
03:02:012 (2) - Move forward 1/2, fits the vocals better
03:05:300 (8) - ^
03:10:231 (18) - d > k | For the claps and the vocal

[Nardo's Taiko Kantan]
00:31:190 (49,50) - Swap | A kat on 49 sounds out of place imo, I think putting it on 50 sounds better
00:43:108 (70) - k > d | This is so that the pitch map on 00:43:108 (70,71,72) - sounds nicer
00:59:341 (97) - d > k | Pitch map?
01:03:451 (104) - d > k | This sounds like a repeat from 01:01:190 (100,101,102) - I think a kat will fit better
01:12:492 (121) - d > k | Pitch map?
02:13:313 (225) - d > k | Pitch map vocals?
02:14:340 (226,227) - Swap | ^
02:17:423 (232) - d > k | 02:15:162 (228,229,230) - repeat from this
02:26:464 (249) - d > k | Pitch map vocals?
03:51:944 (36) - d > k | ^

Nothing else, good luck owo/
Nardoxyribonucleic

lZenxl wrote:

Mod from queuhue

[Nardo's Taiko Muzu]

00:00:368 (1,2,3,6,7,8) - Not sure if this is intended but, the rhythms of these notes are not the same, even though it's following the same guitar Yes, this is intended.
00:48:040 (156) - d > k | k here for vocals? Comparing 00:48:040 (156,157,159) - , 156 has the lowest pitch, so d would be fine.
00:57:286 - Add a don here for vocals? The "i" sound is not so obvious, so no change here.
01:50:916 (383,384) - Swap | For vocals here 01:51:121 (384,385) - have the same vocal pitch, so the current pattern is okay to me.
02:11:259 - Add a don for vocals refer to 00:57:286 -
02:57:903 (601) - k > d | There is a 4/1 kat rhythm here, having a kat here sounds weird fixed

[Nardo's Taiko Kantan]
00:31:190 (49,50) - Swap | A kat on 49 sounds out of place imo, I think putting it on 50 sounds better The current pattern is fine imo, as the instrument there is different from the neighbouring notes
00:43:108 (70) - k > d | This is so that the pitch map on 00:43:108 (70,71,72) - sounds nicer fixed
00:59:341 (97) - d > k | Pitch map? fixed
01:03:451 (104) - d > k | This sounds like a repeat from 01:01:190 (100,101,102) - I think a kat will fit better d fits the instrument more imo.
01:12:492 (121) - d > k | Pitch map? fixed
02:13:313 (225) - d > k | Pitch map vocals? changed k because of the background instrument
02:14:340 (226,227) - Swap | ^ snare mapping, no change.
02:17:423 (232) - d > k | 02:15:162 (228,229,230) - repeat from this same as 01:03:451 (104) -
02:26:464 (249) - d > k | Pitch map vocals? changed k because of the background instrument
03:51:944 (36) - d > k | ^ ^

Nothing else, good luck owo/
Thanks for your mod~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/9I9hM
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

lZenxl wrote:

Mod from queuhue

[Taiko Oni]

00:01:190 (4) - Move forward by 1/2 | I think this fits the music more due to it landing on the guitar There is a note
00:02:834 (10) - ^ ^
00:04:683 (16) - ^ ^
00:09:615 (39,41) - Swap | To fit to the violin on 00:10:026 (42) - also OK
00:29:341 (123) - d > k | I think 00:28:724 (119,121,123,124) - this kat rhythm sound better OK
00:30:984 (132,133) - Swap | End the kat rhythm on a white line here, it sounds nicer change in another way
00:33:142 (144) - d > k | There is too less kats here, I think you should add 1 kat here the music does not change much, so i think if constant d is ok
00:50:300 (218,221) - kk > KK | Add some finishes here to emphasize the vocals ? OK
00:57:081 (252) - d > k | k for vocals here? nope, follow the drum sound here
01:16:396 (359,360,361) - Invert colours | Maybe have a kat on the strong vocal here? OK
01:21:327 (386,388) - dd > kk | Pitch map? 01:21:944 (388,389) - these are of the same pitch nope, follow the music change
01:24:204 (399,404) - Add finishes to these? OK
01:43:519 (481) - d > k | For vocals? Since you have a kat on the vocal here OK
02:00:368 (563) - d > k | Since the vocals on 01:59:957 (561) - 02:01:190 (565) - are very similar in pitch, I think a k here is suitable follow the drum here
02:03:656 (573,577,580) - Add finishes to all of them? OK
02:45:574 (774,775,776) - Invert colours | Pitch mapping here nope, follow the music
02:50:814 - AND 02:51:122 - Add dons | Follows the bass of the music OK
02:57:389 - ^ OK
03:07:560 (33,34) - Swap | I think having the kat on 34 fits the music better a heavier sound on 34 is better
03:20:916 (88,92) - Change both to K ? change to D
03:59:752 (4) - k > d | I think having a d here emphasizes 03:59:957 (5) - better OK

[Taiko Futsuu]
00:34:889 (88) - k > d | I don't think 3 kats in succession is needed here OK
00:40:437 (103,104) - Move 1/2 forward, it fits the vocals better OK
00:43:930 (108,109) - ^ OK
01:02:834 (156) - ^ AND 01:03:040 - Add a don here No, there is a beat
01:15:779 - Add a k here for vocals? not necessary
02:03:451 - Add a k here and change 02:03:245 (321) - to a d | I think this fits the vocals better change in another way
02:07:766 (334) - d > k | For vocals OK
02:08:382 (336) - Delete | I don't think a note is needed here nope, it is for transition
02:40:437 (412,413) - Swap | Pitchmap? swap does not fit there
02:46:807 - Add a note here for the sound in the music OK
02:52:149 (434) - d > k | For the clap in music OK
03:02:012 (2) - Move forward 1/2, fits the vocals better OK
03:05:300 (8) - ^ OK
03:10:231 (18) - d > k | For the claps and the vocal OK

Nothing else, good luck owo/
Thanks for your mod :)
[I]MMoRTal[S]
From my queue

Move 00:41:875 (133) - to 00:42:081 (133) -
01:14:135 (253) - k
01:55:847 (402) - move to 01:56:053 (402) -
02:14:957 (473) - k
02:28:107 (522) - k
02:59:341 (605) - add d
03:00:574 (609) - add d
03:03:451 (617) - add d
03:03:861 (619) - add d
03:10:437 (639) - add d
03:12:492 (646) - aad d
03:13:725 (650) - add d
03:20:300 (671) - add d
03:19:889 (670) - add d
03:23:588 (685) - add d and change 03:23:793 (686) - k
03:53:279 (73,74) - Ctrl+G
00:02:629 (9,10) - :o
00:07:971 (31) - k
00:08:690 (34) - add k
00:42:081 (187) - add d
00:45:882 (204) - add d
00:52:046 (228) - add d
00:54:615 (244) - K
01:26:772 (413) - add k
02:21:327 (678) - k
02:59:341 (836) - add d
03:00:163 (839) - add d
03:12:492 (54) - add d
03:13:827 (60) - add k

