Surono wrote:

catatan:
tolong buat para GD kalau mau kasih update diff coba kirim lewat push biar memudahkan si owner untuk nyalinnya seperti si Alsty, makasih kawen2.

Rivals_7 wrote:

Surono wrote:

catatan:
tolong buat para GD kalau mau kasih update diff coba kirim lewat push biar memudahkan si owner untuk nyalinnya seperti si Alsty, makasih kawen2.

y aja

Mod buat diff aing mendi ey

Surono wrote:

01:05:655 (65655|0,65655|3,65701|1,65746|2,65792|3) - 01:11:326 (71326|0,71326|3,71371|2,71417|1,71463|0) - 1/6s #blamevalen u dem | ????????? cacad peniru malah nyalahin gw


catatan:
tolong buat para GD kalau mau kasih update diff coba kirim lewat push biar memudahkan si owner untuk nyalinnya seperti si Alsty, makasih kawen2. | klik quote > delete [box=][code] dan segala embel"nya > ctrl + a > done

kalo pake puush kadang masalah sama unicode (+ mager aplot)

Valentrixe wrote:

Surono wrote:

01:05:655 (65655|0,65655|3,65701|1,65746|2,65792|3) - 01:11:326 (71326|0,71326|3,71371|2,71417|1,71463|0) - 1/6s #blamevalen u dem | ????????? cacad peniru malah nyalahin gw >:"V dasr pnyezat. tydack lezat nggghhhhh


catatan:
tolong buat para GD kalau mau kasih update diff coba kirim lewat push biar memudahkan si owner untuk nyalinnya seperti si Alsty, makasih kawen2. | klik quote > delete [box=][code] dan segala embel"nya > ctrl + a > done

kalo pake puush kadang masalah sama unicode (+ mager aplot) cct,. salin isi diff itu gampang. ctrl a paste.. aku ctrl a di browser malah kena semua >:C kalau maslah sama unicode ntar aku benerin.. males tarikkkkk mhxxxx mos kalau diforum. *knp mager upload, kan ada shortcut*

AchsanLovers wrote:

yaudah random mod

mod didalam ~

[General]

- check aimod di diff alsty (kebeedaan judul)

- check widescreen support in all diff (gw check diff hitam lainnya masih aktif) lunya ga pake sb ngapaen pake ni

- beda sr last diff sama diff si valen cuman 0.12 -__-

- nyemirrrrrrrrrr :v

tbh mau ngemod taiko tapi gak tau gimana caranya mahlum ccd maen taiko :v

Colomn : 1>4

[arc's Hyper]

banned ? :v
OD / HP : 7,5 ?

- 00:06:204 (6204|1) - move to col 1 ? for balance hand //no pls, dis is balanced d00d3

- 00:12:789 - mungkin ena nya dibuat gini :3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7543458 //no, 00:12:789 (12789|3,12881|2,12972|1,13063|0) - 1 pitch, 00:13:155 (13155|3,13246|1,13338|2,13429|0) - another pitch

- 00:26:509 (26509|1) - move to col 3 ? //00:26:326 (26326|1,26509|1) - 1pitch

entar lanjutin dah, baterai mifi sekarat :v udah mlz ngelanjutin :v

good luck ~~~~~
NYemirrrrrr

btw mutual pls

Surono wrote:

catatan:
tolong buat para GD kalau mau kasih update diff coba kirim lewat push biar memudahkan si owner untuk nyalinnya seperti si Alsty, makasih kawen2.

Abraxos wrote:

Surono wrote:

disable widescreen support in all diffs unless you are planning to make a storyboard for this chart thx for reminded * orz *

*SV boop*

[val's something another, jesus christ, why are there like 5 "another" difficulties in this set]
00:10:960 - This transition from .8x to 1x is about as smooth as sandpaper because you pretty much smushed the entire transition into the last 7 measures of the section. You didn't even start it on a downbeat at 00:10:594 - which would have made this somewhat better. I dislike slowjams in general, so I would recommend scrapping it, but if you do want to keep it, I'd try and start a transition here instead, with values like this

1. 00:12:789 - 00:12:881 - 00:12:972 - 00:13:063 - .7x or something
2. 00:12:835 - 00:12:926 - 00:13:018 - 00:13:109 - 1.3x assuming you used .7x above to average an SV of 1x
3. 00:13:155 - 00:13:246 - 00:13:338 - 00:13:429 - .6x or something slower to get a larger effect
4. 00:13:201 - 00:13:292 - 00:13:384 - 00:13:475 - 1.4x assuming above SV was used to average 1x

00:24:496 - Good rule of thumb is to try and make your SV sequences average 1x throughout so that it's easier to read for the player. In this case, you need to change the 1.2x SVs to 1.9x to even out with the .1x SV since 1.9 + .1 = 2 and the sequence is 2 units (1/4 snaps, count the spaces) long, so 2 / 2 = 1 :thinking:
00:24:954 - I would rather you start the SV sequence on the downbeat at 00:24:862 - instead for easier predictability since the player will probably expect it to be at the end of the LN hold.
00:25:045 - or 00:25:137 - Relating to the above, you can't just have a .7x SV unaccompanied by a speed up or bump at the end. Well, I mean you can, but the player is going to be expecting a speed up to follow after the slowjam. So, assuming you switch the order of the 1.2x and .1x SV at 00:24:496 - (start with .1x, then move to 1.2x), what you can do is this

1. 00:24:862 - .7x
2. 00:25:137 - 1.9x because 4 - (0.7 x 3) = 1.9, with the 4 coming from the number of units used, in this case 4 as it spans 4 1/4 spaces (totaling 1 beat

Here's a badly drawn, needs more jpg visual explanation


00:30:716 - K, so same stuff I mentioned above here. Because the sequence is 4 units long (1/4 snap), and the starting SV is .6, then 00:30:990 - should be 2.2x because 4 - (0.6 x 3) = 2.2
00:31:082 - Seeing as you attempt another SV here, I'd rather you start with a lower value, like .6 again, and then make 00:31:173 - 1.4x to average 1x.

00:36:570 - See above what I wrote for the values here as it's a repeat
00:42:423 - ^
00:48:277 - ^

00:57:423 - 00:58:155 - I actually have no idea what you're trying to achieve here with these SVs. Like, it's just a random 1.2x speed up for those notes, and the emphasis actually comes in on 00:57:972 - , not 00:58:155 - which makes it even more confusing because you're literally accenting nothing here

00:59:984 - Here is where I suggest you do away with the slow SVs at here, 01:00:076 - 01:00:167 - , and instead just use a bump at 01:00:259 - , like 1.9 or something because the math is hard and im too lazy to figure out the value.

01:45:716 - Basically what I said above. Just do here what you've done in the past and use a slow + speed up instead, without trying to gradually increase speed. If you do still want to gradually increase the speed, you'd just need to add up all the numbers and stuff to find out the values you need or whatever. So like, let's say here you're using 1/4 as a unit. 01:45:716 - to 01:46:448 - is 8 units. 01:46:448 - to 01:46:631 - is 2. 01:46:631 - to 01:46:813 - is 2. and so on. actually double that, unit is 1/8 cause that's the smallest
Basically, it'd work out like this:
{(0.4 x 16) + (0.6 x 4) + (0.7 x 4) + (0.8 x 2) + (0.85 x 2) + 0.9 + 1 + 1.1 + 1.2 + 1.3} / 24
20.4 / 24 = 0.85x is the average scroll speed of that entire measure. Basically, try and plug in numbers to make that 1x.

and so on what I've said

Protastic101 wrote:

widescreen support literally doesn't matter if it's checked or not if you don't have a storyboard why do people still point this out aaaaaaaaaaa

Protastic101 wrote:

[val's something another, jesus christ, why are there like 5 "another" difficulties in this set]
00:10:960 - This transition from .8x to 1x is about as smooth as sandpaper because you pretty much smushed the entire transition into the last 7 measures of the section. You didn't even start it on a downbeat at 00:10:594 - which would have made this somewhat better. I dislike slowjams in general, so I would recommend scrapping it, but if you do want to keep it, I'd try and start a transition here instead, with values like this

1. 00:12:789 - 00:12:881 - 00:12:972 - 00:13:063 - .7x or something
2. 00:12:835 - 00:12:926 - 00:13:018 - 00:13:109 - 1.3x assuming you used .7x above to average an SV of 1x
3. 00:13:155 - 00:13:246 - 00:13:338 - 00:13:429 - .6x or something slower to get a larger effect
4. 00:13:201 - 00:13:292 - 00:13:384 - 00:13:475 - 1.4x assuming above SV was used to average 1x

Protastic101 wrote:

00:24:954 - I would rather you start the SV sequence on the downbeat at 00:24:862 - instead for easier predictability since the player will probably expect it to be at the end of the LN hold.
00:25:045 - or 00:25:137 - Relating to the above, you can't just have a .7x SV unaccompanied by a speed up or bump at the end. Well, I mean you can, but the player is going to be expecting a speed up to follow after the slowjam. So, assuming you switch the order of the 1.2x and .1x SV at 00:24:496 - (start with .1x, then move to 1.2x), what you can do is this

1. 00:24:862 - .7x
2. 00:25:137 - 1.9x because 4 - (0.7 x 3) = 1.9, with the 4 coming from the number of units used, in this case 4 as it spans 4 1/4 spaces (totaling 1 beat

Here's a badly drawn, needs more jpg visual explanation
*cute_drawing_from_prot*

well technically your calculation is correct, but the outcome effect isn't suitable for the situation. the speed up effect you suggest is simply too rough (and even harder to press imo). since i'm following the vocal for the effect, it will be better to use slow approach effect

also comment from Lenfried-:


as he said speed up in there doesn't necessary as it can trip up the player
so i'll just use slow approach in here

Protastic101 wrote:

00:30:716 - K, so same stuff I mentioned above here. Because the sequence is 4 units long (1/4 snap), and the starting SV is .6, then 00:30:990 - should be 2.2x because 4 - (0.6 x 3) = 2.2

again technically your calculation is correct but 2.2 speed is too fast, almost like teleportation. even if i'm using 0.7 as base, the speed up still at 1.9 which is still pretty fast, so i'll just stick with my current sv

00:31:082 - Seeing as you attempt another SV here, I'd rather you start with a lower value, like .6 again, and then make 00:31:173 - 1.4x to average 1x.

you created pause effect in here with that sv and that make it harder to press, the note become fall suddenly after bump sv which will trip up the player, its againts my intention as i'm put x0.75 there to smoothen the fall and x1.50 to keep the distance balanced

00:36:570 - See above what I wrote for the values here as it's a repeat
00:42:423 - ^
00:48:277 - ^

00:59:984 - Here is where I suggest you do away with the slow SVs at here, 01:00:076 - 01:00:167 - , and instead just use a bump at 01:00:259 - , like 1.9 or something because the math is hard and im too lazy to figure out the value.

i don't want to use bump in here since there aren't any particular sound that suit with bump effect, i'm trying to make the approach as smooth as possible in here

01:45:716 - Basically what I said above. Just do here what you've done in the past and use a slow + speed up instead, without trying to gradually increase speed. If you do still want to gradually increase the speed, you'd just need to add up all the numbers and stuff to find out the values you need or whatever. So like, let's say here you're using 1/4 as a unit. 01:45:716 - to 01:46:448 - is 8 units. 01:46:448 - to 01:46:631 - is 2. 01:46:631 - to 01:46:813 - is 2. and so on. actually double that, unit is 1/8 cause that's the smallest
Basically, it'd work out like this:
{(0.4 x 16) + (0.6 x 4) + (0.7 x 4) + (0.8 x 2) + (0.85 x 2) + 0.9 + 1 + 1.1 + 1.2 + 1.3} / 24
20.4 / 24 = 0.85x is the average scroll speed of that entire measure. Basically, try and plug in numbers to make that 1x

and so on what I've said

its the transition SV, so basically you use wrong formula on here, we don't have to find the average between the units

• halo Mod request (Mania)

1. Offset :: GOOOOD perfect
   
   1ㅣ2ㅣ3ㅣ4
   
   [Easy]
2. 00:01:814 (1814|3) -vocal end timing is here 00:02:362 -
   00:02:545 (2545|0) - vocal end timing is here 00:03:094 -
   
3. 01:00:350 - ~ 01:06:204 - here is a better to long note.
   just my mind :L
   
   Ex

   [img]
   01:00:350 -
   http://puu.sh/uJRcr/60619e2f30.jpg[/img]
4. 01:06:204 - ~ 01:12:057 - what do you want expression???
   if you want expression main melody
   it's a right
   
   IMG

   
   other part is same
   
5. 01:12:057 (72057|0) - this cut timing is here 01:12:423 -
   01:13:521 (73521|0) - ^
   01:14:984 (74984|0) - ^
   other part is same
   
6. i think 01:21:570 (81570|3,81570|2) - if you want more up this sound express add note here 01:21:387 -
   
7. 01:35:472 - ~ 01:47:179 - here part is need long note
   please express vocal sound in here
   
   [Black Another]
   nope

Niks wrote:

halo mod request. hai
sorry for late np

• halo Mod request (Mania)

1. Offset :: GOOOOD perfect
   
   1ㅣ2ㅣ3ㅣ4
   
   [Easy]
2. 00:01:814 (1814|3) -vocal end timing is here 00:02:362 -
   00:02:545 (2545|0) - vocal end timing is here 00:03:094 -
   
3. 01:00:350 - ~ 01:06:204 - here is a better to long note.
   just my mind :L
   
   [Ex]
   01:00:350 -
   
   
4. 01:06:204 - ~ 01:12:057 - what do you want expression???
   if you want expression main melody
   it's a right
   
   IMG

   
   other part is same I got it!
   
5. 01:12:057 (72057|0) - this cut timing is here 01:12:423 -
   01:13:521 (73521|0) - ^
   01:14:984 (74984|0) - ^
   other part is same
   
6. i think 01:21:570 (81570|3,81570|2) - if you want more up this sound express add note here 01:21:387 -
   
7. 01:35:472 - ~ 01:47:179 - here part is need long note
   please express vocal sound in here
   
   [Black Another]
   nope

good luck!

Gyukari wrote:

Rem & Gyukari Mania Moding!

hi suruno! thank you for req & Sorry I'm late. I was busy because I was a soldier. no problem, sir! (`L_`)7 *and why mostly people call me Suruno ayy lol, sounds cute <3


※The contents may be strange because we refer to translator

If you can not understand, please send me a PM.

• [General]
  
  
  Unicode is broken. fix plz oke~

Good luck XD

Gyukari wrote:

Rem & Gyukari Mania Moding!

hi suruno! thank you for req & Sorry I'm late. I was busy because I was a soldier.


※The contents may be strange because we refer to translator

If you can not understand, please send me a PM.

Mod

|1|2|3|4|

• [General]
  
  
  Unicode is broken. fix plz

• [arc's Hyper]

1. 00:02:362 (2362|3) - delete. this note is ghost note.00:02:179 (2179|1) - Increase this to 00:02:545 - here. //err dude, this a piano sounds
2. 00:08:033 (8033|1,8216|2) - ^ //^
3. 00:10:960 (10960|2,11143|0) - ^ //^
4. 00:05:289 (5289|1) - Change to a short note //nope
5. 00:11:326 (11326|1,11509|2) - Ctrl + h //no, this is balanced
6. 00:14:070 - 00:14:801 - 00:15:533 - Did not intentionally put it? If it is not, I recommend you add it. //no, in this part im follow that kick sounds
7. 00:31:905 - If intentionally left blank, You do not need to refer to it. add 1 note //errr for what, no thanks
8. 00:43:612 - ^ //^
9. 00:44:344 - ^ //^
10. 01:00:990 - ^ //^
11. 01:03:003 - ^ //^
12. 01:03:917 - ^ //^
13. 01:05:381 - ^ //^
14. 01:07:576 - ^ //^
15. 01:07:759 - ^ //^
16. 00:32:637 (32637|1,32820|1) - delete //just deleting this 00:32:637 (32637|1) -
17. 00:57:240 (57240|2,57240|3) - There is no hit sound. //yep
18. 01:23:765 - There is a lot of repeating pattern next time. 2 snaps of lines 1 and 4 are repeated a lot. I encourage you to change note //errr, no thanks
    ex)
19. 01:47:179 - The pattern here and 00:48:643 - here are almost identical. change to pattern //^
    
    

Good luck XD

Yonakr wrote:

[Majstro Oni]00:03:277 (8,9) - k d seems better, or kk d k enough to emphasis these sounds
00:06:204 (17) - d because this sound is low-pitched that the previous I dont follow vocal, I follow other that have high impact
00:16:082 (53,54,55) - kkk or kdk for the "boom" compared with 00:17:911 - this, both of that just over to emphasized *esspesially kkK
00:17:820 - add a circle here ddK? no... I focus cymbal sound
00:16:996 (57) - k to contrast with 00:17:545 (60,61,62) but I dont hear if this need to emphasize with kat
00:19:192 (70) - it's seems better to add a circle but that is finisher... 1/4 pattern + finisher = x_x
00:23:765 (101) - k? no... still 00:25:228 - high this
00:33:460 (176,177,178) - kdk? ehh no

00:33:826 (179,180) - dk?
00:39:679 (226,227) - same ^
00:27:972 (132,133) - same ^ these synth are just monotone and dont have really synchronized..
same logic until 00:45:716 (274) same reason above
It is more consistent with 00:42:789 (251) because it's a k but too over with emphasize
If you don't want to change everything, you should change 00:42:789 (251) to a d but that finisher have big impact sounds

01:20:838 (120) - k previous finishers are K and some in here is D because different impact
01:21:570 (125) - k same above
01:26:692 (167,168,169,170,171) - kkddk? too monotone with pattern in left side and will broke the contrast
01:35:289 (35) - k no, monotone
01:38:399 (58,59) - dk because the second sound is higher did something
01:39:862 (69,70,71,72) - kd because the second sound is lower over emphasize, in previous kd are high range so here is dd..
Nice map Thank you
I'll mod later the other difficulties oke