1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Graveyard
show more
posted

[General]
Offset +6?

[Easy]
This is maybe strange hearing from me, but I think you overused the soft-finish hitsound a bit. This song is sooo relaxing. The constant finishes break the dreamy feeling a bit.
01:38:524 (1,3) - Bad overlap, try to make it neater.

pretty good diff!

[UWS's Normal]
how about using correct grammar and changing the diff name to: UWS' Normal? :P

01:25:893 - you should map the main-rhythm here, which is the piano. I don't like how spots like 01:27:629 - and 01:30:156 - are empty with no beats while the piano makes sound. I would suggest to adjust the rhythm in this part to match the piano for a better experience.

[Hard]
Same hit-finish suggestion as Easy here :P
00:44:209 (4,5) - The spacing here seems a bit questionable.
00:45:156 (7,1) - same for here, unexecpectibly big. On a second thought, these occur often in the map. Might as well leave it like this then.
01:20:051 (5,6) - Make the spacing here 0.60x?
01:37:735 - I don't like the empty gap here, a piano sound is left alone with no beat :( find a matching note for him please.
01:42:787 - same here.
posted

happy30 wrote:


[General]
Offset +6? sounds good to me, fixed.

[Easy]
This is maybe strange hearing from me, but I think you overused the soft-finish hitsound a bit. This song is sooo relaxing. The constant finishes break the dreamy feeling a bit. ah i didn't even notice that i did that. In the beginning parts I cleaned these up, but when the beat kicks in i think they fit fine so i left those.
01:38:524 (1,3) - Bad overlap, try to make it neater. alright fixed this up

pretty good diff!

[UWS's Normal]
how about using correct grammar and changing the diff name to: UWS' Normal? :Pgrammar is correct rarwahawhuawhauw

01:25:893 - you should map the main-rhythm here, which is the piano. I don't like how spots like 01:27:629 - and 01:30:156 - are empty with no beats while the piano makes sound. I would suggest to adjust the rhythm in this part to match the piano for a better experience.

[Hard]
Same hit-finish suggestion as Easy here :P
00:44:209 (4,5) - The spacing here seems a bit questionable. jericho also mentioned that this part was a bit odd to read, but right now I do really like the way this plays. I am open to change here once we work out a better way to do this.
00:45:156 (7,1) - same for here, unexecpectibly big. On a second thought, these occur often in the map. Might as well leave it like this then. I think this fits well anyway since there's a finish at that part, so I think it fits well to have a jump there.
01:20:051 (5,6) - Make the spacing here 0.60x? this has changed multiple times, so I'll hold off on changing this for now until I get another opinion. It was 0.8 then 0.6 then 0.8 again, so we'll see.
01:37:735 - I don't like the empty gap here, a piano sound is left alone with no beat :( find a matching note for him please. for now I'll say no, mainly because there is a matching part at the start of the faster section that I map this same way. I can't think of a really nice way at the moment to remap this while keeping the flow and feel that I have here, so for now I'll say no, but this has been brought up a few times so it is worth looking at again,
01:42:787 - same here. i'll fix this one though.
Thanks happy for looking. Awaiting UWS for changes on his diff.
posted

happy30 wrote:

[UWS's Normal]
how about using correct grammar and changing the diff name to: UWS' Normal? :P
This is correct grammar. To my understanding, "UWS" is an initialism, which like an acronym, follows normal possessive form even when it ends in an "S". After all my name is not "UnitedWeSins"
It's funny no one has mentioned anything about this on other maps, but on this map everyone is lol.

happy30 wrote:

01:25:893 - you should map the main-rhythm here, which is the piano. I don't like how spots like 01:27:629 - and 01:30:156 - are empty with no beats while the piano makes sound. I would suggest to adjust the rhythm in this part to match the piano for a better experience.
Well I respect your opinion there, but I don't think it's such a good idea. Basically I'm using a general rhythm to follow a mix of piano while still keeping the feeling of drums. As you can see it's used consistently through the section. Just following piano as you say would mean repeating 01:25:899 (1) and 01:28:425 (1,2,3) sort of rhythms through the section and we would miss out on interesting 1/1 rhythms presented in the drums. It would make the section less interesting imo.

