1. MawareXtrA (5.44 stars, 1334 notes)

雪 666 Circles 月 666 Sliders 花
Taiko diff

maremaremaremaremaremaremaware

1. fine

1. 00:19:755 (3) - nc for more readable, 01:09:410 (3) - same
2. 00:23:479 (1,2) - these twos are way too far to this one 00:23:686 (3) - , the previous slider is only a kick, so I suggest to ctrl g them to adjust the direction, same for 02:12:720 (1,2) - and 02:13:134 (4,5) -
3. 01:25:548 (1) - suddenly change the sv too much, i will use 1.2 in 01:25:548 (1) - 1.3 in 01:25:755 (2) - 1.4 in 01:25:962 (3) - and finally it was adjusted to 1.5x in 01:26:169 (4) -
4. add nc in 01:33:410 (3) - instead of 01:33:824 (1) - , for more readable, I know why you add nc there but I suggest to nc for a whole pattern but not for the end of vocal
5. 02:00:513 (2) - i think stack it with 02:00:617 (3) - completely will be more friendly, imo it won't destroy the pattern a lot but much more improvement for playing
6. nazi problem in 02:22:031 (3,4,5) - ,I saw the approach circle in the top of 02:21:824 (2) - and found this is not a best blanket, maybe you can fix it
7. 02:25:962 (1,3,1) - do some overlaps with low spacing here?
8. 03:34:100 (2) - i don't find any reason here for the spacing which different between 03:33:824 (1,2,3) - and with this one 03:34:651 (4) -,maybe you should put it to x:150 y:308 for
9. 04:09:410 (1,2,3,4) - same suggestion with 01:25:548 (1) -
10. 04:31:134 (2,3) - imo you can make some overlaps double in the last kiai
11. 04:32:169 (3) - as previous same pattern suggestion

1. 00:08:582 (1) through 00:19:134 (4) - I really dislike the aesthetics of the sliders in this section. They play just fine, but the melody that you map causes there to be a lot of instances of there just being 2 short sliders and one other hit object visible and they just don't look good to me the way they are. I don't have any specific suggestion, but I think they would look better if you could either place them a bit differently or modify the shapes a bit. They're not being held so changing the shape shouldn't affect play.
2. 00:36:720 (1) through 00:46:444 (4) - Something about the hitsounds in this section makes me constantly unsure if I'm hitting notes. I'm not a mapper and honestly I know almost nothing about hitsounding, but I'm guessing it's the drum sounds that are causing it.
3. 01:24:720 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I like how the second half of this crescendos into the sudden high spacing immediately afterwards, but following the stream shape too closely feels wrong to me here. I would suggest increasing the spacing between 4 and 1 a bit, probably by moving the first half of the stream down and to the right just slightly. Right now, I find that in following the shape of the stream, the feel of the direction change overpowers the spacing increase a bit and separating the two halves of the stream would force them to be played separately and highlight the increased spacing. Somehow the other similarly-shaped streams felt fine to me, so I don't know.
   
   
   something like this

   
4. 01:34:651 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - It's possible I just have trouble with these types of patterns but this particular pattern is unusually cruel compared to the rest of the map imo. I would suggest getting a few extra opinions on this specific part. If others agree that it's unusually cruel, slightly more uniformity in how the pattern moves around might help. I'm not saying to just make it a strict clockwise circle of slider-circle, but if some of the transitions were less jarring it would be less evil. Same goes for the other places this pattern appears. (04:26:789 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) and 04:33:410 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) )
5. 02:16:858 (1,2,3,4) - The distance between 2 and 3 feels too big to me compared to the spacing within each pair of notes. Maybe increase the 1-2 and 3-4 spacing just a touch to bring 2 and 3 closer together?
6. 02:44:996 (1,2,3,4) - After several plays I'm still 100ing some or all of the 2-3-4 quite frequently. I think if the SV was a bit higher it would be more natural to move to the circles, which currently feels a bit jarring. (Yes, I'm sure it's the spacing that's throwing me off and not the fact that it's 1/3.)
7. I really like how you mapped the 1/3 section that starts around 3:30.
8. 04:04:444 (3,1,2,3,4,1,2) - It took me a few tries to correctly identify the time interval between 1 and 2 as 1/2 during a play. The 1-2-3 being 1/4 and moving in the opposite direction as expected is a bit of misdirection that for me at least is drawing my attention away from the next combo and causes me to not realize you're switching to 1/2 when the rhythm has recently been based around 1/1. While this is certainly an issue with my reading, I think it would play better if you were to move things around a bit.
9. 
   04:13:548 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - There's nothing wrong with this, but I would love you a bit more if you could find a different way to map half of it.

1. 00:54:927 (1) - i haven't played this pattern (or any of the map really... well i've tried ehehe) but i feel like it might flow a bit better if this was curved the other way sine 00:53:686 (2,3,1,2,3) is going clockwise ;w; http://puu.sh/bDE8S/55ac13745e.jpg
   
2. 01:58:548 (4) - maybe move this up more so it's not overlapping? http://puu.sh/bDEsp/ef2b82ad10.jpg
   
3. 03:11:893 (2,3,4) - idk make spacing same here?
   

