I thought it was rather cool that everyone wins.
Yay Sakura!
Yay Sakura!
Like i said before, not the map i wanted yet they like it i'll try again next challenge.Kytoxid wrote:
Final rankings for anyone with a score above 0 and not named Crimmi (who submitted a +2 map)
Haha, I clicked your "Things I care about" expecting some witty thing but it actually had a list of things you cared about.Crimmi wrote:
Like i said before, not the map i wanted yet they like it i'll try again next challenge.Kytoxid wrote:
Final rankings for anyone with a score above 0 and not named Crimmi (who submitted a +2 map)
this part makes me got more confidence xDKytoxid wrote:
This map does NOT need to be bubble-ready
*facepalm*Equivalent wrote:
Raging Bull ask me to post here. So here we go : Cho-E Amputator
Deadlines added to the challenge post.Zelos wrote:
Zelos here and ready to moddddd.
Hatsune Miku - Baby Baby Sayonara
Also a few questions:
Whats the time limit to send you that forum pm for scoring for both what you think on the 3 maps and what you think of the 3 mods on your map?
And what if by some chance someone in your group already modded your map in the past?
Thus, each member of a group of 4 (which will be the normal size) will have 72 hours to complete 3 mods.Wouldn't 1 person be left out? Maybe change it to 4 mods or groups of 3?
4 per group = 3 excluding yourself. You are not gonna mod your own map are you?Raging Bull wrote:
Thus, each member of a group of 4 (which will be the normal size) will have 72 hours to complete 3 mods.Wouldn't 1 person be left out? Maybe change it to 4 mods or groups of 3?
Some question here o.oKytoxid wrote:
After completing all 3 mods, you will be required to send me a forum PM giving a score to each of the three maps that you have modded, based on your own criteria of a good map. THESE SCORES MUST ADD UP TO 100. Thus, you can give 33,33,34 if you thought they were almost the same quality, or 70,20,10 if one particularly stood out.
After receiving all 3 mods, you will be required to send me a second PM giving a score to each of the three mods you have received based on how useful they were. Once again, these scores should add up to 100!
Don't bother explaining, just be fair. I'm too lazy to read through 21 people's PMs...2 PMs each, 3 explanations per PM...nope, not bothering to read 126 sections.Cirno wrote:
Some question here o.oKytoxid wrote:
After completing all 3 mods, you will be required to send me a forum PM giving a score to each of the three maps that you have modded, based on your own criteria of a good map. THESE SCORES MUST ADD UP TO 100. Thus, you can give 33,33,34 if you thought they were almost the same quality, or 70,20,10 if one particularly stood out.
After receiving all 3 mods, you will be required to send me a second PM giving a score to each of the three mods you have received based on how useful they were. Once again, these scores should add up to 100!
Should the scores be accompanied with reasons, or one can give out scores without having to explain?
I think I gave plenty of signup time. So I won't die any time soon~OzzyOzrock wrote:
WHAT!?!? I MISSED IT!?!!?!?
I HATE YOU ALL
ALL OF YOU SHOULD DIE
akrolsmir wrote:
Should members of the 5-map group parcel out 133 points instead of 100? Or will you just weigh the scores 1.33x for us?
And can we get a 24 hour extension on the basis of having to mod one additional map?
I will do the adjusting, don't worry.Kytoxid wrote:
Once this has been completed, the players will be ranked in terms of total score from both modding and mapping, with the scores adjusted if group sizes turn out to be uneven
...
Deadlines:
These are all for a normal team of 4 players; add one day to b) and c) for each extra player, remove one day for each player under 4.