1. ADVANCED (3.83 stars, 357 notes)
2. BASIC (1.92 stars, 159 notes)
3. EXHAUST (4.8 stars, 501 notes)
4. INFINITE (5.37 stars, 644 notes)
5. KSHR's NOVICE (3.07 stars, 289 notes)

-Chata- wrote:

i'm fine thank you

Sylith wrote:

-Chata- wrote:

i'm fine thank you

and you?

iyasine wrote:

IRC short　mod =ω=

SPOILER

16:27 -Chata-: iyasine shan
16:27 iyasine: はい＼(~o~)／
16:27 -Chata-: test play please :3
16:28 iyasine: sure!
16:28 *-Chata- is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/382887 Yooh - snow storm -euphoria-]
16:28 -Chata-: ~o~
16:28 iyasine: ₍₍ (ง ˘ω˘ )ว ⁾⁾
16:28 iyasine: ooooh
16:28 iyasine: cool song!
16:29 -Chata-: so cooooool
16:29 iyasine: nice!
16:31 iyasine: 素晴らしい
16:31 -Chata-: えへ・・・
16:33 iyasine: 難しいけど超楽しい！！！
16:34 -Chata-: おかしな所とか
16:36 iyasine: 完璧な音取り=ω=
16:37 -Chata-: そんなことないです＝ω＝
16:38 iyasine: 01:56:533 -
16:38 iyasine: softがいいかもo3o
16:39 -Chata-: hai o3o
16:46 iyasine: 無音のsoft-sliderslideがほちぃ！
16:46 -Chata-: soukana
16:47 iyasine: ( ﾟｰﾟ)( ｡_｡)
16:47 iyasine: 無音は嫌い？o3o
16:47 -Chata-: いや、いつも入れてるけど。
16:48 -Chata-: 今回はあんまり必要なくね？ってなって
16:48 iyasine: 01:50:929 -
16:48 iyasine: ここからスライダーのジーって音が気になる！
16:52 -Chata-: 自分ではアプデできないので
16:52 -Chata-: お友達の手を借りました
16:52 iyasine: (｀・ω・´)b
16:52 -Chata-: KDSあげるぅ
16:52 -Chata-: post please
16:53 iyasine: (ﾉﾟοﾟ)ﾉ　ｵｵｫｫｫ-
16:53 iyasine: ありがとうo.o

Quilt wrote:

Best mod kudos plz

Heart-Under-Blade wrote:

配置的なことしか書かないKUSOmodだから・・・

[ADVANCED]

00:22:870 (4,1) - どうせスピンはいるなら最初から入れたほうがいいかもしれない ok

00:22:870 (4,1,1,2) - １と２を半分半分でいいと思う nope. 曲と合わせてるので

ストリーム譜面なのはわかるけど一応HARDって言う難易度だから最後らへんの連打は控えめにしたほうがいいかも mada wakaranai(´・ω・｀)


[EXHAUST]

00:44:647 (1,7,8) - 意識的に置いてるならいいけどそうじゃないならそろえたほうがいい！意識的だし結構気に入ったのでこのまま

01:01:147 (5,6,7,8) - new combo じゃないなら綺麗に置いたほうがいい！ok

01:04:814 (3,6) - ３連打の方向にあわせたほうが綺麗！現状維持

01:39:314 (1,2,3) - hitsoundで台無しになってるから音を小さくしたほうがいい！ok


いい譜面だわ・ω・ｂ

1. NOVICE diffの１本目の赤線(00:00:000 <=ココ)消しましょう。
   

1. こういう音ゲー譜面、OD8のほうが面白い気がします！

1. finishばっかになっちゃった・・・、明らかにシンバルの音が鳴ってる場所を書いてるので、わざと付けてなかったりするのであれば無視してください。

SPOILER

SPOILER

• 00:51:981 (6,7) - 이부분 귀로듣기엔 약간 안맞는 듯한 느낌이 들면서 그냥 이대로도 괜찮은 느낌도 나고 하니까 걍 리듬 하나 링크띄우고갈게요
  배치는 아예 안했으니까 리듬만 보시면 되요 http://puu.sh/9n60q/ae4dc99fab.jpg
  00:55:980 (1,2,1,2) - 이거는 4덩어리가 1패턴같은데 nc한개 푸는건?
  01:12:647 (1,2) - 리듬을 Ctrl+G
  01:40:647 (4,5,6,7,8) - 스트림도중 스페이싱을 바꾼 이유가 있나요?
  01:45:397 (10,1) - 이거랑 01:45:731 (2,3) - 이거는 패턴일관성을 위해 같은모양으로하는건 어떨가요 01:42:647 (1,2,3,4) - 이거처럼요

