1. Garven's Hard (4,58 stars, 363 notes)
2. Insane (4,99 stars, 505 notes)
3. Kurisuchianu Taikoni! (4,99 stars, 1007 notes)
4. Normal (2,91 stars, 244 notes)

narakucrimson wrote:

Hi there! This is what I found:

[General]

The timing and offset are fine.

Why don't you try using another preview pont?
Lol, i dont even rememeber having placing a preview time to this map =o

[Normal]

1:04:626 (2) - Why don't you try stacking this under the end of the slider? I mean, you do it all along the map, this way you'd keep it consistent n.n It was made on purpose, its like a transition to a new pattern.

1:19:026 (1) - Maybe moving this whole "cross" here some grids up would create a nice jump between the red 2 and the yellow 1. I think it fits better~~ I think it is fine =o, cause it is already kind of a jump :x

1:40:146 (1) - I don't see the point in this new combo. Remove it. Okay.

2:36:786 (1) - (^) Maybe the new combo could be at the previous 6. Okay

Nothing too wrong here, anyway :)


[Garven's Hard]

35:586 (4) - I think you should move this slider 1/2 forward in the timeline, and add a circle here. Also, you should shorten the slider by 1/2, too. It sounds better to me that way :)

1:25:746 (6) . The way this slider is stacked confused me a bit. I'd suggest to move it right, but it's ok if you don't like it~~

1:36:306 (1) - As in the other diff, remove the new combo here (maybe...)

2:22:626 (2) - I think the new combo should start here, not at the previous circle.

3:28:626 (6) - Same thingy with the sliders, though it seems a bit more difficult to fix it here :/


[Insane]

2:22:386 (1) - I don't think these stacked sliders are rankable, even if they aren't completely stacked. You can't see if there are reverse arrows. You should get them a little more separated.

2:24:306 (1) - (^)

2:31:986 (5) - (^)

2:58:866 (1) - (^) Will wait for more opinions.

3:49:146 (1) - I'd swap the position in the timeline of 1 and 2. This is to keep the same patter as before, like going backwards and then jump forward. If not, the spacing would be wrong.

3:51:066 (1) - (^) They were done on purpose :T

What an insane Insane xDDDD

-

Great work! You have my star~~

narakucrimson wrote:

[Garven's Hard]

35:586 (4) - I think you should move this slider 1/2 forward in the timeline, and add a circle here. Also, you should shorten the slider by 1/2, too. It sounds better to me that way :) I wanted to stick to vocals pretty strong for this map, so... :(

1:25:746 (6) . The way this slider is stacked confused me a bit. I'd suggest to move it right, but it's ok if you don't like it~~ I'll move it if I get any other complaints about it. :3

1:36:306 (1) - As in the other diff, remove the new combo here (maybe...) Nah

2:22:626 (2) - I think the new combo should start here, not at the previous circle. Hrm, sure. Erufen, can you also add a finish hitsound to it? Thanks~

3:28:626 (6) - Same thingy with the sliders, though it seems a bit more difficult to fix it here :/

Sallad4ever wrote:

[General]
- Delete osb*shot**stab**strangle*
osb doesn't matter anymore, fyi

[Garven's Hard][/color]
inb4 someone will say map it to the same point as other diff :p It didn't feel like a good spot to end to me. :P
this isn't that hard, really I was trying to find a good balance between the two other difficulties. Makes me sad the rating is still I, but oh well.
01:24:786 (5,6) - this is perfectly perfect, <3 <3
01:53:106 (4) - hmm why not change it to finish like the rest of the similar notes that follow the guitar? If you listen, I have a progression of soft whistle, soft finish, normal finish.
02:01:266 (1) - ^

Sallad4ever wrote:

Sorry for the wait

[General]
- Eh I'm sure you are going to re-sizing the BG right? And i still remember the day that i did it D: Ah well, dont have any image editr yet cause i reformatted my pc (dont know how to use paint)
- Delete osb*shot**stab**strangle* Lol, i dont see the .osb file. Maybe i havent full uploaded map yet.
- Countdown is NG What does NG is?
- Don't forget to add Garven on tags Sorry garven.
- You should cut the rest of song that are not mapped to save some space Will think about it.

[Normal]
I don't agree with jumps on normal especially if the normal is as the easiest diff, but this is just a matter of taste I guess
other than that everything looks great Im sure that noobs doesnt know what spacing is. Thats why i gave myself a little liberty to put some small jumps. But will wait for more opinions.

[Insane]
02:22:386 (1) - I can see the approach circle very clear so this is fine, I'm more worried about
02:31:986 (5) - I don't know this is a 1/2 until I miss it, well probably because of the previous similar slider stack
Ehehehe i wasnt sure about them too, but then i figured i would leave it to modders opinion. Although i do still want to hear more opinions about this part.

03:49:146 (1,2) - I'm sure this trap will make people rage
Well, i i figured that after around 10 seconds of the same thing (time wise) i guess this anti jump would be very notable. But will wait for more opinions.

I like the jump on the beginning but the grid streams are killing me, especially these ones 02:18:306 (5,6,7,8,9,10) :o

anyway good luck with the map ;)
~star

NG is an abbreviation of No Good, the count down really doesn't fit cause the song start slow, try halving the count down speed maybe? still I recommend you to remove it

IceBeam wrote:

Sorry for delay.
As per mod4mod request.

[Normal]
00:54:066 (1) - Such a jump on Normal? no way,fix it. Hmm this jump is more understandable. Modified.
01:19:026 (1,2,3,4) - Well again,as long it's the easiest difficulty in the mapset,you better reduce this jumping spacing. This one, i'll wait for more opinions. Cause seriously, newbies doesn't know what spacing is.
01:40:146 (x) - Strange place for making a break to me.I think you should map lyrics part,and maybe make a break from 01:51:666 or 02:07:026. I guess i love to much the music D:
03:28:626 (1) - Combo spam. Deleted new combos.
03:55:266 (x) - Hm.....I even don't know what to suggest instead but it finishes in the wrong place. Well... with the way i mapped, ending the map at 03:39:186 (where garven ended it) Didnt looked so good, in fact i originally planned to end it there. Lol

[Insane]
Rename to TAG4 :D Why? D: The most difficult thing for me in this map is not the jumps, but those little streams well spaced :T Oh i think i know what you mean, I ll think about it.

Garven's Hard is fine.

Sorry for poor modding,nice work.
Star~

James2250 wrote:

I would suggest you change your kiai time so its like Garvens (start/end on white ticks) It looks better Hmm kiai times was placed long time ago, and forgot to change them.
Odd ending points..I think I prefer where Garven ended it~ Consider changing it to there Alright, will wait for mor eopinions =/
At first I thought tick rate 2 might work..but not sure now
Go download Paint.NET and fix background size Photoshop is downloaded, just that im lazy to install it =T
Cut mp3 if you can Fineee, expect that my next full submit have this done and the bg

Normal:
Pretty high AR for the easiest difficulty, at least -1? Maybe even -2 Wanted it to have high AR lol, but i'll do -1
01:56:946 (5,1) - jump prob too much for this difficulty
02:04:626 (5,1) - ^ You're right.
02:59:826 (1) - random new combo Ops
03:07:506 (2,1) - avoid anti jump? Avoided a bit.
Apart from a few too many stacks for the easiest difficulty its nice

Garven's Hard:
Looks nice

Insane:
Alot of copy and paste in general, I would suggest you change some parts to make them more original~ Althought this is true, i really did try to make it different by not giving flips or rotations, but small patterns differences.
00:55:986 (1,2,3,4) - would be nice if you could keep spacing equal
01:19:266 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^ They have same spacing of 1.6x? Unless you mean the stacks, but that's ridiculous.
01:55:986 (1,2,3) - I wouldn't have a jump here Will think about it.
02:03:666 (1,2,3,4) - confusing spacing I don't think they are that confusing... >_>
02:03:666 (1,2,3,4) - don't mind jumps but :( And they kind of follows 01:59:826 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7), if you know what i mean D:
03:49:146 (1,2,3,4,5) - spacing (no one can read that correctly)
03:51:066 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ Will wait for more opinions D: Although if i end it where garven eneded it, then this would be unnecessary! Lol
Some jumps are ok but I would tone them down a bit, don't need to go too crazy with them. Also at least keep the spacing between sets of notes in jumps consistent or it becomes very hard to read them. All of them were on purpose... Lol :T
But for what is worth, i tested this map a lot to make sure that jumps where no impossibles, as far as i rememebr, most of the jumps have been shortened after that test. So only thing that was really killing where those well spaced mini streams.

Gets a star but I think Insane needs a bit more work

Roddie wrote:

Garven's Hard:
00:55:986 (x)-Add a note? Nah, mainly following the lyrics here, and it'd be bland with a huge string of eighth notes with no break in them.
01:53:106 (4)-Add a finish on the end of that slider? I have a progression of soft whistle, soft finish, normal finish.
02:01:266 (1)-Add a finish on the beginning of that slider? ^

thekillerhjkhjk wrote:

[insane]
00:42:476 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this doesn't fit any part of music at all :/
00:53:636 (4) - pretty bad underlap, but possibly acceptable
01:04:196 (6) - ^
01:08:036 (4) - ^
Totally intentional, and they are not overlapped that badly... :T

01:27:476 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - i dont think the first few notes are necessary here Hmm you're right, deleted 01:27:596 -
01:37:676 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - doesn't fit music It does for me...
02:20:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this needs changing. i don't think anyone would rank this much underlapping Will wait for more opinions...
03:10:916 (4) - bad underlap
03:40:556 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - doesnt fit music
03:46:196 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - possibly unrankable. rearrange to be less annoying How the hell would this be unrankable?
03:47:276 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - doesnt fit music
03:52:916 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - possibly not rankable I know... i may change this sometime in the future though.
03:54:596 (1,2,3) - you may need to confirm these kiai fountains with someone

[Garven's hard]
All good

[normal]

all good except for possibly the kiai fountains at the end

starring

1. IRC Mod
2. Garven's Hard seems Fine.
3. Evil Patterns are Evil.

Odaril wrote:

General
The red combo colours is too dark and blends too much with the background. Make it lighter.
Well, i tried to use a lighter red, but it seems that it blends even more than the darker red... Lol, anyways, changed just for you ;D

Normal
01:19:076 (1,2,3,4) - I like the idea of using small jumps in a Normal diff, but these are irregular, and I think that since this is the easiest diff of the mapset, it needs to be beginner-friendly... And these irregular jumps aren't that much. So... Space (1) correctly with the previous note and make the jumps at least regular ? (like always 1.4x or something)
03:21:956 (1,2,3,4) - same comment
I have tested with over 5 people ranked 120000 and above, and all of them seems to be able to do this part almost perfectly. Conclusion: newbies doesn't how to read spacing really well yet.

Insane
I really don't like this, honestly. The jumps seem to be there only to add some difficulty to the map... :/ Also, the high OD makes them very hard to play, and quite frustrating. That's the intention that i had when i mapped this. Althought i guess i could lower OD and AR

00:42:476 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I find them extremely confusing because they're unexpected, and start on blue ticks, which makes them hard to actually catch with the right rhythm.
01:37:676 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ No comments from my part for this, except that they are fine for me.
02:04:196 (3,4) - Confusing spacing: it follows the spacing of the jumps but not the same rhythm... Intentional.
02:15:596 (1,2,1,2) - Same as 00:42:476 - (this is actually true for all the doubles that start on blue ticks)
(suggestion) 02:53:396 (2,5,8) - new combo to mark the jumps ? Don't find it really necessary...
03:52:916 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I find this stream extremely awkward to play, because of its sharp angles and huge spacing.
Also intentional... :(

Garven's Hard
nothing to say

lennox989 wrote:

[Hard]

01:53:156 (4): Remove whistle and add finish? I have these hit sounds set up as a progression to go with the guitars, so nah.
01:55:076 (2): Add finish? ^
02:21:236 (x): Add note? I'm going with the synth, so no thanks
02:21:356 (x): ^
02:21:836 (x): ^
02:22:076 (x): ^
02:31:076 (5): the slider is pretty ugly.. maybe you remove them and set circles like this? I'd rather not add circles since I'm following vocals at this point. And I dunno how else I could get a slider that gets the general feeling of motion from the previous pattern any prettier with the space that I have. :P

Appreciate the look, in any case.

sonnyc wrote:

Garven's Hard
00:42:116 (5) - Eliminate Whistle Hrm, okay.
00:49:316 (4) - No whistle at the end kk

lennox989 wrote:

Hey~
[Normal]


01:19:076 (1,2,3,4): Pretty hard for a normal diff... Sighs... FINEEE ill change.
02:21:956-02:36:836: Those pattern are really bad in my eyes... maybe you change it?. Not really... No Id rather not..x
03:37:316(1,2,3,4): Same as above.

[Insane]

I can only say AR +1 and Circle Size +1 >w< Sighs... Fine ill do it. >_>
Pretty hard D:

sonnyc wrote:

Normal
01:53:156 (3) - Clap?
02:00:836 (3) - ^ They doesn't sound so good for me...
03:02:276 (3) - Clap Okay

Insane
03:46:196 (1~7) - I don't think.. some person could do this.. I suggest to remake the pattern Hmm well its an insane after all, its not meant for everybody...

