1. Lots of hitobjects are not correctly snapped... Lally has pointed almost all of them,though there are vatious unsnapped notes on the taiko diffs too. Remember to resnap them by going into the Timing menu ----> Resnap All Notes!

1. 00:26:615 (5,1) - Not really a fan of this kind of pattern... You see,the linear flow which 00:26:615 (5) - followed got totally broken there because of 00:27:473 (1) - 's placement which implies a returning back,and that actually felt quite umpleasing to play there... Wouldn't it be better if instead you kept your style,blanketting 00:27:473 (1) - with 00:26:615 (5) - ? That would definitely solve the problem,other than creating a quite fun to play pattern with 00:28:501 (2,3) - ,which follows up perfectly its oval flow there. Here's what I have done,see if you like it:
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   4,76,27473,6,0,P|52:52|140:84,1,150
   216,212,28501,1,0,0:0:0
   272,296,28845,2,0,P|217:319|138:273,1,150
   64,152,29872,1,0,0:0:0
   140,88,30215,2,0,P|256:8|372:88,1,300
   448,152,31587,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:41:529 (1,2,3,4) - I know your intent there on blanketting 00:42:215 (3,4) - ,but by doing that wou have created a quite sloppy to play diamond pattern,which does not really play well in there... :\ If you want to anyways continue your blanket there,what about instead using a different structure,such as an arc-pattern,combined with a "3" shaped slider, to continue well the pattern? That does actually play really smooth,other than following up 00:40:501 (4) -
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   136,48,41529,5,8,0:0:0
   236,28,41872,1,0,0:0:0
   316,92,42215,1,8,0:0:0
   292,188,42559,2,0,P|344:200|384:168|384:168|384:220|440:256,1,200
   512,316,43586,1,8,0:0:0

3. 00:56:102 (x)- This isn't really needed,so feel free to skip if you don't want to change: What about adding a note here? It would create a pretty good transition between 00:55:586 (1,3) - ,and it would vary a bit the rhythm played there too! It plays quite good with these 2 sliders imho :3
4. 01:04:158 (2,3,4,1) - Not really a big deal,thoughyou could smooth out a bit the flow there by making instead these two sliders curved. Using two linear sliders kinda felt not really smooth to play,and considering the nature of 01:03:129 (1) - ,using curved sliders would really benefit there,considering that with an arc-shaped pattern you could make 01:05:872 (1) - a wave slider,which works pretty good in both flow (considering the following sliders) and aesthetics!
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   152,200,64158,2,0,P|168:248|216:280,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   305,276,64845,2,0,P|344:248|360:200,1,100,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   352,100,65529,1,2,0:0:0
   252,80,65872,6,0,P|232:132|168:120|168:120|104:108|84:160,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 01:30:558 (2) - I guess you missed a whistle at the beginning of this slider? It would really fit good with the vocals' pitch,and considering that you have added it too at 01:36:043 (3) - I can't see why not there
6. 01:37:244 (5) - As already said in the Easy diff,why are you using a whistle there instead of a finish? I can't really understand this,as a finish would have fit much better there,and again considering you have used it in the Hard diff too,why aren't you using it here too?
7. 02:07:245 (2,3,4) - Not really a big deal again,but instead of using these curved sliders I would rearrange the pattern using a note and 2 sliders 1/1 to make 02:07:245 (2) - blanket 02:06:215 (1) - continuing the pattern with 02:07:587 (3,4) - ,which are linear sliders starting from 02:06:215 (1) - 's head. I think this could flow more smoothly than the actual pattern,because of these transitions,which work pretty well with 02:08:958 (1) - too. Try it out!
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   268,244,126215,6,0,P|180:208|108:280,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   200,316,127245,1,8,0:0:0
   268,244,127587,2,0,P|260:132,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   356,120,128273,2,0,P|364:232,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   368,320,128958,6,0,P|452:280|448:180,1,200
   364,136,129986,1,8,0:0:0
   452,92,130329,2,0,P|404:28|324:48|324:48|272:32,1,200

8. 02:14:445 (1,2) - Huhh...Why are you combining 2 sliders with exactly the same curve using a linear pattern? It really doesen't play well :< I know you are keeping the consistency there,but consider breaking it using two curved sliders with opposite curves - it will play way more smoothly than the actual pattern! Here's how I rearranged the whole pattern,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   56,236,132386,2,0,P|104:272|148:236|148:236|192:204|244:236,1,200
   204,328,133415,2,0,P|236:364|288:360,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   372,312,134101,1,8,0:0:0
   364,212,134445,6,0,P|332:176|280:180,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   204,240,135130,2,0,P|155:242|123:206,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   72,120,135816,2,0,P|24:188|76:292,1,200
   123,206,136843,1,8,0:0:0
   164,116,137187,6,0,P|204:88|204:88|212:36,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   300,37,137873,2,0,P|307:87|307:87|347:115,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   440,152,138558,2,0,P|424:244|331:257,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   256,328,139586,1,8,0:0:0
   180,257,139930,2,0,P|88:244|72:152,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   172,160,140958,1,8,0:0:0
   256,108,141301,1,4,0:0:0

9. 02:23:701 (3,4) - This rhythm setting doesn't really fit with the instruments,considering the vocals do actually finish at 02:24:559 - ,1/2 before actually ends,wouldn't it be better if you actually folllowed them? Shortening 02:24:215 (4) - by 1/2,until 02:24:559 - , and adding a note at 02:24:902 - would totally solve the problem.
   
10. 02:32:272 (5,1) - Similarly as 00:26:615 (5,1) - ,I don't really like that much how you are breaking 02:32:272 (5) - 's oval flow there... A possible solution would be using CTRL+G on the top of 02:33:643 (1) - to make it follow better 02:32:272 (5) - 's curve,but I have made some changes as well,see if you like them!
    
    SPOILER

    
    

    352,220,153643,6,0,P|436:160|432:72,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    344,120,154672,1,8,0:0:0
    248,96,155015,2,0,P|200:104|160:144,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    104,220,155701,5,0,0:0:0
    128,316,156043,2,0,P|176:296|212:324,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    256,232,156729,1,8,0:0:0
    304,320,157072,2,0,P|339:294|387:314,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    452,236,157758,6,0,P|368:196|376:100,1,200
    464,148,158786,1,8,0:0:0
    448,48,159129,2,0,P|352:24|288:92,1,200
    272,188,160158,1,8,0:0:0
    196,252,160501,5,0,0:0:0
    120,188,160843,1,8,0:0:0
    196,120,161186,2,0,P|196:20,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

1. 00:29:359 (1,2,3,4) - This is more a personal opinion that an issue,so feel free to fix just if you want: What about tranforming that triangular pattern in another one, which exactly follows 00:29:359 (1) - 's oval flow? It's rather a subjective thing,but I find this pretty much smooth to play and it creates a nice jump with 00:30:387 (1) - too. Try it out!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   256,272,29359,6,0,P|348:272|392:192,1,180
   360,120,29873,1,0,0:0:0
   300,188,30045,1,0,0:0:0
   392,204,30216,1,0,0:0:0
   272,100,30387,6,0,P|224:104|224:104|180:156|180:156|116:164,2,180
   300,188,31245,1,0,0:0:0
   360,120,31416,1,0,0:0:0
   332,32,31587,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:44:959 (5,6) - Not really a big deal,but what about making a pattern with these two notes reversed? It would totally fit well there,as it follows 00:44:445 (4) - 's dropoff right ahead going from the right to the left and it would make a nice jump with 00:45:302 (1,2,3) - ,considering that you have been using many of these that would be even better! Here I have changed a bit the notes' position to keep the spacing regular there,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   100,148,44445,2,0,P|80:184|25:191|25:191|80:200|100:236,1,180
   132,320,44959,1,8,0:0:0
   44,308,45130,1,0,0:0:0
   188,240,45302,5,0,0:0:0
   256,180,45473,1,0,0:0:0
   324,240,45645,1,8,0:0:0

3. 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - Considering how you have placed 00:46:330 (1,2) - ,this blanket+wave slider didn't really play that smooth,and considering the almost linear pattern 00:47:702 (5,6,1) - ,I would instead suggest you to continue the flow with an arc-shaped pattern,from 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - to 00:47:187 (4,5,6,1) - : imho,following a bit more these dropoffs being played there wouldn't hurt at all,and on the other side,they make the map there smoother and nice to see too! Here's what I have done,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   204,40,46673,2,0,P|164:20|120:12,1,90
   60,80,47016,1,8,0:0:0
   92,164,47187,2,0,P|118:244|202:174|233:253,1,180
   300,316,47702,1,8,0:0:0
   388,296,47873,1,0,0:0:0
   416,208,48045,6,0,P|360:144|464:108|412:40,1,180,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

4. 00:54:902 (3) - That's a quite little hitsounds thing,feel free to ignore it: what about switching the end of this slider to a soft-sampleset one? A normal-sampleset there does fit good,but considering you haven't followed this 2/1 normal-sampleset consistency,it will sound kinda strange,so wouldn't it be better if you actually removed this?
5. 01:34:673 (1,2) - Why didn't you follow the synth's changement of pitch there by skipping over it with a 1/1 slider? It sounds quite strange during the play,and it does not really match up with any of the song's instrument. What about instead using another pattern to follow that follows that changement of pitch? Using a pattern like this would fit quite good there:
   
   A pattern which could fit pretty good there could be using a 1/1 slider which blankets 01:34:673 (1) - and ends at 01:34:502 (4) - with an arc pattern right ahead... Here's what I have done:
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   276,28,94330,1,2,0:0:0
   360,64,94502,1,0,0:0:0
   364,152,94673,5,0,0:0:0
   448,184,94845,2,0,P|452:128|360:64,1,180
   236,196,95530,1,0,0:0:0
   248,284,95702,1,0,0:0:0
   172,336,95873,1,0,0:0:0
   88,308,96045,5,0,0:0:0
   56,224,96216,2,0,P|72:128|136:76,1,180
   304,108,96902,1,0,0:0:0
   336,192,97073,1,0,0:0:0
   304,276,97245,1,0,0:0:0
   356,352,97416,6,0,P|388:312|396:268,2,90,0|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

6. 01:42:559 (4) - Oh well... Why are you using the same curve as 01:42:045 (3,5) - ? I know your intent on ideally encircling 01:41:187 (3) - ,though it does actually break both 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow,which feels kinda unpleasing to play. Why don't you instead reverse this slider's curve? Imho,it would totally flow smooth because it follows quite good 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow being played right there.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   472,104,102045,2,0,P|388:60|320:104,1,180
   296,188,102559,2,0,P|232:200|216:188,1,90
   189,100,102902,2,0,P|124:60|40:104,1,180

7. 02:11:530 (2) - Why are you using this clap? It does kinda feel overused there,and it sounds kinda bad... What if you instead kept the consistency with the first refrain,by removing it? The whole pattern sounded quite better by doing so!
   A really good difficulty you have there,nice job! I enjouyes this quite a lot ^^

-kevincela- wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:36:730 (x)- That's a quite little thing,and you may not agree with me there,but what about adding a note here? There's really no reason to skip over this synth's chord,as you have totally followed it 00:32:958 (1,2,3,4,5) - and by skipping this you have totally broken your 1/1 pattern. Here,I tried to modify the pattern with the new note,as in the current pattern it's kinda difficult to place the note without totally breaking the flow xD Haha , Done
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   476,272,33986,2,0,P|452:244|440:200,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   464,128,34672,1,8,0:0:0
   400,80,35015,1,0,0:0:0
   320,88,35358,1,8,0:0:0
   260,32,35701,6,0,P|184:44|148:124,1,160
   132,192,36730,1,8,0:0:0
   184,256,37072,2,0,P|224:300|256:156|288:300|328:256,1,160

2. 00:38:102 (1,2) - Oh well,not really a fan of the use of this kind of hitobjects. These sliders create a "press-hold rhythm" which is quite strange here,as there is no held of any instruments being heard there,making the whole transition quite weird to play. What about instead composing the whole pattern by a note - 1/1 slider - 1/1 slider to follow better both the drums and synth? Imho,that would be the best solution on this situation: Done
   
   I have made a pattern following this kind of pattern too. See if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   408,244,38102,1,8,0:0:0
   372,324,38445,6,8,P|336:344|296:344,1,80,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,344,39130,2,8,P|177:343|141:323,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   92,260,39815,2,0,P|124:212|56:156,1,160,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   32,80,40843,1,8,0:0:0
   112,76,41186,5,0,0:0:0
   256,144,41872,1,0,0:0:0
   228,216,42215,1,8,0:0:0
   220,296,42558,2,0,P|272:296|296:260|296:260|368:260,1,160

3. 00:54:559 (x)- Again,what about adding a note here? Actually,following the kicks there plays quite good and it continues well your rhythmical pattern! I feel that if I put the note here, is a bit hard to understand for beginners, so do not put here
4. 01:02:444 (3,4) - Considering where 01:01:072 (1) - 's oval flow is going,going directly downwards with this slider is not a really good idea imho. What about instead making this pattern go upwards to follow that oval flow and to make a nice wavy pattern which could work really well here? Here's what I have done,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   256,184,62101,1,8,0:0:0
   184,148,62444,2,0,P|144:144|104:160,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   56,220,63129,2,0,P|28:164|76:84,2,160,4|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,236,65186,1,2,0:0:0
   256,304,65529,1,2,0:0:0
   176,312,65872,6,0,P|144:272|144:272|84:276|56:220,1,160,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 01:13:758 (3) - Hmm,I have a little idea there. What about moving this note instead at x:164 y:364,putting it above 01:12:043 (1) - 's beginning? That would actually play quite good,as it continues the clockwise turn started with 01:12:043 (1) - and continued with 01:12:729 (2) - ,which finishes the pattern quite well there. Done
6. 01:36:044 (1,2,3) - This is a reeeally little thing,just fix if you want: what about making 01:34:672 (2,1) - opposed sliders? By positioning them above 01:33:301 (1) - ,you could complete 01:34:672 (2) - 's oval flow, creating a really good to play pattern...Here's the outcome here: Sorry , i'm not a symetrical mapper . Fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   160,208,96044,6,0,P|80:220|28:168,1,160,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   40,88,97072,1,0,0:0:0
   108,132,97415,1,2,0:0:0

7. 01:37:415 (3) - Shouldn't there be a finish instead of a whistle? I can clearly hear a cymbal being played there,and you have done the same on the other diffs,so why not here? Sure xD , Done
8. 01:44:272 (1,2) - Putting these two sliders above 01:42:901 (4) - using a linear pattern and blanketting 01:45:645 (2) - with 01:44:272 (1) - there kinda breaks the flow,as with the following sliders it plays quite bad and it feels unpleasing... What about instead using a different set using differently-rotated slider to prevent that? Here's what I have done there,once again: nice idea , Fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   344,220,104272,6,0,P|404:199|435:141,2,120
   264,208,105645,2,0,P|217:163|152:161,2,120
   296,280,107015,2,0,P|316:324|368:316|388:356,2,120
   216,280,108386,2,0,P|196:324|144:316|124:354,2,120
   256,212,109758,1,4,2:0:0

9. 02:02:101 (2,3,4,1) - Huh... Using this linear transition with this curved slider,as I had already pointed out in the Hard diff,doesen't really flow that well... I'd use instead and arc-pattern,with 02:02:101 (2) - 's curve reversed,to make it flow smoothly... Here's what I have done,see if you like it! I like too , Done
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   364,196,122101,2,0,P|348:156|312:128,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   244,108,122786,1,0,0:0:0
   164,124,123129,1,8,0:0:0
   112,184,123472,6,0,P|64:224|72:328,2,160,4|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   248,100,125529,2,0,P|312:76|312:76|300:24|344:-16,1,160,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,52,126558,6,0,P|408:88|448:112,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   488,176,127244,1,8,0:0:0
   452,248,127586,1,0,0:0:0

10. 02:20:272 (6) - Shouldn't a New Combo be added there? Other than providing your combo chain from being too long,it will keep the consistency with 02:12:386 (1,2,3,4,1) - ,following the synthesizer transiction. Done[/list:5dde3]
    [General]
    
    
    1. Lots of hitobjects are not correctly snapped... Lally has pointed almost all of them,though there are vatious unsnapped notes on the taiko diffs too. Remember to resnap them by going into the Timing menu ----> Resnap All Notes!
    [Normal]
    
    
    1. 00:26:615 (5,1) - Not really a fan of this kind of pattern... You see,the linear flow which 00:26:615 (5) - followed got totally broken there because of 00:27:473 (1) - 's placement which implies a returning back,and that actually felt quite umpleasing to play there... Wouldn't it be better if instead you kept your style,blanketting 00:27:473 (1) - with 00:26:615 (5) - ? That would definitely solve the problem,other than creating a quite fun to play pattern with 00:28:501 (2,3) - ,which follows up perfectly its oval flow there. Here's what I have done,see if you like it:
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       4,76,27473,6,0,P|52:52|140:84,1,150
       216,212,28501,1,0,0:0:0
       272,296,28845,2,0,P|217:319|138:273,1,150
       64,152,29872,1,0,0:0:0
       140,88,30215,2,0,P|256:8|372:88,1,300
       448,152,31587,1,4,0:0:0

    2. 00:41:529 (1,2,3,4) - I know your intent there on blanketting 00:42:215 (3,4) - ,but by doing that wou have created a quite sloppy to play diamond pattern,which does not really play well in there... :\ If you want to anyways continue your blanket there,what about instead using a different structure,such as an arc-pattern,combined with a "3" shaped slider, to continue well the pattern? That does actually play really smooth,other than following up 00:40:501 (4) -
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       136,48,41529,5,8,0:0:0
       236,28,41872,1,0,0:0:0
       316,92,42215,1,8,0:0:0
       292,188,42559,2,0,P|344:200|384:168|384:168|384:220|440:256,1,200
       512,316,43586,1,8,0:0:0

    3. 00:56:102 (x)- This isn't really needed,so feel free to skip if you don't want to change: What about adding a note here? It would create a pretty good transition between 00:55:586 (1,3) - ,and it would vary a bit the rhythm played there too! It plays quite good with these 2 sliders imho :3
    4. 01:04:158 (2,3,4,1) - Not really a big deal,thoughyou could smooth out a bit the flow there by making instead these two sliders curved. Using two linear sliders kinda felt not really smooth to play,and considering the nature of 01:03:129 (1) - ,using curved sliders would really benefit there,considering that with an arc-shaped pattern you could make 01:05:872 (1) - a wave slider,which works pretty good in both flow (considering the following sliders) and aesthetics!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       152,200,64158,2,0,P|168:248|216:280,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       305,276,64845,2,0,P|344:248|360:200,1,100,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       352,100,65529,1,2,0:0:0
       252,80,65872,6,0,P|232:132|168:120|168:120|104:108|84:160,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    5. 01:30:558 (2) - I guess you missed a whistle at the beginning of this slider? It would really fit good with the vocals' pitch,and considering that you have added it too at 01:36:043 (3) - I can't see why not there
    6. 01:37:244 (5) - As already said in the Easy diff,why are you using a whistle there instead of a finish? I can't really understand this,as a finish would have fit much better there,and again considering you have used it in the Hard diff too,why aren't you using it here too?
    7. 02:07:245 (2,3,4) - Not really a big deal again,but instead of using these curved sliders I would rearrange the pattern using a note and 2 sliders 1/1 to make 02:07:245 (2) - blanket 02:06:215 (1) - continuing the pattern with 02:07:587 (3,4) - ,which are linear sliders starting from 02:06:215 (1) - 's head. I think this could flow more smoothly than the actual pattern,because of these transitions,which work pretty well with 02:08:958 (1) - too. Try it out!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       268,244,126215,6,0,P|180:208|108:280,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       200,316,127245,1,8,0:0:0
       268,244,127587,2,0,P|260:132,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       356,120,128273,2,0,P|364:232,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       368,320,128958,6,0,P|452:280|448:180,1,200
       364,136,129986,1,8,0:0:0
       452,92,130329,2,0,P|404:28|324:48|324:48|272:32,1,200

    8. 02:14:445 (1,2) - Huhh...Why are you combining 2 sliders with exactly the same curve using a linear pattern? It really doesen't play well :< I know you are keeping the consistency there,but consider breaking it using two curved sliders with opposite curves - it will play way more smoothly than the actual pattern! Here's how I rearranged the whole pattern,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       56,236,132386,2,0,P|104:272|148:236|148:236|192:204|244:236,1,200
       204,328,133415,2,0,P|236:364|288:360,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       372,312,134101,1,8,0:0:0
       364,212,134445,6,0,P|332:176|280:180,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       204,240,135130,2,0,P|155:242|123:206,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       72,120,135816,2,0,P|24:188|76:292,1,200
       123,206,136843,1,8,0:0:0
       164,116,137187,6,0,P|204:88|204:88|212:36,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       300,37,137873,2,0,P|307:87|307:87|347:115,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       440,152,138558,2,0,P|424:244|331:257,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       256,328,139586,1,8,0:0:0
       180,257,139930,2,0,P|88:244|72:152,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       172,160,140958,1,8,0:0:0
       256,108,141301,1,4,0:0:0

    9. 02:23:701 (3,4) - This rhythm setting doesn't really fit with the instruments,considering the vocals do actually finish at 02:24:559 - ,1/2 before actually ends,wouldn't it be better if you actually folllowed them? Shortening 02:24:215 (4) - by 1/2,until 02:24:559 - , and adding a note at 02:24:902 - would totally solve the problem.
       
    10. 02:32:272 (5,1) - Similarly as 00:26:615 (5,1) - ,I don't really like that much how you are breaking 02:32:272 (5) - 's oval flow there... A possible solution would be using CTRL+G on the top of 02:33:643 (1) - to make it follow better 02:32:272 (5) - 's curve,but I have made some changes as well,see if you like them!
        
