Still possible, and this will be my last post here until the day ends as I need to sleep and I'm busy all tomorrow.
Then you would might as well claim role if you would want to prevent your own lynch. Unless I dunno the game ends after you do perish~rust45 wrote:
You know, there could be other reasons for me voting for myself other than being a defeatist. You do realize we have no idea what the roles are? And just so you know, I was hoping to spark conversation to root out the real scum, but it seems you just want to all bandwagon on me. Doesn't matter too much though, considering that an innocent usually gets lynched first.
There's that word again.rust45 wrote:
You know, there could be other reasons for me voting for myself other than being a defeatist. You do realize we have no idea what the roles are? And just so you know, I was hoping to spark conversation to root out the real scum, but it seems you just want to all bandwagon on me. Doesn't matter too much though, considering that an innocent usually gets lynched first.
Yeah, if it was really reversed then the story would probably have involved adam's target killing him as opposed to some mysterious person sneaking up on him.Mashley wrote:
Stop worrying about the whole 'shot with his own gun' thing... It's probably just one of nohitter's stories, like the guy falling off a tree.
If I am not mistaken, we ALL received the same PM, with pieguy in the "To:" section. Why would you vote for someone who received the same message you did?DeathxShinigami wrote:
If anything judging from the PM I received at night I'm going to...
Vote: pieguy1372
this0_o wrote:
Wait a sec.If I am not mistaken, we ALL received the same PM, with pieguy in the "To:" section. Why would you vote for someone who received the same message you did?DeathxShinigami wrote:
If anything judging from the PM I received at night I'm going to...
Vote: pieguy1372
roleclaiming? DXDeathxShinigami wrote:
You see, ever thought about what ability I could possess if I knew why to vote against pieguy? Just because it's a coincidence that he was first on the signup list and he was the only person on the "To" field. Doesn't mean I'm voting him because of that.
Due to the rules I really shouldn't reveal this information but in a short way of putting it...
You'll hurt town more if I go down in flames~
I highly doubt the mafia would kill someone off just for saying that one of its members was a "suspicious guy".pieguy1372 wrote:
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
I actually wanted to ask Mduh why he was suspicious of me, I was too late though.pieguy1372 wrote:
Oh wow, are you serious? o.o I was sure he was the cult leader
Anyway, I'm suspicious of BakaloidSky for the following reasons:
-Didn't vote in the first or second rounds
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
So I vote BalakoidSky.
your accusations suckpieguy1372 wrote:
Oh wow, are you serious? o.o I was sure he was the cult leader
Anyway, I'm suspicious of BakaloidSky for the following reasons:
-Didn't vote in the first or second rounds
-MDuh voted him and MDuh ended up dead...perhaps trying to kill off the one who found out?
So I vote BalakoidSky.
+ my reasons for being quiet is my personal life, you'll have to excuse me for that. but i'm sure i'll be getting more activity going on here.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Hmm... I think I agree with pieguy for this one, his reasoning sounds pretty decent. Although DxS sorta caused his own incident, I can't really see everyone suddenly deciding to side against Bakaloid if MDuh just survives through the night. Then again, the only other weird thing I see going on here is... dkun.. who's being even more quiet than Bakaloid...
...That's.. that's just like too quiet man. I don't even know if he's actually really busy or not.
and i would appreciate it if i did too0_o wrote:
I would appreciate it if iMuffin made more contributions to the game than prod responses and random/bandwagon votes.
Well... that's interesting... :< But yeah, you probably should've went for someone who could be of more risk.pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
this roleclaim only made me more suspicious :<pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
Or you're providing a logical reason for pieguy to have checked you instead of pie himself, and he's not a cop.E-Hooker wrote:
I was probably investigated because at least two people believed/do believe/think that I am Mafia. I already said that's not the case, but pieguy seems to have checked up on me last night. Curiosity, perhaps?
Either way, i'm a townie, sorry Wojjie.
I'm not participating? k maybe instead i should throw together poorly worded excuses that make me seem more suspicious than the other way around. inb4 people claim this makes me suspicious.Mashley wrote:
Upon further consideration I'm going to Vote iMuffin... he's just refusing to participate in the game at all.
I'll participate hardMashley wrote:
Are you going to participate now?
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
if we lynched for inactivities i shouldn't really be the only one on the chopping block.0_o wrote:
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
At this point I'm more in favor of a no-lynch since there's an even number of players. An extra round of night actions may be useful.
It's not inactivity I'm voting on, it's the complete vagueness of his posts and his determination not to get into any discussion. If you go through the thread more or less all his posts are bandwagon votes or, most recently, vague responses to me.0_o wrote:
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..