Good Luck ~ :)
Nardoxyribonucleic

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

From my queue

Move 00:41:875 (133) - to 00:42:081 (133) - I can hear the instrument at 00:41:875 -
01:14:135 (253) - k nope, as the vocal has a lower pitch than 01:13:519 (251,252) -
01:55:847 (402) - move to 01:56:053 (402) - same as 00:41:875 (133) -
02:14:957 (473) - k same as 01:14:135 (253) -
02:28:107 (522) - k ^
02:59:341 (605) - add d fixed
03:00:574 (609) - add d fixed
03:03:451 (617) - add d fixed
03:03:861 (619) - add d fixed
03:10:437 (639) - add d fixed
03:12:492 (646) - aad d fixed
03:13:725 (650) - add d no change due to the lack of music support.
03:20:300 (671) - add d fixed
03:19:889 (670) - add d fixed
03:23:588 (685) - add d and change 03:23:793 (686) - k added k at 03:23:588 (685) - only.
03:53:279 (73,74) - Ctrl+G same as 01:14:135 (253) -

Good Luck ~ :)
Thanks for your mod~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/9TAYb.rar
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

From my queue

00:02:629 (9,10) - :oFix
00:07:971 (31) - k OK
00:08:690 (34) - add k not really necessary
00:42:081 (187) - add d added a k
00:45:882 (204) - add d OK
00:52:046 (228) - add d OK
00:54:615 (244) - K D seems better
01:26:772 (413) - add k too heavy at that part if i add it
02:21:327 (678) - k OK
02:59:341 (836) - add d OK
03:00:163 (839) - add d OK
03:12:492 (54) - add d OK
03:13:827 (60) - add k not really necessary

Good Luck ~ :)
Thank for your mod :)
Soldsaga KunG
Taiko mod :)

d = don
D = Big Don
k = kat
K = Big Kat
> = change from

delete difficulty name to
Nardo's Taiko Kantan > Nardo's Kantan
Taiko Futsuu > Futsuu
Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii > Nardo's Muzukashii or Nardo's Muzu
Taiko Oni > Oni
00:20:505 (81) - k
00:25:642 - Add d
00:25:848 (105) - k
00:53:896 (242,243) - k

Goodddddddddd Beatmaps >.<

Good Luck :):)
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

Soldsaga KunG wrote:

Taiko mod :)

d = don
D = Big Don
k = kat
K = Big Kat
> = change from

delete difficulty name to
Nardo's Taiko Kantan > Nardo's Kantan
Taiko Futsuu > Futsuu
Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii > Nardo's Muzukashii or Nardo's Muzu
Taiko Oni > Oni
Indeed, I don't see any rule said that there must not be a word "Taiko" in the diff name, and I prefer keeping it

00:20:505 (81) - k OK
00:25:642 - Add d no due to my own preference
00:25:848 (105) - k OK
00:53:896 (242,243) - k not really make large different

Goodddddddddd Beatmaps >.<

Good Luck :):)
Thanks for your mod :)
mingmichael
hey! sorry for the lateness


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
• don on 03:27:081 - . piano sound becomes a bit low on here

it will be much better to move 03:29:546 - to 03:29:135 - . well yah i know that you wanted to follow the vocals with xx-xxxx notes there. but it gives a bit confusing pattern from 03:26:670 - until 03:30:779 - . your pattern will give xxx-xx-xxxx patterns. why don't you use xxx-xxx-xxx patterns there?it will be much better too IMO

• delete 03:52:560 - . same like 01:13:108 - and 02:27:081 - that you gave a break


====================


[Futsuu]

change HP and OD to be 4. why did you make it same with Kantan? hm
your futsuu seems like a mini muzu IMO. it has a long 1/1 and 1/2 patterns there (for the example like 00:05:300 - until 00:16:807 - ). try to read the guide again about futsuu diff here. at least give some 1/1 breaks there. if you still want to keep yours, tbh the spread diff. for the example again like this (from 03:47:218 - until 03:50:916 -)

kantan


futsuu

well i will try to give some suggestions later on the Notes box to give some breaks there and simplify the patterns a bit
• just delete these 00:01:190 - ; 00:02:834 - ; 00:04:478 - . seriously i don't get those notes's function there o.o

• delete this 00:07:355 - . to give that little break

• change 00:08:998 - to be don and change 00:09:820 - to be kat. it will give a strong pitch sound to follow that increasing pitch sound there

if i were you, i would delete 00:13:930 - ; 00:14:341 - ; 00:14:752 - . seriously they don't follow any sounds there. you can hear it too that the song doesn't give any sounds there, it's empty. okay maybe you want give some creation by yourself, but seriously it means nothing

• delete 00:18:040 - too

• change 00:19:272 - to be kat. it's perfect with a kat for the increasing vocal sound

• delete 00:27:081 - . at least give a break plz there after the finisher comes out

• delete 00:30:368 - ^

• 00:33:656 - ^

• move 00:39:615 - to 00:39:409 - and change 00:39:204 - to be don. i don't get why you put a kat on 00:39:615 - . do you want try to emphasize a finisher on 00:39:820 - with a kat? hmm sounds nice, but it will be better to emphasize a snare sound on 00:39:409 - with a kat only

• bahh a note on 00:53:998 - ? delete it. seriously, the song just gives 1/1 notes for the vocals there

• delete 01:02:218 - . at least give a break there

• delete 01:18:861 -

• 01:24:615 - ^

• 01:27:903 - ^

• 01:41:053 - ^

• 01:44:341 - ^

• 01:47:629 - ^

• 01:50:916 - ^

• 01:57:492 - ^

• 02:00:779 - ^

• 02:08:382 - ^

• move 02:10:437 - to 02:10:642 - and change it to be kat. seriously why is it a 1/2 note there? @@

• move 02:13:725 - to 02:13:930 - and delete 02:14:135 - ^

• don on 02:15:163 - . to emphasize that low vocal

• move 02:23:588 - to 02:23:793 -

• delete 03:09:409 -

• 03:22:766 - ^

delete 03:35:916 - . be consistent please. which sounds that you want to follow? vocal or instrument? if you followed vocal, delete 03:35:916 -

• move 03:49:067 - to 03:49:272 -

• change 03:50:094 - to be kat and 03:50:505 - don and also delete 03:50:300 - if you use the previous mod ^

• move 03:52:355 - to 03:52:560 - and delete 03:52:766 -

• delete 03:54:820 - and 03:56:464 -


====================


[Muzukashii]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
move 00:00:779 - to 00:00:677 - . it needs 1/4 notes there to follow the song actually

