forum

What's a good scroll speed for 5* maps?

posted
Total Posts
5
Topic Starter
timebombed
The notes are way to bunched together to even read at some parts, my current scroll speed is 30. Or is there any other way to be able to read those kind of bunched and jumbled notes?
Lights
30 is usually fine for a 5star chart. it also kinda depends on the skin you're using though. a screenshot would help

edit: it looks to me like you should be more concerned about scores in the 4 and 3star range before you mess with 5star charts anyway. maybe you find youll be able to read denser patterns if you take the time to master slower and less complex ones first.
[LS]PositoniX
it's all about preference. i use 30 on 5-6* maps and get by fine. i reccomend experimenting with 30-33 to see what works best for you
tgnehs
I second the opinions above. I use 32 but I use a low judgement skin and large circles and I have a high refresh rate monitor, meaning that I have a lot of time to see and react to the notes falling. I used to use 36 speed, but I find that at this level using a lower speed is helpful for reading simple patterns like jumptrills and jumpstreams. But yeah, it really depends on your skin. The main limitations for a low speed is density and for high speed is accuracy and tech patterns. Mess around with speed
[LS]PositoniX

tgnehs wrote:

I second the opinions above. I use 32 but I use a low judgement skin and large circles and I have a high refresh rate monitor, meaning that I have a lot of time to see and react to the notes falling. I used to use 36 speed, but I find that at this level using a lower speed is helpful for reading simple patterns like jumptrills and jumpstreams. But yeah, it really depends on your skin. The main limitations for a low speed is density and for high speed is accuracy and tech patterns. Mess around with speed
agreed; your skin's hit position is one of the most important factors in picking a notespeed. 30 notespeed is gonna feel very fast if you're hit position is high.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply