A little bit linked with the idea posted here t/191030 since it would be a good addition.
My idea is to give information about the difficulty of each map in the song select menu. It could be located on the top where OD, CS, AR etc are shown and maybe work as an expanding tab (like the fun spoiler). It can be solid too! Though it may take some space.
I don't have any picture for it, but just imagine that you choose the map, move your cursor to the top and the tab expands: here you have values for aim/speed, maybe with some bar graphs, and of course the basic features like OD, CS. And all those values change depending on the mods selected.
If it was implemented it would get rid of the diff name problem since people would be able to see the "real" difficulty beforehand. The star rating problem would be solved (set a 10 star rating with the limit of 300, maybe more pp rating, those which are over-limit will be 10 star +). Since Tom's algorithm is now the official ranking, I don't think there should be a problem as to use the data for this purpose.
@edit: I forgot about the accuracy rating (depends on the %), so we can just have the values for SS. Or we can just omit it.
@edit2: I'll try to make it look more understandable when I have time.
I'm terrible at explaining things, but well.... You'll have to deal with it.
My idea is to give information about the difficulty of each map in the song select menu. It could be located on the top where OD, CS, AR etc are shown and maybe work as an expanding tab (like the fun spoiler). It can be solid too! Though it may take some space.
I don't have any picture for it, but just imagine that you choose the map, move your cursor to the top and the tab expands: here you have values for aim/speed, maybe with some bar graphs, and of course the basic features like OD, CS. And all those values change depending on the mods selected.
If it was implemented it would get rid of the diff name problem since people would be able to see the "real" difficulty beforehand. The star rating problem would be solved (set a 10 star rating with the limit of 300, maybe more pp rating, those which are over-limit will be 10 star +). Since Tom's algorithm is now the official ranking, I don't think there should be a problem as to use the data for this purpose.
@edit: I forgot about the accuracy rating (depends on the %), so we can just have the values for SS. Or we can just omit it.
@edit2: I'll try to make it look more understandable when I have time.
I'm terrible at explaining things, but well.... You'll have to deal with it.