• delete 00:10:848 - . this additional note doesn't follow any particular sounds

• delete 01:11:670 -

• delete 01:24:820 - . same like the second mod in your diff :P

• delete 02:12:492 - too

• 03:51:122 - ^


====================


[Oni]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
try this. move 00:01:190 - to 00:01:396 - and delete 00:01:807 - . move 00:02:834 - to 00:03:040 - and delete 00:03:451 - and move 00:04:478 - to 00:04:683 - . they will follow the song better with that kind of patterns

delete 00:16:293 - . seriously the song doesn't give any 1/4 notes there, just a simple 1/1 and 1/2 notes only

delete 00:19:581 - ^

00:22:868 - ^

• move 00:25:848 - to 00:25:642 - . your current pattern is too late to follow the instrument sounds there

from 00:53:382 - until 00:54:615 - . okay it's a bit overmapped here. why? you can hear the song again there. the song just give 1/1 notes for the vocals only there. there isn't any sounds come out except 1/1 vocals there. well yah it's up to you on here

• don 01:53:588 - ?

from 02:07:355 - until 02:08:588 - . same like the previous part too

from 03:34:067 - until 03:45:368 - . okay same like your futsuu diff. please be consistent again, which sound that you want to follow. vocals?or instruments? make it sure again please


====================


okay that's all from meh!
futsuu needs some work again there and try to catch some modders again to ensure your futsuu
goodluck!
Nardoxyribonucleic

mingmichael wrote:

hey! sorry for the lateness


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
• don on 03:27:081 - . piano sound becomes a bit low on here It seems fine, fixed.

it will be much better to move 03:29:546 - to 03:29:135 - . well yah i know that you wanted to follow the vocals with xx-xxxx notes there. but it gives a bit confusing pattern from 03:26:670 - until 03:30:779 - . your pattern will give xxx-xx-xxxx patterns. why don't you use xxx-xxx-xxx patterns there?it will be much better too IMO Umm... I think it will not cause any confusion because the previous 03:23:382 (340,341,342,343,344) - is also xxx-xx pattern. The last -xxxx serves as the end of the vocal session.

• delete 03:52:560 - . same like 01:13:108 - and 02:27:081 - that you gave a break fixed


====================


[Muzukashii]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
move 00:00:779 - to 00:00:677 - . it needs 1/4 notes there to follow the song actually OK

• delete 00:10:848 - . this additional note doesn't follow any particular sounds I prefer keeping it as the flow would be better.

• delete 01:11:670 - no change. I can hear the instrument there.

• delete 01:24:820 - . same like the second mod in your diff :Prefer to above

• delete 02:12:492 - too fixed

• 03:51:122 - ^ I think making the last kiai a bit denser is fine, so no change here ;)


====================


okay that's all from meh!
futsuu needs some work again there and try to catch some modders again to ensure your futsuu
goodluck!
Thanks for your mod michael~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/aaUme.rar
JUDYDANNY
Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda's Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.

box=1st coming/box
Later I will mod other diffs.~


[Kantan]
  1. 00:08:998 (13) – delete? plays more easy? And can linked…00:12:697 (18,19,20) - ?
  2. and, 00:12:697 (18) - k?
  3. 00:14:752 (22) - , 00:18:040 (26) - delete? vocal begins ,yes. but not too strong vocal, so not important these notes on this density.
  4. 00:31:190 (46) – move…? 00:32:834 (49) -. I think this Splash sounds is not important on this density.
  5. 00:52:149 (82) - k? backpitch is down… but, rhythm is little confusing..? Simple is better?
  6. 00:54:204 (84) – delete , unnecessary on this density.
  7. 01:03:451 (100,104) – swap …?
  8. 01:22:971 (135) -, 01:26:669 (141) – same as 1st phrase.
  9. 01:28:725 (145,150) – delete? little noisy… I guess.
  10. 01:45:162 (171) – move to 01:46:807 (174) - ?
  11. 01:57:080 (192) – don ? lol same as 1st prhase.
  12. 02:06:122 (207) – k? same as 1st phrase.
  13. 02:08:176 (209) – delete? same as 1st phrase.
  14. 02:17:423 (225,229) – swap? same as 1st phrase.
  15. 02:45:574 (272) – uum, k?
  16. 03:21:738 (331) – move to 1/2 left? for vocal.
  17. 03:25:026 (336) -^
  18. 03:42:286 (17) – move 1/2 left and change k , sounds the best.
  19. and, 03:43:519 (19) – k?
  20. 03:45:779 (24) - unnecessary on this density… ?
  21. and,, 03:46:396 (24) – change k? avoid to 03:44:546 (21) - ~~~ dkd dkd dkd.. lol
  22. 03:52:971 (37) - k?
  23. 04:02:012 (53) - d?
  24. 04:04:067 (57) – delete…?
  25. and,, 04:05:711 (59,60) –(59>delete),(60 >k)?
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:12:081 (40) - change to finisher don? also fit as music imo.
  2. 00:18:861 (58) – d ? same as 00:14:957 (48,49,50,51) – kkkd~~
  3. 01:03:040 (211) – delete?
  4. 01:15:368 (256) – add note
  5. and, 01:15:574 (257) - k? for vocal stress.
  6. and, 01:16:807 (262) – delete , or move? to 01:17:012 -.
  7. 01:26:053 (294) - same as 1st phrase.
  8. 01:44:649 (358,359) – …delete the triplet? Not strong sounds, and I’m not sure why suddenly triplet using. On this part , I think no using 1/4 triplet is clean . :D
  9. 02:02:629 (423) – delete ? can be linked 02:00:368 (416,417,418) – 1/1 notes for vocal :3
  10. 02:28:724 (520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528) – same as 1st phrase.
  11. 03:06:738 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dkkdkd, or dkddkd … or,,, kkdkdd.? Anyhow , 03:06:738 (1,5) - same color is weird for me. uum, why… lol
  12. 03:21:635 (673) - , 03:23:279 (679) – delete ? same as 01:44:649 (358,359) – .
  13. 03:24:204 (682) - finisher? lol
  14. 03:36:327 (11,12) – swap ? same as pitch follow , like… 03:36:327 (11,12) -.
  15. 03:38:588 (19,20,21,22) – ^
  16. 03:41:670 (29) – delete, this . more fit as music.
  17. 03:54:204 (75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) – same as 1st phrase.
  18. 04:03:142 (106) – move 1/4 left. unnecessary this rhythm, imo.
Generally , Nice diffs~ :D
however on the few points that put on 1/4(or 1/2, 1/1) triplet , I’m scared to sounds weird a bit. That’s the reason that there’re removing suggestions.
I think Kantan & Muzukashii can make up more cleaned. :3
[Futsuu]
  1. 00:00:368 (1,2,3,4) - (k,dk,d) ? or(k,dk,k) ? or(k,kk,d)? anyhow, k starts better if you follow to percussion.
  2. 00:06:122 (16) – move to 1/2 left for instrument hits. And I suggest to change k.
  3. 00:07:355 (20) – delete. unnecessary this.
  4. 00:12:697 (35) – k sounds better, for violin. :3
  5. 00:13:519 - ~~~~Same as Oni . on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes.
    00:13:930 (38) –
    00:14:752 (39) –
    00:18:040 (45) –
    00:22:149 (53) –
    00:22:971 (54) - ?
  6. 00:27:081 - , 00:30:368 - , 00:33:656 - …. Delete? anyhow, 00:33:656 – delete is better for vocal .
  7. 00:34:067 (81) – k , same as previous 00:32:423 (76) –
  8. 00:36:944 (88,89,90) – kkd ? previous d k d k pattern…
  9. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound.
  10. 00:49:683 (110) – finisher?
  11. 00:51:533 (119,120,121) – change to k. snare sounds.
  12. and , 00:52:560 (122) – move to 1/2 left ..?
  13. 00:53:382 (124,125,126,127) – make the same as Nardo’s Muzu …or nothing place.? I think players need to little break time.
  14. 00:56:670 (129) - k?
  15. 01:02:218 (145) – delete, and 01:02:423 (145) - k , 01:02:629 (146) – add k?
  16. 01:10:231 (166) – don ?
  17. 01:15:985 (183) - k?
  18. 01:20:300 (195) – k? for vocal and, 01:20:505 – ‘s snare follow.
  19. 01:23:998 (204) – add k?
  20. 01:27:903 (216) – delete?1
  21. 01:28:725 (217) – delete.
  22. 01:32:012 (224) – move to 01:31:190 (223) -. OOO, OOO, (1/1) rhythm pattern…
  23. 01:34:889 (231,232,233) – (d,d,k) >>(d,ddk) ?
  24. and, 01:36:533 (236,237,238,239) – (k,dkd)>(k,k,d)?
  25. 01:41:053 (249,251) – (delete,k). make same as 1st phrase.
  26. 01:44:341 (257,259) - ^, 01:47:629 (266) -^
  27. 02:07:355 (323,324,325,326) – same as 1st pattern.
  28. 01:53:793 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) –
    Uum, try to compare with 1st phrase.
    00:39:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) –
    I think you should decide to decreasing the notes..
  29. 02:09:820 (333,334,335,336) – (kk,d,k) >(kk,dk)?
  30. 02:11:670 (339) – add note here. Backsound hits.
  31. 02:14:135 (346) – move to 1/2 left.
  32. and, 02:13:930 (346) - k?
  33. 02:15:163 (349) – don ? sounds better .
  34. 02:18:451 (357) - k?
  35. 02:21:327 (365) – k.
  36. 02:19:889 (361,364) – swap?
  37. 02:26:875 (380) – add don, can link previous dk kd pattern.
  38. 02:27:903 (383) – k
  39. 02:31:190 (391) - k?
  40. 02:32:834 (395) – move 1/2 left. and change k?
  41. 02:34:272 (399) – k
  42. 02:40:437 (407) – delete, unnecessary for Futsuu.
  43. 02:45:368 (416) -^
  44. 03:05:094 (8) – k
  45. 03:20:916 (42,44,49,51) – finisher?
  46. 03:22:766 (45) delete.
  47. 03:26:053 (51) delete.
  48. 03:28:725 (57) - sounds bass drums. but 57 don sounds … weird for vocal. So 03:28:930 (58) - don ? instead of 57 change don.
  49. 03:32:834 (1) –k
  50. 03:42:081 (22) – add d?
  51. 03:46:807 (32) – k for splash sound..
  52. 03:48:451 (36,37,38,39) – (kd,d,dk)>(kd,dk,k) ?
  53. 03:50:094 (41,42,43) – kkd .. ?
  54. 03:52:766 (49) – move to 1/2 left and, k?
  55. 04:03:245 (10) - k?
  56. 04:00:779 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - ~~~ uum,I suggest this pattern.

