1. Raindrop (5,52 stars, 1895 notes)

<< Previous || #6 Approved/Ranked || Next >>

1. Mp3 and BG from Monstrata's map

Thanks very much to:
-Kazu- #1 | Stefan #2

Modders/Help

1. Smallwu
2. Chromoxx
3. Arrival
4. 404 AccNotFound
5. Nyan
6. JessiChan
7. Arnon
8. Remus
9. Sylphi
10. Tyistiana
11. xfraczynho
12. -Kazu-
13. Stefan

Shooters Stars

1. Me
2. 404 AccNotFound
3. Nyan
4. Tyistiana
5. Gabe

Hit the bell if you want to know when I upload a new map!

[Events]
//Background and Video events
0,0,"rain2.jpg",0,50

Smallwu wrote:

Hello, mod from my queue (Sorry late) No matter ^_^
[General]
Turn off Enable countdown Forgot this

Then open your osu file

[Events]
//Background and Video events
0,0,"rain2.jpg",0,50

To show the girl with umbrella Ok

Btw, can Rain be the Taiko diff name? (Just a question for me :3) This is temporaly, I'll think in other diff name
[Rain]
00:03:394 (8,9) - Ctrl+G to follow the sound like 00:04:766 and 00:05:451 - Really advise you to change them because I can't find what the original pattern are following Ok, changed

00:04:080 (11) - k ^

00:08:880 (28,29) - Ctrl+G ^

00:09:566 (31) - k ^

00:14:366 (48,49) - Ctrl+G ^

00:18:480 (62) - k ^

00:19:851 (68,69) - Ctrl+G ^ All applied ^

00:24:994 - 00:25:680 - How about d kkd ddk? They're more fit on me :3

00:30:480 - 00:31:166 - d kkd ddk ^ :3 Don't like the sound :/

00:35:966 - 00:36:651 - Maybe it's still fit on the pattern what I say above? Nope

00:47:280 (247,248) - Ctrl+G? To keep consistency, you also use the same pattern after this part (but the original pattern are fine) This will be different since it is a little calm

00:47:794 (249) - Remove It feels very empty there, anyway for now I remove it
00:48:137 - If you don't want to do what I say above, add a don here. Because their sound are absolutely same, have no reason that you put a don at 00:47:794 and don't do that at here - it's strange imo Don't like the sound here, for now I remove the before mentioned ^

00:52:766 (265,266) - Ctrl+G? Reason same as 00:47:280 Nope

00:53:280 - Remove Same ^
00:53:623 - Add a don Reason same as 00:48:137 ^

01:18:480 - 01:40:423 - Nice Part! ^q^ Thanks

02:25:680 - 02:26:366 - d kkd ddk Because they're more fit on me :3 Same reason 00:30:480 - 00:31:166 - sorry

02:31:166 - 02:31:851 - ^ ^ :3 ^

02:51:051 (1169,1170,1171,1172) - k d d k to follow pitch, (1172)>(1171) Fixed

02:57:223 (1181) - d Why k here @w@? It's lower than (1180) and (1182)! Lol, fixed

02:58:594 (1182,1183) - Ctrl+G to follow pitch and keep consistency (02:47:623 (1167,1168)) Ok

03:02:023 (1184,1185,1186,1187) - k d k k Maybe you want to do something change, but (1184) (1185) is very strange, they're the highest / the lowest sound at the part This is the same that 02:51:051 (1167,1168,1169,1170) - , so i changed to k d d k

03:05:451 (1189) - Move to 03:05:794 then change to kat? (don fit on me, too) cuz I can't find what you follow before I remove it

03:18:823 (1) - d Because the piano [(1221)>(1)] Ok

04:15:394 - 04:16:080 - d kkd ddk Cuz they're fit on me :333 Nope

04:20:880 - 04:21:566 - ^ ^ :3 ^

04:37:680 (8,9) - Ctrl+G Reason same as the first response

04:43:166 (28,29) - ^ ^

04:48:651 (48,49) - ^ ^

04:54:137 (68,69) - ^ ^ All applied ^

=====
I usually mod like shit when the music repeatability is high, so maybe mod like shit this round ;3 No matter, you've helped me
GL with Rank!

Chromoxx wrote:

hi, played this in multi and thought it was nice... felt like mapping the song too but i guess you saved me some work xD

[General]
Diffname could be something more creative tbh.. off the top of my head we got "Downpour" "Drenched" "Raindrop" or something like that, this was just a brief 15sec brainstorming lul For now I changed to "Downpour", It doesn't convince me at all, but I'll keep looking. I thought in "Drizzle" or "Drizzling", but I don't know
OD could be 6.5 or 7 since it is DnB and following the rythm/accing is very easy for this type of music I think I'll change it to OD 7
BG isn't 16:9, resize if you want to or keep it at the current resolution, it will just get stretched a bit i guess Fixed to 1920x1080 (thanks to waifu2x)

[Diff]
00:06:480 - 00:11:966 - i'd suggest keeping these consistent as d k d with 00:17:451 (58,59,60) - through all the repetitions since it would flow more naturally with your d k d k rythm you have going on here, maybe d d k or d k k would fit better too Fixed with d d k / d k k
00:30:909 - maybe move this to 00:31:080 - to be consistent with the other repetitions, the way you have it now sounds a bit weird imo and it's more creating one thing that stands out than consistent variety imo I forgot this, fixed
01:19:251 - move this to 01:19:337 - here again i'd be fine with the current arrangement if it were somehow built in as a 1 2 1 2 for consistent variety but it's just a lone outstander, so changing it to be consistent would be better. Moved
04:21:309 - same as earlier, move to 04:21:480 - Moved
04:46:251 - again, the d k d would be better here imo Ok

edit: 00:47:280 - turn these to k d to fit the melody better, (00:52:766 - this etc. too) Changed

shoot this up to 12SP and call me back I have to check a few things still, thank you!

Thanks for check
Beatmap updated~

Arrival wrote:

Hello. I have some concerns about some parts of the diff and how little mods there have been.

00:06:480 (18,19,20) - I couldn't tap it on first try, this 3/2 just feels completely out of nowhere for someone not knowing the song. If you really want to put a note on the blue tick, then add a note here 00:06:823 - so it is easier to read. The players that tend to play the map I think they should read this change of pace. But adding the note would also be keeping pace with 00:04:423 - plus it would be a 'intruduccion' what is coming in 00:28:594 (118,119,120) - . So I will add

00:34:594 (161) - Emphasizing this part is necessary to go along with the music and not make something boring. A finisher is the minimum you should do here. Added and changed some patterns

01:26:023 - Starting from here to 01:30:823 - everything seems really overmapped. Nerf it and start the streaming section where it really sounds like it, to make a real contrast and truly fit the song. (01:32:194 - here I'd say)
Yes, I tried to follow the increase in volume here 01:23:966 - , but now that I think about it, the volume was only increased, I don't hear streams (I change some to kat when increase the volume)
Note on the kiais : The kiais are completely filled with 1/4 without usage of 1/2, making it really boring and not flowy at all. Cutting some of the patterns you use and using more 1/2s would truly make the difficulty more enjoyable to play. I really do not feel the need to use the 1/2, It would completely lose track of the melodies in my opinion. Anyway, I will see what I can do

02:04:766 (299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313) - This is extremely redundant and boring to play. Goes along what I said just above. This part I see it likely to add 1/2, also it is too provisory

03:30:137 - The second kiai time uses EXACTLY the same structure as the first (01:40:423 - ), redundant but I'd be fine with that This was a copy-paste, but anyway I can not think many patterns I'll see what I can

Fix a bit considering what I said above and find some mods. After that I may recheck it and put a bubble back, considering the map isn't bad at all.

404 AccNotFound wrote:

m4m via in-game~
sorry really really late xp


[ Raindrop ]

00:12:651 - add finisher? here has crush sound and also delayed synth sound. I follow the piano only, I think if added a finisher, this cuts the piano flow

00:18:137 - ^ without delayed sound. Same reason ^

00:15:394 (54,70,75,78) - finisher. here also has crush sound, and for the difference with the other part that has no crush sound. The same reason, I use the finisher to cut the flow of an instrument or a strong blow. I do not use finishers to maintain consistency with the piano

00:53:966 (271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278) - delete and spinner? synth sound seems not large enough so that hard to match the taiko circle and sound. No, I really like it as it is. In addition it maintains consistency with this 00:48:480 - , the same sounds are still there but with a lower tone. I keep it

03:12:823 (47) - d. it is good that the difference with other part, but i think here is definitely 'd' part and no matched summative background sound in here. I wanted more variation, but I changed to don 03:12:994 (48) - for emphasize on the piano (also varies with the above)

03:18:309 (63) - so, here is same part, but summative synth sound is matched in here. i think change 47 and keep 63 be better. I applied the same as above

04:52:423 - add circle?

04:53:794 (70,75,2) - finisher so that emphasize crush sound and more feel finish part. It's the same reason as 00:15:394 (54,70,75,78) -
for now I keep

04:57:480 - add circle fit with other sound like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8498614? seems little bored. I'm taking it as only 1 sound that fades, it becomes difficult if I add those notes taking into account that it is the end (In addition the sv would not look good)


i really love this map <3
spread is nice and flow is coooool xD
go rank hurry xDDDD

Raindrop

Nyan wrote:

[Raindrop]

00:53:966 (271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278) -

to
It's good, but I need something more specific to can apply this. I maintain it for consistency with 00:48:480 -

01:17:794 (375) - delete Feels rare if haven't note, because is very noticeable imo
03:21:394 (20,21,22,23,24) - dkkdk I changed this section and 01:29:451 - with others patterns

Thanks for mod and stars

JessiChan wrote:

Hola Gaston owo sorry por lo tarde xD ya me conoces. Ya ni me acuerdo cuando te pedí xDD

Raindrop

1. 00:02:880 (6) - No se si se te olvidó poner un azul aca ewe pero bueno, eso, si quieres colócalo. uwu No, mantuve don para más variación
2. 00:13:851 (48,49) - Creo que estaría bien si lo mantienes, haz ctrl + g Ok, cambié tambien 00:19:337 (69) - como al principio para consistencia
3. 00:24:994 (92,93,94,95) - ¿Qué te parecería hacer dkd k? Me parece bien
4. 00:30:480 (132,133,134,135,136) - dkddk Claro, al aplicar lo de arriba tiene sentido que aumente las notas de esa manera xD
5. 00:35:966 (175,176,177,178,179) - ^ Igual Yes
6. 00:47:966 - Creo que no estaría tan mal colocar un azul aca Suena raro antes de que cambie de ritmo aquí 00:48:480 -
7. 00:53:451 - Lo mismo^ No lo aplicaré por ahora
8. 01:39:651 (110) - Puedes cambiarlo a azul si quieres Yo escucho el mismo sonido siempre, lo mantengo
9. 02:36:651 (345,346,347,348,349) - dkddk Ok
10. 04:20:880 (79,80,81,82,83) - Bueno yo creo que ya sería de si lo aplicas o no, repetirlo en las partes similares. ewe Claro que si, porque es lo mismo xD
11. 04:37:166 (6) - Lo mismo que al inicio, azul. Repetí lo mismo

Buena suerte :3 ♥ Gracias

Arnon wrote:

Hola quisiera dejarte un par de sugerencias

SPOILER

• 1. 00:23:623 (82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98) - el patron que usastes vos no me convencio mucho, siento que esta hecho muy en el aire, este que propongo sigue mas el ritmo de la guitarra.
     Apliqué tu sugerencia pero no del todo. Esta parte 00:24:994 - 00:25:680 - lo mantuve ya que no me convencía del todo. Pero hice un par de cambio en los colores.
• 00:28:423 (118,119,120,121,122,123) - en este sector suguiero hacer un poco de enfasis con dobles para darle un poco mas de volumen.
  No hay ningún sonido en 00:41:194 (212) -. No me gusta como queda, lo mantengo para tratar de seguir el sintetizador de acá 00:28:594 -

• 1. 02:00:994 (45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,1) - en esa seccion sugiero q al menos en 02:01:109 (46) - se agrege un don para que sea mas consistente con los otros dobles. Ademas la sugiero extrictamente en esa posicion porque sige la escala de las siguientes notas, osea 02:00:994 (45) - y 02:01:109 (46) - esta al doble de distancia que 02:01:166 (47) - y lo mismo sucede con las siguientes notas.
     No sé qué decir sobre esto, la verdad rompe bastante con la jugabilidad agregando el 1/6 ahí me parece. Estoy en lo correcto con la consistencia, pero eso podría afectar en la jugabilidad en algunos casos. También teniendo en cuenta que el sonido que estoy siguiendo ahí comienza en 02:01:166 (47) - . (No sé si te lo aclaré bien, cualquier cosa decime por game)
  • 1. en la parte del kiai 02:02:366 (56) - ~ 02:24:309 (251) - hay muchas partes que siento q no estan siguendo el ritmo o al menos como es en la seccion anterior del kiai ( 01:40:423 (113) - ~ 02:02:366 (56) - ). lamentablemente no se me ocurrio nada muy distinto.
       Me basé un poco en el mapa de Monstrata ya que cambia de ritmo ahí. Supongo que algo como esto 02:08:366 (107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117) - te referís, pero a mi tampoco no se me ocurre otra cosa xD. Igual estaré probando algunos patrones.

Gracias por leerme hasta el final Gracias a vos por el mod! Bastante bien detallado la verdad

1. 00:42:823 (224,240) - maybe someone already suggested that, but what about making that stream as ddkk-type? I think it follows music more.
2. 01:34:251 (51) - sound is long as 01:34:509 (54) - (i mean even pattern of two kats), did you think about making 01:34:251 (51) - kat? Plus if we compare with that sound before at 01:33:823 (47,51) - , here you mapped two kats. It's unnecessary of course, just suggested.
3. 01:43:423 - won't don here fill the 1/3 sound gap?
4. 02:09:137 (114) - did you do that for variability? Because i can't hear kat here :0
5. 02:21:566 (225,241) - if you changed first stream - here is second.
6. 02:42:309 (11,12,13,17,18,19) - can't find difference between them as sounds, but i think you made them again for variability? Another suggesstion here : 02:42:137 (10,11,12,13) - clicking triple after strong and loud beat is very cool, so why not move 02:43:251 - that to 02:43:080 - and make it don to follow rhythmics of that part?
7. 02:43:509 (19,6) - just mentioning another stream, if you decided to change.
8. 03:45:480 (6) - kat?
9. 04:11:280 (3,19) - streaaaam.
10. 04:33:223 (20,5) - ^.

Remus wrote:

Hi gaston o/

It's very low chance i can find smth after bubble, but i'll offer some suggestions, maybe you'll find them a bit useful. Never mind, your opinion also counts

[Raindrop]

1. 00:42:823 (224,240) - maybe someone already suggested that, but what about making that stream as ddkk-type? I think it follows music more.
   No, you're the first to suggest this to me. You're right, follow the synthesizer more, but I do not like it, the sound is kind of weird. I try to follow the melody I was following in 00:26:709 (105,110,115) -
2. 01:34:251 (51) - sound is long as 01:34:509 (54) - (i mean even pattern of two kats), did you think about making 01:34:251 (51) - kat? Plus if we compare with that sound before at 01:33:823 (47,51) - , here you mapped two kats. It's unnecessary of course, just suggested. I do not think so, I hear this note 01:34:251 (51) - lower than 01:34:509 (54) -. Also the kick falls there
3. 01:43:423 - won't don here fill the 1/3 sound gap? Consistence with 01:40:680 - . Plus a BN said the kiai needs some 1/2
4. 02:09:137 (114) - did you do that for variability? Because i can't hear kat here :0 Yeah, varability. Maybe I'll change these notes
5. 02:21:566 (225,241) - if you changed first stream - here is second. Nope
6. 02:42:309 (11,12,13,17,18,19) - can't find difference between them as sounds, but i think you made them again for variability? Another suggesstion here : 02:42:137 (10,11,12,13) - clicking triple after strong and loud beat is very cool, so why not move 02:43:251 - that to 02:43:080 - and make it don to follow rhythmics of that part? Maybe for variability, but I follow with de kkd this sound 02:32:880 (314,319,324) - . I thought add don in 02:41:709 -
   but i'm not sure
7. 02:43:509 (19,6) - just mentioning another stream, if you decided to change. Nope x2
8. 03:45:480 (6) - kat? Here 01:55:766 (6) - has already kat, I don't like repeat the same patter. I want vary
9. 04:11:280 (3,19) - streaaaam. x3
10. 04:33:223 (20,5) - ^. x4

Very polished map. I can't call that even like 'mod', just list of subjective fixes, lol. Thanks anyways for check this
Anyway, good luck with that owo

1. 00:47:794 - 00:48:137 - 00:53:280 - 00:53:623 - For better flow, It needs to put a note there, in my opinion. Current pattern feels like there is no something which should be.
2. 01:20:023 (108,109,110,111,112,113) - It seems slightly different with the style as you mapped in this part. Being followed the melody, It would be better to use the pattern based on o_oo_oo, in my opinion.
3. 01:30:994 (23,24,25,26,27,28) - Similar as above.
4. 01:39:051 (103) - 02:00:994 (46) - I think, It should be changed to d because of some reasons:
   1. Actually, lower sound than next note.
   2. Considering the previous stream, not enough to emphasize, I think.
   3. On the similar sound such as 02:22:937 and 02:22:937, mapped to don.
5. 02:09:051 (113,114,115,116,117) - It would be better starting to k for consistency.
6. 02:41:280 (4,5,6) - 02:42:651 (14,15,16) - k d k for consistency?
7. 03:28:766 (61) - 03:50:709 (46) - Same as 01:39:051.
8. 04:30:994 (4,5,6) - 04:32:366 (14,15,16) - Same as 02:41:280.

Sylphi wrote:

via modding queue

[Raindrop]

1. 00:47:794 - 00:48:137 - 00:53:280 - 00:53:623 - For better flow, It needs to put a note there, in my opinion. Current pattern feels like there is no something which should be. I follow only the piano here. You're right, it feels a bit empty. I'll see if I can add some notes
2. 01:20:023 (108,109,110,111,112,113) - It seems slightly different with the style as you mapped in this part. Being followed the melody, It would be better to use the pattern based on o_oo_oo, in my opinion. I don't like how it sounds . I think the current pattern follow better with the pitch
3. 01:30:994 (23,24,25,26,27,28) - Similar as above. ^
4. 01:39:051 (103) - 02:00:994 (46) - I think, It should be changed to d because of some reasons:
   1. Actually, lower sound than next note.
   2. Considering the previous stream, not enough to emphasize, I think.
   3. On the similar sound such as 02:22:937 and 02:22:937, mapped to don.
   Yeah, changed with finisher to emphasizes the kick
5. 02:09:051 (113,114,115,116,117) - It would be better starting to k for consistency. Yeah, I thought a other pattern and changed this
6. 02:41:280 (4,5,6) - 02:42:651 (14,15,16) - k d k for consistency? Consistency with what thing? This is the same than 00:40:594 (208,209,210,218,219,220) -
7. 03:28:766 (61) - 03:50:709 (46) - Same as 01:39:051. Yeah, changed
8. 04:30:994 (4,5,6) - 04:32:366 (14,15,16) - Same as 02:41:280. ^

Thanks a lot for mod
Beatmap updated~

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

404 AccNotFound wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

Tyistiana wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

Agree

Hi again~
Might be rejected all uwu

[ Raindrop]
00:12:651 / 00:18:137 - A clearly finisher sounds stands here. Might place K
00:37:337 - Another clearly finisher sounds here. Use finisher here for the consistency of 00:40:080 I considered add the finisher, but idk why I don't added before xD
01:10:937 - Change to k , similar pitch to 01:10:423 I changed the pattern to accept this
02:07:423 (97,98) - Ctrl+G , Seems like the pitch that you have emphasize so far by using k like 01:55:937 / 02:07:166 are stands on 02:07:423 , make it as k might be better for the overall consistency. You're right, fixed
02:15:823 - Add a note here might be cool , there is a pitch on here too. I follow the instrumental here, don't the melody
04:46:937 / 04:52:423 - Yes , a noticeable finisher sound here, might consider to add a finisher note here. uwu Added
04:52:937 - d , let's have a look on 00:07:680 ? Doens't this 00:18:651 (68) - ? I use copy-paste and those note is kat

Hope this will can help you some. You help me a lot!
Good luck!

