forum

You're forced to sleep with one of the two above users

posted
Total Posts
814
show more
Meah
myself
Achromalia
Welp.

CatzerTM it is.
TeeArctic1
Achro it is

(This is getting me in jail)
CatzerTM
achromalia I suppose
Achromalia
...hmm.

probably TeeArctic1.

probably.

i'll go with that.
Westonini
What a funny idea. How am I only seeing this thread now?

Achromalia (wow, what a surprise)
Radiohead
uhhh neither >:(
keremaru
Westonini and his hat.
Westonini
hmmm, "and his hat" huh?

Alright, I'll choose keremal but I've got my eyes on you.
Tad Fibonacci

Westonini wrote:

Alright, I'll choose keremal but I've got my eyes on you.


You fucked up now, westo.

*Police siren starts*

I'll choose Westonini of course. He's legal.
Achromalia
An interesting selection.

uhh...

I'm a tad more familiar with Westonini, heh.
Cynplytholowazy
Can the tad kill me in my sleep thanks
TheLegendaryHD
not bad i guess
Achromalia
Difficult. I'd rather not, but uhh...

shit. I don't know. I'm not necessarily comfortable around either of them, frankly.



I'll go with -GN??

aghhh.
Cynplytholowazy
Etf can I kill both of them in their sleep
Myke Madeline
Achromalia.
Topic Starter
KatouMegumi
cynp
KemZii
KatouMegumi
Topic Starter
KatouMegumi
KemZii ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
keremaru
fizzn
TeeArctic1
Keremal
Achromalia
TeeArctic, probably...?
Radiohead
sleeping with tee: child pornography

sleeping with achro: i don't like this choice but ok

achro
TeeArctic1
Guess achro
Achromalia

Radiohead wrote:

sleeping with tee: child pornography

sleeping with achro: i don't like this choice but ok

achro
but i'm a child...

oh no...

well, unless you mistook "users" for avatars. in that case-- ahh, the decision between pedophilia and necrophilia...

- - -

Possibly Tee?

I've got no idea.

Tee it is.
KemZii
Probably TeeArctic
Wuxo
kemzii
Penguin
nah, I don't want to go to prison

edit: wait, nvm it says that wuxo is 20, so i guess I'll go with that
Journal
Pedophilia or Bestiality


...
apparently wuxo is 20 sooo..former \_(ツ)_/
Please sign in to reply.

New reply