  57. 04:06:122 (18) – k sounds better imo.

  58. I’m scared that players feel to play hard… Taiko Futsuu needs more modders.
    Example, many OO,O,OO, rhythms are.
    Players prefer to OO,OO,O (1 back beat) than OO,O,OO (2 back beats) on kiai.I guess. cuz rhythm is clean.
    and, you should try to complile to the density on each part. I think Futsuu should make the manyparts that no put over 2/1 , like 00:27:081 (62) - delete suggestion.
[Oni]
  1. 00:01:190 (4) - , 00:02:834 (10) - , 00:04:478 (16) - , delete ? unnecessary notes,imo.
  2. and, 00:01:807 (5) - ,move to 00:01:396 (4) - ?
  3. 00:03:040 (9) - add k?
  4. 00:04:683 (15) - ^
  5. 00:06:122 (21) – change k?
  6. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53,54,55) – I suggest 2 patterns. I hope you to choose the either.
    A. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53) – (kkd,* ,d) >>( kkkkd)? cool highpitch sounds following. And smoothly , I guess.
    B. 00:13:108 (54) – finisher , and 00:13:314 (55) – delete? this suggestions are linked previous finisher pattern (00:11:670 (48) -).
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  7. 00:13:519 (56) - ~~~~on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes.
    00:13:930 (58) - ,
    00:14:752 (59) -?
    00:17:218 (67) –
    00:18:040 (68) - ?
    00:20:505 (76) -
    00:22:355 (82) -
  8. 00:22:971 (84) - change to k?
  9. 00:26:361 (100,101) – delete? sounds better imo, cuz previous pattern( 00:25:745 (96,97,98,99) - ) (kk,d,k) are drums follow ?

  10. 00:41:259 (174) – d sounds better for back sound stress.
  11. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound.
  12. 00:52:766 (226) – finisher 2nd part is put, lol
  13. 00:53:177 (227) – delete?
  14. 00:55:231 (239) – add k? splash sounds here.
  15. and, 01:00:163 (267) – add don?
  16. 01:08:382 (312) - ^
  17. 01:10:848 (327,328) – how about swap? 01:10:231 (323) -~~ 1/2 kdkkd~~~
  18. 01:16:190 (356,357) – how about delete? for vocal that is stopped.
  19. and, 01:16:396 (356,357,358) – change to (k,d,k)?
  20. 01:25:231 -, 01:25:334 – add k?
  21. 01:26:464 (403,404,405,406,407,408,409) – same as 1st phrase.
  22. 01:29:546 (419,420) – don ? no piano sounds. And vocal pitch isn’t changed.