        SPOILER

        
        

        352,220,153643,6,0,P|436:160|432:72,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        344,120,154672,1,8,0:0:0
        248,96,155015,2,0,P|200:104|160:144,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        104,220,155701,5,0,0:0:0
        128,316,156043,2,0,P|176:296|212:324,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        256,232,156729,1,8,0:0:0
        304,320,157072,2,0,P|339:294|387:314,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        452,236,157758,6,0,P|368:196|376:100,1,200
        464,148,158786,1,8,0:0:0
        448,48,159129,2,0,P|352:24|288:92,1,200
        272,188,160158,1,8,0:0:0
        196,252,160501,5,0,0:0:0
        120,188,160843,1,8,0:0:0
        196,120,161186,2,0,P|196:20,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    All Done in this diff. . I used the codes because I'm too lazy :P
    
    [TeA's Insane]
    
    
    1. 00:29:359 (1,2,3,4) - This is more a personal opinion that an issue,so feel free to fix just if you want: What about tranforming that triangular pattern in another one, which exactly follows 00:29:359 (1) - 's oval flow? It's rather a subjective thing,but I find this pretty much smooth to play and it creates a nice jump with 00:30:387 (1) - too. Try it out!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       256,272,29359,6,0,P|348:272|392:192,1,180
       360,120,29873,1,0,0:0:0
       300,188,30045,1,0,0:0:0
       392,204,30216,1,0,0:0:0
       272,100,30387,6,0,P|224:104|224:104|180:156|180:156|116:164,2,180
       300,188,31245,1,0,0:0:0
       360,120,31416,1,0,0:0:0
       332,32,31587,1,4,0:0:0

    2. 00:44:959 (5,6) - Not really a big deal,but what about making a pattern with these two notes reversed? It would totally fit well there,as it follows 00:44:445 (4) - 's dropoff right ahead going from the right to the left and it would make a nice jump with 00:45:302 (1,2,3) - ,considering that you have been using many of these that would be even better! Here I have changed a bit the notes' position to keep the spacing regular there,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       100,148,44445,2,0,P|80:184|25:191|25:191|80:200|100:236,1,180
       132,320,44959,1,8,0:0:0
       44,308,45130,1,0,0:0:0
       188,240,45302,5,0,0:0:0
       256,180,45473,1,0,0:0:0
       324,240,45645,1,8,0:0:0

    3. 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - Considering how you have placed 00:46:330 (1,2) - ,this blanket+wave slider didn't really play that smooth,and considering the almost linear pattern 00:47:702 (5,6,1) - ,I would instead suggest you to continue the flow with an arc-shaped pattern,from 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - to 00:47:187 (4,5,6,1) - : imho,following a bit more these dropoffs being played there wouldn't hurt at all,and on the other side,they make the map there smoother and nice to see too! Here's what I have done,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       204,40,46673,2,0,P|164:20|120:12,1,90
       60,80,47016,1,8,0:0:0
       92,164,47187,2,0,P|118:244|202:174|233:253,1,180
       300,316,47702,1,8,0:0:0
       388,296,47873,1,0,0:0:0
       416,208,48045,6,0,P|360:144|464:108|412:40,1,180,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    4. 00:54:902 (3) - That's a quite little hitsounds thing,feel free to ignore it: what about switching the end of this slider to a soft-sampleset one? A normal-sampleset there does fit good,but considering you haven't followed this 2/1 normal-sampleset consistency,it will sound kinda strange,so wouldn't it be better if you actually removed this? It gives a better appearance to the sound, I'll leave it
    5. 01:34:673 (1,2) - Why didn't you follow the synth's changement of pitch there by skipping over it with a 1/1 slider? It sounds quite strange during the play,and it does not really match up with any of the song's instrument. What about instead using another pattern to follow that follows that changement of pitch? Using a pattern like this would fit quite good there:
       
       A pattern which could fit pretty good there could be using a 1/1 slider which blankets 01:34:673 (1) - and ends at 01:34:502 (4) - with an arc pattern right ahead... Here's what I have done:
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       276,28,94330,1,2,0:0:0
       360,64,94502,1,0,0:0:0
       364,152,94673,5,0,0:0:0
       448,184,94845,2,0,P|452:128|360:64,1,180
       236,196,95530,1,0,0:0:0
       248,284,95702,1,0,0:0:0
       172,336,95873,1,0,0:0:0
       88,308,96045,5,0,0:0:0
       56,224,96216,2,0,P|72:128|136:76,1,180
       304,108,96902,1,0,0:0:0
       336,192,97073,1,0,0:0:0
       304,276,97245,1,0,0:0:0
       356,352,97416,6,0,P|388:312|396:268,2,90,0|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    6. 01:42:559 (4) - Oh well... Why are you using the same curve as 01:42:045 (3,5) - ? I know your intent on ideally encircling 01:41:187 (3) - ,though it does actually break both 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow,which feels kinda unpleasing to play. Why don't you instead reverse this slider's curve? Imho,it would totally flow smooth because it follows quite good 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow being played right there.
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       472,104,102045,2,0,P|388:60|320:104,1,180
       296,188,102559,2,0,P|232:200|216:188,1,90
       189,100,102902,2,0,P|124:60|40:104,1,180

    7. 02:11:530 (2) - Why are you using this clap? It does kinda feel overused there,and it sounds kinda bad... What if you instead kept the consistency with the first refrain,by removing it? The whole pattern sounded quite better by doing so!
       A really good difficulty you have there,nice job! I enjouyes this quite a lot ^^

All done in TeA's Insane except the hitsounds

1. 00:23:187 (4) - stack with 00:21:987 (1) - (x:186 y:138)
   　
2. 00:24:902 (5) - like this slider? little blanket for (7)
   
   SPOILER

   

   256,248,24902,2,0,P|224:218|180:253|140:284|84:238,2,180

   
   　
3. 00:27:987 (2) - parallelism to 00:27:473 (1) - . slider 2nd point move to x:228 y:160 (if you fix this suggestion, you should change 00:28:502 (3,5) - slider angle)
   　
4. 00:34:845 (1) - If you want to employ a complete symmetry slider, try this code.
   

   184,220,34845,6,0,P|256:266|328:220,1,180

   　
5. 01:34:673 (1) - add whistle? maybe your pattern.

1. You have a taiko-bg. Someone noted this above, but you said you've updated, when the bg is still there. Just use the default background for the Taiko diffs.
2. SB\2: Could you remove the cap on T in through? It's proper English for a lyric-sb, right?
3. SB\2: This image doesn't fade after the first break. It's behind the background, but nonetheless, it should be changed.
4. The set is really well done! Great job. (I looked through the standard set and didn't find anything to poke at, this is ready to go!)

1. Quite a bit of these difficulty has unsnapped notes. It wouldn't hurt looking through AIBAT. Just run through and click resnap all notes in the timing section as the others have mentioned.

XinCrin wrote:

-kevincela- wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:36:730 (x)- That's a quite little thing,and you may not agree with me there,but what about adding a note here? There's really no reason to skip over this synth's chord,as you have totally followed it 00:32:958 (1,2,3,4,5) - and by skipping this you have totally broken your 1/1 pattern. Here,I tried to modify the pattern with the new note,as in the current pattern it's kinda difficult to place the note without totally breaking the flow xD Haha , Done
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   476,272,33986,2,0,P|452:244|440:200,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   464,128,34672,1,8,0:0:0
   400,80,35015,1,0,0:0:0
   320,88,35358,1,8,0:0:0
   260,32,35701,6,0,P|184:44|148:124,1,160
   132,192,36730,1,8,0:0:0
   184,256,37072,2,0,P|224:300|256:156|288:300|328:256,1,160

2. 00:38:102 (1,2) - Oh well,not really a fan of the use of this kind of hitobjects. These sliders create a "press-hold rhythm" which is quite strange here,as there is no held of any instruments being heard there,making the whole transition quite weird to play. What about instead composing the whole pattern by a note - 1/1 slider - 1/1 slider to follow better both the drums and synth? Imho,that would be the best solution on this situation: Done
   
   I have made a pattern following this kind of pattern too. See if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   408,244,38102,1,8,0:0:0
   372,324,38445,6,8,P|336:344|296:344,1,80,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,344,39130,2,8,P|177:343|141:323,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   92,260,39815,2,0,P|124:212|56:156,1,160,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   32,80,40843,1,8,0:0:0
   112,76,41186,5,0,0:0:0
   256,144,41872,1,0,0:0:0
   228,216,42215,1,8,0:0:0
   220,296,42558,2,0,P|272:296|296:260|296:260|368:260,1,160

3. 00:54:559 (x)- Again,what about adding a note here? Actually,following the kicks there plays quite good and it continues well your rhythmical pattern! I feel that if I put the note here, is a bit hard to understand for beginners, so do not put here
4. 01:02:444 (3,4) - Considering where 01:01:072 (1) - 's oval flow is going,going directly downwards with this slider is not a really good idea imho. What about instead making this pattern go upwards to follow that oval flow and to make a nice wavy pattern which could work really well here? Here's what I have done,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   256,184,62101,1,8,0:0:0
   184,148,62444,2,0,P|144:144|104:160,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   56,220,63129,2,0,P|28:164|76:84,2,160,4|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,236,65186,1,2,0:0:0
   256,304,65529,1,2,0:0:0
   176,312,65872,6,0,P|144:272|144:272|84:276|56:220,1,160,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 01:13:758 (3) - Hmm,I have a little idea there. What about moving this note instead at x:164 y:364,putting it above 01:12:043 (1) - 's beginning? That would actually play quite good,as it continues the clockwise turn started with 01:12:043 (1) - and continued with 01:12:729 (2) - ,which finishes the pattern quite well there. Done
6. 01:36:044 (1,2,3) - This is a reeeally little thing,just fix if you want: what about making 01:34:672 (2,1) - opposed sliders? By positioning them above 01:33:301 (1) - ,you could complete 01:34:672 (2) - 's oval flow, creating a really good to play pattern...Here's the outcome here: Sorry , i'm not a symetrical mapper . Fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   160,208,96044,6,0,P|80:220|28:168,1,160,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   40,88,97072,1,0,0:0:0
   108,132,97415,1,2,0:0:0

7. 01:37:415 (3) - Shouldn't there be a finish instead of a whistle? I can clearly hear a cymbal being played there,and you have done the same on the other diffs,so why not here? Sure xD , Done
8. 01:44:272 (1,2) - Putting these two sliders above 01:42:901 (4) - using a linear pattern and blanketting 01:45:645 (2) - with 01:44:272 (1) - there kinda breaks the flow,as with the following sliders it plays quite bad and it feels unpleasing... What about instead using a different set using differently-rotated slider to prevent that? Here's what I have done there,once again: nice idea , Fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   344,220,104272,6,0,P|404:199|435:141,2,120
   264,208,105645,2,0,P|217:163|152:161,2,120
   296,280,107015,2,0,P|316:324|368:316|388:356,2,120
   216,280,108386,2,0,P|196:324|144:316|124:354,2,120
   256,212,109758,1,4,2:0:0

9. 02:02:101 (2,3,4,1) - Huh... Using this linear transition with this curved slider,as I had already pointed out in the Hard diff,doesen't really flow that well... I'd use instead and arc-pattern,with 02:02:101 (2) - 's curve reversed,to make it flow smoothly... Here's what I have done,see if you like it! I like too , Done
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   364,196,122101,2,0,P|348:156|312:128,1,80,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   244,108,122786,1,0,0:0:0
   164,124,123129,1,8,0:0:0
   112,184,123472,6,0,P|64:224|72:328,2,160,4|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   248,100,125529,2,0,P|312:76|312:76|300:24|344:-16,1,160,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,52,126558,6,0,P|408:88|448:112,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   488,176,127244,1,8,0:0:0
   452,248,127586,1,0,0:0:0

10. 02:20:272 (6) - Shouldn't a New Combo be added there? Other than providing your combo chain from being too long,it will keep the consistency with 02:12:386 (1,2,3,4,1) - ,following the synthesizer transiction. Done[/list:e563a]
    [General]
    
    
    1. Lots of hitobjects are not correctly snapped... Lally has pointed almost all of them,though there are vatious unsnapped notes on the taiko diffs too. Remember to resnap them by going into the Timing menu ----> Resnap All Notes!
    [Normal]
    
    
    1. 00:26:615 (5,1) - Not really a fan of this kind of pattern... You see,the linear flow which 00:26:615 (5) - followed got totally broken there because of 00:27:473 (1) - 's placement which implies a returning back,and that actually felt quite umpleasing to play there... Wouldn't it be better if instead you kept your style,blanketting 00:27:473 (1) - with 00:26:615 (5) - ? That would definitely solve the problem,other than creating a quite fun to play pattern with 00:28:501 (2,3) - ,which follows up perfectly its oval flow there. Here's what I have done,see if you like it:
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       4,76,27473,6,0,P|52:52|140:84,1,150
       216,212,28501,1,0,0:0:0
       272,296,28845,2,0,P|217:319|138:273,1,150
       64,152,29872,1,0,0:0:0
       140,88,30215,2,0,P|256:8|372:88,1,300
       448,152,31587,1,4,0:0:0

    2. 00:41:529 (1,2,3,4) - I know your intent there on blanketting 00:42:215 (3,4) - ,but by doing that wou have created a quite sloppy to play diamond pattern,which does not really play well in there... :\ If you want to anyways continue your blanket there,what about instead using a different structure,such as an arc-pattern,combined with a "3" shaped slider, to continue well the pattern? That does actually play really smooth,other than following up 00:40:501 (4) -
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       136,48,41529,5,8,0:0:0
       236,28,41872,1,0,0:0:0
       316,92,42215,1,8,0:0:0
       292,188,42559,2,0,P|344:200|384:168|384:168|384:220|440:256,1,200
       512,316,43586,1,8,0:0:0

    3. 00:56:102 (x)- This isn't really needed,so feel free to skip if you don't want to change: What about adding a note here? It would create a pretty good transition between 00:55:586 (1,3) - ,and it would vary a bit the rhythm played there too! It plays quite good with these 2 sliders imho :3
    4. 01:04:158 (2,3,4,1) - Not really a big deal,thoughyou could smooth out a bit the flow there by making instead these two sliders curved. Using two linear sliders kinda felt not really smooth to play,and considering the nature of 01:03:129 (1) - ,using curved sliders would really benefit there,considering that with an arc-shaped pattern you could make 01:05:872 (1) - a wave slider,which works pretty good in both flow (considering the following sliders) and aesthetics!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       152,200,64158,2,0,P|168:248|216:280,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       305,276,64845,2,0,P|344:248|360:200,1,100,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       352,100,65529,1,2,0:0:0
       252,80,65872,6,0,P|232:132|168:120|168:120|104:108|84:160,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    5. 01:30:558 (2) - I guess you missed a whistle at the beginning of this slider? It would really fit good with the vocals' pitch,and considering that you have added it too at 01:36:043 (3) - I can't see why not there
    6. 01:37:244 (5) - As already said in the Easy diff,why are you using a whistle there instead of a finish? I can't really understand this,as a finish would have fit much better there,and again considering you have used it in the Hard diff too,why aren't you using it here too?
    7. 02:07:245 (2,3,4) - Not really a big deal again,but instead of using these curved sliders I would rearrange the pattern using a note and 2 sliders 1/1 to make 02:07:245 (2) - blanket 02:06:215 (1) - continuing the pattern with 02:07:587 (3,4) - ,which are linear sliders starting from 02:06:215 (1) - 's head. I think this could flow more smoothly than the actual pattern,because of these transitions,which work pretty well with 02:08:958 (1) - too. Try it out!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       268,244,126215,6,0,P|180:208|108:280,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       200,316,127245,1,8,0:0:0
       268,244,127587,2,0,P|260:132,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       356,120,128273,2,0,P|364:232,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       368,320,128958,6,0,P|452:280|448:180,1,200
       364,136,129986,1,8,0:0:0
       452,92,130329,2,0,P|404:28|324:48|324:48|272:32,1,200

    8. 02:14:445 (1,2) - Huhh...Why are you combining 2 sliders with exactly the same curve using a linear pattern? It really doesen't play well :< I know you are keeping the consistency there,but consider breaking it using two curved sliders with opposite curves - it will play way more smoothly than the actual pattern! Here's how I rearranged the whole pattern,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       56,236,132386,2,0,P|104:272|148:236|148:236|192:204|244:236,1,200
       204,328,133415,2,0,P|236:364|288:360,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       372,312,134101,1,8,0:0:0
       364,212,134445,6,0,P|332:176|280:180,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       204,240,135130,2,0,P|155:242|123:206,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       72,120,135816,2,0,P|24:188|76:292,1,200
       123,206,136843,1,8,0:0:0
       164,116,137187,6,0,P|204:88|204:88|212:36,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       300,37,137873,2,0,P|307:87|307:87|347:115,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       440,152,138558,2,0,P|424:244|331:257,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       256,328,139586,1,8,0:0:0
       180,257,139930,2,0,P|88:244|72:152,1,200,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
       172,160,140958,1,8,0:0:0
       256,108,141301,1,4,0:0:0

    9. 02:23:701 (3,4) - This rhythm setting doesn't really fit with the instruments,considering the vocals do actually finish at 02:24:559 - ,1/2 before actually ends,wouldn't it be better if you actually folllowed them? Shortening 02:24:215 (4) - by 1/2,until 02:24:559 - , and adding a note at 02:24:902 - would totally solve the problem.
       
    10. 02:32:272 (5,1) - Similarly as 00:26:615 (5,1) - ,I don't really like that much how you are breaking 02:32:272 (5) - 's oval flow there... A possible solution would be using CTRL+G on the top of 02:33:643 (1) - to make it follow better 02:32:272 (5) - 's curve,but I have made some changes as well,see if you like them!
        
        SPOILER

        
        

        352,220,153643,6,0,P|436:160|432:72,1,200,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        344,120,154672,1,8,0:0:0
        248,96,155015,2,0,P|200:104|160:144,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        104,220,155701,5,0,0:0:0
        128,316,156043,2,0,P|176:296|212:324,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        256,232,156729,1,8,0:0:0
        304,320,157072,2,0,P|339:294|387:314,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
        452,236,157758,6,0,P|368:196|376:100,1,200
        464,148,158786,1,8,0:0:0
        448,48,159129,2,0,P|352:24|288:92,1,200
        272,188,160158,1,8,0:0:0
        196,252,160501,5,0,0:0:0
        120,188,160843,1,8,0:0:0
        196,120,161186,2,0,P|196:20,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    All Done in this diff. . I used the codes because I'm too lazy :P
    
    [TeA's Insane]
    
    
    1. 00:29:359 (1,2,3,4) - This is more a personal opinion that an issue,so feel free to fix just if you want: What about tranforming that triangular pattern in another one, which exactly follows 00:29:359 (1) - 's oval flow? It's rather a subjective thing,but I find this pretty much smooth to play and it creates a nice jump with 00:30:387 (1) - too. Try it out!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       256,272,29359,6,0,P|348:272|392:192,1,180
       360,120,29873,1,0,0:0:0
       300,188,30045,1,0,0:0:0
       392,204,30216,1,0,0:0:0
       272,100,30387,6,0,P|224:104|224:104|180:156|180:156|116:164,2,180
       300,188,31245,1,0,0:0:0
       360,120,31416,1,0,0:0:0
       332,32,31587,1,4,0:0:0

    2. 00:44:959 (5,6) - Not really a big deal,but what about making a pattern with these two notes reversed? It would totally fit well there,as it follows 00:44:445 (4) - 's dropoff right ahead going from the right to the left and it would make a nice jump with 00:45:302 (1,2,3) - ,considering that you have been using many of these that would be even better! Here I have changed a bit the notes' position to keep the spacing regular there,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       100,148,44445,2,0,P|80:184|25:191|25:191|80:200|100:236,1,180
       132,320,44959,1,8,0:0:0
       44,308,45130,1,0,0:0:0
       188,240,45302,5,0,0:0:0
       256,180,45473,1,0,0:0:0
       324,240,45645,1,8,0:0:0

    3. 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - Considering how you have placed 00:46:330 (1,2) - ,this blanket+wave slider didn't really play that smooth,and considering the almost linear pattern 00:47:702 (5,6,1) - ,I would instead suggest you to continue the flow with an arc-shaped pattern,from 00:46:673 (2,3,4) - to 00:47:187 (4,5,6,1) - : imho,following a bit more these dropoffs being played there wouldn't hurt at all,and on the other side,they make the map there smoother and nice to see too! Here's what I have done,see if you like it!
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       204,40,46673,2,0,P|164:20|120:12,1,90
       60,80,47016,1,8,0:0:0
       92,164,47187,2,0,P|118:244|202:174|233:253,1,180
       300,316,47702,1,8,0:0:0
       388,296,47873,1,0,0:0:0
       416,208,48045,6,0,P|360:144|464:108|412:40,1,180,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    4. 00:54:902 (3) - That's a quite little hitsounds thing,feel free to ignore it: what about switching the end of this slider to a soft-sampleset one? A normal-sampleset there does fit good,but considering you haven't followed this 2/1 normal-sampleset consistency,it will sound kinda strange,so wouldn't it be better if you actually removed this? It gives a better appearance to the sound, I'll leave it
    5. 01:34:673 (1,2) - Why didn't you follow the synth's changement of pitch there by skipping over it with a 1/1 slider? It sounds quite strange during the play,and it does not really match up with any of the song's instrument. What about instead using another pattern to follow that follows that changement of pitch? Using a pattern like this would fit quite good there:
       
       A pattern which could fit pretty good there could be using a 1/1 slider which blankets 01:34:673 (1) - and ends at 01:34:502 (4) - with an arc pattern right ahead... Here's what I have done:
       
       SPOILER

       
       
       

       276,28,94330,1,2,0:0:0
       360,64,94502,1,0,0:0:0
       364,152,94673,5,0,0:0:0
       448,184,94845,2,0,P|452:128|360:64,1,180
       236,196,95530,1,0,0:0:0
       248,284,95702,1,0,0:0:0
       172,336,95873,1,0,0:0:0
       88,308,96045,5,0,0:0:0
       56,224,96216,2,0,P|72:128|136:76,1,180
       304,108,96902,1,0,0:0:0
       336,192,97073,1,0,0:0:0
       304,276,97245,1,0,0:0:0
       356,352,97416,6,0,P|388:312|396:268,2,90,0|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

    6. 01:42:559 (4) - Oh well... Why are you using the same curve as 01:42:045 (3,5) - ? I know your intent on ideally encircling 01:41:187 (3) - ,though it does actually break both 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow,which feels kinda unpleasing to play. Why don't you instead reverse this slider's curve? Imho,it would totally flow smooth because it follows quite good 01:42:045 (3,5) - 's oval flow being played right there.
       
       SPOILER

       
       

       472,104,102045,2,0,P|388:60|320:104,1,180
       296,188,102559,2,0,P|232:200|216:188,1,90
       189,100,102902,2,0,P|124:60|40:104,1,180

    7. 02:11:530 (2) - Why are you using this clap? It does kinda feel overused there,and it sounds kinda bad... What if you instead kept the consistency with the first refrain,by removing it? The whole pattern sounded quite better by doing so!
       A really good difficulty you have there,nice job! I enjouyes this quite a lot ^^

All done in TeA's Insane except the hitsounds

Thanks for the mod that really helped me Kevin Calling to you . Updated

1. Shouldn't the title be simply 'S3RL feat. Sara - Feel The Melody', not 'DJ S3RL'? I'm not sure, but i've looked around and I don't seem to find it labeled as DJ S3RL much anywhere else. I'm sure just S3RL is fine. ((talked to -kevincela- about this, even if there is already a map ranked with DJ in front of S3RL)).

1. 00:33:987 (2) - No point to have a curve here imho; it doesn't really lead on a beat-circle curved transition, so i'd prefer it if you straightened it out.
2. 01:09:302 (2) - Can you make this into a shorter repeat slider instead? It's a pretty long slider for this map when you can be following other tunes in the music. Try something like this.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs.

1. Go to the Timing tab and then click 'Resnap All Notes'. There are around twenty unsnapped notes here, that being single beats or sliderends, which is unrankable.
2. 00:40:502 (4) - Following the music, this is not an area where you would have put a slider before; you should replace this slider with a shorter one that ends at 00:40:845 -, and then add a note at 00:41:187 -. Since then you would have four hitcircles in a row and that may feel like much at a time for an easier difficulty, replace 00:41:873 (2, 3) - with another shot slider.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:045 (3) - Why such a deep curve for such a short slider? Make it appear a bit longer by moving the slider curve point up a bit? It shouldn't effect the spacing too much.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:56:102 (2) - Remove this note; throughout this normal difficulty, this is the only section/area where a beat is placed to follow the girl's vocals; the rest are coincidental and following solely the music's rhythm and beat. Plus, it doesn't flow all too well, honestly.
5. 01:33:130 (5) - Could you move this to the right a bit more? It would give the feel of the note making a bit more curved transition, ( like a suddle angle transition)), rather then a quick one where (5) is now.
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 02:24:216 (4) - Imo, it'd flow a bit better if you made it as if (4) was a continueation of the (3) slider by moving it in the direct angle of where the (3) slider left off as opposed to being more near the top of the slider.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs.

1. 01:29:702 (1) - Can you make this slider more like a curve rather than an arch? It's just plain out weird to play in this pattern imo.
2. 01:37:245 (5) + 02:10:845 (2) - 'End of these sliders are hidden under a hitburst, therefore UNRANKABLE. Re-position the sliders so that you can see if they have a repeat or not, please!
3. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs.

1. 01:35:187 (2) - With the standard hitburst (as all maps looking for this issue should be modded with), it leaves barely any time to see if there is a repeat here or not; also called a hidden slider end. This is moderate and not severe, but I hiiiiighly suggest you change this.

1. 01:15:473 - d; better with a note here!
2. 01:19:587 - d; fill in the empty space. better then a break
3. 01:20:959 - d; ^^^
4. 01:21:473 - k; no need for a finish
5. 01:25:073 - d; better then having a break
6. 01:26:445 - d; ^^^
7. 01:28:330 - make this a k instead, it fits better
8. 01:32:445 - k; no need for a finish
9. 01:36:045 - d; fill in the empty space
10. 01:52:330 (3, 4, 1, 2, 1) - k k k d k
11. 02:33:645 - D?

1. 00:26:616 - there's no finish in the music; make it a regular d.
2. 00:25:587 - k
3. 00:27:816 (2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1) - k d k d k k d k or k d d k k k d d
4. 00:35:359 (1, 2, 3, 4) - k kkd
5. 00:39:645 (1, 1, 2, 3) - k kkd
6. 01:21:473 - k
7. 01:22:845 - k
8. 01:32:445 - d

Elly-chan wrote:

Here's your mod from Project Thorough Modding! Sorry to say, but you're stuck with me as the MAT who's modding this instead.

[General]

1. Shouldn't the title be simply 'S3RL feat. Sara - Feel The Melody', not 'DJ S3RL'? I'm not sure, but i've looked around and I don't seem to find it labeled as DJ S3RL much anywhere else. I'm sure just S3RL is fine. ((talked to -kevincela- about this, even if there is already a map ranked with DJ in front of S3RL)).The "DJ" is considered something that should always go before "S3RL" or something and "Sara" has to go in the title, because it is a voice that sings a duet with S3RL

[Easy]

Hitsound and Combo Mods

1. 00:24:730 (4) - Add a New Combo here; throughout the map, at least during the kiai sections, you add NCs each two measures. It's been two measures and this follows the music better. Afterwards, remove the NC at 00:25:759 -. Done
2. 00:54:902 (1) - Add a finish in here? It fits in with the BGM seeing that there is a shattering sound being made at this moment. This also means remove the finish at 00:55:587 -; it has no real purpose since there is no finish sound in the BGM. It just makes it sound bad. Done
3. 01:03:816 (4) - Remove the whistle here to keep consistent with your hitsound pattern! You only are using whistles for this short section not on her vocal holds, but where her voice is prominently saying something. Done
4. 01:41:530 (3) - New Combo to make your NC-Every-Two-Measures pattern consistent! Done
5. 01:47:016 (3) - Same as above~! Done
6. 02:08:273 (1) - Remove the New Combo here and add it at (3)! To keep your combo pattern consistent and to follow the music better. Done
7. 02:41:530 (5) - New Combo since you would've been following the girl's vocals.

• Done

1. 00:33:987 (2) - No point to have a curve here imho; it doesn't really lead on a beat-circle curved transition, so i'd prefer it if you straightened it out. Nice idea , Done
2. 01:09:302 (2) - Can you make this into a shorter repeat slider instead? It's a pretty long slider for this map when you can be following other tunes in the music. Try something like this. Done
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs.Great idea , Done

[Normal]

Hitsound and Combo Mods

1. 02:24:902 (5) - Why is this not a part of the New Combo afterwards? It follows the girl's vocals as well, so add one here and remove the one from the note directly afterwards.Done

1. Go to the Timing tab and then click 'Resnap All Notes'. There are around twenty unsnapped notes here, that being single beats or sliderends, which is unrankable. Done
2. 00:40:502 (4) - Following the music, this is not an area where you would have put a slider before; you should replace this slider with a shorter one that ends at 00:40:845 -, and then add a note at 00:41:187 -. Since then you would have four hitcircles in a row and that may feel like much at a time for an easier difficulty, replace 00:41:873 (2, 3) - with another shot slider. Done
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:045 (3) - Why such a deep curve for such a short slider? Make it appear a bit longer by moving the slider curve point up a bit? It shouldn't effect the spacing too much. Done
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:56:102 (2) - Remove this note; throughout this normal difficulty, this is the only section/area where a beat is placed to follow the girl's vocals; the rest are coincidental and following solely the music's rhythm and beat. Plus, it doesn't flow all too well, honestly. Done
5. 01:33:130 (5) - Could you move this to the right a bit more? It would give the feel of the note making a bit more curved transition, ( like a suddle angle transition)), rather then a quick one where (5) is now. Done
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 02:24:216 (4) - Imo, it'd flow a bit better if you made it as if (4) was a continueation of the (3) slider by moving it in the direct angle of where the (3) slider left off as opposed to being more near the top of the slider. Done
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs. Done

[Hard]

Hitsound and Combo Mods

1. 00:55:587 (1) - Sincerely, there is no need for the finish. It just sounds bad, there's none in the BGM, and you've used it on the note previous; just remove it, it sounds much better.Done

1. 01:29:702 (1) - Can you make this slider more like a curve rather than an arch? It's just plain out weird to play in this pattern imo Yeah! Done
2. 01:37:245 (5) + 02:10:845 (2) - 'End of these sliders are hidden under a hitburst, therefore UNRANKABLE. Re-position the sliders so that you can see if they have a repeat or not, please! Fixed!
3. 02:43:245 (1) - 'Final bass drop is here. I suggest that you end the map here instead (the spinner to be exact). It feels a bit unnatural to follow the other short sound after the bass drop that occurs.Done

[Insane]

Hitsound and Combo Mods

1. 00:41:702 (5) - Add a New Combo here and remove the next New Combo coming after it; It follows your combo pattern and emphasizes this part of the music more. Done
2. 00:46:330 (1) - Make this part of the previous Combo and add the New Combo where two is currently. It goes with the downbeat, which imho, is much better. Done
3. 01:34:673 (1) - Remove the New Combo here, add it back on 01:35:530 -, and then remove it from 01:36:045 -. It follows the music much better and keeps your combo pattern consistent. Done
4. 02:03:987 (6) - Add a new combo here and then remove the New Combo on the next note- It emphasizes the music much better.Done

1. 01:35:187 (2) - With the standard hitburst (as all maps looking for this issue should be modded with), it leaves barely any time to see if there is a repeat here or not; also called a hidden slider end. This is moderate and not severe, but I hiiiiighly suggest you change this.Change the position of one of the circles to fix the problem

[Muzu]

1. 01:15:473 - d; better with a note here!
2. 01:19:587 - d; fill in the empty space. better then a break
3. 01:20:959 - d; ^^^
4. 01:21:473 - k; no need for a finish
5. 01:25:073 - d; better then having a break
6. 01:26:445 - d; ^^^
7. 01:28:330 - make this a k instead, it fits better
8. 01:32:445 - k; no need for a finish
9. 01:36:045 - d; fill in the empty space
10. 01:52:330 (3, 4, 1, 2, 1) - k k k d k
11. 02:33:645 - D?

All Done here

[Oni]

1. 00:26:616 - there's no finish in the music; make it a regular d.
2. 00:25:587 - k
3. 00:27:816 (2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1) - k d k d k k d k or k d d k k k d d
4. 00:35:359 (1, 2, 3, 4) - k kkd
5. 00:39:645 (1, 1, 2, 3) - k kkd
6. 01:21:473 - k
7. 01:22:845 - k
8. 01:32:445 - d

All Done here

Call Me Back For A Recheck~ ♥

1. 02:41:530 (1) - I think it would flow a bit better if you made it placed where a continuation of the slider would have occured; what I mean is like this!
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 02:11:016 (2) - 'End of this slider is hidden under a hitburst, therefore UNRANKABLE. Re-position the slider so that you can see if it have a repeat or not, please!

1. 00:34:330 (3, 1) - d k
2. 00:36:902 (3, 1) - k d
3. 00:37:416 (2, 3, 4, 1, 1) - k d d k k
4. 00:42:216 (1) - d
5. 00:40:673 (2, 3, 4) - kkk
6. 00:46:759 (2) - remove
7. 01:30:559 - d
8. 01:31:930 - d
9. 02:05:702 (2, 3, 4) - kkk
10. 02:11:187 (2, 3, 4) - kkk

1. 00:54:387 (1, 1, 1, 1) - K D D K
2. 02:22:159 (1, 1, 1, 1) - D K K D

Elly-chan wrote:

Recheckie~! ♥

[Easy]

1. 02:41:530 (1) - I think it would flow a bit better if you made it placed where a continuation of the slider would have occured; what I mean is like this!
   
   SPOILER

   

DONE

[Hard]

1. 02:11:016 (2) - 'End of this slider is hidden under a hitburst, therefore UNRANKABLE. Re-position the slider so that you can see if it have a repeat or not, please!

DONE

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:34:330 (3, 1) - d k DONE
2. 00:36:902 (3, 1) - k d DONE
3. 00:37:416 (2, 3, 4, 1, 1) - k d d k k DONE
4. 00:42:216 (1) - d DONE
5. 00:40:673 (2, 3, 4) - kkk DONE
6. 00:46:759 (2) - remove DONE
7. 01:30:559 - d DONE
8. 01:31:930 - d DONE
9. 02:05:702 (2, 3, 4) - kkk DONE
10. 02:11:187 (2, 3, 4) - kkk

DONE

[Oni]

1. 00:54:387 (1, 1, 1, 1) - K D D K DONE
2. 02:22:159 (1, 1, 1, 1) - D K K D

DONE

NO KDS PLEASE. Poke Me When Updated~! ♥

-Bakari- wrote:

Maaaaan, I totally love TeA's and yous styles. You guys are awesome. Also, you know, I'm always glad to mod your maps.
NOW GO AND GET YOUR BUBBLE BABY

Kin wrote:

please don't edit my taiko without ask me ...

Elly-chan wrote:

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:34:330 (3, 1) - d k ok
2. 00:36:902 (3, 1) - k d ok
3. 00:37:416 (2, 3, 4, 1, 1) - k d d k k ok
4. 00:42:216 (1) - d ok
5. 00:40:673 (2, 3, 4) - kkk I won't make it
6. 00:46:759 (2) - remove ^
7. 01:30:559 - d ok
8. 01:31:930 - d ok
9. 02:05:702 (2, 3, 4) - kkk no change
10. 02:11:187 (2, 3, 4) - kkk ok

[Oni]

1. 00:54:387 (1, 1, 1, 1) - K D D K really strange for me no change
2. 02:22:159 (1, 1, 1, 1) - D K K D ok fix'd

Kin wrote:

Elly-chan wrote:

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:34:330 (3, 1) - d k ok
2. 00:36:902 (3, 1) - k d ok
3. 00:37:416 (2, 3, 4, 1, 1) - k d d k k ok
4. 00:42:216 (1) - d ok
5. 00:40:673 (2, 3, 4) - kkk I won't make it
6. 00:46:759 (2) - remove ^
7. 01:30:559 - d ok
8. 01:31:930 - d ok
9. 02:05:702 (2, 3, 4) - kkk no change
10. 02:11:187 (2, 3, 4) - kkk ok

[Oni]

1. 00:54:387 (1, 1, 1, 1) - K D D K really strange for me no change
2. 02:22:159 (1, 1, 1, 1) - D K K D ok fix'd

I make lil change on oni and muzu (mod + custom combo color changed + lil other change)

update please http://puu.sh/26ehJ
and I've got one taiko GD ranked name as Taikin oni, so can you rename my 2 taiko ?

thanks ~