1. Easy (1.44 stars, 158 notes)
2. Hard (3.22 stars, 457 notes)
3. Insane (4.49 stars, 625 notes)
4. Normal (2.01 stars, 227 notes)

1. 00:10:182 (1) - 我覺得這邊用soft會比較好, normal搭配琵琶有點大聲
2. 00:38:417 (3,1) - 尾巴x384 y240, 可以讓那邊開點
3. 00:40:182 (1) - 去NC ?
4. 00:51:476 (1) - 去NC吧, 這似乎沒什麼特別的
5. 01:08:064 (2) - soft怎麼樣
6. 01:51:829 (1) - 這裡也soft如何
7. 02:21:829 (1) - 去NC ? 通常easy除非特別的地方不然似乎不太能用(1,1) ((歌詞不算啦
8. 02:31:358 (1) - 聽不太出這裡有鼓的hit-hat (跟normal的鼓混在一起了), 建議直接鼓的hitnormal會比較合適

1. 00:04:535 (1,2,3) - 同easy的建議, 不然就是把音量調小點
2. 00:10:182 (1,2,3) - 這也是^
3. 00:15:829 (1,2,3) - 折返的點前的^
4. 00:21:476 (1,2,3) - 也是^
5. 01:06:652 (4) - 嘛類似的你應該知道在哪就不提了

1. 有些地方跟前幾個難度一樣, 建議soft或是小聲點

1. 00:19:711 (5) - 這, 類似豆子什麼的, 我在玩的時候很在意它 (??) 也許可以換點比較不會違和的 (我覺得啦
2. 02:01:358 (5) - 水滴, 豆子, 鴨子 (?)

- Miomio Chii - wrote:

hihi, here is my mod. From Queue's M4M.
-------------------------------------------------
[-General-]
Ok.

[Easy]

1. 00:10:182 (1) - 我覺得這邊用soft會比較好, normal搭配琵琶有點大聲没动
2. 00:38:417 (3,1) - 尾巴x384 y240, 可以讓那邊開點 ok
3. 00:40:182 (1) - 去NC ?前后明显不一样
4. 00:51:476 (1) - 去NC吧, 這似乎沒什麼特別的 ok
5. 01:08:064 (2) - soft怎麼樣减了音量
6. 01:51:829 (1) - 這裡也soft如何没动
7. 02:21:829 (1) - 去NC ? 通常easy除非特別的地方不然似乎不太能用(1,1) ((歌詞不算啦前后明显不一样
8. 02:31:358 (1) - 聽不太出這裡有鼓的hit-hat (跟normal的鼓混在一起了), 建議直接鼓的hitnormal會比較合適能听出来哈

[Normal]

1. 00:04:535 (1,2,3) - 同easy的建議, 不然就是把音量調小點
2. 00:10:182 (1,2,3) - 這也是^减了音量
3. 00:15:829 (1,2,3) - 折返的點前的^
4. 00:21:476 (1,2,3) - 也是^
5. 01:06:652 (4) - 嘛類似的你應該知道在哪就不提了其他没动

[Hard]

1. 有些地方跟前幾個難度一樣, 建議soft或是小聲點减了一点音量

[Insane]
ya我的成績還在呢

1. 00:19:711 (5) - 這, 類似豆子什麼的, 我在玩的時候很在意它 (??) 也許可以換點比較不會違和的 (我覺得啦6？
2. 02:01:358 (5) - 水滴, 豆子, 鴨子 (?)⑨？

End of this mod,
其實大致上可以啦,
就有些琵琶聲用normal真的有點大聲
希望這渣mod能幫上_(:3 J L)_ ...
Good luck to rank this map ! 谢

Regraz wrote:

哇！中文歌，先射一星
这里占个位置
水平有限只mod Easy和Normal
真-新人 mod的不好勿喷QwQ
=======================
你们都说音效！！！！我看看排列吧。。。。。TwT
[General]
1.可取消 letterbox during breaks.ok
2.Stack Leniency为啥是6了。。。。
[Easy]
1. 00:10:182 (1) - 这个slider的形状感觉违和.
2. 00:12:299 (2,1) - 避免堆在一起
3. 00:14:417 (2,3,1) - 虽然他们的间距在允许范围内，但是看起来还是有些差距啊，不如改成等距。、
4. 00:27:123 (1) - 滑条尾加个音效吧ok
5. 00:46:888 (3,4) - 长音，感觉应该改成长滑条
6. 01:29:241 (2,3) - 感觉两个滑条不太对得上vocal？