• 서클4로해도되지않을까 싶네요
  00:33:981 (1) - 흐름이 Alt+F4느낌나는데 슬라이더 180도 뒤집는건 어떤지요
  01:02:397 (4,5) - 요녀석은 아래로 붙여주는게 미관상 더 나아보임 뒤에나오는같은패턴들처럼
  01:10:314 (3,4) - 요녀석들 서로 같은슬라이더로 해서 180도회전한 패턴 바로그패턴 01:13:314 (4,5) - 이런식으로
  01:17:481 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - 5개까지는 그래도 괜찮은데 이건 좀 긴듯 3타다음부터 리턴슬라이더신공 ㄱㄱ
  01:52:544 (4,1,2,3,4,1) - 요거는 http://puu.sh/9n6nn/e1ff9f9561.jpg 이런식으로 하면 더 괜찮을거같음

• 00:39:314 (1) - 76:239
  00:57:981 (3) - 이거 생명선 가릴거같은데? 가 아니라 가림 좀 덜꺾어야될듯. 아니면 위치를 바꿔주던가
  01:43:981 (1) - 여기다가 뉴콤넣은거면 01:45:314 (3) - 여기서 패턴 끝나부리니께 여기도 뉴콤

• 00:43:981 (2) - 이건 걍 앞에슬라이더랑 방향 똑같이 하는게 나을듯
  01:35:981 (1) - 441:195
  01:53:929 (4) - 오버랩이 약간 애매함 걍 방향 돌리는것도 나쁘지 않은 Choice

Kloyd wrote:

하이루 from Hi. I'm Kloyd

EXHAUST

• 00:51:981 (6,7) - 이부분 귀로듣기엔 약간 안맞는 듯한 느낌이 들면서 그냥 이대로도 괜찮은 느낌도 나고 하니까 걍 리듬 하나 링크띄우고갈게요
  배치는 아예 안했으니까 리듬만 보시면 되요 http://puu.sh/9n60q/ae4dc99fab.jpg 유지
  00:55:980 (1,2,1,2) - 이거는 4덩어리가 1패턴같은데 nc한개 푸는건?done
  01:12:647 (1,2) - 리듬을 Ctrl+G done
  01:40:647 (4,5,6,7,8) - 스트림도중 스페이싱을 바꾼 이유가 있나요? 네
  01:45:397 (10,1) - 이거랑 01:45:731 (2,3) - 이거는 패턴일관성을 위해 같은모양으로하는건 어떨가요 01:42:647 (1,2,3,4) - 이거처럼요 ok

DECNAVDA

• 서클4로해도되지않을까 싶네요 하드치고는 어렵다. 라는 의견이 많아서요
  00:33:981 (1) - 흐름이 Alt+F4느낌나는데 슬라이더 180도 뒤집는건 어떤지요 done
  01:02:397 (4,5) - 요녀석은 아래로 붙여주는게 미관상 더 나아보임 뒤에나오는같은패턴들처럼 done
  01:10:314 (3,4) - 요녀석들 서로 같은슬라이더로 해서 180도회전한 패턴 바로그패턴 01:13:314 (4,5) - 이런식으로 nope
  01:17:481 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - 5개까지는 그래도 괜찮은데 이건 좀 긴듯 3타다음부터 리턴슬라이더신공 ㄱㄱ 일단은 유지
  01:52:544 (4,1,2,3,4,1) - 요거는 http://puu.sh/9n6nn/e1ff9f9561.jpg 이런식으로 하면 더 괜찮을거같음유지

ㅜㅒ퍛ㄸ

• 00:39:314 (1) - 76:239nope
  00:57:981 (3) - 이거 생명선 가릴거같은데? 가 아니라 가림 좀 덜꺾어야될듯. 아니면 위치를 바꿔주던가 done
  01:43:981 (1) - 여기다가 뉴콤넣은거면 01:45:314 (3) - 여기서 패턴 끝나부리니께 여기도 뉴콤 done

베이직

• 00:43:981 (2) - 이건 걍 앞에슬라이더랑 방향 똑같이 하는게 나을듯nope.
  01:35:981 (1) - 441:195 done
  01:53:929 (4) - 오버랩이 약간 애매함 걍 방향 돌리는것도 나쁘지 않은 Choicedone

별로 잡을것도 없셈 굳럭

1. There're some inconsistencies in your kiai #2. See this for more details. According to the rules, kiais shouldt be consistent.