Nice, especially Insane!
star~

Aleks719 wrote:

Normal
02:36:356 (1,2) - add claps here
02:36:836 (3) - remove clap, add finish.
Sure thing! It was a great idea actually

Shino wrote:

Modding for Kurisuchianu Taikoni...

Important:
Notes are unsnapped. Fix this so I can continue modding.
(I can't give star right now because of this)

Section Issue:
03:08:440 - Isn't this section too fast? I recommend x1.5.
04:25:120, 04:25:240, 04:52:120 - These are useless. Remove please.

Section Issue:
03:08:440 - Isn't this section too fast? I recommend x1.5.
(Being ranked would be difficult because of using 4 types of speed.)

03:46:917 ~ 03:54:597 - This feels empty(suddenly). How about fill this part and remove some notes?

04:25:120 - / 04:25:240 - / 04:52:120 - These are over the song's length.

Note Issue:
00:03:237 (1) - Remove?

01:20:997 (242) - Remove finish? (I don't think Big note in stream is good.)
01:22:797 (257) - ^
01:24:837 (274) - ^
01:55:317 (99) - ^
03:23:877 (92) - ^
03:25:677 (107) - ^

Shino wrote:

[Kurisuchianu Taikoni]
First, star.
I just modded the important part(in my opinion, of course).

Section Issue:
03:08:440 - Isn't this section too fast? I recommend x1.5.
(Being ranked would be difficult because of using 4 types of speed.)

03:46:917 ~ 03:54:597 - This feels empty(suddenly). How about fill this part and remove some notes?

04:25:120 - / 04:25:240 - / 04:52:120 - These are over the song's length.

Note Issue:
00:03:237 (1) - Remove?

01:20:997 (242) - Remove finish? (I don't think Big note in stream is good.)
01:22:797 (257) - ^
01:24:837 (274) - ^
01:55:317 (99) - ^
03:23:877 (92) - ^
03:25:677 (107) - ^

ps. Sorry for late ^_^;

Xgor wrote:

[Garven's Hard]
00:56:036 - I suggest you add a circle here.

Mm, I am mapping heavily to the vocals with the one instrument note to start each phrase - and although there is a light syllable touch from the singer at that beat, I think it breaks some of the phrasing feel that I have set up in the intro.

Not much more to say here, nice hard and nice slider speed usage.

Thanks. :3

Xgor wrote:

[Normal]
I strongly suggest you have the breaks at the same place as in Garvens difficulty, that break placement just works better imo, I also think it works better to end it at the same place as in Garvens difficultly even both is a bit weird Garven just feels a bit better.

Im guessing that you are talking specifically about 01:36:356 - 01:40:196 - Fine deleted as well as the last part.

01:53:636 (4,5) - (Suggestion) Make these into a slider so it fits better with the rest of the flow of the map.
01:55:556 (2,3) - ^
02:01:316 (4,5) - ^
02:03:236 (2,3) - ^
They are fine for me... >_>
02:20:516 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - The spacing change to 1.5x from 1.0x felt kinda random because there are more intense parts (the chorus) in the song and you made bigger spacing on that part.
Reduced spacing...

[Insane]

00:42:476 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This rhythm feels so odd and is out of place and feels like it's just there for the difficulty.. I suggest you just make it more simpler and make it more sense to the song...
Its to not make it the same all the time >_>

00:54:116 (1,2,3,4,1) - These jumps are so different from the other ones before and after it and they plays a lot better to the song.
I suggest you make this combo more like them.
Hmm not quite sure if im understanding... But added new combo at 00:55:076 (1) -

01:56:516 (2,3) - This anti-jump doesn't fit the song that well, I rather think a jump would fit here so I suggest you do that.
Changed a bit...

01:59:876 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - This spacing feels kinda weird and out of place imo.. Epically 02:03:716 (1,2,3,4) - felt weird.
And i thought they were awesome... Not changing yet, unless you feel strongly about it >_>

02:15:596 (1) - I suggest you remove this circle, feels just weird with the rest.
02:17:516 (1) - ^
Fine, removed.

02:30:116 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I don't think you need this wide jumps to this part, I think 2.0x would be just enough to fit the song.
Lol! Okay reduced xD

02:53:156 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is just.... wrong, I think you just should have the
Not really undersanding what youre trying to say...

Well some parts was pretty cool I admit, but others..... was just plain weird.

Pretty nice map but some stuff felt a bit weird.
*Star*