1. Taikovic (4,78 stars, 2138 notes)

1. The start is quite consistent overall, but I've got to say 00:22:292 (1,8) - and 00:29:014 (37) - I guess you wanted to go for variety, but I think these sound better as k's.
2. 00:33:440 - 00:42:784 - you went a bit lazy here didn't you That part can be mapped as well, while adding a slider to emphasize the drumroll until the start.
3. 00:56:063 - 00:59:013 - I'm not saying this sounds bad (sounds good), but I suggest you removing some notes here to emphasize a slower pace (since here the vocals turn into whispers/echoes)
4. 01:15:079 - 01:18:686 - I suggest following a slower pace here (aka reducing note density) to let the saxo be heard, just dropping the suggestion
5. 01:25:243 - 01:46:227 - I think this fits perfect for a Kiai time
6. 01:47:702 (336) - 01:52:948 (365) - 02:11:309 (458) - Same suggestion as the beginning
7. 02:27:375 (548,549,550,551,552,553,554,555,556) - Hmmm... I can't hear clear 1/4 here, but I guess it is okay to do streams every so often
8. 02:28:194 - 02:38:686 - Another perfect time for Kiai I think
9. 02:49:505 - 03:09:997 - Same saxophone suggestion I gave a bit earlier
10. 03:10:161 - 03:31:145 - Another kiai suggestion
11. 04:44:587 - 05:05:571 - Yet another kiai suggestion
12. 05:30:653 (1925) - Same suggestion than in the beginning
13. 05:33:276 (1940) - whoop ^
14. 05:35:899 (1955) - ^

Raiden wrote:

Good morning Stefan. Mod as requested in my queue




Samuel disapproves HP and OD, 2perv4him

No but seriously, isn't HP6,9 a bit high for this length (specially considering how high the OD is as well)? (~_~) Like I told you at #taiko I agree about the HP, HP5 is enough. Leaving OD untouched.


[ Taikovic Inner Oni]

1. The start is quite consistent overall, but I've got to say 00:22:292 (1,8) - and 00:29:014 (37) - I guess you wanted to go for variety, but I think these sound better as k's. Changed.
2. 00:33:440 - 00:42:784 - you went a bit lazy here didn't you That part can be mapped as well, while adding a slider to emphasize the drumroll until the start. HOLD ON! I wouldn't have the problem to map this section with more notes and/or drumrolls but I perfered to follow the fade-out and the increasing emphasis (from 00:35:407 - ) so I hold it very simple.
3. 00:56:063 - 00:59:013 - I'm not saying this sounds bad (sounds good), but I suggest you removing some notes here to emphasize a slower pace (since here the vocals turn into whispers/echoes) Breaks there feels quite weird with the settings I use in the map.
4. 01:15:079 - 01:18:686 - I suggest following a slower pace here (aka reducing note density) to let the saxo be heard, just dropping the suggestion Removed note on 01:17:374 - , should be better now.
5. 01:25:243 - 01:46:227 - I think this fits perfect for a Kiai time I am trying to use the Kiai Time to emphasize the most important parts of the song which is the first "refrain" (01:04:259 - 01:15:079) and the 2nd half of the last (05:16:063 - 05:26:554). May changes over time but I won't do it for now.
6. 01:47:702 (336) - 01:52:948 (365) - 02:11:309 (458) - Same suggestion as the beginning I rather perfer to keep this untouched (and different).
7. 02:27:375 (548,549,550,551,552,553,554,555,556) - Hmmm... I can't hear clear 1/4 here, but I guess it is okay to do streams every so often Hum.. I can hear it clearly, starts at 02:26:718 but it feels smoother to have 02:26:964 - , 02:27:128 - and 02:27:292 - unmapped.
8. 02:28:194 - 02:38:686 - Another perfect time for Kiai I think ~
9. 02:49:505 - 03:09:997 - Same saxophone suggestion I gave a bit earlier Yep.
10. 03:10:161 - 03:31:145 - Another kiai suggestion ~~
11. 04:44:587 - 05:05:571 - Yet another kiai suggestion ~~~
12. 05:30:653 (1925) - Same suggestion than in the beginning Yo
13. 05:33:276 (1940) - whoop ^ did
14. 05:35:899 (1955) - ^ this

All these SV changes ;w;

Honestly the map is very well done, I don't think you'll need much help. I found some rhythms that I'd have mapped in another way, but your style fits the music perfectly, so I'm staying out of the way. Keep the good work up Stefan.

GL on the rank ╭( ･ㅂ･)و

xtrem3x wrote:

Request via Simple Taiko Modding Queue (M4M)

_____________________________________________________

General:

don = d
kat = k
Big Don = D
Big Kat = K

_____________________________________________________

Taikovic Inner Oni:

00:01:390 - Spinner until 00:07:866- (is a looong intro and these finish point starts other sound and is fine for finish)(?) I like to keep this blank.

00:35:407 - is better finish spinner in 00:42:948- (1 beat distance is better)(?) The actual point is to "end" at the sound on 00:42:784 - . However the spinner is shorter than expected since people tap faster than supposed, changed.

00:46:308 - Move to 00:46:372 I find the usage of kdd while on the cymbal sound pretty cool, won't change that.
00:46:964 - Move to 00:47:128- ^(is more consistent imo)

01:43:440 - Change to k (same pitch in vocal sound) Done.
02:09:669 - Same Sounds more consistent by holding kdkdk..
02:14:915 - Same ^
02:20:161 - Same ^

02:45:899 - is possible change these empty space (and notes) for ... This (red notes = D) (?) That sounds REALLY spammy, also the short 1/2 (?) is good here to lead in the 2nd half.

03:09:505 - Delete all notes except this note and 03:09:833- (no have sound for a stream .-.) Won't change for now. I agree that there is no sound except the voice but it fits well so I want to hold it for the moment.

03:38:849 - Change to k (same reason in 01:43:440- ) (note: in previous sequence from this point can be possible but have combination with BG Hit sounds and vocal, then discarded XD) Like previously said.
03:44:095 - Same ~

03:48:030 - Change to K (have cymbal) Good.

04:09:833 - Same situation with 02:45:899 ~

04:14:095 - Change to k (snare sound) Yeah, sounds weird without k
04:15:407 - Same k on 04:15:571 (1324) sounds much stronger than this one, won't add k.

04:38:931 - Delete (sounds weird a 5th here) Hmkaaaay.

04:59:833 - add note here or move next note to this point .-. Changed.

05:28:849 - Change to k (for variety in monotone color and focusing high sound) I perfer a lesser k usage here.
05:29:013 - Same ~
05:31:636 - Same ~
05:34:259 - Same ~

05:37:046 - is Questionable, no have sound for a big note but want finish song with a big note (or not?)... it ACTUALLY got a beat. That's fine here.

_____________________________________________________

1. 00:22:784 (4) - I'd suggest to change this one as a k ; the pitch is pretty simular to this one 00:22:948 (5) - ; and also, notes become more high pitched on this note.
2. some are simular, so if you changed this ^ ; here's the other : 00:24:096 (10,11) - 00:25:407 (18,19) - 00:26:719 (25,26) - 00:28:030 (33,34) - 00:30:653 (47,48) - 00:31:965 (54,55) - 01:48:030 (336,337) - 01:49:341 (344,345) - 01:50:653 (351,352) - 01:51:964 (359,360) - 01:53:276 (365,366) - 01:54:587 (373,374) - 01:55:899 (380,381) - 05:33:604 (1931,1932) - 05:34:916 (1939,1940) - 05:36:227 (1946,1947) -
3. 00:29:997 (43) - maybe just me, but I think changing this one as a k flow better.
4. 00:46:227 (20,21,22) - I'm not a fan of kdd on white tick. I'd say it's a bit overused but still ok.
5. 01:10:489 (51,52,53) - change this one as kdk ? this melody is simular to this one 01:07:866 (30,31,32) - & 01:13:112 (73,74,75) -
6. 01:13:604 (77,78,79,80,81) - I'd say ddkdk is better for the melody, but flow a bit weird with the other pattern ; so if you change it to ddkdk ; I'd also highly suggest to change this one 01:13:440 (76) - as a k.
7. 01:14:751 (87) - Maybe just me but this one as a D feel better.
8. 01:23:932 (155) - I think it'd be better to make this note different to this one 01:23:850 (154) - since 155 also have the trumpet sound ; so, maybe change 01:23:850 (154) - to a k
9. 04:22:210 (1377) - ^ I'd suggest the same thing for this pattern which are kinda simular, but for this one, it's to make difference with the vocal.
10. 01:32:784 - if you're following the vocal, I think it's kinda strange to skip this note. Maybe add a k
11. 01:38:194 (268) - change this one as a k ? I think it emphasize the next note which is a strong note.
12. 02:17:375 (490,491) - same reason as this one ^ ; change both note as k ?
13. 02:53:768 (740,741,742,743,744,745) - If you're following the trumpet, I think kkddk fit better since this note 02:54:095 (744) - is higher pitched than this one 02:54:259 (745) - .
14. 03:06:063 (835,836,837,838,839) - try kddkd ?
15. 03:09:506 (862,863,864,865,866,867,868) - I really don't like overmapping when there's only vocal 1/1. I'd highly suggest to only use 1/1 on this pattern.
16. 03:23:440 (980) - change this one as a k ? I think it flow better with the previous D
17. 04:17:374 (1336,1337,1338,1339,1340,1341) - instead of kdd kdd ; I think kkddk d sounds better.
18. 04:26:718 (1404,1405,1406) - how about kdk for the vocal ?
19. It might be just me, but I really don't like the kdd spam pattern on the last kiai.

Aloda wrote:

Hi! M4M here.

Taikovic Inner Oni

00:26:882 - I don't like the SV increase here as the song isn't really building at all at this point I kept it below 1.00x since it's kinda too fast for it, I like them how they are rn.

01:45:571 (313,314,315,316,317,318,319) - This is really awkward to read because of the SV changes. I suggest starting the SV decrease from 01:44:587 and making it more gradual. Yeah, I also had my doubts but it's apparently playable.

03:30:489 (1023,1024,1025,1026,1027,1028,1029) - Same as 01:45:571 ~

03:31:145 (1030) - I think this plays and sounds better as a normal note rather than a finisher It's okay for me.. I guess?

The gaps at 03:54:587 and 03:59:833 seen a little weird to me. Consider adding a d in each of them Added d on 03:54:587 - and changed 03:54:752 - to k

Solid map overall, very little that needs to be changed. Good luck!

LigerZero wrote:

no kudosu

tags added "sumijun 法界の火 fires of hokkai emotional skyscraper stage 6 boss theme 疒 comiket80 c80"

Crystallize wrote:

Don't mind the way that I'm listing what I say. :p

At the 04:14:49 aprox. stream,which is the "final boss" stream in terms of difficulty,Again you've started the stream with too much tension . After 04:15:17,the jumps fit well, but you have to fix that start. - I think its alright.

-You over-used the clap hitsounds ,the clapping rhythm is making the one in the song not be heard clearly. - Not really.

-At 00:23 and 00:25 ,I think that you used those sliders because of the echoes of those pattern end's and to create continuity,but they don't fit.You should end them like the ones at 00:28 and 00:31. - Nah, they fit.

-At 00:34:20 (the first stream), there is that alarm in the background that grows lowder as the stream goes on,so it has that feeling of building tension,but the two doubles that go right-left at the start of the stream make you feel that you already started with all the tension right of the bat. Instead of doing this ,you should remove those and start the stream right after the hyperdash at 00:34:00. - I wanted to keep this stream intense and interesting.

-At 01:16, the stream goes well , but the clusters of fruits feel too sudden if they start at 01:22,they should start around 01:23:00. - No. I have listened to this MANY times, and it starts here.

- 01:39:31, when the singer's voice stops at that point, you should do the same as you did at 03:24:15. - I want to have some variety.

Surono wrote:

fruit is sweet, diabetes...

aa... its moved to here, dem!1!!

edit:
dem sir, idk to do.

>Taikofix
rip OD 6.9 hard ripped

* 00:01:310 - why this deleted lool, I just comment longtimeago *blem my rip english longtimeago til now*. please if my words not clear don do anyting xd ( put K, strong sound! ) I came to the conclusion it annoys most of the people and you know how's the shit rolling. People don't want to enjoy the song but to smash their keyboard in parts. B)
* 00:32:621 - this is should consistent kat cuz its still similar with 00:29:998 - previous sound Fair point.
* 00:35:408 - aa... Have idea sir? `_J` It fits!
00:33:441 (60,61,62) - better as don cuz kat is unnecessary, 00:35:408 - here 4 don 1/2, 00:36:064 - 24 don 1/4, 00:38:031 - kat 24 1/4, 00:39:998 - and don again 24 notes ( needs increasing volume if you applied this for drum ). I decided to make them as k since the "high sound" fits better to it.
last 00:41:965 - Spinner |`_J´)J
thats looks interesting than boring spinner..
* 00:48:441 - don? looks need 3plet for this and 00:49:260 - this kat. thats vocal and drum seems fit with this Okay.
* 00:46:637 - change to don? drum really not stronk as ddkkd, ddkdd better for this fade drum. 00:47:949 - like u did this yo
* 00:51:883 - kat? drum start goes up I made some changes to have ddkdd here but yeah.
* 00:59:096 - kat for kkd pattern? also fits with vocal I'd rather go on 00:58:932 - to be consistent with your previous suggestion.
* 01:01:228 - this kat for drum start high? Following vocals here, no change.
* 01:03:605 - spinner end at here and 01:03:769 - dk 1/2 here? I find, that's not really necessary at all.
* 01:08:932 - I think this need kat since flow is better to hear kdddk sounds more logical imo.
* 01:09:506 - fill this finisher? I used to have a finisher here but decided to remove because of reasons.
* 01:15:572 (91,92) - why not swap this to follow that saxofon? looks better than follow that fade snare Nah.
* 01:19:424 - kat this for high saxofon? changed to kkddk
* 01:31:965 - I think this kat unnecessary for this vocal, kdk also already fit with 01:32:457 - this pattern imo I find it's pretty essential for the vocals here.
* 01:35:162 - same above, change to don? nope.
* 01:37:129 - kat? Nah, kdddk works well with my settings.
* 02:09:342 (438,439) - swap? this looks akward monocolor and the contrast Changed.
* 02:13:932 - kat and 02:14:588 (467,468) - same above? ~
* 02:49:424 - don for flow of saxofon? The 1/1 break here is more natural
* 03:22:047 - kat this? like previous suggestion ~
* 03:31:146 - from previous point about swap d k and 03:41:637 - from here you can keep them. just for interesting pattern and avoid for monocolor ~
* 04:03:932 (1240,1241,1242,1243,1244,1245) - tattuttattat tuttat~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* 04:13:359 - don? like previous suggestion ~
* 04:21:637 (1359,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364,1365,1366,1367) - kkkdkdkkd? Makes it more random than it is, prefer the kkddkdkdk style.
* 04:35:490 - and this not have really important instrument so this can be keep as kdddk lol yas
* 04:54:506 - don? like previous suggestion, also for 04:54:752 - more emphasize this drum ~
* 05:02:211 - kat? differ instrument with left kdddk That's fine, I already used this in the previous five minutes.
* 05:10:244 - kat, like previous. that flow fits imo nah.
* 05:10:818 - fill finisher? Would be too dense if you ask me but I get ya point.
* 05:14:998 - ~
many nazi things.. cuz my english bad lol

but this overall map like.. had monocolor patterns so thats like give boring to play, but sv instead for avoid boring so yeah fine. but really this needed variaton if theres has differ sound imo

GLuck sir `_L`

1. I personally would suggest HP 4 since its a marathon, but this is only my opinion :p.
2. 

1. 00:23:277 - I think, since you're mapping the piano, you should add a note here, this without a note sounds awkward imo.
2. 00:28:523 - ^
3. 00:46:391 - Personally, dddkd sounds better for this kind of sound, 00:46:637 - this note here is the one that sounds the highest too.
4. 00:47:703 - ^
5. 00:48:359 - Make this one a dkd to make it fit more with the music and the vocals.
6. 00:51:637 - Same thing with the dddkd.
7. 00:52:949 - ^
8. 01:06:719 - Try making this one a k, you can hear the melody getting higher everytime and it goes down at 01:07:047 -
9. 01:11:965 - ^
10. 01:47:211 - Same thing as the first point.
11. 01:52:457 - ^
12. 02:03:932 - Personally, I think k d d k d fits better here, following better the piano and the drums.
13. 02:27:539 - Have you tried making this pattern kdkkddk? I think it fits better with the vocal.
14. 02:43:932 - Don't know about you, but I think D kkk D kkk D kkk D kkk D sounds better for this.
15. 02:46:555 - Here you could do the exact opposite, making it K ddd K ddd K ddd K ddd K
16. 03:13:441 - Don't really think this sounds as good as it might sound. Try kkddkdkkd, I think it fits better for this kind of melody.
17. 03:32:129 - You know what I will say about this, follow the first point :p.
18. 03:34:752 - ^
19. 03:37:375 - ^
20. 04:07:867 - Same thing I suggested before.
21. 04:10:490 - ^
22. 04:35:900 - This sounds way better as kdddk imo.

1. Check your kiai times. They look unsnapped.
2. Fix the Bugged SV.
3. Set a consistent preview point.
4. Preferably change "bgbgbg.png" to "bgbgbg.jpg", cuz y'know, it saves space.

1. 00:44:752 (9,10,11) - / 00:49:998 (47,48,49) - Since these patterns are very similar both with the lyrics and with the instruments, I would prefer if they're mapped the same way. Either 00:50:162 (49) - switch that to k or switch 00:44:916 (11) - that to d.
2. 02:26:228 (533) - This isn't good position for a finisher in my opinion. Other finishers, such as 02:25:572 - here, have clearly audible cymbals in the music, but there isn't a cymbal noise 02:26:228 - here, only a drum. Unless you want to emphasize that drum, I recommend you remove the finisher from this position. If you would like, consider removing 02:26:801 (537) - this and adding a finisher 02:26:719 (536) - there.
3. 02:51:473 (718) - I recommend switching this to k because the pitch is more similar to 02:51:637 (719) - this than 02:51:309 (717) - that.
4. 02:54:424 (741) - Similar to what I said about the finisher 02:26:228 (533) - here, it's just my opinion though.
5. 03:02:293 (799,800) - I recommend removing (100) and adding a finisher to (799). I think you understand what I mean now and probably you disagree lol but either way I'll stop with that. :3
6. 05:05:572 - / 05:15:408 - Since this is the same as 01:04:260 - / 01:14:752 - this, I encourage you to make it kiai time. It's fine if you don't though.

Jonawaga wrote:

Hello, M4M~!
[~(Ai)Mod~]

1. Check your kiai times. They look unsnapped.
2. Fix the Bugged SV.
3. Set a consistent preview point.
4. Preferably change "bgbgbg.png" to "bgbgbg.jpg", cuz y'know, it saves space.

[~Mod~]

1. 00:44:752 (9,10,11) - / 00:49:998 (47,48,49) - Since these patterns are very similar both with the lyrics and with the instruments, I would prefer if they're mapped the same way. Either 00:50:162 (49) - switch that to k or switch 00:44:916 (11) - that to d.
2. 02:26:228 (533) - This isn't good position for a finisher in my opinion. Other finishers, such as 02:25:572 - here, have clearly audible cymbals in the music, but there isn't a cymbal noise 02:26:228 - here, only a drum. Unless you want to emphasize that drum, I recommend you remove the finisher from this position. If you would like, consider removing 02:26:801 (537) - this and adding a finisher 02:26:719 (536) - there.
3. 02:51:473 (718) - I recommend switching this to k because the pitch is more similar to 02:51:637 (719) - this than 02:51:309 (717) - that. Since 02:51:637 (719) - is significantely stronger than (718) I didn't change to k, I want to make sure the sax on (719) is emphasized properly.
4. 02:54:424 (741) - Similar to what I said about the finisher 02:26:228 (533) - here, it's just my opinion though.
5. 03:02:293 (799,800) - I recommend removing (100) and adding a finisher to (799). I think you understand what I mean now and probably you disagree lol but either way I'll stop with that. :3 100? :^) Changed anyways.
6. 05:05:572 - / 05:15:408 - Since this is the same as 01:04:260 - / 01:14:752 - this, I encourage you to make it kiai time. It's fine if you don't though. I haven't set this part on Kiai to increase the impact of 05:16:064 - 05:26:555 - but I understand what you mean. No change howevber.

Overall nice job with this map~!! Have a well-earned star!

BoberOfDarkness wrote:

So I finally manage to start working on that

CTB

1. 00:36:555 (7,8) - I feel you should't place hyperdash to this note, I would moved them around 00:36:391 (5,6) - and then place hyper from (8) to 00:36:719 (1) - - Fiddled around a little and made another type of hyper.
2. 02:09:834 (2,4) - I don't like idea of those slow sliders here - They fit the vocals.

Thats all from me right now

1. 00:34:096 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the curve here looks really weird with the previous pattern, moving them to the right of 00:34:014 (8) - looks much better
2. 00:43:277 - I think this section here needs a bit of rework, mostly due to very long hypers with antiflow (00:44:424 (6,1) -) but also generally strong hypers in a rather calm part (00:45:736 (6,1) -). This is a calm part of the map and I think you can nerf it a bit to fit the song better. I think after 00:51:146 - though, the longer distances fit better due to the intensity building up.
3. 00:53:769 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - And for this, I think you can keep the same switching 1/2 and 1/4 pattern you used in the previous part, doesn't make sense to me that a more intense part of the song plays calmer than the calm part of the song
4. 01:00:982 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - idk what i feel about these tbh...
5. 01:03:769 (2) - I'd tilt this to the left to emphasise the strong beats in the music better
6. 01:04:916 (1) - 01:06:555 (1) - 01:07:539 (1) - why are these combos so short??
7. 01:06:473 - 01:09:096 - unmapped triplets that you for some reason chose to map here 01:11:637 (5,6,1) - and here 01:13:932 (1,2,3) -
8. 01:09:833 (3,4,1) - I understand the usage of the previous double hypers cause high pitch but this one doesn't make sense to me, please remove hyper between (3,4)
9. 01:14:424 (3,4,1) - way way way way too long distance, especially with (1) being almost entirely vertical pls nerf
10. 01:17:375 (1,1,1) - 01:18:195 (1,1) - 01:18:687 (1,1,1) - etc... ok what the fuck is this nc'ing?
11. 01:23:932 (1) - ehhhh you follow vocals other places (01:43:605 (1,1,1) - ) so why ignore it here?
12. 01:25:244 (1) - 01:26:555 (1,2,3) - 01:27:867 (1) - 01:32:949 (1) - 01:37:047 (1,2) - etc you’re switching way too much between following vocal and not, try to be consistent about it.
13. Furthermore I’d discuss the usage of hypers, what is the purpose of having hyper here 01:25:244 (1,2) - ? There is literally no distinct sound on (2) to support a hyper. Here 01:25:900 (3,1,2) - you at least have vocals but I still don’t think they fit due to the pitch being so low. While here 01:29:670 (3) - the strong beat is on a slider end. This issue runs through most of the map
14. 01:56:719 - 02:07:211 - And here the density suddenly drops from all 1/2’s to 1/1 rhythm ignoring the piano completely which feels very very odd to play
15. 02:45:572 (2,3,1,2,3) - holy wtf this is so overdone
16. 03:31:146 - 03:41:637 - I enjoyed this part though, I feel this part compliments the music very very well compared to the rest of the map
17. 04:50:818 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - holy that's a lot of nc's in a row LOL
18. 05:04:260 (1,1,1) - 1/8 starts already here

xfraczynho wrote:

Here I am finally xD

[General]

