Leehom Wang - Yao Gun Zen Me Le!!

posted
Total Posts
21
show more
Topic Starter
liangv587
好好改
Awaken
王直男 谢谢你的爱
Narcissu
沒想到587做正常的insane 這麼厲害……Orz

手動黑化什麼鬼……那個osb真的要這樣?

怎麼有兩個Mp3 …… 而且kbps 這麼低……黑科技還是什麼?

BG是1366*767……可能你有強迫症會希望換成768……

[Easy]

很不錯111

不過到後面似乎就懶了,基本都是貪吃蛇和blanket,多錨點少了,弧度也固定了

[Normal]

00:18:677 - 重音還是建議放置點擊,其他地方如果被排版限制就算了。這種帶了finish的儘量都起滑條下圈吧

[Hard]

01:39:148 (1,2,3,4) - 這種3/4表示人聲的方式,如果不希望滑條尾的normal-hitnormal影響節奏可以把samplest 切成soft達到簡易消音的效果

01:43:030 (3) - 值得一提是音樂這裡很神奇的停掉了,不建議overmap在hard

[Insane]

01:23:619 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 這個完全貼底線了大概相當難打……【雖然我小映射輕鬆虐

02:00:324 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - 只管放8/16連打不必擔心難打……四下一頓反而不合曲,也不合4.5的星級

如果這是妹子歌我把星全給你 ~\(≧▽≦)/~
jonathanlfj
i tried, need furthur refinements in some transitions since different layers seem to go at different timing...

331,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
1742,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
24330,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
25080,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
25785,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
26470,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
27153,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
29978,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
64188,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
65246,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
66657,361.44578313253,4,1,1,70,1,0
68102,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
69513,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
70924,337.078651685393,4,1,1,70,1,0
71598,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
72312,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
75148,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
78676,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
79426,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
80092,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
80797,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
100561,348.837209302326,4,1,1,70,1,0
102305,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0
103382,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
111896,338.983050847458,4,1,1,70,1,0
112573,355.029585798817,4,1,1,70,1,0
112928,372.670807453416,4,1,1,70,1,0
113300,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
114679,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
116090,350.877192982456,4,1,1,70,1,0
117493,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
118921,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
119626,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
120315,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
125980,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
126730,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
127435,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
128120,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
128786,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
131609,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
151373,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0
Topic Starter
liangv587

jonathanlfj wrote:

i tried, need furthur refinements in some transitions since different layers seem to go at different timing...

331,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
1742,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
24330,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
25080,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
25785,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
26470,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
27153,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
29978,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
64188,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
65246,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
66657,361.44578313253,4,1,1,70,1,0
68102,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
69513,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
70924,337.078651685393,4,1,1,70,1,0
71598,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
72312,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
75148,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
78676,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
79426,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
80092,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
80797,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
100561,348.837209302326,4,1,1,70,1,0
102305,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0
103382,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
111896,338.983050847458,4,1,1,70,1,0
112573,355.029585798817,4,1,1,70,1,0
112928,372.670807453416,4,1,1,70,1,0
113300,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
114679,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
116090,350.877192982456,4,1,1,70,1,0
117493,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
118921,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
119626,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
120315,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
125980,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
126730,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
127435,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
128120,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
128786,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
131609,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
151373,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0
thanks a lot
zj0924
占个坑先~

[Insane]
  1. 00:08:447 (5,6) - 45的flow角度有点大,试试类似这样的
  2. 00:09:506 (3,4) - 同样的道理,渣改
  3. 00:47:977 (7,8,1) - 这样的flow尽量避免,很难受
  4. 01:09:160 (1) - 如果要用这样的反跳也应该是叠在之前出现过的圈上效果会比较好,目前的摆法一直会抢拍,虽然你用了nc但我觉得并没有什么用。叠01:08:807 (4) - 上
  5. 01:12:312 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 这里bass音很强依旧不建议用钝角来表达
  6. 01:20:797 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 我觉得可以放开一点,打起来很紧感觉
  7. 01:23:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这梗打起来很难受
  8. 01:32:973 (6) - 叠01:32:091 (1) - 上,会好一点...?否则678的flow...
  9. 01:41:345 (1,1) - nc分梗?
  10. 01:42:305 (1,2,3,4) - 由于前面的更我觉得这里用连打串会更好
  11. 02:12:667 (7,8,1) - 这flow直的难受..
  12. 02:17:785 (4,5,6) - 太难打了这大钝角,而且距离还不一样。做个类似这样的效果会好很多
  13. 02:26:256 (4,5,6) - ^
剩下的有空就更新~
Topic Starter
liangv587

zj0924 wrote:

占个坑先~

[Insane]
  1. 00:08:447 (5,6) - 45的flow角度有点大,试试类似这样的不喜欢overlap
  2. 00:09:506 (3,4) - 同样的道理,渣改这个可以
  3. 00:47:977 (7,8,1) - 这样的flow尽量避免,很难受钝角跳并没什么不好
  4. 01:09:160 (1) - 如果要用这样的反跳也应该是叠在之前出现过的圈上效果会比较好,目前的摆法一直会抢拍,虽然你用了nc但我觉得并没有什么用。叠01:08:807 (4) - 上并不会抢拍,打图还是要听声音的,而且这里音效音量都降低了
  5. 01:12:312 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 这里bass音很强依旧不建议用钝角来表达
  6. 01:20:797 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 我觉得可以放开一点,打起来很紧感觉
  7. 01:23:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这梗打起来很难受
  8. 01:32:973 (6) - 叠01:32:091 (1) - 上,会好一点...?否则678的flow...单点跳还管flow
  9. 01:41:345 (1,1) - nc分梗?
  10. 01:42:305 (1,2,3,4) - 由于前面的更我觉得这里用连打串会更好
  11. 02:12:667 (7,8,1) - 这flow直的难受..
  12. 02:17:785 (4,5,6) - 太难打了这大钝角,而且距离还不一样。做个类似这样的效果会好很多
  13. 02:26:256 (4,5,6) - ^懒改了
剩下的有空就更新~
谢摸
说好的剩下的呢
Kencho
woc 有2kd
[General]
  1. 根據現在圖的走向,除了EZ以外全難度HP-1?
[Insane]
  1. 00:24:517 (2) - 由於突然減速的關係建議再加個NC

    00:53:625 (4) - ctrl+G會更好

    00:55:036 (4) - 這滑條應該ctrl+H重新放一下吧,順著方向比較好
[Hard]
  1. Nice diff
[Normal]
  1. 保持DS誤差不要超過+-0.05x

    00:23:624 (4,1) - 1.05x

    00:24:330 (1,2) - 0.93x

    01:03:507 (4,1) - 0.92x

    01:18:324 (2,3) - 1.07x

    01:40:561 (3) - 雙折返好坑,建議換成單折返

    01:50:440 (3,4) - 01:51:499 (4,1) - 02:04:550 (3,4) - 02:05:980 (1,2) - 02:06:730 (2,3) - 02:07:435 (3,4) - 02:08:120 (4,1) - DS

    排版來說沒什麼,就是感覺圓圈有點太多,不過對比EZ的話也足夠了
[Easy]
  1. 00:13:036 (1,2) - 1.06x

    00:23:624 (3,1) - 01:02:801 (4,1) - 01:03:860 (1,2) - DS

    01:03:860 (1,2,3) - 這個走向不太好

    01:09:513 (3,4) - 01:17:971 (1,2) - 01:20:444 (4,1) - 01:36:326 (1,2) - DS

    01:40:561 (3) - 不要雙折返

    01:47:617 (2,1) - 01:50:440 (2,3) - 02:07:082 (2,3) - 02:29:961 (1,2) - DS
美麗
meii18
Hello! Old M4M

