• 
  00:38:441 (4) - спейсинг немного отошёл,подвинь слайдер немного ближе к прошлой ноте Всё.
  00:49:604 (5) - немного овермап для этого места, так как у тебя идут 2 удара по краям этого слайдера,не лучше ли просто поставить две ноты что бы не сбивать ритм, а так же придерживаться твоего расставления НК : exmple Всё.
  01:13:629 - зачем пропускать здесь важный удар,к тому же 01:03:180 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - до этого места где по 4 ноты Я думаю, всё...
  01:20:371 (5) - нк ,01:21:719 - а так же удар здесь Думаю, всё...
  01:31:495 (3,4) - бланкет Всё.
  02:04:865 (4) - конец не в ритм, мб ты мог бы сделать его короче на красный тик?

Gordon123 wrote:

remove commas in the tags
my bad,I didnt tell you about it ;w;

monstrata wrote:

NC (New Combo) Pattern Issues

This is a general issue. Once you've mastered how to do NC's, you'll know them for life!
NC's should be placed on the downbeat because that is the start of a new measure in a song. Lets look at the timeline: The large white ticks are the downbeats. Always try to have a New combo there. For easier difficulties, you may choose to NC every second downbeat, but make sure your pattern is consistent! If you NC every downbeat, don't randomly switch to every two downbeats. Only do so if the music shifts (for example, during a calm section or a slow-down).



Essentially, you want every downbeat to be the beginning of a New Combo, as such:



Another reason to NC may be because you are using a different slider-velocity. NC'ing the slider gives the player a better visual cue that the slider may be faster, or slower, and because of your NC, they will have more time to prepare.

dalioth wrote:

Alright, so here is what I found that might be of use to you, or at least I hope it will be at any rate.

Hard

00:35:476 -The first thing I noticed when going through the beatmap was right there I saw that you have two notes suddenly stacked together Which seems both distinctly out of place do to how all the other notes before and after it flow together,this can cause people to find it unfair and oft accidentally miss it unless specifically thinking able to stopping at that note. Seeing however you try to use it in repetition through the song I recommend it used a bit more frequently, especally at the beginning so that players will come to expect that there will be double stacks (and later triple stacks) within the song rather then being caught off guard by the sudden and much more rapid use of it. added stack at beginning

00:41:057 - This one is my opinion but following the clap sound effect to the new beats that come up with the song is a excellent way to give more life into the feel of the song you should use default skin while hitsounding finish hitsounds is better for strong beats

00:51:348 - 00:52:220 -Doesn't exactly feel right to skip such strong point before the first climax of the song starts especally with the long note just before leading well into switching to the music of the song to be the focus rather then the vocals. added slider

01:30:062 - This one is also my own opinion, but I found that the song has a lot more emphasis and strength by turning on the Clap sound effect on every white tick in the Kai time up to here 01:53:068 same as before

01:55:764 - Doesn't quite match up with the music, it sounds distinctly off do to the emphasis on the red tick it passes over hmm will think about that

I'll give you a link so you can see the osu file of the changes I made so you can see for yourself if you like them or how you can modify them yourself to better suit what you want to make the song into. Other points that I changed besides the clapping. i want to change everything by myself tbh

00:24:488 (1) - I changed this combo to better show of stacking right at the start. As well as the combo at 00:42:976 i fixed issues with combos

I also added a note at 00:51:522 (2) to have it flow with the change in musical focus i added it

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qr2ml718mlsd ... DWYla?dl=0

mulraf wrote:

hey from my queue o/


General:
______________________________________________________________
- The diff spread is a little weird imho? from 1.48 to 1.88* and then straight to 3.39*. personally i'd make the normal diff a little harder. I'm going to make diff called advanced or take GD
- i feel like you (i don't mean your gd with this) need to work on your NC's a bit. This is a really, really easy and quick guide for NC's

monstrata wrote:

NC (New Combo) Pattern Issues

This is a general issue. Once you've mastered how to do NC's, you'll know them for life!
NC's should be placed on the downbeat because that is the start of a new measure in a song. Lets look at the timeline: The large white ticks are the downbeats. Always try to have a New combo there. For easier difficulties, you may choose to NC every second downbeat, but make sure your pattern is consistent! If you NC every downbeat, don't randomly switch to every two downbeats. Only do so if the music shifts (for example, during a calm section or a slow-down).



Essentially, you want every downbeat to be the beginning of a New Combo, as such:



Another reason to NC may be because you are using a different slider-velocity. NC'ing the slider gives the player a better visual cue that the slider may be faster, or slower, and because of your NC, they will have more time to prepare.