1. The SV changes in the easiest diff are rather confusing. the SV changes aren't really necessary, since there're some rd lines already and changing the speed even more feels confusing.
2. Reduce both OD and HP Drain by one tick since they are too high for the easiest diff and don't work well with your rhythm.
   Note: since the rhythm is quite changeable, I'd reduce OD to 2. So, the BPM changes will be less confusing for beginners.
3. 00:43:314 (1) - acording to your previous combo patterns, this NC shouldn't be here.Moreover, it doesn't really fit with the song. Consider removing it, please.
4. 00:56:647 (1,2,1,2) - I really doubt that 1/2 patterns are playable enough for this diff. The diff is already hard enough and those 1/2s are just too much, imo. Since the diff is meant to be the easiest, you can try something like this.
5. 01:53:929 (4) - the spacing here is much bigger that it's supposed to be. Moreover, the overlap looks out of your style and appears quite messy to me. Considr fixing the spacing here, I feel like it should be around x1.6 or so and try to avoid the overlap since it can conduse some players.
   
   Your flow felt quite tricky and some of the patterns weren't intuitively playable, but it looks like a part of your style, so I guess it's okay. This diff could need some more modding and work, imo.

1. 00:21:314 - ignoring the drum here dosn't sound like a good idea to me. Consider making the slider 1/1 shortre and maybe placing a circle at 00:21:647, so you'll be abl e to follow the drums closer and to keep your rhythm more logical. Here's an exaple, in canse if you need one.
2. 00:22:647 (4) - please, do not use such sliders in the E/N diffs. The second rverse arrow appears way too fast and feels unexpected. Players just don't have enough time to read and end up missing it. What to do, then? Try using red nods to curve the slider in the parts, where the pepeats were. This way. So, the beats won't be ignored and you'll be able to keep the diff more readable.
3. 00:37:981 (2) - minor - the blanketing here isn't perfect and this is pretty obvious, to be honest. Consider fixing it or just poke me in game and I'll give you the code.
   Note: you see to be pretty good with the editor, so I assume that you can fix it on your own.
4. 00:57:981 (3) - minor - the overlap with the HP-Bar feels rather untdy. Since quite a lot of players use custom and huge HP-Bars this little overlap may turn into a disaster. Consider moving the slider down in order to avoid overlapping!
5. 01:05:981 (1) - previously you were placing NCs less often, so this one feels kinda unnecessary and makes your comboing look untidy.
6. 01:42:314 - a circle here would reflect the drums and fit with your rhythm. try placing i here and see if you like it or not!
   
   The diff was okay, although I recommend you to get some more mods just to make sure that there're no more minor mistakes/problems left.

1. Consider making your circles a bit smaller? There're quite a lot of objects in the playfield and using this circle size can make your map look quite untidy.
2. Increasing HP Drain by one tick would make the diff a bit more challenging and enjoyable. It'd also work well with the balance of the mapset.
3. 00:12:148 (4) - an NC here would reflect the rhythm changes greately, it is also needed here to point out that therer'resome very unusual beats.
4. 00:33:647 (4,1,2) -transitions between these objects didn't work very well to me. Consider using something different to make your flow feel more natural . Looking for an example?
5. 00:37:231 - a circle here would fit. Try to place it and see if it is playable enough or not, personally, i feel like without it your rhythm feels incomplete.
6. 00:45:981 (1) - make this slider shorter, so players will have enough time to switch from this slider to the next one. Having 1/8 gap here is just not enough and makes players feel uncomfortable and miss.
7. 01:09:647 (7) - a new combo her is kinda necessary since the rhythm and amount of repeats change on this slider.
8. 01:11:647 (2) - hthese sliders look like they have just ONE repeat, and the second repeats is way too hard to notice. Consider making the diff a bit more readable. For example, you can move the tail of this slider CLOSER to the following object, this way. So, players wil understand that there might be 2 repeats!
   Note: 01:14:147 (2) - same here. Never been a fan of such sliders, but it kinda fits here, so, why not.
9. 01:17:481 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1) - according to the guide, this diff is meant to be Hard. Using these long streams here is too complicated for this kind of diffs, so I recommend you to replace some of them with a spinner!
   