Raose wrote:

CANCER

1. 00:54:927 (1) - i haven't played this pattern (or any of the map really... well i've tried ehehe) but i feel like it might flow a bit better if this was curved the other way sine 00:53:686 (2,3,1,2,3) is going clockwise ;w; http://puu.sh/bDE8S/55ac13745e.jpg yeah
   
2. 01:58:548 (4) - maybe move this up more so it's not overlapping? http://puu.sh/bDEsp/ef2b82ad10.jpg the overlap was intentional since blankets, its also a common pattern i make on higher AR maps
   
3. 03:11:893 (2,3,4) - idk make spacing same here? kk
   

yeaaaa best mod 2014 GOODLUCK

1. Offset sounds a bit early for me try -9

1. 00:35:479 (2) - Consider moving this 1/4 back in the timeline. IMO it is much more comfortable to follow the vocal in this part, as it is clearly dominating the instrumental.
2. 00:38:996 (4,1) - Perhaps unstack this to keep the movement going? Also this is like the only stack in this section involving beats like this. Perhaps try a pattern like this:
   
   box

   
   (5): 104|252
   (1): 283|190
3. 01:15:617 (3,3,3,3) - Perhaps add NC's on those aswell? To keep a musical NC consistency with these 01:12:307 (1,1) -
4. 01:41:272 (1,2,3) - Hmmm... TBH I expected some speed-ups here Consider doing so? imo it is really fitting imo. If you do these don't forget those aswel: 01:42:927 (2,3,4) - // 04:40:031 (1,2,3) - // 04:41:686 (3,4,5) -
5. 02:26:169 (2,4) - Perhaps reduce the spacing a bit? It's really big compared with the rest of this section. I'd do smth like this:
   (2): 184|74
   (4): 101|126
6. 04:27:410 (1,2,1,2) - Angle is a bit to sharp, its not Mawaring good enough Try moving 04:27:617 (2) - to 168|208 and 04:27:927 (2) - to 344|176
7. 04:49:755 (3) - Hmmm perhaps a ctrl+g here and moving it to around 64|93? Plays a lot more comfy imo.
8. 05:08:168 (2,3,1,2) - How about keeping the circular motion going that you started here 05:07:341 (2,3,1) -. Like this:
   
   box

   
   (3): Ctrl+G
   (1,2): Switched in the timeline

xChippy wrote:

derp
Mostly suggestion, map seems fine as-is

[General]

1. Offset sounds a bit early for me try -9 got a -7 confirmation from Frostmourne, seems good now

[cancer]

1. 00:35:479 (2) - Consider moving this 1/4 back in the timeline. IMO it is much more comfortable to follow the vocal in this part, as it is clearly dominating the instrumental. changed to a repeat slider to cover both
2. 00:38:996 (4,1) - Perhaps unstack this to keep the movement going? Also this is like the only stack in this section involving beats like this. Perhaps try a pattern like this: placed it over 00:38:575 (2)
   
   box

   
   (5): 104|252
   (1): 283|190
3. 01:15:617 (3,3,3,3) - Perhaps add NC's on those aswell? To keep a musical NC consistency with these 01:12:307 (1,1) - kk
4. 01:41:272 (1,2,3) - Hmmm... TBH I expected some speed-ups here Consider doing so? imo it is really fitting imo. If you do these don't forget those aswel: 01:42:927 (2,3,4) - // 04:40:031 (1,2,3) - // 04:41:686 (3,4,5) - the reason i didnt speed this up is because i pictured a slow down instead (the gray slider), if i sped the first ones up the contrast of the SV would be too big and the music really doesnt justify the emphasis imo
5. 02:26:169 (2,4) - Perhaps reduce the spacing a bit? It's really big compared with the rest of this section. I'd do smth like this:
   (2): 184|74
   (4): 101|126 i have reduced the spacing to form a nice overlap with 02:27:093 (2,3,4)
6. 04:27:410 (1,2,1,2) - Angle is a bit to sharp, its not Mawaring good enough Try moving 04:27:617 (2) - to 168|208 and 04:27:927 (2) - to 344|176 moved to a similar position, it forms a line with the other circles with increasing distance
7. 04:49:755 (3) - Hmmm perhaps a ctrl+g here and moving it to around 64|93? Plays a lot more comfy imo. sure
8. 05:08:168 (2,3,1,2) - How about keeping the circular motion going that you started here 05:07:341 (2,3,1) -. Like this: yep also reversed 05:08:989 (3,4) - for better flow
   
   box

   
   (3): Ctrl+G
   (1,2): Switched in the timeline

shyt mod, well call me back~

Konei wrote:

Ahhh, oops.

The comboburst is too huge, it may not be bigger than the default one, so please fix that and call me back.

jonathanlfj wrote:

Priti wrote:

Second kiai
y u do dis

Fycho wrote:

I haven't given my fire virginity haha XD