忽视这个滑条形状
。。。。

7. 01:35:594 (3,1) - 叠上了不太好看
8. 01:36:299 (1,2) - 不做个blanket么？感觉不太好看这里
9. 01:40:535 (3) - 这个太棒了赞一个！;D
10. 01:44:770 (2,3,1) - 不如把2尾巴 3 和1的头做成正三角形，看着也美观一些。
11. 02:07:358 (3) - 加个音效吧。
12. 02:08:770 (1) - 滑条尾加个音效吧。ok
13. 02:20:064 (3,1) - 还是感觉不好看。。。擦到一起了。。。 ok【好吧。。。。
[Normal]
感觉有点简单了。。。AR+1？其实也差不多，你喜欢就改了吧
1. 00:25:711 (3) - 加个音效？
2. 01:17:947 (1,2,3) - 加音效强调一下
3. 02:07:358 (3) - 加个音效？
其他没改
===============没了=====
没能帮得上大忙，不好意思。。。。
太谦虚了，谢

Hollow Wings wrote:

as ur req

General

1. Leehom Wang 果然还是写成 Wang Leehom，日本名字不也是不改变姓名顺序的么人家是美国人，这是他英文名，不是Wang Li Hong
2. 中英文标题叹号统一，要都有要么都没有

Insane

1. 01:58:888 (1,2,3,4,5) - 这里还有前面同样的一个地方，虽然这么下节奏也感觉没啥大问题，不过跟着琴声不是更好么，还换个梗，更丰富些
2. 02:00:299 (1) - 从这里吉他+琵琶都是连打的节奏啊，全都放弃不说还都复制前面的这是何苦。。。想点别的梗放在这里感觉更好试过了，连打不适合吧，那些音全是飘的
3. 几个8个单点组成的几何跳无非为：两个弧线钝角跳，两个不同组合的正方形，折返。其实并不需要拘泥于一定要放单点，或者说放单点也不一定只用这么几个梗，主要是用的太多了虽然木有问题但是嘛你懂的
4. 其实全图都是这样，多用点梗吧，看前面其实我觉得节奏抓的还是不错的，不过就算后面复制粘贴前面的的话最好也稍微变那么点，不然会很无聊的0.0.0
5. 当然了，这张图直接打下来的话也还算不错，至少没违和感，以上只是以mapping角度来提点建议

其他的改了

嗯。。。王力宏+音效挺认真=射你一星

goodluck 0.0

jonathanlfj wrote:

i tried, need furthur refinements in some transitions since different layers seem to go at different timing...

Timing

331,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
1742,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
24330,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
25080,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
25785,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
26470,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
27153,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
29978,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
64188,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
65246,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
66657,361.44578313253,4,1,1,70,1,0
68102,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
69513,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
70924,337.078651685393,4,1,1,70,1,0
71598,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
72312,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
75148,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
78676,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
79426,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
80092,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
80797,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
100561,348.837209302326,4,1,1,70,1,0
102305,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0
103382,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
111896,338.983050847458,4,1,1,70,1,0
112573,355.029585798817,4,1,1,70,1,0
112928,372.670807453416,4,1,1,70,1,0
113300,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
114679,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
116090,350.877192982456,4,1,1,70,1,0
117493,357.142857142857,4,1,1,70,1,0
118921,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
119626,344.827586206897,4,1,1,70,1,0
120315,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
125980,375,4,1,1,70,1,0
126730,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
127435,342.857142857143,4,1,1,70,1,0
128120,333.333333333333,4,1,1,70,1,0
128786,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
131609,352.941176470588,4,1,1,70,1,0
151373,359.281437125748,4,1,1,70,1,0

zj0924 wrote:

占个坑先~

[Insane]

1. 00:08:447 (5,6) - 45的flow角度有点大，试试类似这样的不喜欢overlap
   
2. 00:09:506 (3,4) - 同样的道理，渣改这个可以
   
3. 00:47:977 (7,8,1) - 这样的flow尽量避免，很难受钝角跳并没什么不好
4. 01:09:160 (1) - 如果要用这样的反跳也应该是叠在之前出现过的圈上效果会比较好，目前的摆法一直会抢拍，虽然你用了nc但我觉得并没有什么用。叠01:08:807 (4) - 上并不会抢拍，打图还是要听声音的，而且这里音效音量都降低了
5. 01:12:312 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 这里bass音很强依旧不建议用钝角来表达
6. 01:20:797 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 我觉得可以放开一点，打起来很紧感觉
7. 01:23:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这梗打起来很难受
8. 01:32:973 (6) - 叠01:32:091 (1) - 上，会好一点...？否则678的flow...单点跳还管flow
9. 01:41:345 (1,1) - nc分梗？好
10. 01:42:305 (1,2,3,4) - 由于前面的更我觉得这里用连打串会更好
11. 02:12:667 (7,8,1) - 这flow直的难受..
12. 02:17:785 (4,5,6) - 太难打了这大钝角，而且距离还不一样。做个类似这样的效果会好很多
    