I changed a few patterns I hope it's alright, just tried to make bad flow better:
01:18:952 (1,2,3,4,1) -
01:43:583 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) -

Thanks a lot for modding!
http://puu.sh/4KHEu.osu
posted
Updated.
posted


Hi :roll:

[Easy]
00:16:426 (2) - I think it will be better if you remove whistle from the tail, somehow it sounds weird
00:26:531 (2) - ^
00:32:847 (1) - 1 slider combo feels unnecessary for me.. maybe delete this NC ?
00:37:899 (1) - Drum sampleset to the tail ? you can hear a drum sounds in this time
00:39:478 (4) - ^
01:03:162 (2,3) - Check the Distance Snap please :3
01:08:215 (2) - Can you move this a bit down or atleast changed it to U curved ? it almost ovelap orz.. looks ugly IMO
01:41:688 (2,3) - The blanket combo seems not perfect,, try to rearranged it if possible
02:01:899 (2) - Delete drum from the head.. it doesn't emphasize anything and it sounds awkward
02:06:320 (7) - NC to keep consistency with your Insane.

[UWS Normal]
00:42:320 (4,2) - It doesn't stack properly.. just minor though, it doesn';t affect gameplay after all :p
00:29:057 (2) - It would be nice if you copy and use this 00:27:162 (3) - to replace it.. better flow after all
00:37:268 (4) - Just try curved ? will make more beautiful pattern IMO
01:08:847 (4) - Missed whistle because you use whistle at the start of 01:03:162 (3) - this will repair the consistency :3
01:15:162 (5) - Maybe you can try to add whistle or (reduced volume) clap to the head.. no hitsound will be boring

[Hard]
IMO.. the Hard is more like a light Insane.. especially the 190 BPM's part.. i think the jumps it's extreme enough to be called as insane >.<
It will emphasize the music better if you delete whistle at 01:20:531 (1) - 's head then add whistle on 01:20:215 (6) -
I can't find anything here.. orz

GL~
posted

Momochikun wrote:



Hi :roll:

[Easy]
00:16:426 (2) - I think it will be better if you remove whistle from the tail, somehow it sounds weird
00:26:531 (2) - ^ fixed both
00:32:847 (1) - 1 slider combo feels unnecessary for me.. maybe delete this NC ? alright
00:37:899 (1) - Drum sampleset to the tail ? you can hear a drum sounds in this time fixed
00:39:478 (4) - ^ fixed
01:03:162 (2,3) - Check the Distance Snap please :3 eh, you can't tell during gameplay and the symmetry here is good the way it is.
01:08:215 (2) - Can you move this a bit down or atleast changed it to U curved ? it almost ovelap orz.. looks ugly IMO changed to a curved slider
01:41:688 (2,3) - The blanket combo seems not perfect,, try to rearranged it if possible fixed the curve here, should be fine
02:01:899 (2) - Delete drum from the head.. it doesn't emphasize anything and it sounds awkward fixed
02:06:320 (7) - NC to keep consistency with your Insane. makes the pattern look a bit weird to have the last note be a different color, so no change here.

[Hard]
IMO.. the Hard is more like a light Insane.. especially the 190 BPM's part.. i think the jumps it's extreme enough to be called as insane >.<
It will emphasize the music better if you delete whistle at 01:20:531 (1) - 's head then add whistle on 01:20:215 (6) - I'll add the whistle, but leaving the one also because it fits the music well
I can't find anything here.. orz

GL~
thanks momo
posted

Momochikun wrote:

[UWS Normal]
00:42:320 (4,2) - It doesn't stack properly.. just minor though, it doesn';t affect gameplay after all :p
Is fine imo.

00:29:057 (2) - It would be nice if you copy and use this 00:27:162 (3) - to replace it.. better flow after all
Hm, it just seems to me the sliders have identical curves already.

00:37:268 (4) - Just try curved ? will make more beautiful pattern IMO
I'd like to stick with my bent slider, I find beauty in a variety of sliders here and I prefer contrasting flow with 00:37:899 (1).

01:08:847 (4) - Missed whistle because you use whistle at the start of 01:03:162 (3) - this will repair the consistency :3
I don't think so :<. Just following vocals here with whistles. You've mistaken the 4 here for the 01:07:584 (3) in the hitsound pattern.

01:15:162 (5) - Maybe you can try to add whistle or (reduced volume) clap to the head.. no hitsound will be boring
Just that no sound in the music calls for a whistle and I don't hear a clap in the music, so I believe no hitsound is the best option, also consider 01:10:110 (6) in the pattern.


Thank you Mochi very much for modding! :):)
posted
Hi there!

Please get another two mods, to let us know you're still aiming for rank! Call me (or any other QAT BAT member) back then.
posted

Irreversible wrote:

Hi there!

Please get another two mods, to let us know you're still aiming for rank! Call me (or any other QAT BAT member) back then.
Alright will do!
posted
Mod placeholder.