Chromoxx wrote:

u can also call me again if u want :p

1. 00:01:680 - 70
2. 00:45:566 - 70 back
3. 00:56:709 - 60 acá
4. 01:29:451 - 75/80
5. 02:46:251 - 70 con un SV down sería bonito
6. 03:08:194 - si le haces SV down a la de arriba, increméntale un poco acá y que empieze el 1.0x en 03:19:166 -
7. 03:19:166 - 75/80, dependiendo si tomas el de arriba
8. 04:35:966 - 70

1. 00:02:880 (6) - 00:03:223 - se ve mejor para el build up del principio
   ^00:56:709 - esta la podrías mantener para la variación
2. 00:05:280 - 00:10:766 - 00:16:251 - agregar un don acá también podría ser bueno, el 1/1 quiebra mucho la densidad del primer 8/1
3. 00:30:480 (134,135,136) - el kkd suena un poco fuerte imo, kdd podría fillear mejor
4. 00:47:794 - 00:53:280 - no te pinta hacer un build up como ? El de ahora se siente extraño en el tema de lo que mappeas y qué no
5. 01:37:594 (84,86) - yo borraría esas 2 y haría 01:37:680 (85) - finisher, creo que la consistencia es más importante que el buildup, es raro ver un patrón de 01:35:109 - 13 notas y después una longstream considerando como se buildea la melodía
   ^01:59:623 (30) - en esta lo entiendo más, el cymbal no suena tan fuerte y para ser kiai se ve mejor
6. 01:39:909 (106,107) - 02:01:851 (51,52) - 03:29:623 (65,66) - 03:51:566 (51,52) - esas fillean mejor como kd, pruébalo y sigue bien los tonos
7. 01:45:223 - 01:56:194 - 03:36:309 - 03:45:909 - en esas 4 podrías meter unos dobles en vez de los quintuples, es súper opcional pero podría calzar re bien la melodía
8. 02:21:566 - 04:11:280 - 04:33:223 - podrías meterles una variación a estas entre medio (comparadas con 00:42:823 - )
9. 02:43:509 - same
10. 03:13:337 - podrías agregar kat para variación como en 03:18:823 -
11. 04:35:966 - refer to 00:01:680 - (copy&paste si haces cambio xD)
12. 04:57:909 - la verdad yo terminaría el mappeo ahí con un don en vez de kat, como que están un poco de más las otras imo y sería bonito el énfasis de terminar y seguir escuchando tranqui lo que viene, ojalá se entienda lo que digo xD (en ese caso borras las greenline de después)

xfraczynho wrote:

Holahola

Hazme acordar de revisar el metadata cuando respondas a este mod!

[General]
Sugerencias sobre los volúmenes

1. 00:01:680 - 70
2. 00:45:566 - 70 back
3. 00:56:709 - 60 acá
4. 01:29:451 - 75/80
5. 02:46:251 - 70 con un SV down sería bonito
6. 03:08:194 - si le haces SV down a la de arriba, increméntale un poco acá y que empieze el 1.0x en 03:19:166 -
7. 03:19:166 - 75/80, dependiendo si tomas el de arriba
8. 04:35:966 - 70