   The diff seems to be too tricky for a regular Hard, imo. Anyway, probably it's just me. Otherwise, you did a pretty good job.

1. Your OD is way too high for a song with rhythm and timing changes. Reducing OD by one tick would increase the playability a lot.
2. 00:16:897 - 00:17:231 - the beats at these points are ignored and it seems kinda unreasonable to me. Why do you ignore them? They're pretty loud and quite important.
3. 00:48:647 (1) - this is way too soon after the spinnre. An average player needs much more time to be able to read and catch the slider. Consider leaving some more space there.
4. 01:03:147 (6) - the jump feels exaggerated. Yeah, the beat here is a bit louder than normal ones, but this jump is way too big for it. It is really confusing, imo.
   Note: same happens a few more times, see for yourself.
   
   The diff is quite alright. You did a pretty good job with this one!

-Bakari- wrote:

As requested. Thank you for your request!

[General]

1. There're some inconsistencies in your kiai #2. See this for more details. According to the rules, kiais shouldt be consistent.

[BASIC]

1. The SV changes in the easiest diff are rather confusing. the SV changes aren't really necessary, since there're some rd lines already and changing the speed even more feels confusing.
2. Reduce both OD and HP Drain by one tick since they are too high for the easiest diff and don't work well with your rhythm.
   Note: since the rhythm is quite changeable, I'd reduce OD to 2. So, the BPM changes will be less confusing for beginners.
3. 00:43:314 (1) - acording to your previous combo patterns, this NC shouldn't be here.Moreover, it doesn't really fit with the song. Consider removing it, please.
4. 00:56:647 (1,2,1,2) - I really doubt that 1/2 patterns are playable enough for this diff. The diff is already hard enough and those 1/2s are just too much, imo. Since the diff is meant to be the easiest, you can try something like this.
5. 01:53:929 (4) - the spacing here is much bigger that it's supposed to be. Moreover, the overlap looks out of your style and appears quite messy to me. Considr fixing the spacing here, I feel like it should be around x1.6 or so and try to avoid the overlap since it can conduse some players.
   
   Your flow felt quite tricky and some of the patterns weren't intuitively playable, but it looks like a part of your style, so I guess it's okay. This diff could need some more modding and work, imo.

[ADVANCED]

1. Consider making your circles a bit smaller? There're quite a lot of objects in the playfield and using this circle size can make your map look quite untidy.
2. Increasing HP Drain by one tick would make the diff a bit more challenging and enjoyable. It'd also work well with the balance of the mapset.
3. 00:12:148 (4) - an NC here would reflect the rhythm changes greately, it is also needed here to point out that therer'resome very unusual beats.
4. 00:33:647 (4,1,2) -transitions between these objects didn't work very well to me. Consider using something different to make your flow feel more natural . Looking for an example? Nope. No reason to change
5. 00:37:231 - a circle here would fit. Try to place it and see if it is playable enough or not, personally, i feel like without it your rhythm feels incomplete. Nope. No reason to change too
6. 00:45:981 (1) - make this slider shorter, so players will have enough time to switch from this slider to the next one. Having 1/8 gap here is just not enough and makes players feel uncomfortable and miss. No reason to change. maybe hard players well playing done this way
7. 01:09:647 (7) - a new combo her is kinda necessary since the rhythm and amount of repeats change on this slider. Nope. It's a change to hard for reading
8. 01:11:647 (2) - hthese sliders look like they have just ONE repeat, and the second repeats is way too hard to notice. Consider making the diff a bit more readable. For example, you can move the tail of this slider CLOSER to the following object, this way. So, players wil understand that there might be 2 repeats! Doesn't matter to playing. Why not? this is 1/6 repeats slider. but, Same as time 1/4 repeat slider
   Note: 01:14:147 (2) - same here. Never been a fan of such sliders, but it kinda fits here, so, why not. 　Same as just avobe
9. 01:17:481 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1) - according to the guide, this diff is meant to be Hard. Using these long streams here is too complicated for this kind of diffs, so I recommend you to replace some of them with a spinner! for the time being I'll keep this. I know it is hard. considering. but I'm following this. https://osu.ppy.sh/s/103372 Hyper is not Hard. Hyper is semi Insane
   
