Silynn wrote:
I think some who deserve top 25 will end up being left out due to the vote limitation
Why is it capped at 15?
I kind of agree with this, perhaps Kanye could make #1 worth 25 points (down to a #15 vote being worth 10?).
those wrote:
I'm seeing too few val0108 votes
He didn't do much 2012, really
Aqo wrote:
Zarerion wrote:
Niko is definitely #2 for me. He can stream better than WW ever could and can get his scores without retrying hundreds of times. He is fast and accurate, if he still had a tablet, I believe he would have the potential to surpass Cookiezi, which neither WW nor rrtyui could do imo.
??
Niko has been back to playing on tablet for quite a while now, and he doesn't do any better with neither peripheral. Skill at jumps boils down to reading speed, not to what device you use. People should stop assuming mouse takes more skill because it simply doesn't.
also,
- Hakurei Reimu- anybody? Why don't I see this name mentioned anywhere, this player is insanely good at everything.
Skill at jumps boils down to reading speed, sure (sidenote: wow Aqo that is such a thing you would say), but the general consensus (I personally agree with this) is that it's much easier to acquire/be consistent with that skill on a tablet (absolute tracking vs. relative tracking debate). But no one reply to this, I'll abide per Silynn's appropriate request to not turn this into a mouse vs. tablet discussion, just had to put my opinion out there at least once.
Also - Hakurei Reimu- is really only good at DT, refute me with evidence if you think I'm wrong.
Tanzklaue wrote:
Purple wrote:
TTTL has some unique DT scores, so you could -maybe- argue that hes better than one of them, but it'd be pretty hard.
TTTL doesn't have much else though, he is probably top 15, but not top 5.
TTTL hasn't played nearly enough in 2012 to be considered, I think that's why. He definitely is an amazing player, though.
those wrote:
Wishy wrote:
If you are pro mouse player and get FC on Airman, then tablet player comes and gets FC too. Who's got the best score? None, they are both as good, the mouse player shouldn't be considered better just because he is mouse.
If you get 100% on a math test without a calculator and your friend gets 100% on the same math test with a calculator, who is more skilled?
Dude those I love you more every day.
pls come on #osu moar so we can do puns w/ your name kthxWishy wrote:
This is not about opinions it's about people not understanding what being a top player means. And it's not that I THINK A TOP PLAYER IS THIS, a top player is an elite player whose one of the best (overall), that's it, doesn't matter if you think XXX should be considered a top player because OMG he can do hard stuff on mouse (assuming he is not even close to top players).
The problem is that, what you've been saying this whole thread, that how a player achieves a score has nothing to do with how they should be considered relative to others who achieve the score a different way...that is 100% your opinion, as well.
-GN wrote:
Just a question: does the order of the lists count? If so, what counting system are you guys using?
Also a minor suggestion, too - what about adding a tiny description, no more than 2-3 words telling the viewers what exactly makes the currently shown user a candidate for this list? Not every user around knows who the people on the list is. I could see this being hard to come up with, though.
Thanks.
After giving this some thought, I think I might do this using YouTube's toggleable annotation system. Some people would prefer not to have these descriptions, either because they already know of each players' strengths, or perhaps because they don't care, or maybe even because the onscreen obtrusion may just be annoying. This is all up to Kanye's approval, of course.
EDIT: However, YouTube's annotations are kind of...
ugly. So hmm.
wow shit that was a really long post