is metadata and stuff checked yet?
01:16:688 (1,2,3) - the visual distance is unevennnn
01:47:499 (6,1,3) - ^
01:21:877 (1,2) - too close compared to everything else
01:36:147 (1,2,3,4) - ^
02:11:174 (1,3) - ^
01:24:472 (1) - imo an extended slider would work nice here
01:29:661 (1,2) - it fits but why is this the only part that has an antijump? what about 01:32:255 (1,2,3) - 01:34:850 (1,2,3) - and dont give me 'this is the first part of the section so i want it to be different'
01:45:228 - ur not very good at using high sv are u.. this is lik a better version of now loading kiai time,,
01:50:417 (1,1,1) - i feel this is just soo anticlimatic, why not start from a lower SV so u can actually feel a diference in gameplay?
same with other parts
02:08:580 (1,2) - i think ctrl g plays better
02:53:661 (4) - is this really 1/6? doesnt really sound like it to me
03:33:878 (3,2) -
04:06:634 (1) - this wave shud be.. curved more i guess
i do think the visual spacing is a bit inconsistent
also i dont like the kiais
01:16:688 (1,2,3) - the visual distance is unevennnn
01:47:499 (6,1,3) - ^
01:21:877 (1,2) - too close compared to everything else
01:36:147 (1,2,3,4) - ^
02:11:174 (1,3) - ^
01:24:472 (1) - imo an extended slider would work nice here
01:29:661 (1,2) - it fits but why is this the only part that has an antijump? what about 01:32:255 (1,2,3) - 01:34:850 (1,2,3) - and dont give me 'this is the first part of the section so i want it to be different'
01:45:228 - ur not very good at using high sv are u.. this is lik a better version of now loading kiai time,,
01:50:417 (1,1,1) - i feel this is just soo anticlimatic, why not start from a lower SV so u can actually feel a diference in gameplay?
same with other parts
02:08:580 (1,2) - i think ctrl g plays better
02:53:661 (4) - is this really 1/6? doesnt really sound like it to me
03:33:878 (3,2) -
04:06:634 (1) - this wave shud be.. curved more i guess
i do think the visual spacing is a bit inconsistent
also i dont like the kiais