Thanks For Mod ^^0_o wrote:
General
Not a fan of the background/combo colours. It's kinda weird to have an advertisement for a website as a background, and it's a pretty dull one at that (that goes for the combo colours too). Maybe try using a screencap from the level? You would be surprised how much a bit more colour livens up a map.
Easy
00:17:628 (2,3,5,6) - Stacks like these are really tricky for newbies since the hitburst obscures the oncoming approach circle. I would recommend unstacking them.
Normal
~
Hard
~
It's honestly not the most exciting mapset in the world, but as far as ranking requirements go you're pretty much set. Good luck!
forum
Yoko Shimomura - Welcome to Booster Tower
posted
Total Posts
96
Topic Starter
add square to the tags?
no kd
no kd
Topic Starter
Fixed,but is "Squaresoft"Hyguys wrote:
add square to the tags?
no kd
Remember to move to pending
[Hard]
Not really a hardcore ones, OD-1?
00:32:1978 (4) - put this to y:73
00:38:729 (5) - new combo here, remove NC on next (1), NC on (4)?
01:28:214 - the last timing line can be even softer, 15% may fits the volume of the song.
[Normal]
00:04:063 (6) - when you map without grid snap, you should be able to avoid such spacing problem orz (0.75x - 0.80x)
00:06:575 (5) - Use this code such that it ends at y:88
I don't see many problems. The only thing I want to oint out that when you switched off grid snapping and make sliders, make sure the ending position of slider forms a stright line with the coming notes, especially in a horizontal or vertical pattern.
For example, normal, 00:34:709 (1,2), ending of (1) is at x:85 but beginning of (2) is at x:90. They should be the same.
00:46:707 (5,6) is also the same, (5) ends at y:108 while (6) begins at y:106.
Please fix all these stuffs by yourself~
star
[Hard]
Not really a hardcore ones, OD-1?
00:32:1978 (4) - put this to y:73
00:38:729 (5) - new combo here, remove NC on next (1), NC on (4)?
01:28:214 - the last timing line can be even softer, 15% may fits the volume of the song.
[Normal]
00:04:063 (6) - when you map without grid snap, you should be able to avoid such spacing problem orz (0.75x - 0.80x)
00:06:575 (5) - Use this code such that it ends at y:88
171,295,6575,2,0,B|104:192|176:80,1,220
I don't see many problems. The only thing I want to oint out that when you switched off grid snapping and make sliders, make sure the ending position of slider forms a stright line with the coming notes, especially in a horizontal or vertical pattern.
For example, normal, 00:34:709 (1,2), ending of (1) is at x:85 but beginning of (2) is at x:90. They should be the same.
00:46:707 (5,6) is also the same, (5) ends at y:108 while (6) begins at y:106.
Please fix all these stuffs by yourself~
star
General
I agree with Faceman that the background should probably be changed
Easy
Set tick 2 like the other diffs?
Just a note - for future maps I'd reccomend using slightly higher slider speed and spacing so 1/2s don't overlap with each other - it makes the map look a lot more polished. Otherwise, the map doesn't have anything really wrong with it
I agree with Faceman that the background should probably be changed
Easy
Set tick 2 like the other diffs?
Just a note - for future maps I'd reccomend using slightly higher slider speed and spacing so 1/2s don't overlap with each other - it makes the map look a lot more polished. Otherwise, the map doesn't have anything really wrong with it
Topic Starter
Thanks For ModRandomJibberish wrote:
General
I agree with Faceman that the background should probably be changed
Easy
Set tick 2 like the other diffs?
Just a note - for future maps I'd reccomend using slightly higher slider speed and spacing so 1/2s don't overlap with each other - it makes the map look a lot more polished. Otherwise, the map doesn't have anything really wrong with it
Fixed
Emmm pq esta aun en WIP lol...
Solo eso un comentario nomas, nada importante que decir.
o/
Solo eso un comentario nomas, nada importante que decir.
o/
Ahh that's better 
Topic Starter
Thanks For Bubbled 0_o ^^0_o wrote:
Ahh that's better
[General]
Offset -10 ms, the current one feels too late.
Hitsounds feel too loud for the song.
I agree with Faceman and RJ, you could've used a background of the actual Booster Tower, dont mind if you dont change, but would have been better
[Easy]
Not a problem, but out of curioisity why arent you using any finishes on Easy considering you used them on your other diffs?
Offset -10 ms, the current one feels too late.
Hitsounds feel too loud for the song.
I agree with Faceman and RJ, you could've used a background of the actual Booster Tower, dont mind if you dont change, but would have been better
[Easy]
Not a problem, but out of curioisity why arent you using any finishes on Easy considering you used them on your other diffs?
I think for the easy diff shouldn't have many slider tick ... because is more hard. (?
Good luck moody <3
Good luck moody <3
Oh yeah also, your blue combo color is too dark and blends with the black part of the background
[Easy]
00:51:781 (4,1) - Anti-Jump?
No kudosu
Edit: Rebubbled~
[Easy]
00:51:781 (4,1) - Anti-Jump?
No kudosu
Edit: Rebubbled~
Topic Starter
Thanks For BubbledSakura Hana wrote:
Oh yeah also, your blue combo color is too dark and blends with the black part of the background
[Easy]
00:51:781 (4,1) - Anti-Jump?
No kudosu
Edit: Rebubbled~
-Pretty much everything I see calls this song "Welcome to Booster Tower", I would double check that quickly just to make sure you have the correct title
-The BPM sounds better to me being 119:400 than 119.428 so I would try and get a second opinion on that as well
Easy:
-Why not start using finishes until 10%+ into the song when the other difficulties start them straight away?
00:28:671 (1) - should have a finish at the start to follow the rest
00:52:786 (1) - ^
01:02:833 (4) - new combo
01:08:862 (1) - add a finish to the start?
01:16:901 (3) - new combo
Normal:
00:00:537 (1) - add a finish
01:08:862 (1) - ^
Hard:
00:06:565 (7,1) - switch new combo
00:10:584 (7,1) - ^
00:38:719 (5,1) - ^
00:40:728 (5,1) - ^
00:46:757 (5) - new combo, 00:47:762 (1) - remove new combo
01:12:881 (1) - add a finish
The mapset looks fairly well done, just go through and make sure your combos stay consistent and your hitsounds keep following the same rhythm
-The BPM sounds better to me being 119:400 than 119.428 so I would try and get a second opinion on that as well
Easy:
-Why not start using finishes until 10%+ into the song when the other difficulties start them straight away?
00:28:671 (1) - should have a finish at the start to follow the rest
00:52:786 (1) - ^
01:02:833 (4) - new combo
01:08:862 (1) - add a finish to the start?
01:16:901 (3) - new combo
Normal:
00:00:537 (1) - add a finish
01:08:862 (1) - ^
Hard:
00:06:565 (7,1) - switch new combo
00:10:584 (7,1) - ^
00:38:719 (5,1) - ^
00:40:728 (5,1) - ^
00:46:757 (5) - new combo, 00:47:762 (1) - remove new combo
01:12:881 (1) - add a finish
The mapset looks fairly well done, just go through and make sure your combos stay consistent and your hitsounds keep following the same rhythm
Topic Starter
Thanks For Mod,All FixedJames2250 wrote:
-Pretty much everything I see calls this song "Welcome to Booster Tower", I would double check that quickly just to make sure you have the correct title
-The BPM sounds better to me being 119:400 than 119.428 so I would try and get a second opinion on that as well
Easy:
-Why not start using finishes until 10%+ into the song when the other difficulties start them straight away?
00:28:671 (1) - should have a finish at the start to follow the rest
00:52:786 (1) - ^
01:02:833 (4) - new combo
01:08:862 (1) - add a finish to the start?
01:16:901 (3) - new combo
Normal:
00:00:537 (1) - add a finish
01:08:862 (1) - ^
Hard:
00:06:565 (7,1) - switch new combo
00:10:584 (7,1) - ^
00:38:719 (5,1) - ^
00:40:728 (5,1) - ^
00:46:757 (5) - new combo, 00:47:762 (1) - remove new combo
01:12:881 (1) - add a finish
The mapset looks fairly well done, just go through and make sure your combos stay consistent and your hitsounds keep following the same rhythm
- Hard
00:06:567 (1) - Remove new combo (Useless)
00:10:587 (1) - ^
00:38:727 (1) - ^
- Normal
00:23:150 (4,6) - Remove wistle
00:30:687 (4-1st,3rd) - ^
00:51:290 (4,6) - ^
01:02:848 (5-1st,3rd) - ^
01:11:391 (4,6) - ^
- All
Put the wistle in stytem. Like W>N>W>N (W=Wstle N=None) and never (W>W>W>W>W).
Lastly, that's nice to put the distance snap.
00:06:567 (1) - Remove new combo (Useless)
00:10:587 (1) - ^
00:38:727 (1) - ^
- Normal
00:23:150 (4,6) - Remove wistle
00:30:687 (4-1st,3rd) - ^
00:51:290 (4,6) - ^
01:02:848 (5-1st,3rd) - ^
01:11:391 (4,6) - ^
- All
Put the wistle in stytem. Like W>N>W>N (W=Wstle N=None) and never (W>W>W>W>W).
Lastly, that's nice to put the distance snap.
Surprise Mod!
~Easy~
00:20:637 (1,2) - Center this please.
00:22:145 (x) - Add note?
00:52:798 (1,2) - Center this?
~Normal~
No problems I can see here.
~Hard~
00:06:567 (1) - I think that something more like this would sound a bit better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/107957
00:10:587 (1) - Add Finish here.
Great song, great map, have a star!
~Easy~
00:20:637 (1,2) - Center this please.
00:22:145 (x) - Add note?
00:52:798 (1,2) - Center this?
~Normal~
No problems I can see here.
~Hard~
00:06:567 (1) - I think that something more like this would sound a bit better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/107957
00:10:587 (1) - Add Finish here.
Great song, great map, have a star!
Bubbled.
Topic Starter
Thanks For Bubbled fartownik ^^fartownik wrote:
Bubbled.
did't catch problems so.
Topic Starter
Thanks abalee! ^^abalee wrote:
did't catch problems so.
Aleks pointed out the spacing error at 00:01:290 (4,5) yet it never got fixed. What gives?
It's the first thing I noticed when I looked at this map
It's the first thing I noticed when I looked at this map
Also, James2250 pointed out wrong title too, yet it never got changed o.o
Yeah everywhere i look, song title is "Welcome to Booster Tower" or "Welcome to Bukki Tower" which im guessing is the japanese one, title is wrong definitively
Edit: Also is it just me or at the end of the song offset is late o.o
Also reposting this here in case anyone was wondering about the title, here's the mapper's explanation
Yeah everywhere i look, song title is "Welcome to Booster Tower" or "Welcome to Bukki Tower" which im guessing is the japanese one, title is wrong definitively
Edit: Also is it just me or at the end of the song offset is late o.o
Also reposting this here in case anyone was wondering about the title, here's the mapper's explanation
Timing is fine; song title is wrong
Topic Starter
please,read the message from Sakura,i explain the titleLybydose wrote:
Timing is fine; song title is wrong
But booster tower is fine too.Lybydose wrote:
Timing is fine; song title is wrong
So I guess the correct title of Jumpin' Jack Flash is actually "No More Music!? The Last Hope!!" then? I mean, that's the name of the level.MoodyRPG wrote:
please,read the message from Sakura,i explain the titleLybydose wrote:
Timing is fine; song title is wrong
Topic Starter
So I guess the correct title of Jumpin' Jack Flash is actually "No More Music!? The Last Hope!!" then? I mean, that's the name of the level.i follow the pattern of the game,is the same thing
Except that's no reason for a wrong title, there's never a good reason for a wrong titleMoodyRPG wrote:
please,read the message from Sakura,i explain the titleLybydose wrote:
Timing is fine; song title is wrong
Level can go in tags (except in the real title, it's also in the title) so there's no need at all to have a wrong title
the song can be find as ...Sakura Hana wrote:
Except that's no reason for a wrong title, there's never a good reason for a wrong titleMoodyRPG wrote:
please,read the message from Sakura,i explain the title
Level can go in tags (except in the real title, it's also in the title) so there's no need at all to have a wrong title
Isn't necessary change the tittle.
Not saying it's reason for unrank, since it's already been 3 days, but as i said, there's No reason for you to use a wrong title, NO REASON AT ALL
You're right, it's completely unnecessary to spend 2 minutes uploading a name fix and then reranking it. What was I thinking?
I don't understand why we are arguing over this. I mean, I see no point in it.
I had my map unranked for a fix and it was fine with me.
It's just a quick fix anyway - title change.
It's just a quick fix anyway - title change.
Do they fall under the less than one week rule?
If so then yes, they can be unranked to change the title.
Things like this should be pointed out during the ranking process, but when mistakes like this happen, it's still better to correct them.
If so then yes, they can be unranked to change the title.
Things like this should be pointed out during the ranking process, but when mistakes like this happen, it's still better to correct them.
It is completely unnecessary to whine about unranking maps.