[Easy]
  1. I would like to use 1.1x or 1.2x spacing to avoid the overlaps in my opinion
  2. 00:27:153(1,2)- This pattern doesn't look really good in my opinion.You can re-arrange the pattern like here but then you have to move some objects to avoid spacing issues
  3. 00:31:389(1,2)- On this note there are not the reset of the vocals as I can hear the music plus the vocals.The NC must be on the next note I mean on 00:33:154(2)- because the reset of the vocals are on 00:32:801- but there's slider's tail and on this note would be good to emphasize the reset of the vocals so I suggest to remove the NC from 00:31:389(1)- and add it on 00:33:154(2)-
  4. 00:35:272- Here's a noticeable beat and seems that it's kind of strong beat.A note would be good here to emphasize this stronger beat
  5. 00:37:389(1)- Here you have to remove the NC since there aren't reset of the vocals and add the NC on 00:38:448(3)- instead
  6. 00:49:742(3,4)- Spacing issue
  7. 01:04:540(2,3)- The flow seems to be odd here since the direction of 01:04:540(2)- feels it's like that it goes to left but the next note is on right part so I suggest to make ctrl+H here to improve the flow between these notes
  8. 01:09:513(1)- I guess you forgot to add the NC since there are the reset of the vocals as I can see
  9. 01:11:261- Another noticeable and also strong beat.To emphasize it instead leaving it empty,you can add a note here
  10. 02:28:550(3,4)- Honestly saying,this rhythm seems pretty weird to me because the vocal is saying only one time that lyric and starting this tick with the next slider's head instead having there a note would be good.Also you have to snap the slider back to 1/1 if you will move it to 02:28:550- and then the note must be on 02:29:609- because there's a strong beat and it will feel empty then if there will not be a note or something to emphasize that strong beat
    I suggest to take a look again at NCs.Some of them are added where are not the reset of the vocals


[Hard]
  1. 01:08:012(4,5)- On 00:11:360(4,5)- you used 1.6x spacing but here you used kind of 1.5x spacing.I suggest to use the same spacing as you did at 01:08:012(4,5)- but you need here 1.3x spacing to have the same spacing like 01:08:012(4,5)-
    01:08:807(8,1)- Here there's a little break between these notes and you used the same spacing but seems like that it feels confusing.When I played this pattern,I missed 1 clicking it early because there was the same spacing.You have to increase the spacing of this note (1)- to avoid confusing while playing this pattern
  2. 01:31:032(1)- I don't think that changing the SV here with 0.80x would feel useful enough for following the vocals from there and also increasing the SV to 1.00 it's the same but you have just to extend the slider like here so increasing the SV to 1.00 would follow the vocals much better in my opinion that 0.80 SV


[Insane]
  1. 00:50:448(5,6,7,8)- The guitars are going to be stronger here but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly which doesn't emphasize the guitars at all.To emphasize the stronger guitars,you have to increase the spacing of the notes to give that emphasis as you did at other patterns where are the strong guitars
  2. 00:58:566(2,3)- Seems like here's is kind of overmapping because here I don't hear doublets if you listen the music carefully so you have to delete 00:58:683(3)- to avoid overmapping and also since on the purple tick (1/3 tick) there's no any sound to follow it
  3. 01:08:807(4,1)- Same issue as I said in Hard difficult
  4. 02:21:314(8,1)- The guitars are getting stronger on 02:21:491(1)- as I can see but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly so you have to increase the spacing here to emphasize the strong guitars instead decreasing them suddenly


Overall good set.Nothing to say in Normal.Some mods would be appreciated before pushing it forward and then you can call me for a recheck.
Good Luck!
Topic Starter
liangv587

ByBy wrote:

Hello! Old M4M

[Easy]
  1. I would like to use 1.1x or 1.2x spacing to avoid the overlaps in my opinion
  2. 00:27:153(1,2)- This pattern doesn't look really good in my opinion.You can re-arrange the pattern like here but then you have to move some objects to avoid spacing issues
  3. 00:31:389(1,2)- On this note there are not the reset of the vocals as I can hear the music plus the vocals.The NC must be on the next note I mean on 00:33:154(2)- because the reset of the vocals are on 00:32:801- but there's slider's tail and on this note would be good to emphasize the reset of the vocals so I suggest to remove the NC from 00:31:389(1)- and add it on 00:33:154(2)-
  4. 00:35:272- Here's a noticeable beat and seems that it's kind of strong beat.A note would be good here to emphasize this stronger beat
  5. 00:37:389(1)- Here you have to remove the NC since there aren't reset of the vocals and add the NC on 00:38:448(3)- instead
  6. 00:49:742(3,4)- Spacing issue
  7. 01:04:540(2,3)- The flow seems to be odd here since the direction of 01:04:540(2)- feels it's like that it goes to left but the next note is on right part so I suggest to make ctrl+H here to improve the flow between these notes
  8. 01:09:513(1)- I guess you forgot to add the NC since there are the reset of the vocals as I can see ok
  9. 01:11:261- Another noticeable and also strong beat.To emphasize it instead leaving it empty,you can add a note here
  10. 02:28:550(3,4)- Honestly saying,this rhythm seems pretty weird to me because the vocal is saying only one time that lyric and starting this tick with the next slider's head instead having there a note would be good.Also you have to snap the slider back to 1/1 if you will move it to 02:28:550- and then the note must be on 02:29:609- because there's a strong beat and it will feel empty then if there will not be a note or something to emphasize that strong beat ok
    I suggest to take a look again at NCs.Some of them are added where are not the reset of the vocals


[Hard]
  1. 01:08:012(4,5)- On 00:11:360(4,5)- you used 1.6x spacing but here you used kind of 1.5x spacing.I suggest to use the same spacing as you did at 01:08:012(4,5)- but you need here 1.3x spacing to have the same spacing like 01:08:012(4,5)-
    01:08:807(8,1)- Here there's a little break between these notes and you used the same spacing but seems like that it feels confusing.When I played this pattern,I missed 1 clicking it early because there was the same spacing.You have to increase the spacing of this note (1)- to avoid confusing while playing this pattern
  2. 01:31:032(1)- I don't think that changing the SV here with 0.80x would feel useful enough for following the vocals from there and also increasing the SV to 1.00 it's the same but you have just to extend the slider like here so increasing the SV to 1.00 would follow the vocals much better in my opinion that 0.80 SV


[Insane]
  1. 00:50:448(5,6,7,8)- The guitars are going to be stronger here but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly which doesn't emphasize the guitars at all.To emphasize the stronger guitars,you have to increase the spacing of the notes to give that emphasis as you did at other patterns where are the strong guitars
  2. 00:58:566(2,3)- Seems like here's is kind of overmapping because here I don't hear doublets if you listen the music carefully so you have to delete 00:58:683(3)- to avoid overmapping and also since on the purple tick (1/3 tick) there's no any sound to follow it
  3. 01:08:807(4,1)- Same issue as I said in Hard difficult
  4. 02:21:314(8,1)- The guitars are getting stronger on 02:21:491(1)- as I can see but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly so you have to increase the spacing here to emphasize the strong guitars instead decreasing them suddenly


Overall good set.Nothing to say in Normal.Some mods would be appreciated before pushing it forward and then you can call me for a recheck.
Good Luck!
thanks for modding
Topic Starter
liangv587

Kencho wrote:

woc 有2kd
[General]
  1. 根據現在圖的走向,除了EZ以外全難度HP-1?
[Insane]
  1. 00:24:517 (2) - 由於突然減速的關係建議再加個NC 可以反应过来的

    00:53:625 (4) - ctrl+G會更好 ok

    00:55:036 (4) - 這滑條應該ctrl+H重新放一下吧,順著方向比較好 ok
[Hard]
  1. Nice diff
[Normal]
  1. 保持DS誤差不要超過+-0.05x 由于timing变化,为了物件之间的间隙,变了一些ds,但是影响不大

    00:23:624 (4,1) - 1.05x

    00:24:330 (1,2) - 0.93x

    01:03:507 (4,1) - 0.92x

    01:18:324 (2,3) - 1.07x

    01:40:561 (3) - 雙折返好坑,建議換成單折返 这里不好处理,想过很多方案,这个是最好的

    01:50:440 (3,4) - 01:51:499 (4,1) - 02:04:550 (3,4) - 02:05:980 (1,2) - 02:06:730 (2,3) - 02:07:435 (3,4) - 02:08:120 (4,1) - DS

    排版來說沒什麼,就是感覺圓圈有點太多,不過對比EZ的話也足夠了
[Easy]
  1. 00:13:036 (1,2) - 1.06x

    00:23:624 (3,1) - 01:02:801 (4,1) - 01:03:860 (1,2) - DS

    01:03:860 (1,2,3) - 這個走向不太好 ok

    01:09:513 (3,4) - 01:17:971 (1,2) - 01:20:444 (4,1) - 01:36:326 (1,2) - DS

    01:40:561 (3) - 不要雙折返 这里不好处理,想过很多方案,这个是最好的

    01:47:617 (2,1) - 01:50:440 (2,3) - 02:07:082 (2,3) - 02:29:961 (1,2) - DS
美麗
thanks for modding
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply