Hello there, so
Easy- 00:09:813 (2) - Touches healthbar
- 00:12:497 (2,1) - Not perfectly stacked if you care about that.
- 00:49:129 (1,2) - Pretty minor thing but it doesn't look like the symmetry is qutie right; the head of 1 is slightly closer to 2 than it is from the tail.
- 01:17:865 (4,1) - 1 seems to have much less significance in the music since it gets calmer here, so I feel having a 1/1 click pattern after having 01:14:392 (1,2,3) be a sparser pattern seems less fitting. Making 4 a slider would work nice in my opinion.
- 02:54:498 (2) - Tail is missing clap.
Will mod the rest of the diffs when I get back from classes.More Easy- 00:51:655 (1) - Sounds like you're primarily following the vocals, but you miss the beat on 00:52:286 so maybe shorten this slider to end on here?
- 01:18:813 - Random suggestion, perhaps dragging the break to start here would be a cool effect?
Normal- 00:20:076 (1,2,3,4) - Seems like a shame to miss the red ticks for this final part of the build up, especially after using them in the combo prior. Perhaps 1,2,3 could be 1/2 sliders?
- 00:36:497 (1) - Healthbar.
- 01:18:339 - 01:18:497 - There are two drum beats here which feel like they are nice to be grouped with 01:18:181 (1). You could make 1 a 1/2 reverse slider to map these, and then do what I suggested in Easy with the break if you wanted.
- 01:47:076 (2) - Healthbar.
- 02:18:813 (1) - Similar as before with the drums. Won't mention it again so add it to the other diffs if you wanted.
Hard- 00:17:865 (4) - Ctrl+J on this would make the grouping of 00:17:234 (2,3,4) a little better instead of having 3,4 br parallel and 2 be the odd one out where it doesn't need to be.
- 00:22:286 (1,2) - You mapped 00:21:339 (1,2,3) without a stack so it would make sense to do the exact same thing here without a stack for the same sounds. The movement would feel nicer to play for this rhythm too in my opinion.
- 00:26:392 (1,2) - Similar thing.
- 00:32:392 (4) - Healthbar.
- 00:42:497 (6) - Healthbar.
- 01:31:918 (4) - This overlap could be avoided. Seems out of place.
- 02:04:603 (4,1) - A sharper angle does seem more appropriate if you're emphasising this with a finish.
- 02:47:076 (2,3) - Could make these the same shape. Slightly off at the moment.
- 03:14:730 (5) - So this is a slider in Hard but are two circles in Normal huh.
Insane- 00:00:575 (1,1) - Not perfectly stacked if you care. Quite a few tail stacks seem off in this diff actually.
- 00:11:707 (1,1) - Seems like an unecessarily awkward angle to enter a stream to me.
- 00:32:707 (2,4,4) - Sliders here but circles in Hard. I guess if you wanted to make it more difficult to read with circles then you could alternate between stacking and not stacking.
- 00:43:444 (4,4,5) - Similar thing here. Makes sense to just keep using circles, just do some stacking-reading thing to make them a bit more interesting.
- 00:57:655 (1,2) - The flow seems unecessarily awkward here. It's current position and the backwards flow doesn't make it seem like it's paired with 2 very well.
- 01:39:339 (1) -
This is cool.- 01:53:234 - Might aswell be an active note if you wanted.
Extra- 00:51:339 (5) - Might aswell make these circles like you did with 00:50:707 (2,3) for consistency.
- 02:24:497 (4,5,6,7) - Minor personal thing, but having this be a zig-zag shape seems cooler to me than just a straight line.
- 02:26:392 (1) - Could just go straight into circles without using a slider to transition so that 02:26:550 is actively mapped and it groups with 02:27:023 (5,6,7) - 02:27:497 (9,10,1) better. Everything else is circles already.
- 02:36:497 (1,2,3) - 02:37:444 (7,8,1) - And then you could make these circles too for consistency.
- 03:14:225 (1,2) - I kinda expected these to be much further spaced. There's not much reason to keep these close since the last two notes are still pretty strong.
top secret shhEdit2: Formatting