to clarify, this is a distinctly different experience from what youre describing (if you mean what i think you do), since the context is notably different and has none of those connotations. the premise is specifically oriented toward being able to view every sentimental/moral/philosophical perspective humanity has to offer whether in first-person or in third-person in order to understand how people live and what things mean to them. it might be my fault for failing to specify that... or maybe that too would be included in your interpretation? i don't know.AxisPraxisMDS wrote:
Again, Thats sound voyeurism, and pls, Stop using that question again over and over
also, re-using the prompt is ideal if you want a variety of opinions from different people on a subject. i understand if the prompt could be repetitive if a healthy variety of opinions have already been collected, but i do think it worsens when the same person continues to answer without adding anything. i think re-using this is fair when you're reciprocating and answering other prompts, since there will be some amount of fair exchange regardless of repetition.
pata and i would probably differ greatly in our opinions on a lot of media, and the variety of media i've consumed would be nowhere near as comprehensive. i do like hearing what they have to say, though.AxisPraxisMDS wrote:
Next user Has taste of Gaming and anime equivalent to Patattita
...
the next user is a chronically maladaptive daydreamer?