If you want a more detailed explanation i can suggest pishi's video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neycvFQ5Ug4

Fixed


Normal:
______________________________________________________________
- 00:59:809 (6) - You ignored the clapping here while you mapped it at 00:54:416 (1,2) - , 01:56:438 (2) - or 02:01:832 (2) - Ok fixed

Hard:
______________________________________________________________
- 00:44:022 (4) - maybe a straight slider here instead bc it sounds like 00:41:581 (4) - and 00:46:813 (3) - Done
- 00:48:208 (1) - and this maybe curved instead bc it sounds like 00:45:418 (1) - Done
- 01:28:967 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - this sounds a bit undermapped to me. you hear some extra sounds there that should be mapped imho. especially at 25/50% speed you can hear it very well. Changed that

sorry for being a little late and good luck with the map o/ NP

Swegmec wrote:

From Swegmec's Modding queue

General Feedback
OD could be slightly higher (5 -> 6). Done!

Difficulty spread is somewhat weird and skips the 2* range completely. It's not a deal breaker by any means, but it can be somewhat disappointing when players need to go up a whole 1.4* or more to get to the next difficulty in the song.

Could definitely use another difficulty or two (insane at the minimum). If you need, I can create it for you, but that's a whole other topic. Let me know.
You can map insane if you want to

Hard
00:30:069 (1,2) - Something in between these perhaps? Added
00:53:742 (1,2) - If this is going to be your highest difficulty you want to mimic the song beats as much as possible. I would add a triple-stream here, somehow. Well i listened to it in 25% of speed and i couldnt hear any 1/4 beat so will fix if someone will mention again
01:02:843 (4) - Change to quarter-beat slider. Done
01:37:562 (2) - Here until about 1:47 your notes dance around the outside without hitting the center of the play area. Not necessarily a bad thing, but if you would like to add some more variety to the map try moving some notes into the center. Will fix if someone mention again
01:54:416 (1,2,3) - (2)'s distance spacing is off. Use the yellow text in the top right (when you select circles/sliders) and make sure that the numbers are about the same (+/- 0.05). Done
Rankability: 5.5 / 10 Needs more content, and some tweaks. Otherwise you're well on your way to a ranked map in a few weeks/months.
Good luck! Yeah the map is new for now so it needs a lot of work

Asuka_- wrote:

super quick mod from #modres
Easy
01:03:180 - 60% is noisy to me. maybe chenge to 40%?? Okay done

Normal
01:02:506 (4) - hpbar xdxd Fixed
[]
clean map. good luck!

BlakeBestWaifu wrote:

From my modding Q

Normal

00:25:011 (2,3) - 1/2 stack here I think its fine but if someone mention again i will fix
00:40:708 (3,4) - 1/2 stack here Changed that to something else!
00:50:825 (3,1) - 1/2 stack here same as in first
On normal stacking should be constant. Everywhere else you used 1/1 stacks like you changed your mind have way through.I'm aware of that but you can hear vocal on these 2 points on red tick and white one

Hard

The whole difficulty seems very linear like a normal. The kiai times have the same spacing as the rest of the song. Maybe increase the distance snap in the kiai times Will work on it

Sorry for a short mod didn't know what else to say. The storyboard of the first kiai time scared the shit out of me, really didn't expect it. Good luck with mapset!

Saltssaumure wrote:

Hi from my modqueue. This isn't the map you requested to be modded, but you said the other one was a shitmap so here I am. i requested mod months ago xd but thanks

[Hard]
00:45:069 (4) - ctrl+g as other slider pairs go in the same direction ok fixed but next time specify yourself point out previous sliders
01:32:843 - The vivid purple, dark blue, and light blue combo colours look out of place on this background, it would look better if less saturated. made them more bright

Couldn't find anything to say about the other diffs. Good luck!

Gibcio wrote:

Easy:
GUT GUT
Normal:
JestDobrze
Hard:
00:53:573 (6,1) - Repeat slider tutaj Nie pasuje do rytmu
01:04:528 (1,2) - slider Myśle że 2 slidery przed starczą nie chce aby mapa miała 3 slidery z rzędu
02:04:528 (3) - 2 kółeczka takie jak są 02:04:865 (4,5) Za dużo kółek O.O

wiem że prawie nic nie pomogłem bo ta mapka to totalny ResidentSleeper i nie ma co w niej tak na prawdę poprawiać

Mir wrote:

You could probably add an insane to this set if you wanted to. The song really supports higher difficulty levels and stopping at Hard kinda undersells the song's potential. The diffs look fine but ranking this without an insane? Are you sure?

Maxylan wrote:

Also, fucking respond to modders, it's the least you can do as a thank you for them taking their time out of their day to help you. Even if you don't agree with them, tell them why.

