DragonForce - Valley of the Damned

posted
Total Posts
263
show more
dqs01733
ok kayne wanted me to clarify what i meant
its super sloppy looks like shit and the snapping is probably not right for some object BUT ITS JUST AN EXAMPLE TO GIVE A GENERAL IDEA
http://puu.sh/m9c28.osz

Edit: between 03:37:396 - and 03:56:596 -
Topic Starter
Kayne

dqs01733 wrote:

ok kayne wanted me to clarify what i meant
its super sloppy looks like shit and the snapping is probably not right for some object BUT ITS JUST AN EXAMPLE TO GIVE A GENERAL IDEA
http://puu.sh/m9c28.osz

Edit: between 03:37:396 - and 03:56:596 -
Uuh that's nice, let's see if roxas and riki likes it
deetz
yep, that's what I meant lol.

If you do that, I'd just suggest adding breaks between the sets of objects to prevent unfair hp drain.
Topic Starter
Kayne

deetz wrote:

yep, that's what I meant lol.

If you do that, I'd just suggest adding breaks between the sets of objects to prevent unfair hp drain.
We'll see if it's needed~
TehDragonGuy

Kayne wrote:

deetz wrote:

yep, that's what I meant lol.

If you do that, I'd just suggest adding breaks between the sets of objects to prevent unfair hp drain.
We'll see if it's needed~
I wouldn't say it's needed, testing it with Auto, it doesn't drop much due to the reverse sliders and the short little stream, as well as the low HP drain. I wouldn't bother, although it might add a nice effect to add them as breaks, and it is nicer for the player as there are breaks around 1/3 and 2/3 through the map.
Roxas

dqs01733 wrote:

ok kayne wanted me to clarify what i meant
its super sloppy looks like shit and the snapping is probably not right for some object BUT ITS JUST AN EXAMPLE TO GIVE A GENERAL IDEA
http://puu.sh/m9c28.osz

Edit: between 03:37:396 - and 03:56:596 -
So... I don't really know how you could get sliders like this 03:41:396 (2) - (with a 1/24 snapping I guess?), but they're perfect in my ears. So here's the part with 1/24 ??? sliders.

123,341,217396,5,0,0:0:0:0:
460,296,219796,5,0,0:0:0:0:
276,182,221396,2,0,L|293:220,3,30
394,123,221671,2,0,L|375:296,1,168.750006437302
376,290,222196,5,0,0:0:0:0:
195,209,224096,2,0,L|178:247,3,30
149,57,224446,1,0,0:0:0:0:
74,168,224596,5,2,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225646,5,0,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225721,1,0,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225796,1,0,0:0:0:0:
194,220,226096,1,0,0:0:0:0:
114,190,226246,2,0,P|151:149|248:158,1,135.000005149842
347,357,226696,1,0,0:0:0:0:
349,323,226771,1,0,0:0:0:0:
351,289,226846,1,0,0:0:0:0:
354,255,226921,1,0,0:0:0:0:
357,221,226996,5,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,228946,5,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,229021,1,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,229096,1,0,0:0:0:0:
153,205,229396,5,0,0:0:0:0:
201,203,230996,6,0,L|184:165,3,30
80,266,231271,2,0,L|100:76,1,168.750006437302
97,98,231796,5,0,0:0:0:0:
383,239,233696,6,0,L|400:201,3,30
430,370,234046,1,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,234196,5,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235246,5,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235321,1,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235396,2,0,P|306:284|380:277,1,135.000005149842
199,191,235996,2,0,P|136:213|62:220,1,135.000005149842


But iirc RC says something like "Don't put things in the mapset outside the editor, otherwise it will be unrankable" (for example Stack leniency to 0, edited from .osu file, when the minumim from the editor is 2).

So if I am right, should we change the BPM in that part? The only "irregular" thing is the drum. (I'm no more into those things, I don't really remember how we should act here)
Topic Starter
Kayne

Roxas wrote:

dqs01733 wrote:

ok kayne wanted me to clarify what i meant
its super sloppy looks like shit and the snapping is probably not right for some object BUT ITS JUST AN EXAMPLE TO GIVE A GENERAL IDEA
http://puu.sh/m9c28.osz

Edit: between 03:37:396 - and 03:56:596 -
So... I don't really know how you could get sliders like this 03:41:396 (2) - (with a 1/24 snapping I guess?), but they're perfect in my ears. So here's the part with 1/24 ??? sliders.