1. Well as I said Preview timing could be really nicer, the silence is a little long when selecting so it's a little confusing and not that hype. If you want to hold it then 00:00:982 - is really better imo :p (remember to change the ctb aswell in that case) Uh, I am actually curious why I have placed it so damn early at all. lmao

[Taikovic Inner Oni]

1. I can agree if you don't like it since it's personal but 00:01:310 - D could be interesting if you don't have problem with making people wait for next note xD Oh believe me, I actually had a note here but people were like ";; stop doing that" so I removed the note just for people's sake.
2. 00:24:588 (14,15,16) - these three kats sounds a little exagerated so 00:24:588 (14) - don could fit better I use kat for the reason of emphasizing the piano well.
3. 00:27:211 (29) - 00:29:834 (44) - ^ ^
4. 00:33:441 (62,63,64,1) - this doesn't make sense at all for me since 00:33:441 - you're mapping the piano then suddenly 00:35:408 - an spinner to emphasize the background sound that is coming from 00:33:769 - , deciding for one of them should be better I agree at some point that the sudden density change - or rather focus change - isn't everybody's taste but I found that cool from the very begin and I don't want to change it near end.
   It does make sense but it's nothing someone needs to like purely from the concept.
5. 00:53:605 (74) - kat on here so you make a mirror from 00:53:113 (69,70,71) - and follows the kick better, also emphasize on next D It'd only make sense if I would also map 00:53:687 - with a kat note so kdkkD could indeed cover the kicks at 00:53:605 - / 00:53:687 - well.
6. 00:56:965 - 00:58:277 - you could add a note on them, there's a sound that I feel could be really mapped imo they are not so significant to have them mapped with objects.
7. 01:02:457 (146,147) - ctrl+g cause pitches? Yeah, thought the same while playing. Thanks for strengthing that feeling. :3c
8. 01:19:998 (121) - I don't feel like this really needs a big note tbh I probably love it waaaay too much to work with big notes but I like this one a lot so no change.
9. 01:24:588 (157) - ^ same mmm That on the other hand sounds plausible to change it as simple note. At least it doesn't sound that significant that should be different from 01:23:932 (155) - (which is a simple kat as well)
10. 01:30:654 (200) - 01:30:326 - fits better for the break imo wh.. this is indeed a weird break spot, changed.
11. 02:35:900 - I think isn't that dense if you add a note on here, noticed you wanted to break on here but could be enough with 02:39:178 - It isn't dense at all but I feel it works out better to skip that beat to strenghten the voice here a bit.
12. 02:54:424 (741) - same about big note usage, by deleting I don't hear anything that strong Song itself doesn't but how I use the finisher by having them consistent after each 16/1 makes them viable.
13. 03:09:506 (858,859,860,861,862,863,864) - I highly suggest to delete this stream, is reaaaaaaaaaally overmapped; there isn't any sound else than relax voice Man.. I really hate to remove that stream but I guess nothing else is left for me. Removed the entire stream.
14. 03:15:244 - add k? Moved 03:15:572 - instead, to be consistent with 01:30:654 (200) - .
15. 03:59:834 - same as above, add? ~
16. 04:18:359 (1336) - same about finisher usage ~
17. 04:34:752 (1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466) - this really feels weird, probably 04:34:752 (1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456) - dkddk d on these could fit better changed to kkddk instead.
18. 04:38:932 (1486,1487) - delete these cause no sound on there and makes a good space for next D :p buh-byeee
19. 04:49:670 - k too? Yeah, something like that.
20. 04:54:506 (1601,1603) - delete aswell? a lil overmapped imo I used kkddkkd for the first two refrain as well, doesn't look wrong to me either way.
21. 04:55:736 (1612,1613,1614,1615,1616,1617) - dkddk d too? aye, applied my changes here.

Other than that seems reaaally nice for me, you choiced a good song made a good job on there :p
Let me know when you apply it, anyways I'd like to read 1 more comment specially on some finishers usage and some parts that are a lil overmapped

1. I'd recommend you set the preview point at around 01:14:998 - or something, I saw you were aware that the preview point was kinda early so maybe this is a nice spot (or 04:13:359 - for the same purpose but avoiding playing the whole song in the preview w)

1. 02:13:769 (465,466) - delete first, change second to k. This way you make a little more emphasis on the vocals while also making 02:14:096 (467) - more notorious as the prominent drum sound in this pattern. If it wasn't for vocals, I'd also delete 02:14:916 (471) - to make the pattern feel better on itself.
2. 02:16:391 (480) - I'd say move this to 02:16:555 - and change it to k. Better drum following and a bit better transition between a pattern and the other.
3. 02:21:637 (507) - (mostly personal suggestion, as I don't really like much those "k d d d d k") delete this note and not necessary but 02:21:801 (508) - could become a k
4. 02:27:211 (540) - The song doesn't really call for this to be a finisher, as it instead goes for the trills that start at 02:26:883 - . This may be a little harder than you want for this diff, so I don't think a long deathstream starting from 02:26:883 is the solution here.
5. 02:54:424 (741) - that doesn't really need to be a finisher
6. 03:05:736 (826) - (personal suggestion, don't really like kdkdk so I'd understand if you don't agree on this one) maybe you could delete this note so that 03:05:900 (828) - is better represented as the main snare here
7. 03:39:998 - starting here, the drums go like 1/2 "dk kd" so probably it'd be nice if you did that aswell
8. 04:00:818 (1216,1217,1218,1221,1222,1223,1226,1227,1228) - to make a bit of variance between these, maybe you could make them "ddk dkk ddkkd" (also personal suggestion in case a bit of variance here weighs more than consistency). In any case, I really see the last ddk as a ddkkd working perfectly so at least consider that one
9. 04:48:441 (1545,1546) - how about a little CTRL+G here for a slightly nice pattern?

-Kazu- wrote:

damn at this point it's really hard to point stuff that really matters, a lot of good modders were here x_x

[General]

1. I'd recommend you set the preview point at around 01:14:998 - or something, I saw you were aware that the preview point was kinda early so maybe this is a nice spot (or 04:13:359 - for the same purpose but avoiding playing the whole song in the preview w) This is me, being individual and I already decided to stay with the current preview point.

[Taikovic Inner Oni]

1. 02:13:769 (465,466) - delete first, change second to k. This way you make a little more emphasis on the vocals while also making 02:14:096 (467) - more notorious as the prominent drum sound in this pattern. If it wasn't for vocals, I'd also delete 02:14:916 (471) - to make the pattern feel better on itself. Applied to the first point, made consistency changes as well.
2. 02:16:391 (480) - I'd say move this to 02:16:555 - and change it to k. Better drum following and a bit better transition between a pattern and the other. Cool.
3. 02:21:637 (507) - (mostly personal suggestion, as I don't really like much those "k d d d d k") delete this note and not necessary but 02:21:801 (508) - could become a k Applied to the first point.
4. 02:27:211 (540) - The song doesn't really call for this to be a finisher, as it instead goes for the trills that start at 02:26:883 - . This may be a little harder than you want for this diff, so I don't think a long deathstream starting from 02:26:883 is the solution here.
5. 02:54:424 (741) - that doesn't really need to be a finisher removed~
6. 03:05:736 (826) - (personal suggestion, don't really like kdkdk so I'd understand if you don't agree on this one) maybe you could delete this note so that 03:05:900 (828) - is better represented as the main snare here Well.. I indeed don't like that point. I find kdkdk pretty.
7. 03:39:998 - starting here, the drums go like 1/2 "dk kd" so probably it'd be nice if you did that aswell yap
8. 04:00:818 (1216,1217,1218,1221,1222,1223,1226,1227,1228) - to make a bit of variance between these, maybe you could make them "ddk dkk ddkkd" (also personal suggestion in case a bit of variance here weighs more than consistency). In any case, I really see the last ddk as a ddkkd working perfectly so at least consider that one Used ddk kkddk ddk instead.
9. 04:48:441 (1545,1546) - how about a little CTRL+G here for a slightly nice pattern? nice one

though nothing really was slightly wrong for me to point out x_x This should have been ranked since years wwww ☆☆☆☆☆