   The diff seems to be too tricky for a regular Hard, imo. Anyway, probably it's just me. Otherwise, you did a pretty good job.

[EXHAUST]

1. Your OD is way too high for a song with rhythm and timing changes. Reducing OD by one tick would increase the playability a lot.
2. 00:16:897 - 00:17:231 - the beats at these points are ignored and it seems kinda unreasonable to me. Why do you ignore them? They're pretty loud and quite important. nope. I don't ignore beats
3. 00:48:647 (1) - this is way too soon after the spinnre. An average player needs much more time to be able to read and catch the slider. Consider leaving some more space there.
4. 01:03:147 (6) - the jump feels exaggerated. Yeah, the beat here is a bit louder than normal ones, but this jump is way too big for it. It is really confusing, imo.
   Note: same happens a few more times, see for yourself.
   
   The diff is quite alright. You did a pretty good job with this one!

In general, the mapset could use some more work, some polishing and so on. But I like the way how it's done, keep improving it!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Best of luck!

1. good i like this mapping style just need some improvement on jump and stream

azintairin710 wrote:

hei... from my Q

oh... sh*t -_- my headphone is wrecked :3 maybe i just modding the placement and curve :3 so sorry

Overall

1. good i like this mapping style just need some improvement on jump and stream

EXHAUST
AR = 9? i think it better than force with the SV ok
00:02:481 (3,4,5) - stream better (imo) so it follow the flow
00:02:981 (7) - curved slider slightly better
00:03:231 (8) - fix the placement, make it stream instead of little jump
00:04:731 (2) - don't use to high angle point here :3 not following the rhythm ok
00:07:814 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - fix the distance :3 make it more beautiful
00:11:314 (1,2,3) - make stream like this
00:14:647 (4,5,6) - use stream to down right
00:25:981 (1) -i'm not sure this one is can be caught by player (even it's the best player) move the start point maybe no... you can't do this ._. i have re-check the ranking criteria and this one is an unranked criteria ._. fix this
00:40:064 (4) - unsnapped done
00:44:147 (2,3) - ctrl+g? ok
00:51:147 (1,2,3) - use stream
01:00:981 (3) - don't hide circle in AR 9 (except it's a fast click)
01:06:814 (2,3) - ctrl+g
01:12:647 (1,2,3) - fix the stream ok
01:28:647 (3) - fix ok
01:39:981 (1,2,3) - same as 00:02:981 (7,8,1)
01:40:897 (7,8) - why you do different spacing?

ADVANCED
quite good just reduce some fast click :3 it's like an easy insane :3 but ignore this if it's were your purposes
00:41:647 (4) - remove this and use new reverse (to hard if it's a hard diff :3 just ignore if it's an easy insane)
00:50:481 (2) - move to x:116 y:148 :3 better blanket here instead of stack (better flow to
01:11:981 (3) - fix the curve make better blanket
01:23:981 (1) - wow @_@ quite big jump :3 maybe fix this

good luck

1. 00:05:981 fix this, the sliders end is placed weirdly
2. 00:07:981(2) blanget this from (1)?
3. 00:25:981(1) make it straight

1. 00:01:981(1) make it straight

[Kanbe Kotori] wrote:

[KSHR's novice]

-00:22:647 (1,2) - how about using one repeat slider?
> No change. How can I do this? There are 4 beats in 1/6 here, so this rhythm can't be turn into a slider with one repeat.

-00:36:647 (1) - how about adding finish on head of slider?
> A cymbal sound doesn't go here, so no change.

-00:41:814 (5) - place on same position with former circle?
> Indeed it might be a bit hard for players to play this pattern. Okay.

-01:02:981 (4,5) - former one(01:02:314 (2)) looks better imo.
>Okay, turn them into a 1/4 slider with two repeats for consistency with 01:02:314 (2) - .