123,341,217396,5,0,0:0:0:0:
460,296,219796,5,0,0:0:0:0:
276,182,221396,2,0,L|293:220,3,30
394,123,221671,2,0,L|375:296,1,168.750006437302
376,290,222196,5,0,0:0:0:0:
195,209,224096,2,0,L|178:247,3,30
149,57,224446,1,0,0:0:0:0:
74,168,224596,5,2,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225646,5,0,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225721,1,0,0:0:0:0:
405,99,225796,1,0,0:0:0:0:
194,220,226096,1,0,0:0:0:0:
114,190,226246,2,0,P|151:149|248:158,1,135.000005149842
347,357,226696,1,0,0:0:0:0:
349,323,226771,1,0,0:0:0:0:
351,289,226846,1,0,0:0:0:0:
354,255,226921,1,0,0:0:0:0:
357,221,226996,5,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,228946,5,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,229021,1,0,0:0:0:0:
229,63,229096,1,0,0:0:0:0:
153,205,229396,5,0,0:0:0:0:
201,203,230996,6,0,L|184:165,3,30
80,266,231271,2,0,L|100:76,1,168.750006437302
97,98,231796,5,0,0:0:0:0:
383,239,233696,6,0,L|400:201,3,30
430,370,234046,1,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,234196,5,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235246,5,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235321,1,0,0:0:0:0:
243,306,235396,2,0,P|306:284|380:277,1,135.000005149842
199,191,235996,2,0,P|136:213|62:220,1,135.000005149842


But iirc RC says something like "Don't put things in the mapset outside the editor, otherwise it will be unrankable" (for example Stack leniency to 0, edited from .osu file, when the minumim from the editor is 2).

So if I am right, should we change the BPM in that part? The only "irregular" thing is the drum. (I'm no more into those things, I don't really remember how we should act here)
Updated, can we have some opinions? :c
mithew
03:55:396 (4,5) - these two should end on white ticks
Topic Starter
Kayne

mithew wrote:

03:55:396 (4,5) - these two should end on white ticks
fixed.
Kite
cool map
Lex TheGayOtter
I really enjoyed playing this beatmap, although it didn't feel right playing a CS4 dragonforce map XD
Topic Starter
Kayne
Well I think it's ready for being approved again now..?
dqs01733
could you like, not use my EXAMPLE in the map? I didnt explicitly state in my post to NOT US MY THING IN THE MAP but it should have been pretty damn clear that's what i tried to imply. It really took me less than 10 minutes to map that, and atleast 80% of that time trying to figure out the snapping on 03:41:371 (2) - . btw it was never right to begin with, current thing just happened by accident and sounded close enough but somehow you managed to get it even more wrong in ur update lol.. It's not that i dont want you to "copy" my work because i couldnt care less about that, its just that I don't want something i created with such little effort and quality to get into qualified/ranked.

So please just map that part for yourself, ask a timing expert for help about the drum pattern around 03:41:371 - . Start putting down some time and effort into your work instead of doing the bare minimum. it doesnt really seem like youre even trying at this point, like you didnt even bother checking and correcting anything when copying over my thing to your map???? inconsisten nc'ing, some random whistle hitsound and snapping errors that you somehow managed to butcher up even more? come on man..
Roxas

dqs01733 wrote:

could you like, not use my EXAMPLE in the map? I didnt explicitly state in my post to NOT US MY THING IN THE MAP but it should have been pretty damn clear that's what i tried to imply. It really took me less than 10 minutes to map that, and atleast 80% of that time trying to figure out the snapping on 03:41:371 (2) - . btw it was never right to begin with, current thing just happened by accident and sounded close enough but somehow you managed to get it even more wrong in ur update lol.. It's not that i dont want you to "copy" my work because i couldnt care less about that, its just that I don't want something i created with such little effort and quality to get into qualified/ranked.

So please just map that part for yourself, ask a timing expert for help about the drum pattern around 03:41:371 - . Start putting down some time and effort into your work instead of doing the bare minimum. it doesnt really seem like youre even trying at this point, like you didnt even bother checking and correcting anything when copying over my thing to your map???? inconsisten nc'ing, some random whistle hitsound and snapping errors that you somehow managed to butcher up even more? come on man..
Meh. Seriously meh.

I liked your part so I wanted to keep it with some little modifications.

But well, you know what? I'm gonna map as I like and with correct snapping, I'm sick of everyone complaining about this map.
xdominik
I feel like this map was better when it was qualified . The removal of the guitar solo was bad idea in my opinion , it created pretty awkard moment in the one of most memorable and intensive parts of song and beatmap . I think most player like me had felt fun and excitment when was playing that part so I think it would be wise to bring that one back but in the end it's just a opinion
RikiH_
cancer slider

125,264,428381,6,0,B|143:225|227:193|275:230|311:272|311:272|336:302|390:370|542:317|551:197|429:67|333:170,1,667.741935483871
[ KronixWolff ]
the map was much better from when the solo was there at the beginning and the circles would go into a stream it was more fun pls add it back :c
Makan1
I hope this can get re-qualified again :>
Topic Starter
Kayne

Makan1 wrote:

I hope this can get re-qualified again :>
I hope too but as always its not easy to find someone that wants to check it.
Ppus

Makan1 wrote:

I hope this can get re-qualified again :>
i too but sometimes beatmaps graveyard don't goes for rank or approval.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply