So you are here because....?Eclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
forum
SHIKI - Pure Ruby [Another is for approval]
posted
Total Posts
142
Topic Starter
LOLEclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
I could point out how bad yours is compared to mine in so many ways (and it's only half of this length), but nah you're not worth my time since you don't even complete your own maps, sorry brah but placing rhythm and letting your buddy megaman make all the patterns takes no effort.
also I think it's pretty ironic how you complain about the community when you're a complete bitch, oops.
brb remapping this like 5 times and talking about how it's art
I've read all your posts and read again this. I laughed so much.Eclaire wrote:
shit game and community
nice map glass, gj
Hi Mystearica. What are you doing now?Eclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
Look at your map again before complain.
Oh my, are you still there?
This map is way better than yours, so stop crying.
This map is way better than yours, so stop crying.
Topic Starter
by the way Myst, thanks for the generous rating that is 4/10, but if I had to rate your version I'd give it 2/10; 1 point for the song choice and 1 for the finger cramp I got from playing your overmapped crap.
oh and before you try to troll me about how I brought people into this thread(like you always have in the past when you had problems with Alace); I didn't ask anyone to back me up in this, bye bye.
oh and before you try to troll me about how I brought people into this thread(like you always have in the past when you had problems with Alace); I didn't ask anyone to back me up in this, bye bye.
Topic Starter
yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
UR BAD DECAY
Topic Starter
LYBYDOSE ALSO APPROVES OF THAT QUOTE
i went on vent and they weren't even there
what is this witchery
what is this witchery
Just a small protestant here, wasn't suppose to have at least 1 map below 3 star to get ranked?. I do know this map is awesome but tbh, I afraid this map will be example for those who doesn't want to make map under 3 star. As for most, below 3 star is a nuisance to make.
No, normal plays easy enough.
Ranked/Approved Beatmaps »
There is still justice in our world. Grats on ranking
There is still justice in our world. Grats on ranking
For veteran players of course it easy enough. The aim for 3 star and below was for "beginner"xsrsbsns wrote:
No, normal plays easy enough.
You were wrong in one part: it doesn't need to be below 3 stars, it needs to be at least 3 stars. If you check the actual star rating, it's 3.74 stars, so it's fine.Ayeen wrote:
Just a small protestant here, wasn't suppose to have at least 1 map below 3 star to get ranked?. I do know this map is awesome but tbh, I afraid this map will be example for those who doesn't want to make map under 3 star. As for most, below 3 star is a nuisance to make.
Eclair you're so cool.
Also, congratulations on the rank, Glass!
I remember when I was being a lazy fuck about my difficulty.
Also, congratulations on the rank, Glass!
I remember when I was being a lazy fuck about my difficulty.
3.74 is higher than 3, but your whole statement is wrong, actually.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
You were wrong in one part: it doesn't need to be below 3 stars, it needs to be at least 3 stars. If you check the actual star rating, it's 3.74 stars, so it's fine.
Shit, guys, this is happening a lot lately. Is it that difficult to include another difficulty?peppy wrote:
Each map set must have at least two difficulties, one of which must be below a 3-star difficulty level. This is so that players of all levels of experience are able to enjoy maps of the songs they love
Oh, I apologize then. My mind is not that clear in the early morning
Waryas
Glass wrote:
yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
UR BAD DECAY
I am not jealous. I come here only to backup my statement about Decay being bad.Decay wrote:
yeahyeahyeahhh jealous boi
pretty clearly violates the 1 3-star < difficulty rule
again
sigh
too late to unrank it now
again
sigh
too late to unrank it now
Just map an easier diff and get it ranked separately. iirc correctly, that has been done before.Ephemeral wrote:
pretty clearly violates the 1 3-star < difficulty rule
again
sigh
too late to unrank it now
Topic Starter
Good god this fucking map was in pending since SEPTEMBER LAST YEAR, bubbled since APRIL and yet you only complain when this gets ranked? Fuck off, atleast try to play the difficulty first, I ain't gonna make a boring map full of 1/1 just to get it under 3 stars, Normal plays PERFECTLY FINE as a normal you would know if you actually tested it.