-01:12:647 (5) - add NC
> Nope. Select 01:09:981 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - and you can notice the reason why I don't do this.

N a s y a wrote:

gomi mod desu
僕のtotal kudosuが1桁のときの内容見てみてください・・（闇）

[KSHR's novice]

00:56:314 (5) - finish付け間違え？
> 難聴でした・・　Removed

01:09:314 (3) - finishいれてもいいかもしれない
> Fixed. soft finishいれました

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

[General]
AIMod 를 체크해주세요! Your AIMod
프리뷰 포인트가 일치 하지 않다네여 lol

그... 익저랑 어드밴스드의 난이도 갭이 좀 많이 큰 것 같아요. 베이직과 노비스의 차이도 약간 큰 것 같구요.
다른 분들은 어떨지 모르겠지만, 제가 느끼기에는 좀 많이 큰 차이가 있는 것 같네요...

[BASIC]

np XD

[KSHR's NOVICE]

np XD

[ADVANCED]

01:50:929 (1) - 리버스를 하나 없애고 익저처럼 한 리듬 당겨주시는게 좋을 것 같아요.
그 외에는 딱히 없네요 :3

[EXHAUST]

00:10:314 (3,6) - 요 슬라 두개도 서클로 바꾸시는게 더 박자감이 살 것 같아요.

00:47:397 (1) - 이 스핀의 끝 지점을 00:48:481 - 여기로 당기시는건 어떨까요? 약간의 텀을 주는게 좋을 것 같아요.

01:25:981 (3,4) - 이 두개를 ctrl+G 해서 순서를 바꾸는건 어떨까요? 더 자연스럽게 흘러 갈 것 같아요.

01:50:930 (1) - 리버스를 없애고 한 박자 당겨주시는게 듣기가 더 좋을 것 같아요.

짧은 슬라들이 매우 멋지군여!

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

Hello! as your in-game req!
Noob modder's trash short mod incoming!
I always give a suggestion. If you don't want to change, You don't need change anything.

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

[General]
AIMod 를 체크해주세요! Your AIMod
프리뷰 포인트가 일치 하지 않다네여 lol ok

그... 익저랑 어드밴스드의 난이도 갭이 좀 많이 큰 것 같아요. 베이직과 노비스의 차이도 약간 큰 것 같구요.
다른 분들은 어떨지 모르겠지만, 제가 느끼기에는 좀 많이 큰 차이가 있는 것 같네요... :D.. 상관없는겁니다!

[BASIC]

np XD

[KSHR's NOVICE]

np XD

[ADVANCED]

01:50:929 (1) - 리버스를 하나 없애고 익저처럼 한 리듬 당겨주시는게 좋을 것 같아요.
그 외에는 딱히 없네요 :3

[EXHAUST]

00:10:314 (3,6) - 요 슬라 두개도 서클로 바꾸시는게 더 박자감이 살 것 같아요. 그럴거같기도 하지만 배치를 하는게 귀찮으므로..

00:47:397 (1) - 이 스핀의 끝 지점을 00:48:481 - 여기로 당기시는건 어떨까요? 약간의 텀을 주는게 좋을 것 같아요. ok

01:25:981 (3,4) - 이 두개를 ctrl+G 해서 순서를 바꾸는건 어떨까요? 더 자연스럽게 흘러 갈 것 같아요. ok

01:50:930 (1) - 리버스를 없애고 한 박자 당겨주시는게 듣기가 더 좋을 것 같아요. 어드밴스드와 마찬가지로 nope. 1/6박자에 맞춰논거기때문에 당기면 박자에 안맞습니다.

짧은 슬라들이 매우 멋지군여!

Nice map :]
Good Luck!

Sonnyc wrote:

[BASIC]
00:01:981 (1) - 2칸 오른쪽으로. ok
00:28:981 (1) - 간격 ok
00:46:981 (4) - 개인적으로 00:45:647 (2)와 대칭되는 위치에 놓아도 괜찮은 스핀 이전 마무리가 될것 같은데 고민한번 바랍니다. nope
01:54:848 (2) - 가장 쉬운 난이도에 이런 변속 노트는 너무너무 가혹하네요. ok

[KSHR's NOVICE]
Good diff, but I don't feel this diff as a "Novice".

[ADVANCED]
00:41:647 (4,5) - 이거 대신 1/4 리버스 슬라 쓰면 좀 별로려나요? 별 의미는 없어보이네요

[EXHAUST]
00:16:730 (2,3,4) - 끝에 피니시 같은거 넣어주실 수 있나요? 00:16:897 이런 중간 박자를 씹어서 어색한 느낌을 덜해줄지도. ok
01:39:536 (2) - y축 2개 더 높여서 226 만드시면 완벽히 (1,3) 가운데에 위치해요ok

BASIC은 노말 느낌인데 NOVICE와 ADVANCE는 하드+ 느낌이네요. 익저 난이도의 난이도 차이는 괜찮다 쳐도 베이식-노비스 갭이 크네요.

그건 노비스가 엄연한 하드기때문이죠. 어드밴스는 인세인입니다. 익저스트는 엑스트라구요

ShiraKai wrote:

オッホッホ

[General]
none.

[BASIC]

1. 00:22:981 (4) - add finishとNCどうでしょ～ いいアクセントになると思います ok
2. 00:45:647 (2,4) - ここのclapはS:C9のじゃなくていいんです？ なんかデフォルトのだと浮いている気が… ok
3. 00:56:647 (1) - 好みだけど尻尾の方もうちょっと曲げませんか？ しっかりブランケットする方が僕は好きなのら ok
   
   ム

   
4. 01:23:314 (1) - 01:23:981 - をもっと際立たせるために01:23:314 - の音量をもうちょっと下げたいなあ ん…特に意味はさなそうなのでnope

[ADVANCED]

1. 00:10:481 (2) - x168,y:190とかにちょっとだけ下げた方がAIMしやすそうです( ˘◡˘ ) ok( ˘◡˘ )
2. 00:38:647 (2,3) - 音取りなんですけど00:37:314 (2,3) - と一緒でいいと思います、というか今のだと少し違和感が…やってみたもののこっちの方に違和感を感じたのでnopeで
3. 00:54:647 (1,1) - remove NC? 形的にも無い方が綺麗に見えると思います その後に出る風車形の奴らと合わせたものなんだしEXHAUSTと合わせたものでもあります
4. 01:01:314 (5) - 終点にwhistle?ok
5. 01:16:647 (1) - 01:16:981 (2) - と同じ形置きたくないですか？コピペ少なめにするための意図的な曲げでした
6. 01:46:314 (7) - 00:45:981 (1) - 　みたいなパターンで1/4から1/8に代わってるのでNC入れませんか？1/8関係なくNC入れるところでした( ˘◡˘ )
   01:46:314 (7) - ^
7. 01:39:314 (1,2) - (1)は始点と終点、(2)は中点にfinishとかどうですか 　入れ忘れ( ˘◡˘ )Nice

[EXHAUST]

1. 00:16:314 (6,1,2,3,4) - 音取りが少し怪しいような… 00:16:897 - 00:17:231 - 00:17:564 - の音を無視しているのがとても気になりました
   上記の音を拾わないにしても00:16:730 (2,3,4) - を青線から始めるのは打っててとても変な気分でした…
   
   
   音取りの提案を幾つかしておきます 最大限に参考にして音取りしなおしました
2. 01:39:536 (2) - 始点のfinishいらないと思います
3. 01:45:397 (10) - 好みですケドこの辺こんな感じでNCいれたいッス～おｋ
   
   ム

   before
   
   after
   

ストリームの配置がcoolすぎてビビりマシマシ (*ゝω・)ﾉ ｱﾘｶﾞ㌧♪

以上です～ ベリーナイスマップでした

1. 노트소리가 전체적으로 작은거같은데 기붕탓인가 긁적..
2. 지금 안건데 ADVANCED 랑 EXHAUST 사이에 난이도 차이가 좀 크네요.

1. 00:00:648 (1,1) - 이거 스피너사이 간격이 쪼매 좁은거 같기도한데 BPM이 높은것도 그렇고 전체적인 난이도를 보니 기대 수치가 높은 것 같으니 이쯤해둘게영.
2. 00:16:481 (3) - 디스턴스가.. 그리고 자세히보시면 또 삐끗한것들 꾀 많아여.
3. 00:54:647 (3,4,5) - 엄청난 의외인건 제가 블랭킷을 매우 좋아한다는거죠.
4. 01:10:481 (2) - 다른파트처럼 서클두개는 어때여. 뭔가 뉴비들은 이거 처리하기 힘들어 보이는데.

1. 00:13:147 - at this part, the note density was increased suddenly. so, I think the players may confuse beat with visual side.
2. 00:22:647 (1,2) - I don't think some player can't hit this. if I'm a mapper of this, I wanna put 4-hit repeat slider at here. / 少し難しく見える
3. 00:46:981 (2) - how about NC here? probably, some players miss at previous note. so, we should safe way for supply HP as add NC. plus, no break time immediately after the slider.

1. 00:06:481 (2) - 이건 겹치지 않는게 어떤가여? 아님말고
2. 00:26:647 (1) - 소리가 너무 안들려요. 최소한 휘슬이라도 넣어주세요.

Pandiar wrote:

[KSHR's novice]

00:15:814 (4) - 好みの問題なのですが、(3)の最後がやや下向きで終わっているので画像のような形はどうでしょうか

SPOILER

>Fixed

01:53:006 (1) - ここ(01:53:467)のピアノの音がテンポもわかりやすいので、単発で拾っても良いのではと思いました。

SPOILER

>曲調に合わせてobjectの数を出来るだけ増やしたくないのでこのままで。

Sonnyc wrote:

[KSHR's NOVICE]
Good diff, but I don't feel this diff as a "Novice".
Simplified some rhythms/patterns. I'm going to do it again or partly remake if someone points out the same.

ShiraKai wrote:

[KSHR's NOVICE]

1. 00:14:314 (2) - 曲げて00:14:647 (3) - と対応させたくないですか？
   
2. 00:22:870 (2) - プレイしてみての感想なんですけど、そのまま下に流すより上に持って行った方がやりやすかったなあと言った感じです
   
   たとえば

   
   Fixed
3. 00:51:314 (1) - 始点、中点とともに終点も同じ音だと思うので終点にもwhistle欲しいです。
   Fixed
4. 00:52:647 (1) - SamplesetのNormalの付け忘れ？
   ついてるはず！
5. 01:05:647 (4,2) - 綺麗に重ねたいッス
   おっと

Dark Fang wrote:

[KSHR's NOVICE]

今晩は Hi

1. 00:13:147 - at this part, the note density was increased suddenly. so, I think the players may confuse beat with visual side.
   I'm sure it doesn't really affect gameplay though. Well moved downward 00:12:647 (1) - by 1 grid to make DS consistent.
2. 00:22:647 (1,2) - I don't think some player can't hit this. if I'm a mapper of this, I wanna put 4-hit repeat slider at here. / 少し難しく見える
   It would be easier for players to play 2 repeat sliders with 8 objects (the current pattern) than 4 ones with 4 objects (the one you suggested) imo.
3. 00:46:981 (2) - how about NC here? probably, some players miss at previous note. so, we should safe way for supply HP as add NC. plus, no break time immediately after the slider.
   Is there stuff that misleads players here? 00:44:647 (1,2) - can give enough HP recovery imo. Well I see no reason to add NC more than necessary.

1. これ多分difficulty spreadアウトかもしれない・・・(EXHAUSTとADVANCEDの差)　ADVANCEDをもう少し難しくするのが一番手っ取り早いかも。間にもう１個diff作るほうが確実だけど・・・。
   

1. 00:00:648 (1) - 終端だけでもsoft hitsound使ったほうがいいかも。ここに音が入るのは不自然です。
2. 00:21:981 (1,2) - 00:22:647 (1,2,3,4) - ここはいいんだけど00:21:981 (1,2) -こっちはまだ1/3の音ないような・・・ちょっと難しいかもしれないけど1/4リズムでここは音取りしましょう。
3. 00:29:564 (3) - ここも1/8じゃないです。1/4なのでこんな感じにしてみては？
   
   
   nice stream :3
   

1. 00:19:314 (1) - finish
   

1. とてもきれいです
   

1. 00:19:314 (3) - finish
2. 00:28:981 (1,2) - スペーシング乱れてるので直しておきましょう。