Marianna wrote:

Why are you responding to the mod for me? If I said I do not see anything needed it is why I do not see anything needed if you wanted to respond to the mods because they did not diff you?
At no point did I say that the mod is bad, I just did not find anything really relevant

ShiiTsuin wrote:

Sorry, I know you aren't a strong English Speaker, so I understand a lot of this stuff but...
I just wanted reasoning why nothing was relevant to you, and why it was your "vision". Having 4 ranked maps, I have to assume you have at least some understanding of mapping, possibly more than me, but you've proved to me literally nothing about your "prowess", when I find what I believe to be issues and you brush it off without any explanation. Moreover, things like consistent visuals are a necessity, even in an Insane lmao. The fact that you've never ranked an Insane means you should be more open to criticism, rather than shutting yourself off like Monstrata or Delis would.
In the case of you saying that it's your "Vision of mapping" I couldn't care less whether it's what you see as the god-tier of mapping, or just something you like. Whilst nothing I noted was particularly necessary, it's still worth while at least playing around with my "improvements" to see whether they make a difference to the aesthetics or playability.

Once again, sorry if this looks like I'm butt hurt, and I know this might be starting an argument, just wanted some more information and stuff, and to get something off of my chest. Good luck with this though, I wanna see this mapset ranked

Natsu wrote:

@Marianna actually you have to give a proper reply to the modder.

Marianna wrote:

why me god? why?
This was already resolved, fuck osu

Net0 wrote:

"Pretty much any other complaints I would have about this map have already been addressed by points mentioned above. I personally don't like the inconsistent visual spacing, or the potentially inconsistent mapping."
The modder pointed with reason a few issues he thinks that should be mentioned and stated a personal opinion on the map overall. I don't see any sarcasm or hidden offenses. In this case you should just reply Marianna, even if you're denying everything (which seems the case).

The only case you don't have to reply a mod, is when the modder is clearlly making fun or attacking you or your map. Bad behavior is discourage and leads to nothing.

To @ShiiTsuin if you're uncertain about a certain aspect of the map, addressed to it inside the mod itself, general comments such as "I personally don't like the inconsistent visual spacing, or the potentially inconsistent mapping." only leads ppl to overlook your mod and take things to a personal side, so I'd try to smooth things more next time when you mod ^^.

Marmorexx wrote:

Hard Difficulty ---

00:28:325 (3) - Feels like this should be a new combo. Doesnt have to. Its just a feeling. Making here new combo is kinda pointless
00:59:978 (4,5) - The change from "Note->Slider->Note->Slider to Slider-> Note" comes really sudden and might catch a lot of people offguard.
not really for example 00:57:787 (1,2) and 00:56:101 (4,1)

-> From 01:12:618 to 01:23:405 you aligned all notes in a "circle". It just goes round and round and round. You could improve the flow by throwing in some variation here and there. I cant really understand why everyone hates it i did for purpose needs to be considered

01:29:304 (3) - Remove this slider and place a note in its origin. Then you put the triples half a beat after that, followed up with 2 single taps or a slider (7&8)
This fits way better onto the beat It follows beat in kinda other way but i would like to keep slider after 1/4 one

01:31:495 (1) - Maybe make this a little curved to the right to indicate better that it goes back and you have to jump to (2) afterwards i want keep this straight bcs i've used this pattern for example here 01:26:438 (3,4) i think making something other is pointless
01:52:393 (3,4) - 01:52:899 (5,1) - If you move these 2 packs closer together its more fluent to play. the distance for the jumps can stay the same. But if there is the same distance between each of the notes, it gets hard to read. it's fine for me my friend testplayed it
02:03:770 (6) - If you create a triple there, here (02:04:528 (3)), and a slider here (02:04:865 (4,5)) it gives the map a nice and sudden ending, like the song suggests. Dont move the notes, they're really good, just change them if you want ^^ I don't really want to put too many circles at the end

Marmorexx wrote:

Insane ---

Love how you handled the Overlaps here! Everytime there is enough time for the note to fade away properly, you let it overlap! Good work, lovin it.
00:32:511 (4) - New Combo would look stylish here instead of 00:32:860 (1) I think this combo is fine
00:57:450 (5,6,7) - I keep hitting this early, maybe move it away from (4) a little it's fine i've testplayed with friends
01:09:585 (4,5) - Since the melody gets higher here maybe make the circles go higher, too. In a manner like this: the current one is fine
It feels also really nice because the next jump is a similar one.
01:22:731 (2) - Having a perfect overlap here is a little irritating. I know it adds to the uniqueness of the map, but it'd feel nicer if you at least stacked them. i think this overlap is fine
01:35:034 (6,7,8) - Maybe turn these by like 20° CCW to make hitting them more fluent. If they are aligned like this it feels a little unintuitive. not really

Also in the Part between the 2 Kiai Sections (From 01:03:180 to 01:13:967), the Guitar in the song plays very short, muted notes. To make the beatmap "fit" better, you should use more half beat sliders and less Full beat sliders like 01:05:202 (4)! There is a lot of potential in this part on my opinion. it's fine