>.>

Hi~
Modding as requested :3
Sorry for not replying but I can't get rid of that bad habit yet >.<

[General]
Maybe add UWS to tags?
[Easy]
Settings/General feedback
Not much to worry here, just a little 1/1 circles I'll point, I'd say it's a quite tough Easy, but it fits perfectly with the song.

Rhythm
00:43:899 (2) - Maybe remove this note, it'd be consistent with your previous pattern and would help to make the next pattern feel stronger, as this spot has more emphasis there.
02:00:004 (2,3,4,5) - 4 circles in a row at 190BPM could be a bit hard to handle for beginners, maybe joint either (2,3) or (4,5) into a slider?
02:05:056 (3,4,5,6,7) - A similar suggestion as above.

Placement
00:26:531 (2) - I'd move this a bit down, so the flow would be a bit more smooth, around x:300 y:272 could be a nice spot.
01:40:741 (4,1,2) - I should say that the flow is quite weird here, I suggest doing someting like this, the movement would be more natural imo.


Aesthetics
00:17:689 (3) - You could move the red anchor to x:208 y:348, so the peak is at the same time as the piano hit.
00:37:899 (1,2) - If a blanket was your intention here, you could improve it a bit.
01:27:162 (3) - *nazi* This has a slight overlap with (2), you could move it a bit away and maybe improve the blanket here.
01:41:688 (2,3) - This blanket looks sloppy, try moving the middle anchor of (2) to x:424 y:224 and the last anchor to x:480 y:236

Comboing
01:54:951 (1) - Maybe remove NC, this is breaking your NC pattern o3o
[UWS's Normal]
UWS's -> UWS'? o3o *runs*

Settings/General feedback
Use OD5, this will allow a better OD spread, as it'll be 3 - 5 - 7.
A solid normal, I really enjoyed it :3 (WHY AM I BIASED AAAAAAAAAAAA)

Rhythm
00:18:952 (2) - Using a 2/1 beat slider here would feel better, as the hold feeling will match with the piano, which you've been following.
[Hard]
Settings/General feedback
I have mixed feelings about this, the diff is quite good, but there are many jumpy parts (specially in the last part) I'll be pointing the ones which aren't that fitting. I might agree with some of the previous mods and say that this feels like an easy Insane, the BPM is 190 and can't be helped that much though, but using an SV around ~1.70 (2.10x0.80) for a Hard is quite much, of course this is just an opinion.

Rhythm
01:27:635 - Maybe add a note here for the piano? As you've been following in most of the song, having this beat empty is quite odd.

Placement
00:19:899 (8,1) - Unstacking this would make easier to foresee how many repeats this have better.
00:30:005 (7,1) - ^
00:48:005 (1,2) - This jump is quite long in comparison with the previous ones. How about stacking it in the end of 00:47:689 (7) instead the beginning? At first glance I thought this was 1/2 beat apart.
00:49:268 (4,5,6,1) - Maybe it's just me ranting, but using 2.0x for spacing would still work and reduce a bit the gap between Normal and Hard.
01:02:057 (4,5) - The increase in spacing here feels a bit weird as there's no big emphasis, keeping the spacing consistent would feel better. This also would help to read 01:02:531 (6,1) as 1/2 instead 1/4.
01:37:267 (1,2) - This part is a bit tricky, in 01:36:004 (1,2,3) you're mainly following the piano, while here you are basing mostly on the main beat, adding the jumpy feeling you've given in the diff, this leads to think these sliders are 1/2 apart from each other instead 1/1. You could move this slider 1/2 beat back and adding a circle in 01:38:214, or simply add a circle in 01:37:741, with this you'll keep the consistency for the piano.
02:00:635 (3,4,5,6) - A more squarish pattern her will improve the flow greatly, as it'll be less sharpy in 02:00:793 (4,5,6), giving less chance of error.

Aesthetics
00:18:952 (5,6) - Maybe open the curve in the other side? Like you did with 00:19:584 (7).

Comboing
00:50:215 (1) - This still belongs to the previous part, so remove NC here.
01:10:110 (1) - Maybe remove NC?
01:20:531 (1) - Remove NC.

That'd be all from my part, good luck \:3/
posted

DakeDekaane wrote:

Mod placeholder.

>.>

Hi~
Modding as requested :3
Sorry for not replying but I can't get rid of that bad habit yet >.<

[General]
Maybe add UWS to tags? hmm, not sure if i need to or not we'll see
[Easy]
Settings/General feedback
Not much to worry here, just a little 1/1 circles I'll point, I'd say it's a quite tough Easy, but it fits perfectly with the song.

