That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated manga
bruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
yeah but that's the problem, they seem just happy matching what was already done, not taking it furtherRezq Gokou wrote:
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
I don't think an adaptation necessarily has to be way better than its predecessor. An adaptation is just a change one from medium to another. Sure, with a transition from manga to anime, you'll get the benefits of moving pictures and sound which you can utilize, but in no way I believe that we should hold excessive expectations from these added qualities.Patatitta wrote:
yeah but that's the problem, they seem just happy matching what was already done, not taking it furtherRezq Gokou wrote:
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
yeah I get that, but it's just, it doesn't seem ambitious at all?, in order to actually make a proper adaptation you must take into consideration what the medium does best and worst, you cant translate things 1:1, so by trying to translate it 1:1, I don't know, i'm afraid they're shying away from doing really cool stuff with the original material and also fumbling it alltogetherStomiks wrote:
I don't think an adaptation necessarily has to be way better than its predecessor. An adaptation is just a change one from medium to another. Sure, with a transition from manga to anime, you'll get the benefits of moving pictures and sound which you can utilize, but in no way I believe that we should hold excessive expectations from these added qualities.Patatitta wrote:
yeah but that's the problem, they seem just happy matching what was already done, not taking it furtherRezq Gokou wrote:
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
I presume you'll agree that each medium has its own strength and weaknesses, so there shouldn't be a pecking order of light novel < manga < anime. An anime adaptation could never beat Junji Ito's page turn and the insane amount of detail he draws for each and every page. Instead, a sacrifice has to be made and you'll have to trade those qualities for sound and animation since studios have limited budget and time constraints.
You can't expect every anime adaptation to possess a manga's every good quality + impressive utilization of anime's own sound and animation to be the baseline or else you'll just set yourself up for failure in most cases.
TL;DR: Just translate a manga's level of quality as it as would in anime form, and it'll already be great for most audiences since animation and sound is already an upgrade.
What do you wanna see in an anime adaptation? There're many anime that translate that manga 1:1 but just by adding good animation and sound design they're already improving the work by a good degree.Patatitta wrote:
Stomiks wrote:
I don't think an adaptation necessarily has to be way better than its predecessor. An adaptation is just a change one from medium to another. Sure, with a transition from manga to anime, you'll get the benefits of moving pictures and sound which you can utilize, but in no way I believe that we should hold excessive expectations from these added qualities.Patatitta wrote:
yeah but that's the problem, they seem just happy matching what was already done, not taking it furtherRezq Gokou wrote:
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
I presume you'll agree that each medium has its own strength and weaknesses, so there shouldn't be a pecking order of light novel < manga < anime. An anime adaptation could never beat Junji Ito's page turn and the insane amount of detail he draws for each and every page. Instead, a sacrifice has to be made and you'll have to trade those qualities for sound and animation since studios have limited budget and time constraints.
You can't expect every anime adaptation to possess a manga's every good quality + impressive utilization of anime's own sound and animation to be the baseline or else you'll just set yourself up for failure in most cases.
TL;DR: Just translate a manga's level of quality as it as would in anime form, and it'll already be great for most audiences since animation and sound is already an upgrade.
yeah I get that, but it's just, it doesn't seem ambitious at all?, in order to actually make a proper adaptation you must take into consideration what the medium does best and worst, you cant translate things 1:1, so by trying to translate it 1:1, I don't know, i'm afraid they're shying away from doing really cool stuff with the original material and also fumbling it alltogether
considering adult swim doesn't have that great of a track record when it comes to anime, I would be a little bit worried
almost no anime adapts 1:1, it may seem like so at first, but the pacing and the how much screentime they give to everything and that sort of stuff matters even if they're not cutting plot pointStomiks wrote:
What do you wanna see in an anime adaptation? There're many anime that translate that manga 1:1 but just by adding good animation and sound design they're already improving the work by a good degree.Patatitta wrote:
Stomiks wrote:
I don't think an adaptation necessarily has to be way better than its predecessor. An adaptation is just a change one from medium to another. Sure, with a transition from manga to anime, you'll get the benefits of moving pictures and sound which you can utilize, but in no way I believe that we should hold excessive expectations from these added qualities.Patatitta wrote:
yeah but that's the problem, they seem just happy matching what was already done, not taking it furtherRezq Gokou wrote:
they still did a good job though capturing the same feeling as the original illustration, considering Junji Ito's style has a lot of detailsPatatitta wrote:
I like junji ito's art, but I just when I see an adaptation, I wish for it to be more than the original illustrations, not the exact sameStomiks wrote:
That's understandable. I personally loved the illustrations from Junji Ito's works and have been always curious as to what it'd look like in motion (specifically when it's actually a good one). Most horror anime are utter garbage so getting to see a potentially great one adapted from one of the best horror manga artists definitely hypes me up.Patatitta wrote:
I didn't like uzumaki very much to begin with so I'm a bit mixed with the decision to make it ltierally an animated mangabruhPolyspora wrote:
I would've watched it if stomiks wasnt excited for it
I presume you'll agree that each medium has its own strength and weaknesses, so there shouldn't be a pecking order of light novel < manga < anime. An anime adaptation could never beat Junji Ito's page turn and the insane amount of detail he draws for each and every page. Instead, a sacrifice has to be made and you'll have to trade those qualities for sound and animation since studios have limited budget and time constraints.
You can't expect every anime adaptation to possess a manga's every good quality + impressive utilization of anime's own sound and animation to be the baseline or else you'll just set yourself up for failure in most cases.
TL;DR: Just translate a manga's level of quality as it as would in anime form, and it'll already be great for most audiences since animation and sound is already an upgrade.
yeah I get that, but it's just, it doesn't seem ambitious at all?, in order to actually make a proper adaptation you must take into consideration what the medium does best and worst, you cant translate things 1:1, so by trying to translate it 1:1, I don't know, i'm afraid they're shying away from doing really cool stuff with the original material and also fumbling it alltogether
considering adult swim doesn't have that great of a track record when it comes to anime, I would be a little bit worried
Also, I think Studio Drive would be more worrying since they're a relatively new studio will a just small number of anime made.
september 28 / anywhere if you're not a coward[ Rynn ] wrote:
when is this gonna be released? where can i watch it for free?? :000
And I just happened to have a guide for downloading Free and Open Source Software with thatYmir wrote:
A lot of popular piracy sites did get taken down so I guess it's a valid question.
On a completely unrelated note, torrenting is a peer-to-peer (P2P) form of downloading files that doesn't rely on central servers but instead on each member of a swarm to supply a file.