1. 01:23:922 (2,3) - spacing inconsistency

1. 00:46:588 (3,4) - 01:29:255 (3,4) - 01:32:588 (4,5) - etc. personally i wouldn't recommend stacking a circle underneath a slider end for a Normal; might be confusing to read for beginners/casual players.

1. not a Normal, i'm shocked! but yeah this is fine

1. 00:33:088 (4,5,6,7) - 00:34:422 (4,5,6,7) - 00:43:755 (4,5,6,7) - 00:45:088 (4,5,6,7) - etc. honestly i don't mind the stream after the slider end, but i do think it's kind of cramped with the current set up. also blending the stream and vocals like that makes the streams come across as unexpected. why not try simplifying the vocals and streams into something like this?
   
   SPOILER

   this way there's a more clearer distinction between vocals and the streams. the less blending also makes it sound less busy imo. alternatively you can make the double repeat slider into circles
   
2. 01:31:144 (2) - honestly i don't think you need this note. sound here is barely noticeable and throwing a 1/3 rhythmlike this out of the blue when it's not that audible isn't the best idea

1. 00:15:588 (2,4,1,2) - this is a minor thing, but why not try making the (1,2) parallel to the (2,4)? i feel it'd look visually nicer
2. 00:28:588 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - 00:39:255 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - 01:11:255 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - etc. feels kind of really dense; music doesn't really divide like this. honestly a rhythm like this might be more suitable:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:24:588 (1,2,3,4) - try making (3,4) parallel to (1,2)
4. 01:28:588 (1,2,3,4) - combo inconsistency with 00:45:922 (1,2,1,2) - 02:00:588 (1,2,1,2) -
5. 01:31:144 (2) - honestly i don't think you need this note. sound here is barely noticeable and throwing a 1/3 rhythmlike this out of the blue when it's not that audible isn't the best idea
6. 01:51:588 (3) - shouldn't you also NC here too?

Doormat wrote:

haitai haitai

[Turtle]

1. 01:23:922 (2,3) - spacing inconsistency fixed

[Extra]

1. 00:15:588 (2,4,1,2) - this is a minor thing, but why not try making the (1,2) parallel to the (2,4)? i feel it'd look visually nicer yup
2. 00:28:588 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - 00:39:255 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - 01:11:255 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - etc. feels kind of really dense; music doesn't really divide like this. honestly a rhythm like this might be more suitable: yeah it was kinda too much, fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:24:588 (1,2,3,4) - try making (3,4) parallel to (1,2) sure
4. 01:28:588 (1,2,3,4) - combo inconsistency with 00:45:922 (1,2,1,2) - 02:00:588 (1,2,1,2) - yup
5. 01:31:144 (2) - honestly i don't think you need this note. sound here is barely noticeable and throwing a 1/3 rhythmlike this out of the blue when it's not that audible isn't the best idea imo it feels really weird without the 1/3 here, and it's kinda noticeable with it's unique spacing, also between 2 long sliders it wont throw off players
6. 01:51:588 (3) - shouldn't you also NC here too? since the snares are on every tick there and not only 1/2s i think it's better to not nc it

since metadata was reverted back to "ayase rie" i'm assuming that it should be okay to directly qualify this instead of requiring a rebubble, since metadata wasn't changed. fix what you need to and call me back

Doormat wrote:

[Kyuukai]

1. 00:46:588 (3,4) - 01:29:255 (3,4) - 01:32:588 (4,5) - etc. personally i wouldn't recommend stacking a circle underneath a slider end for a Normal; might be confusing to read for beginners/casual players. I think it's fine for a Normal diff, initiates beginners to something new

[Taiga] wrote:

Veto from my side



Despite being a guideline, jump from 4,35* to 5,70* is nowhere close to being a reasonable spread.

Reason:



Key point: The difficulties in the mapset must be in a consecutive order.

Doormat wrote:

spread isn't determined only by star rating; it is also dependent on the density increase between difficulties.

the density increase between the insane and the extra is pretty reasonable, but i'll leave it to linada to argue for the difficulty increase.

also, the difficulties are in a consecutive order. it goes from easy -> normal -> hard -> insane -> extra. a mapset that doesn't have a consecutive order would be if it jumped from hard -> extra without an insane in the middle.

Linada wrote:

difficulty jump is only due to big jump spikes before kiais though, overall the map is around 5.5 so i guess it's kinda ok ? even if the jump in the spread can seem big it's only due to the spacing

having another extra would mean exactly the same map but with overall lower spacing, i don't think it's really needed though

[Taiga] wrote:

I saw this jumps, tbh, I cannot find any justification for them except forcing artificial difficulty spikes, lowering it could make diff around 5,4 star which could cover way wider community group than it is now. well they can seem big but they are fitting imo, thoses part of the song are really intense

I also understand that this "might be made with intention to play exclusively DT", yet, I think maps should cover with difficulty spread great majority of community with intention of nomod. no i don't and wont ever map something to be played with DT, it may be a DT farm map or idk but it's not my intention

In my honest opinion, I could either adjust extra diff for lower star rating or add another insane between to be fair not only with guidelines but also to please everyone. As not only for myself, but almost everyone in mid rank who doesn't play DT is left with nothing here in term of "pure farming" which can be also done with nomod / HD / HR. i don't think it's really necessary imo, but if this ever get DQd i might consider doing one but in it's current state it's fine to me