Cause I would've hoped he'd fall for that (which he didn't) and it'd be an excuse to why I could chat at night.
Whatever.
Unvote
Vote: DxS
Whatever.
Unvote
Vote: DxS
I highly doubt the mafia would kill someone off just for saying that one of its members was a "suspicious guy".pieguy1372 wrote:
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
I actually wanted to ask Mduh why he was suspicious of me, I was too late though.pieguy1372 wrote:
Oh wow, are you serious? o.o I was sure he was the cult leader
Anyway, I'm suspicious of BakaloidSky for the following reasons:
-Didn't vote in the first or second rounds
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
So I vote BalakoidSky.
your accusations suckpieguy1372 wrote:
Oh wow, are you serious? o.o I was sure he was the cult leader
Anyway, I'm suspicious of BakaloidSky for the following reasons:
-Didn't vote in the first or second rounds
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
So I vote BalakoidSky.
+ my reasons for being quiet is my personal life, you'll have to excuse me for that. but i'm sure i'll be getting more activity going on here.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Hmm... I think I agree with pieguy for this one, his reasoning sounds pretty decent. Although DxS sorta caused his own incident, I can't really see everyone suddenly deciding to side against Bakaloid if MDuh just survives through the night. Then again, the only other weird thing I see going on here is... dkun.. who's being even more quiet than Bakaloid...
...That's.. that's just like too quiet man. I don't even know if he's actually really busy or not.
and i would appreciate it if i did too0_o wrote:
I would appreciate it if iMuffin made more contributions to the game than prod responses and random/bandwagon votes.
Well... that's interesting... :< But yeah, you probably should've went for someone who could be of more risk.pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
this roleclaim only made me more suspicious :<pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
Or you're providing a logical reason for pieguy to have checked you instead of pie himself, and he's not a cop.E-Hooker wrote:
I was probably investigated because at least two people believed/do believe/think that I am Mafia. I already said that's not the case, but pieguy seems to have checked up on me last night. Curiosity, perhaps?
Either way, i'm a townie, sorry Wojjie.
I'm not participating? k maybe instead i should throw together poorly worded excuses that make me seem more suspicious than the other way around. inb4 people claim this makes me suspicious.Mashley wrote:
Upon further consideration I'm going to Vote iMuffin... he's just refusing to participate in the game at all.
I'll participate hardMashley wrote:
Are you going to participate now?
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
if we lynched for inactivities i shouldn't really be the only one on the chopping block.0_o wrote:
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
At this point I'm more in favor of a no-lynch since there's an even number of players. An extra round of night actions may be useful.
It's not inactivity I'm voting on, it's the complete vagueness of his posts and his determination not to get into any discussion. If you go through the thread more or less all his posts are bandwagon votes or, most recently, vague responses to me.0_o wrote:
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
I agree exactly.Mashley wrote:
It's not inactivity I'm voting on, it's the complete vagueness of his posts and his determination not to get into any discussion. If you go through the thread more or less all his posts are bandwagon votes or, most recently, vague responses to me.0_o wrote:
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :<0_o wrote:
Nonetheless, I still say no-lynch is the way to go. If there are 4 mafioso then we can't afford a mislynch today as that would leave us tied 4:4 tomorrow, thus we would lose. On the other hand, if we no-lynch today then the auxes would get another round of night actions, as well as increase the odds of lynching a mafioso. (Chance that a random lynchee is a mafia today = 4/10; chance tomorrow after a no-lynch = 4/9) We really have nothing to lose by postponing the lynch.
Vote no lynch
It's a game of "Do I chicken out or do I keep on?"Kitsunemimi wrote:
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :<0_o wrote:
Nonetheless, I still say no-lynch is the way to go. If there are 4 mafioso then we can't afford a mislynch today as that would leave us tied 4:4 tomorrow, thus we would lose. On the other hand, if we no-lynch today then the auxes would get another round of night actions, as well as increase the odds of lynching a mafioso. (Chance that a random lynchee is a mafia today = 4/10; chance tomorrow after a no-lynch = 4/9) We really have nothing to lose by postponing the lynch.
Vote no lynch
If you're wrong, we'll certainly lose an innocent overnight, while there was originally still room for error. In my opinion, it's not too hard to nail the Mafia by taking educated votes, we can't just sit around and let some people get killed until the odds are greater.
I'm actually leaning towards there being 3 mafia, but I'm preparing for the worst case scenario. The townies need an odd number of players, so even if there are 3 mafia a no-lynch would still be beneficial since we would have to do it at SOME point.Kitsunemimi wrote:
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :< If you're wrong, we'll certainly lose an innocent overnight, while there was originally still room for error.