13. 02:26:256 (4,5,6) - ^懒改了

剩下的有空就更新~

1. I would like to use 1.1x or 1.2x spacing to avoid the overlaps in my opinion
2. 00:27:153(1,2)- This pattern doesn't look really good in my opinion.You can re-arrange the pattern like here but then you have to move some objects to avoid spacing issues
3. 00:31:389(1,2)- On this note there are not the reset of the vocals as I can hear the music plus the vocals.The NC must be on the next note I mean on 00:33:154(2)- because the reset of the vocals are on 00:32:801- but there's slider's tail and on this note would be good to emphasize the reset of the vocals so I suggest to remove the NC from 00:31:389(1)- and add it on 00:33:154(2)-
4. 00:35:272- Here's a noticeable beat and seems that it's kind of strong beat.A note would be good here to emphasize this stronger beat
5. 00:37:389(1)- Here you have to remove the NC since there aren't reset of the vocals and add the NC on 00:38:448(3)- instead
6. 00:49:742(3,4)- Spacing issue
7. 01:04:540(2,3)- The flow seems to be odd here since the direction of 01:04:540(2)- feels it's like that it goes to left but the next note is on right part so I suggest to make ctrl+H here to improve the flow between these notes
8. 01:09:513(1)- I guess you forgot to add the NC since there are the reset of the vocals as I can see
9. 01:11:261- Another noticeable and also strong beat.To emphasize it instead leaving it empty,you can add a note here
10. 02:28:550(3,4)- Honestly saying,this rhythm seems pretty weird to me because the vocal is saying only one time that lyric and starting this tick with the next slider's head instead having there a note would be good.Also you have to snap the slider back to 1/1 if you will move it to 02:28:550- and then the note must be on 02:29:609- because there's a strong beat and it will feel empty then if there will not be a note or something to emphasize that strong beat
    I suggest to take a look again at NCs.Some of them are added where are not the reset of the vocals

1. 01:08:012(4,5)- On 00:11:360(4,5)- you used 1.6x spacing but here you used kind of 1.5x spacing.I suggest to use the same spacing as you did at 01:08:012(4,5)- but you need here 1.3x spacing to have the same spacing like 01:08:012(4,5)-
   01:08:807(8,1)- Here there's a little break between these notes and you used the same spacing but seems like that it feels confusing.When I played this pattern,I missed 1 clicking it early because there was the same spacing.You have to increase the spacing of this note (1)- to avoid confusing while playing this pattern
2. 01:31:032(1)- I don't think that changing the SV here with 0.80x would feel useful enough for following the vocals from there and also increasing the SV to 1.00 it's the same but you have just to extend the slider like here so increasing the SV to 1.00 would follow the vocals much better in my opinion that 0.80 SV

1. 00:50:448(5,6,7,8)- The guitars are going to be stronger here but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly which doesn't emphasize the guitars at all.To emphasize the stronger guitars,you have to increase the spacing of the notes to give that emphasis as you did at other patterns where are the strong guitars
2. 00:58:566(2,3)- Seems like here's is kind of overmapping because here I don't hear doublets if you listen the music carefully so you have to delete 00:58:683(3)- to avoid overmapping and also since on the purple tick (1/3 tick) there's no any sound to follow it
3. 01:08:807(4,1)- Same issue as I said in Hard difficult
4. 02:21:314(8,1)- The guitars are getting stronger on 02:21:491(1)- as I can see but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly so you have to increase the spacing here to emphasize the strong guitars instead decreasing them suddenly

ByBy wrote:

Hello! Old M4M

[Easy]

1. I would like to use 1.1x or 1.2x spacing to avoid the overlaps in my opinion
2. 00:27:153(1,2)- This pattern doesn't look really good in my opinion.You can re-arrange the pattern like here but then you have to move some objects to avoid spacing issues
3. 00:31:389(1,2)- On this note there are not the reset of the vocals as I can hear the music plus the vocals.The NC must be on the next note I mean on 00:33:154(2)- because the reset of the vocals are on 00:32:801- but there's slider's tail and on this note would be good to emphasize the reset of the vocals so I suggest to remove the NC from 00:31:389(1)- and add it on 00:33:154(2)-
4. 00:35:272- Here's a noticeable beat and seems that it's kind of strong beat.A note would be good here to emphasize this stronger beat
5. 00:37:389(1)- Here you have to remove the NC since there aren't reset of the vocals and add the NC on 00:38:448(3)- instead
6. 00:49:742(3,4)- Spacing issue
7. 01:04:540(2,3)- The flow seems to be odd here since the direction of 01:04:540(2)- feels it's like that it goes to left but the next note is on right part so I suggest to make ctrl+H here to improve the flow between these notes
8. 01:09:513(1)- I guess you forgot to add the NC since there are the reset of the vocals as I can see ok
9. 01:11:261- Another noticeable and also strong beat.To emphasize it instead leaving it empty,you can add a note here
10. 02:28:550(3,4)- Honestly saying,this rhythm seems pretty weird to me because the vocal is saying only one time that lyric and starting this tick with the next slider's head instead having there a note would be good.Also you have to snap the slider back to 1/1 if you will move it to 02:28:550- and then the note must be on 02:29:609- because there's a strong beat and it will feel empty then if there will not be a note or something to emphasize that strong beat ok
    I suggest to take a look again at NCs.Some of them are added where are not the reset of the vocals

[Hard]

1. 01:08:012(4,5)- On 00:11:360(4,5)- you used 1.6x spacing but here you used kind of 1.5x spacing.I suggest to use the same spacing as you did at 01:08:012(4,5)- but you need here 1.3x spacing to have the same spacing like 01:08:012(4,5)-
   01:08:807(8,1)- Here there's a little break between these notes and you used the same spacing but seems like that it feels confusing.When I played this pattern,I missed 1 clicking it early because there was the same spacing.You have to increase the spacing of this note (1)- to avoid confusing while playing this pattern
2. 01:31:032(1)- I don't think that changing the SV here with 0.80x would feel useful enough for following the vocals from there and also increasing the SV to 1.00 it's the same but you have just to extend the slider like here so increasing the SV to 1.00 would follow the vocals much better in my opinion that 0.80 SV

[Insane]

1. 00:50:448(5,6,7,8)- The guitars are going to be stronger here but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly which doesn't emphasize the guitars at all.To emphasize the stronger guitars,you have to increase the spacing of the notes to give that emphasis as you did at other patterns where are the strong guitars
2. 00:58:566(2,3)- Seems like here's is kind of overmapping because here I don't hear doublets if you listen the music carefully so you have to delete 00:58:683(3)- to avoid overmapping and also since on the purple tick (1/3 tick) there's no any sound to follow it
3. 01:08:807(4,1)- Same issue as I said in Hard difficult
4. 02:21:314(8,1)- The guitars are getting stronger on 02:21:491(1)- as I can see but the notes' spacing decreased suddenly so you have to increase the spacing here to emphasize the strong guitars instead decreasing them suddenly

Overall good set.Nothing to say in Normal.Some mods would be appreciated before pushing it forward and then you can call me for a recheck.
Good Luck!

Kencho wrote:

woc 有2kd

[General]

1. 根據現在圖的走向，除了EZ以外全難度HP-1？

[Insane]

1. 00:24:517 (2) - 由於突然減速的關係建議再加個NC 可以反应过来的
   
   00:53:625 (4) - ctrl+G會更好 ok
   
   00:55:036 (4) - 這滑條應該ctrl+H重新放一下吧，順著方向比較好 ok

[Hard]

1. Nice diff

[Normal]

1. 保持DS誤差不要超過+-0.05x 由于timing变化，为了物件之间的间隙，变了一些ds，但是影响不大
   
   00:23:624 (4,1) - 1.05x
   
   00:24:330 (1,2) - 0.93x
   
   01:03:507 (4,1) - 0.92x
   
   01:18:324 (2,3) - 1.07x
   
   01:40:561 (3) - 雙折返好坑，建議換成單折返 这里不好处理，想过很多方案，这个是最好的
   
   01:50:440 (3,4) - 01:51:499 (4,1) - 02:04:550 (3,4) - 02:05:980 (1,2) - 02:06:730 (2,3) - 02:07:435 (3,4) - 02:08:120 (4,1) - DS
   
   排版來說沒什麼，就是感覺圓圈有點太多，不過對比EZ的話也足夠了

[Easy]

1. 00:13:036 (1,2) - 1.06x
   
   00:23:624 (3,1) - 01:02:801 (4,1) - 01:03:860 (1,2) - DS
   
   01:03:860 (1,2,3) - 這個走向不太好 ok
   
   01:09:513 (3,4) - 01:17:971 (1,2) - 01:20:444 (4,1) - 01:36:326 (1,2) - DS
   
   01:40:561 (3) - 不要雙折返 这里不好处理，想过很多方案，这个是最好的
   
   01:47:617 (2,1) - 01:50:440 (2,3) - 02:07:082 (2,3) - 02:29:961 (1,2) - DS

美麗