Todo aplicado

[Raindrop]
Más que todo serán sugerencias, el mapa está bastante bueno

1. 00:02:880 (6) - 00:03:223 - se ve mejor para el build up del principio
   ^00:56:709 - esta la podrías mantener para la variación No me convence del todo como suena, quiero seguir el piano a toda costa
2. 00:05:280 - 00:10:766 - 00:16:251 - agregar un don acá también podría ser bueno, el 1/1 quiebra mucho la densidad del primer 8/1 El 1/1 lo hice para enfatizar el sintentizador que se escucha en 00:04:766 (13,15) - . Agregué los dons a partir del 00:12:651 - por el incremento del crash cymbal
3. 00:30:480 (134,135,136) - el kkd suena un poco fuerte imo, kdd podría fillear mejor Lo hice para no repetir lo mismo en 00:24:994 (94,95,96) -
4. 00:47:794 - 00:53:280 - no te pinta hacer un build up como ? El de ahora se siente extraño en el tema de lo que mappeas y qué no No hay sonido en 00:48:309 - y se me hace muy incomodo la transición con las notas en 00:47:794 - 00:48:137 - , creo que con el break se deja en claro el cambio de follow
5. 01:37:594 (84,86) - yo borraría esas 2 y haría 01:37:680 (85) - finisher, creo que la consistencia es más importante que el buildup, es raro ver un patrón de 01:35:109 - 13 notas y después una longstream considerando como se buildea la melodía No me gusta como queda, será cosa mia,
   pero siento que agregar un finisher ahí sería algo exagerado ya que el crash cymbal lo uso para enfatizar el sintentizador en 01:34:937 (56,70) -, y a partir de 01:37:680 - hace fade out (para compensarlo agregué SVs de volumen)
   ^01:59:623 (30) - en esta lo entiendo más, el cymbal no suena tan fuerte y para ser kiai se ve mejor El sintentizador no hace el fade out como el anterior por lo que el volumen sigue igual (y el patrón un poco más complicado xD)
6. 01:39:909 (106,107) - 02:01:851 (51,52) - 03:29:623 (65,66) - 03:51:566 (51,52) - esas fillean mejor como kd, pruébalo y sigue bien los tonos ¿Por qué no los 2? :^)
7. 01:45:223 - 01:56:194 - 03:36:309 - 03:45:909 - en esas 4 podrías meter unos dobles en vez de los quintuples, es súper opcional pero podría calzar re bien la melodía Los dobles los usé en 01:18:480 - , voy a mantener los 5plet por la intensidad del kiai
8. 02:21:566 - 04:11:280 - 04:33:223 - podrías meterles una variación a estas entre medio (comparadas con 00:42:823 - ) Hice cambios en 02:21:566 - y 04:11:280 - . Los demás los mantengo por consistencia
9. 02:43:509 - same Quiero mantener la consistencia con 00:42:823 -
10. 03:13:337 - podrías agregar kat para variación como en 03:18:823 - Agregado
11. 04:35:966 - refer to 00:01:680 - (copy&paste si haces cambio xD) Cambié algunas cosas
12. 04:57:909 - la verdad yo terminaría el mappeo ahí con un don en vez de kat, como que están un poco de más las otras imo y sería bonito el énfasis de terminar y seguir escuchando tranqui lo que viene, ojalá se entienda lo que digo xD (en ese caso borras las greenline de después) Todos tienen el mismo tono sólo con menos volumen, por eso lo termino con k

Eso es todo, me avisas de vuelta!

xfraczynho wrote:

último recheck

00:19:509 (73) - 00:20:880 (78) - 00:21:566 (80) - missing big note (consistencia con 00:18:137 (66) - ) con el background cymbal Agregué sólo en 00:19:509 (73) - , se ve algo feo agregar un finisher en 00:21:566 (80) - si hay otra nota en 1/2 luego. Quiero enfatizar el efecto del sintetizador que hace acá 00:22:251 (83) - . Además mantengo la consistencia que hay en 00:40:080 - .

a todo esto; creo que entendiste mal, no sugerí nota en 00:48:309 - , pero puedo entender lo que hiciste ahora, sólo es una acotación Lo revisé de nuevo pero me quedaré con el actual

01:05:623 (40,41,42,43,44,45) - esto se me hace muy raro, prueba literalmente lo contrario a lo que está, sigue melodía y tonos, (d k d d k d) Aplicado

eso nada más, si no tienes cambios antes del bub me llamas de vuelta Creo que no hay nada más

1. Smoother SV curves on the section 01:39:394 - ~ 01:40:251 - (and in similar sections)
2. Fixed the note at 02:00:994 - that overlapped the next note (and in similar sections)
3. Changed the last part's structure so that it matches better the rest of the map