The main diff is for approval, if anything the other diffs are bonus diffs. Why unrank?
Don't you know? You mod AFTER maps are ranked.Glass wrote:
Good god this fucking map was in pending since SEPTEMBER LAST YEAR, bubbled since APRIL and yet you only complain when this gets ranked? Fuck off, atleast try to play the difficulty first, I ain't gonna make a boring map full of 1/1 just to get it under 3 stars, Normal plays PERFECTLY FINE as a normal you would know if you actually tested it.
Topic Starter
nice ava LOL
;___;
A controversial is a controversial map to be ranked. You map earlier than we new mappers are, you should know the rules more than we new mappers are. It a valid critics to the BAT who rank this, and I pointed this out in #modhelp too. It is more to "learn from your mistake" here for ranking what is against the rules and fair between mappers who struggling to make those "boring" easy you mention then than go "unranked this map". And as Ephermal said it is too late for unranked. It up to him to accept (as harsh critic or positive critic) my criticism or not. About pending period, I've seen map that pending more than 1 year still not ranked.
edit: grammatical error will lead to misunderstanding~
edit: grammatical error will lead to misunderstanding~
k \:D/Ayeen wrote:
A controversial is a controversial map to be ranked. You map earlier than we new mappers are, you should know the rules more than we new mappers are. It a valid critics to the BAT who rank this, and I pointed this out in #modhelp too. It is more to "learn from your mistake" here for ranking what is against the rules and fair between mappers who struggling to make those "boring" easy you mention then go "unranked this map". And as Ephermal said it is too late for unranked. It up to him to accept (as harsh critic or positive critic) my criticism or not. About pending period, I've seen map that pending more than 1 year still not ranked.
Topic Starter
Oh look, 4.44 stars with only 1 note, this must means that it's even harder than my normal right?
No. This rating system is fucking retarded, the normal is 3.74 stars just because of the BPM, if you can't play that, you might wanna go back to playing TVsized anime stuff, 1 minute and half of 1/1 on a 120 BPM shouldn't be too hard I think
.jeez
Congrats 
lol
lol
Calm down, sailor; of course the star rating system is going to be completely inaccurate when you place a single object down. That doesn't say anything about its accuracy with complete maps. And really, do you expect relatively new players to be able to beat that Normal difficulty? I don't care what the BPM is, making a difficulty under 3 stars is not difficult. It doesn't have to be full of 1/1 and be completely boring either regardless of what everyone else does with their maps. You're just making excuses for your own damn incompetence.Glass wrote:
Oh look, 4.44 stars with only 1 note, this must means that it's even harder than my normal right?
No. This rating system is fucking retarded, the normal is 3.74 stars just because of the BPM, if you can't play that, you might wanna go back to playing your TVsized anime stuff, 1 minute and half of 1/1 on a 120 BPM shouldn't be too hard I think
This isn't a new rule or anything, it's been in place for quite some time now. Whine all you want, but it's not going to change the fact that your map slipped by and shouldn't have been ranked in its current state. If you can't make decent difficulties under 3 stars, go get a guest mapper next time.
nevermind, I'm too tired and wasn't going to argue on anything anyway
Topic Starter
Yes they would, I've been to multiplayer with a couple friends of mine WHO ARE NEW TO THIS GAME and they all passed the map, they don't even play this game as often as most of people here so don't give me that "it's too hard for newbies" bullshit.Jarby wrote:
Calm down, sailor; of course the star rating system is going to be completely inaccurate when you place a single object down. That doesn't say anything about its accuracy with complete maps. And really, do you expect relatively new players to be able to beat that Normal difficulty?
That's what I did when I first started the difficulty, full 1/1s and it was still well above 3, so I thought might as well throw in more rhythm than plain 1/1, problem?Jarby wrote:
I don't care what the BPM is, making a difficulty under 3 stars is not difficult. It doesn't have to be full of 1/1 and be completely boring either regardless of what everyone else does with their maps. You're just making excuses for your own damn incompetence.
I don't know who is whining; myself or those of you who're bitching about my map 'slipping by' while all you MATs/BATs were too busy checking your friends' maps to care about anyone else. Oops I might've touched a nerve there, too bad deal with it.Jarby wrote:
Whine all you want, but it's not going to change the fact that your map slipped by and shouldn't have been ranked in its current state.
The main difficulty of this set is [Another], I could've given even less of a fuck and got it approved just by itself, but I decided to throw in some bonus difficulties for those who don't even bother playing approved maps.Jarby wrote:
If you can't make decent difficulties under 3 stars, go get a guest mapper next time.
Shael_old
so what you say is i can go and delete my boring easy diff from my pending map that i mapped specially to follow the "below 3 stars" rule? D:
Waryas
Topic Starter
Thank you.Shael wrote:
I'm on Glass side here, this song is very good and I think you guys over react a little bit
There should be more songs like this, not like 99% of the songs here in osu
gz on ranked glass
If it's boring even for yourself then you might very well delete it.senaya wrote:
so what you say is i can go and delete my boring easy diff from my pending map that i mapped specially to follow the "below 3 stars" rule? D:
and then people will complain about how the length differs too much.JesusYamato wrote:
Just saying, you don't have to map the whole song in [easy], you could get away with only mapping 50s or so with full of 1/1 and it'd hav ebeen below 3 stars
You can't speak for everyone with that. I also know many people that would fail miserably at a map of this difficulty. I'm going to assume that your friends are familiar with rhythm games at the very least, but you have to be aware that not everyone is.Glass wrote:
Yes they would, I've been to multiplayer with a couple friends of mine WHO ARE NEW TO THIS GAME and they all passed the map, they don't even play this game as often as most of people here so don't give me that "it's too hard for newbies" bullshit.Jarby wrote:
Calm down, sailor; of course the star rating system is going to be completely inaccurate when you place a single object down. That doesn't say anything about its accuracy with complete maps. And really, do you expect relatively new players to be able to beat that Normal difficulty?
There's more than one way to map a song. In any case, using less objects would have lowered the star rating to under 3 and would have made it accessible to new players as an easier difficulty. By the looks of it, a seperate difficulty probably would have been best.Glass wrote:
That's what I did when I first started the difficulty, full 1/1s and it was still well above 3, so I thought might as well throw in more rhythm than plain 1/1, problem?Jarby wrote:
I don't care what the BPM is, making a difficulty under 3 stars is not difficult. It doesn't have to be full of 1/1 and be completely boring either regardless of what everyone else does with their maps. You're just making excuses for your own damn incompetence.
See, the reason why I set up my mod queue was to avoid stuff like that. Everyone has their own way of dealing with it, really, but these days people are getting more reluctant to mod their friends' maps just for the sake of it. It has its own stigma attached to it and we all know it's not the best way of handling the daunting amount of pending maps. It's actually completely irrelevant here, so I'm dropping it before you link a bunch of maps that were ranked in a week or something to prove a point.Glass wrote:
I don't know who is whining; myself or those of you who're bitching about my map 'slipping by' while all you MATs/BATs were too busy checking your friends' maps to care about anyone else. Oops I might've touched a nerve there, too bad deal with it.Jarby wrote:
Whine all you want, but it's not going to change the fact that your map slipped by and shouldn't have been ranked in its current state.
If you don't give a fuck, then don't even bother getting anything ranked. I don't know how you can so violently defend something you're so apathetic about in reality.Glass wrote:
The main difficulty of this set is [Another], I could've given even less of a fuck and got it approved just by itself, but I decided to throw in some bonus difficulties for those who don't even bother playing approved maps.Jarby wrote:
If you can't make decent difficulties under 3 stars, go get a guest mapper next time.