  23. 01:40:334 (460,461) – delete? same as 1st phrase.
  24. 01:53:588 (533) – how about change d? instead of change 01:53:382 (532) – don.
  25. 01:54:820 (536,537,538,539,540) - 539 needs don sound I guess. So I suggest (kkk,d,k)
  26. and, 01:55:848 (541) - k?
  27. and…01:56:053 (543) – how about add d?
  28. 02:00:163 (557) – k?
  29. 02:03:861 (573,574) – (573>>d),(574>delete). same as 1st phrase. Anyhow, triplet is little hard, imo.
  30. 02:07:149 (588) - delete?
  31. 02:13:930 (623) – k sounds better, almost sounds higher.
  32. 02:16:601 (639,640) - dk? for back sound pitch, emphasize to 02:18:451 (651) – don sounds.
  33. uum, if you can accept, 02:09:204 (596) -, 02:22:355 (672) - , change k?
  34. 02:20:403 (665) – how about change thek? more smoothly , I guess.
  35. and, 02:20:711 (667,668) – swap?
  36. 02:33:040 (734,735,736) – (k,d,d) >(d,k,k)? back sound stopped. So fit as music imo.
  37. 02:39:409 (753) - k? piano is high.
  38. 02:41:875 (760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767) – (kdk,kdkdk)>>(k,kdkdk,k)? backsounds hits, yes. But,,, I suggest other pattern. piano can hear easiler?
  39. 02:43:519 (1,3,4) – (k,d,k)>>(d,k,d) ?

  40. 02:53:177 (800,801,802) – how about removing (800 and,802) or(800,801)? Plays not too hard I guess. Linked 02:50:814 (789) -.
  41. 02:56:053 (813) – add don? drums hit.
  42. 02:59:957 (830) - k? for vocal.
  43. 03:06:533 (29) - k? sounds better imo.
  44. 03:08:998 (39,40,41) – (40>remove) (41> delete?) triplet is… weird a bit..?
  45. 03:09:820 (43) - k? for vocal.
  46. 03:18:861 (82) - k? same as 03:15:574 (69) -.
  47. 03:21:327 (92,93,94,95) – (dd,dK) >(ddk,K) ? or kd,dK?
  48. 03:24:615 (106,107,108,109) - ^ anyhow , 109 needs finisher, .
  49. 03:24:204 (105) – finisher lol.
  50. 03:25:848 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - Either
    A. how about? for vocal.http://puu.sh/ab3qG/e901c27e1b.jpg
    B. 03:26:772 (116) – add k? instead of additional 03:26:567 -.
    └―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  51. 03:30:574 (133) – delete?
  52. 03:32:834 (1,2,3) – uum,,, delete? or ….kkk? anyhow, don sounds don’t need for violin slar…. ._.
  53. 03:34:272 (5) – move to 1/2 right. . ~~~03:43:930 - no put rhythm pattern.(like,, 03:37:560 - , 03:40:848 - noput.)
  54. 03:35:711 (9) – how about move 1/2 left ? for emphasize next kk,kd pattern :3
  55. 03:42:286 (33) – move to 1/2 right?
  56. and, 03:43:108 (36) – delete?
  57. 03:49:683 (67,68,69) – kkd… ?
  58. 03:51:738 (80) – d? or 03:51:635 (79) – d?
  59. 03:55:231 (103) – how about change to k? if yoy like..
  60. 04:01:396 (7,8) – d,k ?
  61. 04:05:094 (26,27,28,29) – if you choose 1st, 2nd pattern kkkkd, I also suggest to change kkkkd.
  62. 03:59:135 (2,3,4,5) – I suggest kkkd or kkdk, reason is near 03:32:834 (1,2,3) - . don sounds feels … noisy..?

  63. lol, very many suggestions :? but not bad! I like this. Oni can make up more quality!! :D

Good Luck~~~ >w<//
Nardoxyribonucleic

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda's Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.

box=1st coming/box
Later I will mod other diffs.~


[Kantan]
  1. 00:08:998 (13) – delete? plays more easy? And can linked…00:12:697 (18,19,20) - ? mapping the snare seems to be fine imo. I don't put note at 00:12:286 - because the previous 00:11:670 (18) - is a big don.
  2. and, 00:12:697 (18) - k? nope, the music has a lower pitch than 00:12:492 -
  3. 00:14:752 (22) - , 00:18:040 (26) - delete? vocal begins ,yes. but not too strong vocal, so not important these notes on this density. fixed
  4. 00:31:190 (46) – move…? 00:32:834 (49) -. I think this Splash sounds is not important on this density. fixed, and changed to don.
  5. 00:52:149 (82) - k? backpitch is down… but, rhythm is little confusing..? Simple is better? keeping this as d could have a better emphasis on the next K.
  6. 00:54:204 (84) – delete , unnecessary on this density. Umm... The cymbal-like sound starting from 00:52:766 - stops at 00:54:204 - , so I think it is fine to put a note there.
  7. 01:03:451 (100,104) – swap …? nope, the vocal at 01:05:505 - has a higher pitch than 01:03:451 -
  8. 01:22:971 (135) -, 01:26:669 (141) – same as 1st phrase. same as above.
  9. 01:28:725 (145,150) – delete? little noisy… I guess. fixed
  10. 01:45:162 (171) – move to 01:46:807 (174) - ? fixed like 00:31:190 (46) -
  11. 01:57:080 (192) – don ? lol same as 1st prhase. fixed
  12. 02:06:122 (207) – k? same as 1st phrase. refer to the explanation at 00:52:149 (82) -
  13. 02:08:176 (209) – delete? same as 1st phrase. ^ , refer to 00:54:204 (84) -
  14. 02:17:423 (225,229) – swap? same as 1st phrase. same as 01:03:451 (100,104) -
  15. 02:45:574 (272) – uum, k? fixed
  16. 03:21:738 (331) – move to 1/2 left? for vocal. The vocal there is too soft compared to the loud instrument sound at 03:21:738 (334) - . No change here.
  17. 03:25:026 (336) -^ ^
  18. 03:42:286 (17) – move 1/2 left and change k , sounds the best. fixed
  19. and, 03:43:519 (19) – k? no change, the music is quiet there.
  20. 03:45:779 (24) - unnecessary on this density… ? This note follows the vocal well, no change.
  21. and,, 03:46:396 (24) – change k? avoid to 03:44:546 (21) - ~~~ dkd dkd dkd.. lol no change as d could follow the music in a better way.
  22. 03:52:971 (37) - k? fixed
  23. 04:02:012 (53) - d? k could fit the vocal pitch better imo.
  24. 04:04:067 (57) – delete…? retained for following the music.
  25. and,, 04:05:711 (59,60) –(59>delete),(60 >k)? remained unchanged, ^
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:12:081 (40) - change to finisher don? also fit as music imo. The instruments are different, so k would be better.
  2. 00:18:861 (58) – d ? same as 00:14:957 (48,49,50,51) – kkkd~~ k fits the vocal well imo.
  3. 01:03:040 (211) – delete? fixed
  4. 01:15:368 (256) – add note no change for the sake of consistency as the previous 01:02:218 -
  5. and, 01:15:574 (257) - k? for vocal stress. d seems to be fine as the vocal there has a lower pitch than 01:15:779 (257) -
  6. and, 01:16:807 (262) – delete , or move? to 01:17:012 -. deleted
  7. 01:26:053 (294) - same as 1st phrase. same as 00:12:081 (40) -
  8. 01:44:649 (358,359) – …delete the triplet? Not strong sounds, and I’m not sure why suddenly triplet using. On this part , I think no using 1/4 triplet is clean . :Dremain unchanged, as I want to make the 2nd phrase a bit harder than the 1st one.
  9. 02:02:629 (423) – delete ? can be linked 02:00:368 (416,417,418) – 1/1 notes for vocal :3 um... retained for consistency.
  10. 02:28:724 (520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  11. 03:06:738 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dkkdkd, or dkddkd … or,,, kkdkdd.? Anyhow , 03:06:738 (1,5) - same color is weird for me. uum, why… lol nope, the current pattern follows both the instrument and the vocal well imo.
  12. 03:21:635 (673) - , 03:23:279 (679) – delete ? same as 01:44:649 (358,359) – . It will be too easy if triplet is not used here...
  13. 03:24:204 (682) - finisher? lol fixed
  14. 03:36:327 (11,12) – swap ? same as pitch follow , like… 03:36:327 (11,12) -. refer to 03:06:738 -
  15. 03:38:588 (19,20,21,22) – ^ The current pattern follows the piano nicely, so no change here.
  16. 03:41:670 (29) – delete, this . more fit as music. nope, I can hear a sound there.
  17. 03:54:204 (75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  18. 04:03:142 (106) – move 1/4 left. unnecessary this rhythm, imo. fixed
Generally , Nice diffs~ :D
however on the few points that put on 1/4(or 1/2, 1/1) triplet , I’m scared to sounds weird a bit. That’s the reason that there’re removing suggestions.
I think Kantan & Muzukashii can make up more cleaned. :3

Good Luck~~~ >w<//
Thanks for your long mod JuDa~ :)

Latest Update: http://puu.sh/acBBt.rar
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

mingmichael wrote:

hey! sorry for the lateness


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================

[Futsuu]

change HP and OD to be 4. why did you make it same with Kantan? hm
your futsuu seems like a mini muzu IMO. it has a long 1/1 and 1/2 patterns there (for the example like 00:05:300 - until 00:16:807 - ). try to read the guide again about futsuu diff here. at least give some 1/1 breaks there. if you still want to keep yours, tbh the spread diff. for the example again like this (from 03:47:218 - until 03:50:916 -)

kantan


futsuu

well i will try to give some suggestions later on the Notes box to give some breaks there and simplify the patterns a bit
• just delete these 00:01:190 - ; 00:02:834 - ; 00:04:478 - . seriously i don't get those notes's function there o.o OK

• delete this 00:07:355 - . to give that little break OK

• change 00:08:998 - to be don and change 00:09:820 - to be kat. it will give a strong pitch sound to follow that increasing pitch sound there OK for 00:08:998 -, but I prefer keeping 00:09:820 - as show the increase in pitch to 00:10:026 -

if i were you, i would delete 00:13:930 - ; 00:14:341 - ; 00:14:752 - . seriously they don't follow any sounds there. you can hear it too that the song doesn't give any sounds there, it's empty. okay maybe you want give some creation by yourself, but seriously it means nothing OK

• delete 00:18:040 - too OK

• change 00:19:272 - to be kat. it's perfect with a kat for the increasing vocal sound OK

• delete 00:27:081 - . at least give a break plz there after the finisher comes out OK

• delete 00:30:368 - ^ OK

• 00:33:656 - ^ OK

• move 00:39:615 - to 00:39:409 - and change 00:39:204 - to be don. i don't get why you put a kat on 00:39:615 - . do you want try to emphasize a finisher on 00:39:820 - with a kat? hmm sounds nice, but it will be better to emphasize a snare sound on 00:39:409 - with a kat only sound nice, ok

• bahh a note on 00:53:998 - ? delete it. seriously, the song just gives 1/1 notes for the vocals there OK

• delete 01:02:218 - . at least give a break there

• delete 01:18:861 -

• 01:24:615 - ^

• 01:27:903 - ^

• 01:41:053 - ^

• 01:44:341 - ^

• 01:47:629 - ^

• 01:50:916 - ^

• 01:57:492 - ^

• 02:00:779 - ^

• 02:08:382 - ^ All ok

• move 02:10:437 - to 02:10:642 - and change it to be kat. seriously why is it a 1/2 note there? @@ OK

• move 02:13:725 - to 02:13:930 - and delete 02:14:135 - ^ OK

• don on 02:15:163 - . to emphasize that low vocal OK

• move 02:23:588 - to 02:23:793 - OK

• delete 03:09:409 - OK

• 03:22:766 - ^ OK

delete 03:35:916 - . be consistent please. which sounds that you want to follow? vocal or instrument? if you followed vocal, delete 03:35:916 - OK

• move 03:49:067 - to 03:49:272 - OK

• change 03:50:094 - to be kat and 03:50:505 - don and also delete 03:50:300 - if you use the previous mod ^ OK

• move 03:52:355 - to 03:52:560 - and delete 03:52:766 - OK

• delete 03:54:820 - and 03:56:464 - OK


====================


[Oni]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
try this. move 00:01:190 - to 00:01:396 - and delete 00:01:807 - . move 00:02:834 - to 00:03:040 - and delete 00:03:451 - and move 00:04:478 - to 00:04:683 - . they will follow the song better with that kind of patterns OK

delete 00:16:293 - . seriously the song doesn't give any 1/4 notes there, just a simple 1/1 and 1/2 notes only OK

delete 00:19:581 - ^ ^

00:22:868 - ^ ^

• move 00:25:848 - to 00:25:642 - . your current pattern is too late to follow the instrument sounds there OK

from 00:53:382 - until 00:54:615 - . okay it's a bit overmapped here. why? you can hear the song again there. the song just give 1/1 notes for the vocals only there. there isn't any sounds come out except 1/1 vocals there. well yah it's up to you on here I may consider it as I think it is a good transition for getting into kiai

• don 01:53:588 - ? k seems better

from 02:07:355 - until 02:08:588 - . same like the previous part too ^

from 03:34:067 - until 03:45:368 - . okay same like your futsuu diff. please be consistent again, which sound that you want to follow. vocals?or instruments? make it sure again please


====================


okay that's all from meh!
futsuu needs some work again there and try to catch some modders again to ensure your futsuu
goodluck!
Thank for you mod, I really not familiar with mapping futsuu

I will check JuDa's mod later

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda's Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.

box=1st coming/box
Later I will mod other diffs.~


[Futsuu]
  1. 00:00:368 (1,2,3,4) - (k,dk,d) ? or(k,dk,k) ? or(k,kk,d)? anyhow, k starts better if you follow to percussion. OK
  2. 00:06:122 (16) – move to 1/2 left for instrument hits. And I suggest to change k. fine for me
  3. 00:07:355 (20) – delete. unnecessary this. OK
  4. 00:12:697 (35) – k sounds better, for violin. :3 OK
  5. 00:13:519 - ~~~~Same as Oni . on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes. OK
    00:13:930 (38) –
    00:14:752 (39) –
    00:18:040 (45) –
    00:22:149 (53) –
    00:22:971 (54) - ?
  6. 00:27:081 - , 00:30:368 - , 00:33:656 - …. Delete? anyhow, 00:33:656 – delete is better for vocal . OK
  7. 00:34:067 (81) – k , same as previous 00:32:423 (76) – OK
  8. 00:36:944 (88,89,90) – kkd ? previous d k d k pattern… OK
  9. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound. OK
  10. 00:49:683 (110) – finisher? OK
  11. 00:51:533 (119,120,121) – change to k. snare sounds. OK
  12. and , 00:52:560 (122) – move to 1/2 left ..? OK
  13. 00:53:382 (124,125,126,127) – make the same as Nardo’s Muzu …or nothing place.? I think players need to little break time. I think those note is necessary, may consider it under further mod
  14. 00:56:670 (129) - k? d seems better
  15. 01:02:218 (145) – delete, and 01:02:423 (145) - k , 01:02:629 (146) – add k? OK
  16. 01:10:231 (166) – don ? OK
  17. 01:15:985 (183) - k? OK
  18. 01:20:300 (195) – k? for vocal and, 01:20:505 – ‘s snare follow. OK for k, I want to reduce 4 notes pattern for keeping it easy
  19. 01:23:998 (204) – add k? OK
  20. 01:27:903 (216) – delete?1 OK
  21. 01:28:725 (217) – delete. OK
  22. 01:32:012 (224) – move to 01:31:190 (223) -. OOO, OOO, (1/1) rhythm pattern… OK
  23. 01:34:889 (231,232,233) – (d,d,k) >>(d,ddk) ? OK
  24. and, 01:36:533 (236,237,238,239) – (k,dkd)>(k,k,d)? OK
  25. 01:41:053 (249,251) – (delete,k). make same as 1st phrase. OK
  26. 01:44:341 (257,259) - ^, 01:47:629 (266) -^ OK
  27. 02:07:355 (323,324,325,326) – same as 1st pattern. ^
  28. 01:53:793 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) –
    Uum, try to compare with 1st phrase.
    00:39:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) –
    I think you should decide to decreasing the notes.. OK
  29. 02:09:820 (333,334,335,336) – (kk,d,k) >(kk,dk)? Fix in another way
  30. 02:11:670 (339) – add note here. Backsound hits. OK
  31. 02:14:135 (346) – move to 1/2 left. ^
  32. and, 02:13:930 (346) - k? d is better imo
  33. 02:15:163 (349) – don ? sounds better . OK
  34. 02:18:451 (357) - k? OK
  35. 02:21:327 (365) – k. OK
  36. 02:19:889 (361,364) – swap? sound strange
  37. 02:26:875 (380) – add don, can link previous dk kd pattern. some changes for that
  38. 02:27:903 (383) – k OK
  39. 02:31:190 (391) - k? OK
  40. 02:32:834 (395) – move 1/2 left. and change k? OK
  41. 02:34:272 (399) – k OK
  42. 02:40:437 (407) – delete, unnecessary for Futsuu. OK
  43. 02:45:368 (416) -^ OK
  44. 03:05:094 (8) – k OK
  45. 03:20:916 (42,44,49,51) – finisher? OK
  46. 03:22:766 (45) delete. OK
  47. 03:26:053 (51) delete. OK
  48. 03:28:725 (57) - sounds bass drums. but 57 don sounds … weird for vocal. So 03:28:930 (58) - don ? instead of 57 change don. color=#00FF00]OK[/color]
  49. 03:32:834 (1) –k d seems better for fitting the vocal imo
  50. 03:42:081 (22) – add d? I prefer less note at that period, seems to heavy
  51. 03:46:807 (32) – k for splash sound.. OK
  52. 03:48:451 (36,37,38,39) – (kd,d,dk)>(kd,dk,k) ? change in another way
  53. 03:50:094 (41,42,43) – kkd .. ? OK
  54. 03:52:766 (49) – move to 1/2 left and, k? OK
  55. 04:03:245 (10) - k? d seems better
  56. 04:00:779 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - ~~~ uum,I suggest this pattern. not bad, OK

  57. 04:06:122 (18) – k sounds better imo. OK

  58. I’m scared that players feel to play hard… Taiko Futsuu needs more modders.
    Example, many OO,O,OO, rhythms are.
    Players prefer to OO,OO,O (1 back beat) than OO,O,OO (2 back beats) on kiai.I guess. cuz rhythm is clean.
    and, you should try to complile to the density on each part. I think Futsuu should make the manyparts that no put over 2/1 , like 00:27:081 (62) - delete suggestion.
[Oni]
  1. 00:01:190 (4) - , 00:02:834 (10) - , 00:04:478 (16) - , delete ? unnecessary notes,imo. OK
  2. and, 00:01:807 (5) - ,move to 00:01:396 (4) - ? OK
  3. 00:03:040 (9) - add k? OK
  4. 00:04:683 (15) - ^ OK
  5. 00:06:122 (21) – change k?
  6. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53,54,55) – I suggest 2 patterns. I hope you to choose the either.
    A. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53) – (kkd,* ,d) >>( kkkkd)? cool highpitch sounds following. And smoothly , I guess. I use kkddd instead
    B. 00:13:108 (54) – finisher , and 00:13:314 (55) – delete? this suggestions are linked previous finisher pattern (00:11:670 (48) -).
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  7. 00:13:519 (56) - ~~~~on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes. OK
    00:13:930 (58) - ,
    00:14:752 (59) -?
    00:17:218 (67) –
    00:18:040 (68) - ?
    00:20:505 (76) -
    00:22:355 (82) -
  8. 00:22:971 (84) - change to k? OK
  9. 00:26:361 (100,101) – delete? sounds better imo, cuz previous pattern( 00:25:745 (96,97,98,99) - ) (kk,d,k) are drums follow ? Fix in another way

  10. 00:41:259 (174) – d sounds better for back sound stress. OK
  11. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound. OK
  12. 00:52:766 (226) – finisher 2nd part is put, lol OK
  13. 00:53:177 (227) – delete? OK
  14. 00:55:231 (239) – add k? splash sounds here. OK
  15. and, 01:00:163 (267) – add don? OK
  16. 01:08:382 (312) - ^ Use a k
  17. 01:10:848 (327,328) – how about swap? OK 01:10:231 (323) -~~ 1/2 kdkkd~~~ I prefer kdk d
  18. 01:16:190 (356,357) – how about delete? for vocal that is stopped. OK
  19. and, 01:16:396 (356,357,358) – change to (k,d,k)? OK
  20. 01:25:231 -, 01:25:334 – add k? OK
  21. 01:26:464 (403,404,405,406,407,408,409) – same as 1st phrase. ^
  22. 01:29:546 (419,420) – don ? no piano sounds. And vocal pitch isn’t changed. OK

