Cerulean Veyron wrote:

eyyy

[- - Easy - -]

1. 00:53:294 (2,3) - Optional objective: It's pretty minor, but I could see something here that's not quite flowing pretty smooth tbh. Either moving circle (3) a little left near the corner, or ... blanket circle (3)? moved 3 to the left for a curve
2. 01:06:476 (1) - Speaking about aesthetics, I think the curve here can be more utilized by moving it's slider point somewhere. Something that'd look like this will make it's structure a little bit improved though, pretty much sure. fixed

[- - Normal - -]

1. 00:05:567 (3,4) - Would be nice if this were to be a bit identical on position, like a parallel for example. But somehow slider (4) is just a little bit at higher grid. Just my personal opinion. fixed
2. 00:23:749 (3) - The rhythm composition is quite nice imo, but I could possibly here there's a very good beat that landed on 00:24:658 - very intense. So I think something clickable should work this out more correctly. So rather than a reverse arrow, a 1/2 slider just as how you did on every previous tracks. So there's the consistency~ I tried this out and I'm a bit unsure, i know what you mean by the strong beat but the vocals here are different to each verse so I wanted to have a slight change in the rhythm to reflect that, idk, maybe change
3. 01:07:839 (2,3) - I think this distance spacing is quite screwed up, probably spaced lower than the default 0.9x. So I think this is a kinda mistaken, or missed, or overlooked.
4. 01:12:839 (3,4) - Optional objective: Well I think you should change a little patterning here because you've used a lot of linear 1/2 sliders on many track, so I think this should be suitable for a bit curving. How about these two sliders? Might be far greater for aesthetics after the previous linear notes. It's up to you though. no change here, made the sliders straight like the previous sliders for consistency between drum fills

[- - Hard - -]

1. 00:06:930 (3,1) - You could've done nearly the same small spaced-jump as 00:03:294 (3,1) - by 1.5x , it'd really emphasize the note density and consists with that imo. didnt think about that, nice idea
2. 00:09:203 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Right here, you've used 1.4x spacing out of the sudden over these patterns. While the rest of all tracks and verses are using 1.2x by default, I think this shouldn't be implemented because it totally overtakes too much emphasis over the music change or w/e. I guess you'd better redo this. i didnt notice the ds change XD, fixed
3. 00:23:749 (1) - The same thing as the previous diff about the rhythm composition. again idk, if i use another 1/2 slider it feels a bit out of place with the other two, and i don't think it warrents 3 circles in a row, maybe change later again
4. 00:28:522 (2,3) - Is this 1.1x distance spacing intentional though? I haven't seem you doing that on the previous two 1/2 circles on 00:24:885 (2,3) - . So I can see this a bit inconsistent. fixed
5. 00:43:749 (1) - Well, for a polished structure here, how about moving this out somewhere around x:272|y:241 or another coordinate of grid. It'd form a diamond formation or sth that looks aesthetically better on patterning. Watch the spacing next to it if applying this. fixed (i screwed up making the diamond the first time xdd)
6. 01:02:839 (1) - Whoa, that straight slider nearly went almost offscreen through the corner. Well, nearly tbh. I don't really think replacing this slider to another placement, but changing it's position should be a little better. There are many ways doing sth to this slider, so I don't know you way. Try another thing than a straight slider here or w/e. ok so i had to change my resolution to see this, but i think i made it a little better now

wow nice mappu, rip no 2kds ;n;

Okay, good luck!!

MkGuh wrote:

I would really like to icon this if I were a BN :3

maybe it happens

-Latias- wrote:

hi, random mod from #modreqs

Insane

00:09:203 (1,2,3,4,5) - large distance here for a relatively calm part of song. you could move 00:10:113 (3,4) closer to 00:10:567 (5) to make a blanket, while lowering 00:09:885 (2) y value to around 121 changed but a bit differently
00:11:703 (3,4) - slider here, nothing in song is needing emphasis of circles. it would be great with just a slider I have these here for consistency with the previous two bars, maybe change if more people suggest it
00:16:022 (4) - again with the large distance from 00:16:022 (4). you should move to around x:270 y:195, or could line up with 00:16:022 (4) nerfed ds a little bit
00:18:976 (3,4) - 1/1 slider here no thanks, I want to get the bass drum notes in here
00:25:567 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -Try this no thanks, I really like how the spacing between each of these jumps represents a change in the vocals which are rising and falling in intensity in this bar
00:30:113 (3,4) - the song doesn't justify why 3 has to end on a blue tick. its not the same as 00:03:294 (1,1) or 00:06:931 (1,1) or 00:23:749 (1,2). with all the points i just listed, there's a reason why the slider should end on blue tick. but with this timestamp, it simply doesn't work the vocals end on the blue tick on this bar, the 'su' is on the blue tick
00:26:476 (4,5,1) - make equal distance between sliders pls ??
00:41:931 (1) - should have started 00:41:703 (6) I'm focusing mainly on the drums in this section and if I started it here then I'd miss out on the bass drum notes
00:44:658 (3,4) - would have been fine with just 1/1 slider maybe, but doing this means I lose the emphasis I have on the snares
00:51:931 (4,5) - should have just stretched 00:51:931 (4) to 00:52:385 (5)
00:57:839 (2) - create this into a repeater maybe, i'm a bit unsure on this one because of the intensity of the vocal
00:59:203 (1,2) - ^^ no thanks, there is a switch on the vocals on the (2)
01:06:476 (1,2) - create 1/1 slider maybe, if i do this i will need to do it more often in the second half of the kiai since there are a lot of times this comes up but i don't want to lose the consistency that it has at the moment
01:24:203 (6) - nc here ? fixed
01:27:157 (1,1,1) - doesn't work for an ending. it just doesn't sound right. probably put some repeaters here ? maybe again, i really like this ending

Also, in you tags get rid of "Intro" as you already have "opening" fixed

Hope the mod helps !

1. 00:32:840 (1) - maybe ctrl+j this so that it has a better flowing movement from 00:31:931 (6) -
2. 01:16:476 (4,5) - why did you switch them around here? almost everywhere else you have slider>note instead of note>slider (for example 01:05:567 (5,6) - , 01:11:021 (3,4) - , 01:22:839 (3,4) - etc.)

1. 00:10:567 (4) - maybe ctrl+h for better movement between these two sliders
2. 00:18:294 (1) - why not copypaste this slider 00:17:840 (4) - instead? since theyre almost the same shape might aswell make it the same
3. 01:16:248 (3) - might want to make the end of this clickable since it ends on a pretty strong sound

1. 00:16:249 (5) - maybe move this a little bit up and to the right so it flows better into 00:16:476 (1) -
2. 00:24:203 (2,4) - patterns like this usually look the best like this (with the smaller slider in the middle of the big one) imo
   
   example

   
3. 00:53:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as of now the angle into the linear stream is a bit harsh to play and you could smoothen it up by doing something like this (also blanketting 00:53:522
   example

   

Voli wrote:

Hey m4m

Can't find anything in Easy

Normal

1. 00:32:840 (1) - maybe ctrl+j this so that it has a better flowing movement from 00:31:931 (6) - yup
2. 01:16:476 (4,5) - why did you switch them around here? almost everywhere else you have slider>note instead of note>slider (for example 01:05:567 (5,6) - , 01:11:021 (3,4) - , 01:22:839 (3,4) - etc.) i did this because the drum changed from going kickkicksnare to kicksnaresnare, and since i represented that in the hitsounds it would be better to have the same thing played on a slider than having it the other way around

Hard

1. 00:10:567 (4) - maybe ctrl+h for better movement between these two sliders yup
2. 00:18:294 (1) - why not copypaste this slider 00:17:840 (4) - instead? since theyre almost the same shape might aswell make it the same i didnt know how to at the time xd, fixed
3. 01:16:248 (3) - might want to make the end of this clickable since it ends on a pretty strong sound maybe change, i left it as unclickable so the rhythm wouldn't be too dense, but if more people suggest then ill change

Insane

1. 00:16:249 (5) - maybe move this a little bit up and to the right so it flows better into 00:16:476 (1) - moved a little
2. 00:24:203 (2,4) - patterns like this usually look the best like this (with the smaller slider in the middle of the big one) imo im confused it looks the same as the one i have atm
   
   example

   
3. 00:53:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as of now the angle into the linear stream is a bit harsh to play and you could smoothen it up by doing something like this (also blanketting 00:53:522 ok will fix since it's been suggested a lot before :p
   example

   

Solid map, you won't have much trouble ranking this imo, but GL hopefully ;d

Battle wrote:

[Easy]
00:21:931 (1) - 00:25:567 (1) - 00:32:840 (1) - The way you introduce these sliders is kinda awkward since it just decreases the rhythm density by a lot, if you do sth like this you might want to make it a 2/1 slider rather than a 3/1 slider
01:06:476 (1) - eh i think they're ok, maybe fix if more people suggest it
01:08:294 (3) - maybe make these 3/2 repeat sliders? I think they follow the music a little better and adds a little variety since it would follow the vocals will consider
it'd be nice if you hitsounded the slider ticks since you went over a few of the clap beats with the long sliders i prefer the ticks this way, having hitsounded ticks is super confusing imo

[Normal]
00:55:567 (1) - 00:59:203 (1) - Like both of these are following the vocals but you're not really following the vocals all the time, it just feels inconsistent will fix a couple of the later patterns in this section for more consistency
some sharp flows at the start like 00:20:113 (3,4,5,1) - could be a bit smoother so look over the start to make things a bit smoother

[Hard]
00:02:613 (6,1) - Maybe put the nc on 6 instead? 00:02:613 (6,1,2,3) - sounds like it's together to me, same as other time this happens noty, the 1/2/3 are all part of the same sound which is different to the rest of the bar, 6 is just guitar
00:37:385 (2,3,4) - tbh I would expect the 1/4 here to be a bit smaller since the music is kinda calm but w/e nerf ds by a little
00:53:976 (4,5,6,1) - Are you sure this is appropriate for hard players? kick sliders in general are pretty confusing to get into, and considering that they're just overlapping it might cause further confusion, same as other instances i think they play ok, and everyone who has testplayed it so far seems to be able to read it ok so i'll leave it as is, if more people think its too confusing ill change it
01:11:476 (4,1,2) - ^ I don't know if they can exactly interpret anti-jumps the way they're supposed to fixed the pattern a bit so its easier to see the next note

[Insane]
01:00:453 (4) - overmapped z fix
I mean like besides like really intense part, things are kinda just spaced the same even though there's strong beats (example can be seen with 01:14:430 (3,4,5,6) - , 4 is pretty far away from 3 despite not being a super strong beat but 6 has relatively smaller spacing or equal spacing to 4 so it doesn't feel as emphasized as it should imo) moved 4/5 a bit

I'm not too big of a fan of some of the aesthetics so z

Gabe wrote:

hihi!

General
Why not a 192kbps mp3?
Overall notes:

1. Folder is clean
2. Metadata confirmed, on your beatmap's opening post
3. Metadata and settings (artist, title, source, tags, countdown, etc) consistent on every difficulties
   ---
4. Hitsounds consistent
5. New combos consistent
6. Objects following the song perfectly

This is .. perfect thanks :d

No problem with Easy.

Normal

1. 00:21:931 (1) - Looking at the previous slider, which is curved at the left and having a flow to the right, it would be better if this slider was moved to x:454 y:152 for the flow. ok, rearranged next pattern to fit ds aswell

Really neat!

Hard

1. 00:26:931 (4) - One thing here, if we look previously on 00:21:931 (1,2,3,4) - , you were using reversed jumps on these sliders. You are doing something quite similar at this point also. It would be quite nice if you'd do a CTRL+G to this one slider as well. (But, the thing that is refraining me from suggesting this,
   is the slider (3) on the previous pattern because it is not reversed like the others, yet it's following your main intentions. I believe you were trying to do the same thing for the second pattern with (3,4)?) this last one is different because their is no significant vocal change on 4, if i ctrl + g'd this the spacing would be far too high for whats actually happening in the music

Insane
Clean!

call me back~
also gave battle his kudo since it was modded over a year ago.

MkGuh wrote:

I would really like to icon this if I were a BN :3

maybe it happens

1. 00:03:077 (4,5) - Do the same rhythm as 00:06:713 (4) - imo. The little... chime sounding things? Sure. Let's call them that.. The little chimes sound in both spots so a reverse 1/2 slider would work great.
2. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - The (1,2,3) could probably flow better. It's mainly the sharp angle at (3) after (2). maybe something like this can work? Adjust whatever you need to afterwards. Shouldn't be too much. Or just do whatever you want here.
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:34:895 (3,4) - (3) would be great if it was just a 2/1 slider. This lets the 3/4 vocals play out without interference and empashizes on the two snare hits at 00:35:804 - and 00:36:259 (4) -
4. 00:53:531 (2,3) - Swap? You probably want to be clicking the two strong finishes instead of just one. (Go Circle, Slider instead of Slider, Circle)
5. 01:23:076 (3,4) - Probably good as a 2/1 slider like the ones before it. Nothing really changes here imo.

1. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe keep up the natural drum rhythm here? One could argue that it actually should be more intense here anyways since the vocals get stronger and the drum beat stays the same.
2. 00:32:168 (6) - The way your natural rhythm works, this kinda screams to have a note played at 00:32:395- even if it's just by a reverse arrow or something. If not, then 00:33:986 (2,3) - feels a bit forced.
3. 00:55:804 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:59:440 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Two things:
   These rhythms kinda vary a bit too much imo even though they sound the same. 00:56:713 (2,2,3) - There's an extra click in the second set, and 00:57:622 (3,4) - the first has an extra beat on the reverse. Not sure if you meant for this to be intentional since it makes a completely varied rhythm while still following the overall rhythm idea, but I do think they should try to be a little consistent if possible.
   The other issue is that you have a strange mix of vocal/drum mapping here that feels out of place (It's only the 3/4 reverse sliders). To be honest, I'd prefer if you focused on one or the other but I'll leave it up to you to decide.

1. 00:21:940 (5) - man.. were we already doing these kinds of sliders back then? :thonkin:
2. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - speaking about this being more intense from the normal mod. lol. Anyways, This is a pretty big jump up in movement here. Maybe lighten these jumps up some? A little extra is fine, I just didn't expect this much.
3. 00:32:622 (3,4,1) - 00:28:986 (3,4) - is probably a better rhythm choice to use here still since the sounds should be separated in the (3).
4. 00:34:895 (1,2,3) - This is harder than the insane rhythm wise. care to fix?
5. 00:37:622 (2,3,4) - ^
6. 00:35:804 (4,5,6) - Tbh, I prefered your natural jump growth you did back at 00:06:713 (1,2,3) - I feel like it would fit this here perfectly as well. again right now, it just feels a bit too spaced out.
7. 00:41:940 (4,1,2,3) - nice
8. 00:44:895 (3,4) - I think you get the idea now.
9. 00:51:259 (1,2,1,2) - I don't think the NC here is necessary, but do what you want because it's just an NC. The world won't end.
10. 00:54:213 (4,5,6,7) - Flip for flow from (3)?
11. For the first half of the kiai. maybe add some small jumps for stuff like 01:02:849 (5,1) - etc. because it'd be great to have a bit more emphasis in this section.
12. 01:11:713 (4,1,2) - This stacking is kind of inconsistent. Adjust (2) to be like (4,1)?

1. 00:02:168 (1,2) - and 00:05:804 (1,2) - could be spaced the same.
2. 00:03:077 (3,4,1) - That same build-up concept you were using in hard would be great here. Add more emphasis to the (1). You do this at 00:06:713 (3,4,1) - at least.
3. 00:08:531 (4,5) - reoccurring theme I guess. I don't really care if you want to keep this since it adds some flavor, but I figured I might as well mention it because others might mention it right? Anyways, this should technically be setup for 'nice jumps' but instead you use it for some lame stacking thing that doesn't really express the intensity in the drums... alright I'll stop there. Keep these as is because I like the consistency and it's a shame we don't see this as often anymore. <3
4. 00:12:168 (3,4) - and then you do this and ruin everything I just said.. So let's just cross that out... Anyways at least your kiai is consistent for it... or it better be... moving on.
5. 00:36:031 (5) - Should be spaced so the (4,6) gets more emphasis. You know what I mean. Actually why not just turn it into free PP?
6. 00:38:986 (2) - Not sure if this is following some sort of pattern, but this would flow better if it was off to the right more.
7. 00:54:895 (1) - That's some S-tier rumbling.
8. 01:13:758 (9) - Circles instead? Fits with the 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - triplets because same hitsounds.
9. 01:16:485 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe could be a bit less linear and then sharp from (4,5)

Lanturn wrote:

nice.

So timing. idk, it still sounds late at some points for me. hint 00:24:440 - Feels like it's around 15-20ms late but I honestly suck at timing. fixed it

Is there a reason why you need the 3rd sampleset? Aren't both of them the same as 2? Or did you actually want the default sliderbody sound during the Kiai? gonna make the hitsounding not succ

Pretty sure you don't need epilepsy warning for a few flashes that don't even really occur close together. ok

You can manually edit the .osu to remove the uncheckable letterbox thing if you want.

TV Size / Ver isn't required in the titles anymore due to some metadata changes that will be happening in the future. You are free to remove it. These will be going into tags. ok

Galileo Galilei should be both the unicode and romanized artist name. Move ガリレオガリレイ into the tags. Fix your SB as well because of this. ok



[Easy]
Would love a little bit more variety instead of just 1/1s, but let's keep what you've got for old times sake. gotta preserve that late 2015/early 2016 style whatever that is

Delete the one pointless green timing in the kiai. i dont see it??

1. 00:03:077 (4,5) - Do the same rhythm as 00:06:713 (4) - imo. The little... chime sounding things? Sure. Let's call them that.. The little chimes sound in both spots so a reverse 1/2 slider would work great. wanted these different because of the hihat clasp in the 2nd set of these
2. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - The (1,2,3) could probably flow better. It's mainly the sharp angle at (3) after (2). maybe something like this can work? Adjust whatever you need to afterwards. Shouldn't be too much. Or just do whatever you want here. did your thing
3. 00:34:895 (3,4) - (3) would be great if it was just a 2/1 slider. This lets the 3/4 vocals play out without interference and empashizes on the two snare hits at 00:35:804 - and 00:36:259 (4) - yea, also adjusted patterns after to be cooler
4. 00:53:531 (2,3) - Swap? You probably want to be clicking the two strong finishes instead of just one. (Go Circle, Slider instead of Slider, Circle) yea
5. 01:23:076 (3,4) - Probably good as a 2/1 slider like the ones before it. Nothing really changes here imo. yea

[Normal]

1. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe keep up the natural drum rhythm here? One could argue that it actually should be more intense here anyways since the vocals get stronger and the drum beat stays the same.
2. 00:32:168 (6) - The way your natural rhythm works, this kinda screams to have a note played at 00:32:395- even if it's just by a reverse arrow or something. If not, then 00:33:986 (2,3) - feels a bit forced. did something
3. 00:55:804 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:59:440 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Two things:
   These rhythms kinda vary a bit too much imo even though they sound the same. 00:56:713 (2,2,3) - There's an extra click in the second set, and 00:57:622 (3,4) - the first has an extra beat on the reverse. Not sure if you meant for this to be intentional since it makes a completely varied rhythm while still following the overall rhythm idea, but I do think they should try to be a little consistent if possible. deleted the 2nd rhythm
   The other issue is that you have a strange mix of vocal/drum mapping here that feels out of place (It's only the 3/4 reverse sliders). To be honest, I'd prefer if you focused on one or the other but I'll leave it up to you to decide.

[Hard]
From like 00:07:622 - to 00:36:259 - you don't really have any 1/1 gaps for rest. Consider adding some? You're demanding like 30 seconds of clicking. added a couple

1. 00:21:940 (5) - man.. were we already doing these kinds of sliders back then? :thonkin: i was a meta mapper before this meta even existed ?????????
2. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - speaking about this being more intense from the normal mod. lol. Anyways, This is a pretty big jump up in movement here. Maybe lighten these jumps up some? A little extra is fine, I just didn't expect this much. nerfed a bit
3. 00:32:622 (3,4,1) - 00:28:986 (3,4) - is probably a better rhythm choice to use here still since the sounds should be separated in the (3).
4. 00:34:895 (1,2,3) - This is harder than the insane rhythm wise. care to fix?
5. 00:37:622 (2,3,4) - ^ rearranged this whole section
6. 00:35:804 (4,5,6) - Tbh, I prefered your natural jump growth you did back at 00:06:713 (1,2,3) - I feel like it would fit this here perfectly as well. again right now, it just feels a bit too spaced out. did something similar
7. 00:41:940 (4,1,2,3) - nice lol
8. 00:44:895 (3,4) - I think you get the idea now.
9. 00:51:259 (1,2,1,2) - I don't think the NC here is necessary, but do what you want because it's just an NC. The world won't end. wanna keep nc because start of a new phrase
10. 00:54:213 (4,5,6,7) - Flip for flow from (3)? yea
11. For the first half of the kiai. maybe add some small jumps for stuff like 01:02:849 (5,1) - etc. because it'd be great to have a bit more emphasis in this section. ok
12. 01:11:713 (4,1,2) - This stacking is kind of inconsistent. Adjust (2) to be like (4,1)? yikes

[Insane]

1. 00:02:168 (1,2) - and 00:05:804 (1,2) - could be spaced the same. yea, did a few more spacing changes too
2. 00:03:077 (3,4,1) - That same build-up concept you were using in hard would be great here. Add more emphasis to the (1). You do this at 00:06:713 (3,4,1) - at least. sure
3. 00:08:531 (4,5) - reoccurring theme I guess. I don't really care if you want to keep this since it adds some flavor, but I figured I might as well mention it because others might mention it right? Anyways, this should technically be setup for 'nice jumps' but instead you use it for some lame stacking thing that doesn't really express the intensity in the drums... alright I'll stop there. Keep these as is because I like the consistency and it's a shame we don't see this as often anymore. <3
4. 00:12:168 (3,4) - and then you do this and ruin everything I just said.. So let's just cross that out... Anyways at least your kiai is consistent for it... or it better be... moving on.
5. 00:36:031 (5) - Should be spaced so the (4,6) gets more emphasis. You know what I mean. Actually why not just turn it into free PP? monkaS
6. 00:38:986 (2) - Not sure if this is following some sort of pattern, but this would flow better if it was off to the right more. ya
7. 00:54:895 (1) - That's some S-tier rumbling. yikes
8. 01:13:758 (9) - Circles instead? Fits with the 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - triplets because same hitsounds. ya
9. 01:16:485 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe could be a bit less linear and then sharp from (4,5) did some stuff with the rest of this combo and ctrl + g'd it so it flows better

tbh, I don't really have many problems with the map. most of these were just picky or inconsistent anyways. Just double-check the timing and we could probably push this forward as is.

SPOILER

1. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - imo still a bit much. I was expecting more in the range of like 1.6-1.7 max since every other note before and after this is the standard 1.2 DS. Kinda the same thing with 00:26:259 (2) - but whatever. Just wanted to mention this again if you wanted to nerf further.

1. 00:03:304 (4,1) - It's great and all that you did the build up idea.. but now this one is way further away than 00:06:940 (4,1) - is. I was expecting them to be a little more similar you know?

Lanturn wrote:

Timing point on easy is at 00:55:814 - instead of 00:55:804 - like the rest, though the 00:55:804 still sounds off. Did you actually fix the timing? Stuff still sounds off for me. like +20-30 off now.