Rhythm
00:43:899 (2) - Maybe remove this note, it'd be consistent with your previous pattern and would help to make the next pattern feel stronger, as this spot has more emphasis there. sure
02:00:004 (2,3,4,5) - 4 circles in a row at 190BPM could be a bit hard to handle for beginners, maybe joint either (2,3) or (4,5) into a slider?
02:05:056 (3,4,5,6,7) - A similar suggestion as above. fixed both of these.[/color]

Placement
00:26:531 (2) - I'd move this a bit down, so the flow would be a bit more smooth, around x:300 y:272 could be a nice spot. sure
01:40:741 (4,1,2) - I should say that the flow is quite weird here, I suggest doing someting like this, the movement would be more natural imo.


Aesthetics
00:17:689 (3) - You could move the red anchor to x:208 y:348, so the peak is at the same time as the piano hit. fixed
00:37:899 (1,2) - If a blanket was your intention here, you could improve it a bit. fixed
01:27:162 (3) - *nazi* This has a slight overlap with (2), you could move it a bit away and maybe improve the blanket here. oops
01:41:688 (2,3) - This blanket looks sloppy, try moving the middle anchor of (2) to x:424 y:224 and the last anchor to x:480 y:236 adjusted

Comboing
01:54:951 (1) - Maybe remove NC, this is breaking your NC pattern o3o nc here is to musically match that drum roll break
ch with the piano, which you've been following.[/notice]

[Hard]
Settings/General feedback
I have mixed feelings about this, the diff is quite good, but there are many jumpy parts (specially in the last part) I'll be pointing the ones which aren't that fitting. I might agree with some of the previous mods and say that this feels like an easy Insane, the BPM is 190 and can't be helped that much though, but using an SV around ~1.70 (2.10x0.80) for a Hard is quite much, of course this is just an opinion. yeah, at this point it can't really be helped, but this diff was weird to label as a difficulty so hard had to be the way to go. The spread works out okay-ish so i don't think it's too bad.

Rhythm
01:27:635 - Maybe add a note here for the piano? As you've been following in most of the song, having this beat empty is quite odd. i'll stick to my guns on this one, i like the breaks here

Placement
00:19:899 (8,1) - Unstacking this would make easier to foresee how many repeats this have better.should be fairly easy since you can see the approach circle, and musically this is a pretty intuitive slider.
00:30:005 (7,1) - ^same here
00:48:005 (1,2) - This jump is quite long in comparison with the previous ones. How about stacking it in the end of 00:47:689 (7) instead the beginning? At first glance I thought this was 1/2 beat apart. i'll hold off on this one for now, here i was playing a bit with slider leniency but we'll see if this will be a problem or not
00:49:268 (4,5,6,1) - Maybe it's just me ranting, but using 2.0x for spacing would still work and reduce a bit the gap between Normal and Hard. sure
01:02:057 (4,5) - The increase in spacing here feels a bit weird as there's no big emphasis, keeping the spacing consistent would feel better. This also would help to read 01:02:531 (6,1) as 1/2 instead 1/4. i'll decrease the spacing here some, overall i think the pattern is nice though
01:37:267 (1,2) - This part is a bit tricky, in 01:36:004 (1,2,3) you're mainly following the piano, while here you are basing mostly on the main beat, adding the jumpy feeling you've given in the diff, this leads to think these sliders are 1/2 apart from each other instead 1/1. You could move this slider 1/2 beat back and adding a circle in 01:38:214, or simply add a circle in 01:37:741, with this you'll keep the consistency for the piano. I'm going to stick with how have it now unless the 2nd BAT opinion is to change this as well.
02:00:635 (3,4,5,6) - A more squarish pattern her will improve the flow greatly, as it'll be less sharpy in 02:00:793 (4,5,6), giving less chance of error. alright

Aesthetics
00:18:952 (5,6) - Maybe open the curve in the other side? Like you did with 00:19:584 (7). nah on these, the flow with slider leniency is fine enough, and i like the contrast here of the differing directions

Comboing
00:50:215 (1) - This still belongs to the previous part, so remove NC here.
01:10:110 (1) - Maybe remove NC? i like this one for the square pattern
01:20:531 (1) - Remove NC. i like the end ones to note the noises at the end at the breaks

That'd be all from my part, good luck \:3/
thanks, sorry for the super delayed response~
posted
Hey. Hope you're not waiting for my reply.
I'd like to keep that slider the way it is. It's supposed to represent the new drum transition that is introduced.
OD is up to you Moway.
Thanks for modding. :)
posted
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.