Hello~ I'm here to mod some CTB diffs
[Rew's Cup]
[Rew's Cup]
- I think HP 5 or 5.5 is more appropriate to this song instead of 6 that is a little high.
- "Widescreen Support" is checked. Since this mapset doesn't have a SB, you should cancel it.
- 00:26:584 (2,1,2,3) - I think this kind of patterns is improper to use in Cup, maybe just follow the vocal here?
- 00:56:045 (3) - The flow will be better and smoother if you make this slider more horizontal toward the left, to connect the previous patterns.
- 01:00:536 (1) - The vocal here is sleek, so I think it's good to make this silder into ) shape. And to avoid the dash, maybe try moving 01:01:254 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - all to x:178, the patterns will not be ruined if you do that. Looks like this.
- 00:11:674 (1,2,3) - The distance between (1) and (2) is too large for no dash, I think? Also in my opinion, the distance between (2) and (3) is too big for no dash, too small for dash, and I prefer use no dash here. So maybe move (1) to x:272, and (2) to x:256 ?
- 00:33:231 (1,2) - The vocal at (2) is the highest in this part, so I think it's proper to use dash between (1) and (2) as well. And maybe remove some dashes before?
- 00:49:578 (2,3) - Two vocal sounds here are both very strong, maybe make (2) more horizontal toward the right, as you did at 00:38:081 (2,3) - that has the same vocal beat.
- 00:50:835 (2) - Then make this one more vertical, to make the strong vocal mentioned above (00:49:578 (2,3) - ) more highlighted. I think this can help players distinguish the strong beat/vocal from the weak one.
- 01:08:620 (3,1) - Move these more right, like to x:208? I think the distance between the previous patterns is too large.
- 01:10:955 (2) - Maybe replace this slider with two notes? Because I think that during 01:10:775 - and 01:11:853 - could be considered to be a group, and each timepoints in this group has a very clear and strong single sound. So I think it's more proper to use notes instead of slider here. Sorry if this is strange ;w;
- 01:12:033 (1,2,3) - The sounds here is clearly different from the previous one, I think. So maybe make some difference in patterns. Like move them to x:352?
- 01:15:986 (4) - I think it's good to more this completely vertical, in my opinion, only a little tilted is a bit strange.
- 00:03:410 (1,2) - A little strange because the vocal here is stronger than the one at 00:01:434 (1,2,3) -, but the distance is smaller. maybe move 00:03:770 (2) - a little left, like x:32, to follow the strong vocal more properly?
- 00:10:057 (4) - Since it's the end of a part which has the very strong vocal, it deserves larger distance, so maybe move this note to x:112? And this will not ruin the patterns.
- 00:11:674 (1) - To connect with the previous slider, I think it's okay to make this slider into ) shape as well, also the flow will be smoother in my opinion.
- 00:14:728 (6) - There's a little strange with this note. Due to the beat here, it's better to create a pause here, I think it's good to remove it, as you did at 00:12:752 -. If you take my advice, then move 00:14:548 (5) - to x:192 or what, to make the flow reasonable.
- 00:24:428 (4) - In this case, a note at almost the center between two sliders but not at the precise center is a bit strange I think. Maybe move it to the accurate center to make it more good-looking while playing? Or just move it much closer to the previous/next slider?
- 00:27:482 (4,5,6,7,8) - Good patterns but, to make patterns look better while playing, could you make them be symmetrical to x-axis? Looks like this.
- 00:28:380 (2,3,4,5,6) - Same as above. Really hope you could fix that. Also at these points by follows: 00:34:129 (3,4,5,6,7) -, 00:39:877 (3,4,5,6,7) -, 00:51:374 (3,4,5,6,7) -. ;w;;
- 00:31:434 (4,1) - The distance between these two objects should be larger to make dash, because the sound at (1) is much stronger than the one at (4). It's a little strange if there's merely very small distance, I think.
- 01:03:410 (1,2,3) - Same issue as 00:24:428 -, but here I think moving the note (2) closer to (3) is better, to emphasize the strong beat that shows that it's closer to the end.
- 01:06:285 (1,2,3) - I think the flow will be more good-looking and smoother if you make the distances among four timepoints all the same, like this. You can see that the start of the slider and the end of the slider, has the same length distance with the rest ones.
- 01:07:003 (4,5,6) - Here as well, also to make the movement at 01:06:823 (3) - be reasonable if you take my suggestion. I'd move them all to a little left, looks like this.
- 01:16:345 (1) - It's better to put this spinner at 01:16:524 - instead of here, because the gap now is too close I think.
- AR/OD is too high I think? This song doesn't deserves that high AR/OD, 9.2 or 9.3 is enough in my opinion.
- "Widescreen Support" is checked. Since this mapset doesn't have a SB, you should cancel it.
- 00:01:075 (4) - Try a none-reverse ) shape slider instead of a reverse slider? Here's no sound at 00:01:255 -.
- 00:05:027 (3,4) - The distance between the end of the previous slider and the next one should be larger I think. Maybe put (4) at x:224?
- 00:07:003 (4) - To make the flow looks better while playing, I think it's good to put this note at the accurate center between two sliders, or put it much closer to the previous slider to distinguish the emphasis of the strong sound at 00:07:183 -.
- 00:10:955 (1,2,3,4) - The consecutive Hdashes couldn't emphasize the point that truly needs emphasized, I think. In this case, the "truly needs emphasized" point is at 00:11:674 -, and 00:11:584 - should use Hdash. So, I prefer you make (1), (2), and (3) much closer, like this. And it will look like this when playing. This is not only to emphasize the beat accurately, but also to make the map more interesting, the consecutive 1/4 Hdashes will up the star rate severely, however, it's very easy to catch, isn't it?
- 00:22:452 (2,3,4,5) - Same here, I think this is good, only the end of (5) has Hdash. Also your Chorus part is very hard, if you take my suggestion, this even could help the emphasis of Chorus much stronger, I think.
- 01:03:410 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I'm very fond of this part, I love this, good job!
- 01:08:081 (2,3) - The sound at (2) is stronger than the one at (3), maybe make (2) more horizontal, and (3) more vertical?
- 01:13:291 (3) - I have listened carefully with 25% speed, this sounds you followed here only appears two times. So I suggest that you use only an 1/8 slider without any extends.
- 01:13:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - To follow the weaker and weaker sounds as time going, it's good to make the distance smaller and smaller as well. Maybe like this?