SB\light2.png
SB\ring.png
These two files aren't being used in the SB anymore, so they can be removed.

Remove the unused .osb file. The one with the TV Size in it.

SPOILER

Anyways, I'm assuming you can see the text in the SB yourself? They aren't showing up for me since I'm in fallback, and I can't hop over to a newer build to check.

[Hard]

1. 00:22:168 (1,2,3,4) - imo still a bit much. I was expecting more in the range of like 1.6-1.7 max since every other note before and after this is the standard 1.2 DS. Kinda the same thing with 00:26:259 (2) - but whatever. Just wanted to mention this again if you wanted to nerf further.

[Insane]

1. 00:03:304 (4,1) - It's great and all that you did the build up idea.. but now this one is way further away than 00:06:940 (4,1) - is. I was expecting them to be a little more similar you know?

Nothing much else to say about the difficulties. It's just those unrankable things at the top that need fixing. and a confirmation that the SB lyrics and such are showing up for you since they aren't for me.

confirmation lyrics and text show for me

Sotarks wrote:

Hi,

Insane
00:03:541 (1) - How about muting this slider end, a bit too loud imo.
00:07:178 (1) - ^ do the same here too ye

01:12:859 (3,4,5) - I'd consider changing this overlap here for the sake of readability. I think its fine, the ar is high enough for it to be readable imo and since this is top diff I don't think it's that much of an issue
[]

That's all I have to say, SB and timing looks fine for me.
Good map.

Call me back,

1. 00:03:996 (1) - this sounds is prominent enough to put a hitsound on it, currently you do not have any. Other three difficulties have whistle with drum additions, by the way.
2. 00:38:087 (3,4) - spacing to circle (4) is too big if we compare that to the rest of the difficulty. Also, singer doesn't give much emphasis on that as well as instrumentals are not that prominent. And you may want to make spacing more equal for 00:38:087 (3,4,1) - because sound is more or less equal there, too.
3. 00:42:178 - finisher sound here is strong enough to give bigger spacing emphasis on that.
4. 00:46:723 (3,4) - also they seem like they should be stacked because it sounds like one stanza and you used to stack circles like these two.

Namki wrote:

Hello. Few things to mention before map gets ranked.

Lanturn has already said that but I cannot see the SB lyrics as well even in Stable version and MA says that these lyrics files are unused. We really need people to check that because for me there are no lyrics at all.
idk why some people can see lyrics and some can't, modding assistant doesn't bring this issue up for me so i dont rly know how i can fix it?

Insane

1. 00:03:996 (1) - this sounds is prominent enough to put a hitsound on it, currently you do not have any. Other three difficulties have whistle with drum additions, by the way. mb
2. 00:38:087 (3,4) - spacing to circle (4) is too big if we compare that to the rest of the difficulty. Also, singer doesn't give much emphasis on that as well as instrumentals are not that prominent. And you may want to make spacing more equal for 00:38:087 (3,4,1) - because sound is more or less equal there, too. i can nerf
3. 00:42:178 - finisher sound here is strong enough to give bigger spacing emphasis on that. no space in playfield and i wouldn't want to buff it so much that it would be massively spaced compared to the previous pattern anyway because of vocals reducing
4. 00:46:723 (3,4) - also they seem like they should be stacked because it sounds like one stanza and you used to stack circles like these two. ???? did you use the wrong time stamp? this pattern is intentionally different to 00:48:087 (2,3,4) - because the lyrics and drum patterning totally change

Myxomatosis wrote:

Disqualified for the SB issue. I have no idea how to fix this though, gotta look into it more in-depth later. For now, you could try to post in the Help forum to get some dev reaction (or a user who knows the solution).

Lanturn wrote:

@Sotarks, SB issues. Anyways, got confirmation that I can push this forward again. SB is still messed up a little in Fallback, but since it isn't supported anymore, this is a non-concern (my suffering). Double-check the SB on your end before qualifying again and we can all be happy.

Speaking of that, Happy Birthday Log Off Now.