> AGHSJAKSASHGSHJAKLSSA no easy diff plz unrank
> easy diff added
> ASFGAHJASHGASFDGAH do you call this a easy diff? too boring unrank
> easy diff added
> ASFGAHJASHGASFDGAH do you call this a easy diff? too boring unrank
can you just stop
all of you
all of you
Topic Starter
They aren't even familiar with rhythm games, the only games we've ever played together are RPGs and FPSs, so yet again, no excuse.Jarby wrote:
You can't speak for everyone with that. I also know many people that would fail miserably at a map of this difficulty. I'm going to assume that your friends are familiar with rhythm games at the very least, but you have to be aware that not everyone is.
Unless I kept some huge unfitting gaps between notes there would've been no way to get it anywhere near 2 stars. So no thanks, I rather just have a Normal.Jarby wrote:
There's more than one way to map a song. In any case, using less objects would have lowered the star rating to under 3 and would have made it accessible to new players as an easier difficulty. By the looks of it, a seperate difficulty probably would have been best.
It's actually revelant here, what I'm saying is that it's been in pending for so long, been bubbled for so long and yet only yyy(he's been waiting for me to finish the set), deepsea(he mostly checks old bubbles and not take requests) and Garven(he's been consistenly checking my maps) were nice enough to take a look.Jarby wrote:
See, the reason why I set up my mod queue was to avoid stuff like that. Everyone has their own way of dealing with it, really, but these days people are getting more reluctant to mod their friends' maps just for the sake of it. It has its own stigma attached to it and we all know it's not the best way of handling the daunting amount of pending maps. It's actually completely irrelevant here, so I'm dropping it before you link a bunch of maps that were ranked in a week or something to prove a point.
Yeah I really wouldn't give a fuck about getting my maps ranked if more than like 20 people actually played whatever's pending on my list.Jarby wrote:
If you don't give a fuck, then don't even bother getting anything ranked. I don't know how you can so violently defend something you're so apathetic about in reality.
I'm sure in my days of newbie, I'd rather play this Normal than a boring 1/1 map.
Also, while it may not look easy enough for the easiest difficulty, once beginners get the concept of sliders they should be able to pass this easilly, since the sliders follow the music in a really intuitive way. Awesome maps, bro.
Also, while it may not look easy enough for the easiest difficulty, once beginners get the concept of sliders they should be able to pass this easilly, since the sliders follow the music in a really intuitive way. Awesome maps, bro.
Lock this thread already. Jarby go away
posting before lock \:D/
Also, it's the BATs fault who bubbled and ranked this before taking a closer look if this map had a difficulty under 3 stars, please go PM flame them instead of posting here \:D/
bye~ \:D/
\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/
Also, it's the BATs fault who bubbled and ranked this before taking a closer look if this map had a difficulty under 3 stars, please go PM flame them instead of posting here \:D/
bye~ \:D/
\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/\:D/
Looks like everyone is having a nice little controversy here. My conclusion:
- The difficulty spread could have been better and it is not the best example of a good difficulty spread.
- The beatmap is already ranked and will not be unranked.
- There probably isn't much point in arguing about this.
tl;dr people discussing a problem that doesn't exist
Pretty much this ^SapphireGhost wrote:
- The difficulty spread could have been better and it is not the best example of a good difficulty spread.
- The beatmap is already ranked and will not be unranked.
- There probably isn't much point in arguing about this.
The difficulty spread could definitely be better in the mapset I agree, as for the star rating it normally works fairly accurately with entire mapsets until you get above 4 stars (meaning it is not as hard as you make it sound to get under 3 stars and still keep the map fairly entertaining for beginners.) But anyway it is ranked now and there is no point in continuing these troll posts and constant arguments back and forth.
I would try and experiment more and you might be surprised what patterns you are able to come up with that still keep the map simple yet fun for everyone. Anyway for now I am locking this before it gets even more out of hand.