In my opinion, it's not too hard to nail the Mafia by taking educated votesYou mean like our last two lynches? Sure there is skill in spotting the mafia, but there definitely IS luck involved and no matter how you look at it we have a better chance picking a mafia member out of 9 people than 10
we can't just sit around and let some people get killed until the odds are greater.An innocent is going be killed tomorrow whether we lynch someone or not. If there are 4 mafia then we only have one shot - a no lynch would only move us closer to the target before shooting.
I'm gonna vote you tomorrow.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Well I don't want to look weird either so
Unvote
Vote: no vote
you're joking rightWojjan wrote:
I'm gonna vote you tomorrow.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Well I don't want to look weird either so
Unvote
Vote: no vote
Errrr... right...Kitsunemimi wrote:
I'll mostly go with what other people agree on, unless I think there's something wrong about it.
Deputy
A Deputy is a role that begins as a Vanilla Townie with no knowledge of their special role. Once the Cop has 'died', the Deputy will be notified and can choose to 'retrieve' the results of that Cop's investigations. If there is more than one Cop, the deputy usually can only get the results of one of the Cop's investigations, so they must choose wisely.
Variations
A common variant is that the Deputy will begin the game with knowledge of his role (often called a Retired Cop). Whether or not the player knows about his abilities at the game's start is usually dependent on the moderator.
Mashley wrote:
Er, Wojjan, who's Harris?
The thing about each of these people though (and you too faceman), is that nobody really said anything about them in the first place. I personally always feel that if there's nothing too weird going on, it's safer to not get too involved. So when you base your suspicions on the comments I've made so far, it may sort of seem like I'm just neutral with a bunch of people, when I really can't determine who's good or bad.0_o wrote:
This leaves Quaraezha, Kitsunemimi, Mashley and iMuffin. None of them have shown much suspicion at all for each other (they DID gang up on iMuffin yesterday, so that could mean that iMuffin is innocent or they were trying to make themselves look good by voting a mafioso out), so by process of elimination I believe that three, or maybe all of them are mafia.
Err... what? First of all how is posting my opinions of everyone getting attention off myself, and secondly what attention? You said yourself I have hardly been accused at all; there really wasn't any attention on me to begin with.iMuffin wrote:
faceman you seem to be trying very hard to get all the attention off yourself and out of everyone here you haven't really brought under suspicion as everyone else has.
so i'm going to Vote: O_o*0_o
So basically I'm suspicious for not being suspicious enough.iMuffin wrote:
sorry typo, also again i accuse you and you are immediately put on the defensive, like very defensive. You are a little too good at staying out of the light, and scum doesn't like light very well.
for someone who doesn't take me seriously in the first place, my accusations seem to bother you quite a bit.0_o wrote:
So basically I'm suspicious for not being suspicious enough.iMuffin wrote:
sorry typo, also again i accuse you and you are immediately put on the defensive, like very defensive. You are a little too good at staying out of the light, and scum doesn't like light very well.
Ok
More like annoy, actually.iMuffin wrote:
for someone who doesn't take me seriously in the first place, my accusations seem to bother you quite a bit.
The people there are the ones who voted for lynch in the first two days.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Also, his guesses for who the Mafia also seem pretty random. It's like he chose the people who had that kind of... "mafia" personality... I'm not sure.
He didn't make a vote on the third day. He didn't even mention anything about no lynch. He didn't make a vote on the first day either.BakaloidSky wrote:
sorry if I haven't been able to post lately.
I'll get straight to the point and put my FOS on Mashley.
been lurking for some time to see how things turn out. And I don't have anything to post either.
FOS on Mashley, Kitsunemimi and pieguy.
I don't like how Mashley voted for lynch on the first two days and voted for no lynch on the 3rd day. On the 3rd day he seemed almost determined to have no lynch. which only made me suspicious.
Mashley didn't vote on Day 1 either. On top of that you (Bakaloid) also voted for a no lynch on Day 3. But even if he did everything you said he did, what's so suspicious about that? Don't get me wrong, I think Mashley has a good shot at turning up mafia as well, but your reasoning doesn't make much sense.Kitsunemimi wrote:
He didn't make a vote on the third day. He didn't even mention anything about no lynch. He didn't make a vote on the first day either.BakaloidSky wrote:
sorry if I haven't been able to post lately.
I'll get straight to the point and put my FOS on Mashley.
been lurking for some time to see how things turn out. And I don't have anything to post either.
FOS on Mashley, Kitsunemimi and pieguy.
I don't like how Mashley voted for lynch on the first two days and voted for no lynch on the 3rd day. On the 3rd day he seemed almost determined to have no lynch. which only made me suspicious.
And a lot of people voted on the first two days, and no lynch on the third day. I don't see what you're trying to say here.
Where did he claim cop?0_o wrote:
pieguy's results