Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

ehh, not bad

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

ehh, not bad

I am not happy... (I'm stuck at 190ms~ can't improve)

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Hmm it may be the refresh rate idk. Mines 60 that's why I react so late.

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Hmm it may be the refresh rate idk. Mines 60 that's why I react so late.

Yeah mine's at 60 too. Don't have any other option to change it too other than that.

Aireunaeus wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

ehh, not bad

I am not happy... (I'm stuck at 190ms~ can't improve)

bruhhhhh 190ms is literally good wdym

1. 326ms
2. 275ms
3. 294ms
4. 284ms

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Hmm it may be the refresh rate idk. Mines 60 that's why I react so late.

Yeah mine's at 60 too. Don't have any other option to change it too other than that.

same, i think i may buy a 75 or 144 hz one someday later

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Hmm it may be the refresh rate idk. Mines 60 that's why I react so late.

Yeah mine's at 60 too. Don't have any other option to change it too other than that.

same, i think i may buy a 75 or 144 hz one someday later

Btw I should also try this with a 60hz (my last 60hz record was around 210ms but it was a while ago)

Aireunaeus wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Aireunaeus wrote:

pheww, you saved this thread into being derailed

Yeah I'm planning on fixing my fuck ups.

Also I can't seem to get any better. Seems like I really need new specs to improve further cause I swear my reaction time is faster than that.

Hmm it may be the refresh rate idk. Mines 60 that's why I react so late.

Yeah mine's at 60 too. Don't have any other option to change it too other than that.

same, i think i may buy a 75 or 144 hz one someday later

Btw I should also try this with a 60hz (my last 60hz record was around 210ms but it was a while ago)

aaaaand?

btw, got this on a 75hz monitor.

Naiad wrote:

I tend to hover around 160 whenever I do it. I still cant comfortably read ar above 10.3, though (lol)

Pressur_YT wrote:

I got 276ms 🙁

Anaxii wrote:

Pressur_YT wrote:

I got 276ms 🙁

You can do better dw

Pressur_YT wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

Pressur_YT wrote:

I got 276ms 🙁

You can do better dw

ok now I got 211ms!!!