"This provides BNs an opportunity to use their discretion to veto actually unreasonable sliders if such a situation arises"
In a perfect world, yes, but we all know this won't happen if QAH stays the way it is now. In fact, without RC supporting it, there's even less incentive for BNs to veto harmful uses. We've seen in the past that vetos on subjective issues always causes problems for the person placing the veto.
On the point of the RC change, I think allowing these kinds of sliders creates an unhealthy relationship when playing the game. This is already partially present due to SV, but making it even more difficult to trust sliders because every single one could have some unexpected effect is not a good development in my opinion.
Edit: Also unsure how this change can affect converts, anybody know if there could be issues?
In a perfect world, yes, but we all know this won't happen if QAH stays the way it is now. In fact, without RC supporting it, there's even less incentive for BNs to veto harmful uses. We've seen in the past that vetos on subjective issues always causes problems for the person placing the veto.
On the point of the RC change, I think allowing these kinds of sliders creates an unhealthy relationship when playing the game. This is already partially present due to SV, but making it even more difficult to trust sliders because every single one could have some unexpected effect is not a good development in my opinion.
Edit: Also unsure how this change can affect converts, anybody know if there could be issues?