  23. 01:40:334 (460,461) – delete? same as 1st phrase. change a little
  24. 01:53:588 (533) – how about change d? instead of change 01:53:382 (532) – don. OK
  25. 01:54:820 (536,537,538,539,540) - 539 needs don sound I guess. So I suggest (kkk,d,k) OK
  26. and, 01:55:848 (541) - k? OK
  27. and…01:56:053 (543) – how about add d? OK
  28. 02:00:163 (557) – k? OK
  29. 02:03:861 (573,574) – (573>>d),(574>delete). same as 1st phrase. Anyhow, triplet is little hard, imo. OK
  30. 02:07:149 (588) - delete? OK
  31. 02:13:930 (623) – k sounds better, almost sounds higher. OK
  32. 02:16:601 (639,640) - dk? for back sound pitch, emphasize to 02:18:451 (651) – don sounds. OK
  33. uum, if you can accept, 02:09:204 (596) -, 02:22:355 (672) - , change k? OK
  34. 02:20:403 (665) – how about change thek? more smoothly , I guess. not bad
  35. and, 02:20:711 (667,668) – swap? OK
  36. 02:33:040 (734,735,736) – (k,d,d) >(d,k,k)? back sound stopped. So fit as music imo. OK
  37. 02:39:409 (753) - k? piano is high. OK
  38. 02:41:875 (760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767) – (kdk,kdkdk)>>(k,kdkdk,k)? backsounds hits, yes. But,,, I suggest other pattern. piano can hear easiler? OK
  39. 02:43:519 (1,3,4) – (k,d,k)>>(d,k,d) ? ?

  40. 02:53:177 (800,801,802) – how about removing (800 and,802) or(800,801)? Plays not too hard I guess. Linked 02:50:814 (789) -. remove 800, 801
  41. 02:56:053 (813) – add don? drums hit. OK
  42. 02:59:957 (830) - k? for vocal. OK
  43. 03:06:533 (29) - k? sounds better imo. OK
  44. 03:08:998 (39,40,41) – (40>remove) (41> delete?) triplet is… weird a bit..? OK
  45. 03:09:820 (43) - k? for vocal. OK
  46. 03:18:861 (82) - k? same as 03:15:574 (69) -. OK
  47. 03:21:327 (92,93,94,95) – (dd,dK) >(ddk,K) ? or kd,dK? ddk K
  48. 03:24:615 (106,107,108,109) - ^ anyhow , 109 needs finisher, . OK
  49. 03:24:204 (105) – finisher lol. OK
  50. 03:25:848 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - Either
    A. how about? for vocal.http://puu.sh/ab3qG/e901c27e1b.jpg OK
    B. 03:26:772 (116) – add k? instead of additional 03:26:567 -.
    └―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  51. 03:30:574 (133) – delete? OK
  52. 03:32:834 (1,2,3) – uum,,, delete? or ….kkk? anyhow, don sounds don’t need for violin slar…. ._. This three notes are following vocal
  53. 03:34:272 (5) – move to 1/2 right. . ~~~03:43:930 - no put rhythm pattern.(like,, 03:37:560 - , 03:40:848 - noput.) OK
  54. 03:35:711 (9) – how about move 1/2 left ? for emphasize next kk,kd pattern :3 OK
  55. 03:42:286 (33) – move to 1/2 right? OK
  56. and, 03:43:108 (36) – delete? OK
  57. 03:49:683 (67,68,69) – kkd… ? OK
  58. 03:51:738 (80) – d? or 03:51:635 (79) – d? 79 one
  59. 03:55:231 (103) – how about change to k? if yoy like.. current one is ok
  60. 04:01:396 (7,8) – d,k ? OK
  61. 04:05:094 (26,27,28,29) – if you choose 1st, 2nd pattern kkkkd, I also suggest to change kkkkd. not fit imo
  62. 03:59:135 (2,3,4,5) – I suggest kkkd or kkdk, reason is near 03:32:834 (1,2,3) - . don sounds feels … noisy..? it is fine imo

  63. lol, very many suggestions :? but not bad! I like this. Oni can make up more quality!! :D

Good Luck~~~ >w<//
Thank for your long mod :)Tired XD
_todestrieb
WHOA YES THIS SONG
FROM MY MODDING QUEUE

Nardo's Taiko Kantan
Kantan has same OD as Futsuu? Consider OD -1
00:12:697 (19,20) - k d (the pitch goes down)
00:23:382 (33) - k
00:29:135 (43,44) - reverse
01:37:354 (159) - k
01:51:327 (184) - ^
01:59:957 (198) - d
02:06:121 (209) - k
02:19:066 (231) - ^
02:39:820 (266,267) - reverse
02:45:574 (275) - d
03:45:368 (23) - K
04:02:012 (53) - d

Taiko Futsuu
00:06:738 (15) - k
00:28:724 (60) - ^
00:36:533 (79,80) - reverse
00:40:437 (90) - k
00:42:286 (92,93) - reverse
00:51:122 (110) - K
01:11:053 (164) - d
01:12:286 (167,168) - reverse
01:38:177 (232) - k
01:38:793 (234) - d
01:41:875 (242) - k
01:45:574 (251) - ^
02:03:656 (289) - K
02:05:094 (294) - ^
02:08:998 (304,305) - reverse
02:13:314 (316) - k
02:26:464 (351) - ^
03:14:341 (27) - D?
03:17:218 (33) - d
03:42:697 (22,23) - reverse
04:05:094 (13) - K

Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii
00:02:012 (6) - k
00:05:505 (17) - D
00:20:094 (62) - k
00:33:451 (103) - Moving to 00:33:245 -
00:37:355 (116) - k
00:50:916 (167) - D
00:52:766 (175) - K
00:57:286 - Adding a note (d)
01:20:711 (274) - k
01:47:423 (368) - Moving to 01:47:218 -
01:49:272 (375) - k
01:56:875 (404,405) - reveeeeerse
02:04:888 (433) - D
02:11:259 - Same as 00:57:286 -
02:14:957 (470) - k
02:31:395 (530) - ^
02:47:218 (564) - ^
03:37:149 (15) - ^

Taiko Oni
00:05:505 (17) - k
00:06:327 (21) - ^
00:10:231 (41) - D
00:12:800 (53) - k
00:14:957 (59) - ^
00:18:245 (67,68) - reverse
00:46:190 (196) - k
00:47:629 (201,202,203) - k k d
00:50:300 (213) - K
00:50:916 (215) - D
01:20:711 (380) - k
01:23:793 (393) - ^
02:01:807 (566) - ^
02:04:889 (577) - D
02:44:341 (768) - k
03:14:341 (63) - D
03:41:464 (28) - I think this note isn't really needed
03:41:875 (30) - k
03:47:834 (54,55) - reverse
04:05:094 (26) - D
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply