Also Zex, when i said anti town > scum, I meant it as a way like "sure he's anti town to me right now but I'd rather not vote for his lynch when we could be scum hunting"
hope that clears it up.
hope that clears it up.
zekks didn't respond properly to Lincolm here. Instead he responded with a unrelated thought here, which I wrote my opinion about hereZexion wrote:
Sorry, a bit disconnected right now.
So what's the case on Zekks? Besides their bold claim about mafia to fear them which is pretty null right now. In any case, after a statement like that I definitely wouldn't lynch them today.
I try not to be angry, and sorry if it looked like so. Same with the content in this and future messages, pretend thet any "angry" text is emphasis. My tone might get like this due to irl events.Hika wrote:
Calm down Jesus fuck I thought when you said fuck RVS you were stating it in a way you thought it was over
is okay just calm your nerves
What worries me, is the fact that he ignored my question. That was a try to fish out why is he just parrotting the two most active guys. He is either a newb townie that does not really know what is going on, or scum pretending to be one.rEdo wrote:
What do you mean by decent?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I would reconsider my vote, but I don't know to vote for
I might vote for Foxtrot, since she is trying to pin everyone on Lincolm, but that seems kinda weak, but I'll still hold onto that
Or I can change my vote to Lincolm, because Foxtrot has decent amount of evidence to support the fact that Lincolm could be the mafia
What the hell is this?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
As long as I'm still alive, no mafia can't stop me
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I'm just confused, I'm too lazy to look over things asdf. If I die the mafia will have a higher chance of living, so if you decide to kill me off, good luck!
someone understands! no fucks were given todayrEdo wrote:
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.
then leave and stop being a troll. or actually start playing the game seriously. i suggest you to look back in the previous threads and try to get a general idea of how it works. hell, this is my first time playing mafia in YEARS and look, i am trying to be a decent player here because i know that mafia can be time consuming, and i certainly don't want to be a waste of time like you're being right now. you're being extremely rude right now to play who actually want to play this game. and even if this is your way to play scum or whatever, it's a dumb one. i can't believe i voted you trying to get a reaction out of you. now i know this is all too pointless. yeah, i sound angry, because you're wasting our time when there could be ACTUAL content going on.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
someone understands! no fucks were given todayrEdo wrote:
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?Hika wrote:
oh shit I'm so slow I forgot we have possible PRs
Slow your role bros, zekks could be a PR and doing it wrong
Dully noted.abraker wrote:
What if I told you that I vote knowing I will likely regret the decision later? I vote when I am able to justify my vote since at least last game. Last time I voted Dawnsday as soon as soon as I had justification to vote, which was his mason crap. This time I am hesitant to vote zekks due to me being wrong about Dawnsday last game. This is why rvs sucks even if you can justify your reasons.
Because I didn't assume he would have the same reason or same respond. As I said before, the first respond I specially consider it because maybe Zekks thought it was RVS stage, so he went " idc e e e e e". Then there was like more 10-15 posts and more contents to discuss so I would really like his opinions about everyone when he was active, but he still go "i go sha la la la la". I asked about John again because Zekks already gave his opinion about me and Foxtrot, the other one who involved was John but he didn't say anything about him, so I asked about John to Zekks again.abraker wrote:
@Lincolm
Also now that I look at it, why did you ask zekks about John twice here and here? You got your "joke" response from from zekks here, WHICH YOU JOKED BACK, ACKNOWLEDGING THE ANSWER. Like what the fuck, man? Maybe that's why zekks didn't bother answering that one properly in particular?
I don't want to discuss this because it achieves nothing except who or what is PR or not. We should do and act as our alignment regardless our power.Foxtrot wrote:
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?
Because if you discuss anything about him, you are going to achieve nothing about him (he won't respond seriously), especially if he is going to flip as town, you're going to hurt town.Foxtrot wrote:
I still don't get why we should back off from Zekks if he's scum, like Hika and Lincolm are suggesting. Sure, there's not enough content, but does it really matter if there's enough evidence that shows Zekks having higher chances of scum instead of town?
Why? If he's not commited to reading he's going to hurt town in the long run. It's not FUN to policy lynch rest assured I'd rather the idea was never even conceived but honestly.Lincolm wrote:
, but I hate policy lynch also.
... that's it? Really? Why start the PoE with abraker?Lincolm wrote:
Vote :abraker because PoE
Who would you start start with?Foxtrot wrote:
... that's it? Really? Why start the PoE with abraker?Lincolm wrote:
Vote :abraker because PoE
That's what I told myself when I lynched dawnsday last game. Now look at me, I'm voting for myself.johnmedina999 wrote:
Also, I agree with everyone else, if we get nowhere by the end of the mafia day, just lynch Zekks, because there is a 2/9 chance we can be lynching scum, and it's better to lynch someone than not lynch anyone at all.
But why John? And why zekks? What were your thoughts between the connection between the twoLincolm wrote:
I asked about John again because Zekks already gave his opinion about me and Foxtrot, the other one who involved was John but he didn't say anything about him, so I asked about John to Zekks again.
Something that mafia would conveniently bandwagon on without hesitation while giving a non critical reason to.Lincolm wrote:
because PoE (L-3)
What do you mean you have no choice? If you're town you would have all the reason in the world to defend yourself from being lynched, because more town = good. The only reason I see you giving up is if you're Mafia, or extremely lazy, and both of those options are anti-town. You're getting suspicious.abraker wrote:
Well since we can forgive zekks's concerning stupidity, PoE looks sexy as fuck, and I would like to bring my end of the deal, I guess I have no choice either
self-vote
No, you do have a choice. And that choice is not to off yourself. Are you trying to do this to make yourself more believable?abraker wrote:
Well since we can forgive zekks's concerning stupidity, PoE looks sexy as fuck, and I would like to bring my end of the deal, I guess I have no choice either
vote: abraker
johnmedina999 wrote:
What do you mean you have no choice? If you're town you would have all the reason in the world to defend yourself from being lynched, because more town = good. The only reason I see you giving up is if you're Mafia, or extremely lazy, and both of those options are anti-town. You're getting suspicious.abraker wrote:
Well since we can forgive zekks's concerning stupidity, PoE looks sexy as fuck, and I would like to bring my end of the deal, I guess I have no choice either
self-vote
Foxtrot wrote:
No, you do have a choice. And that choice is not to off yourself. Are you trying to do this to make yourself more believable?abraker wrote:
Well since we can forgive zekks's concerning stupidity, PoE looks sexy as fuck, and I would like to bring my end of the deal, I guess I have no choice either
vote: abraker
Dulcet wrote:
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?
Aight, ty anyway.Hika wrote:
Also, self voting strategy shouldn't be mentioned here. Maybe google it cause we're currently in game and dont want mafia doing anything with that information.
I don't like this.johnmedina999 wrote:
There isn't much else to work with right now so I say it's a good option.
Also, I agree with everyone else, if we get nowhere by the end of the mafia day, just lynch Zekks, because there is a 2/9 chance we can be lynching scum, and it's better to lynch someone than not lynch anyone at all.
No.Foxtrot wrote:
Honestly, I don't know. Is PoE any efficient?
Like it will achieve something if you're town. Good game, I'm sticking my vote right now. And it is L-2 with your self-vote.abraker wrote:
Well since we can forgive zekks's concerning stupidity, PoE looks sexy as fuck, and I would like to bring my end of the deal, I guess I have no choice either
vote: abraker
As I said already, Zekks alarmed my radar with "idc" post so I particularly need information coming out from him.abraker wrote:
But why John? And why zekks? What were your thoughts between the connection between the two
I want to know your read on everybody here.
So what? No one pressure. No one pushing. Waiting more contents. PoE is less accurate thing to find scum, but is there any accurate method to find scum without power role? Is it wrong to use PoE? Why is L-3 (or maybe you thought it was L-2) a dangerous thing for you? even rEdo (plus someone if you really thought it was L-2) doesn't tell explicitly why did he vote you.abraker wrote:
Something that mafia would conveniently bandwagon on without hesitation while giving a non critical reason to.
voting because activity is something I really don't like. Same with inactivity. Your votes seem to have little basis and just go with the bandwagon.Lincolm wrote:
If rEdo didn't vote him, I would still vote abraker because he is more active than Zexion.
*Unless it's pushing them to be more activeabraker wrote:
Same with inactivity
Slight correction: He bandwagons with no real justification, and makes it seem like it is a normal thing to do. I get it if you are trying to choke out activity or info, but it doesn't make sense otherwise.abraker wrote:
Lincolm: The only problem is that he bandwagons with no real justification. Just declare a bandwagon, he will be second to hop on it
abraker wrote:
@John
Your reads?
i'll wait for you to explain thisDawnsday wrote:
Hika - Actually one of my strongest "gut" feelings I've had in a mafia game thus far. Everything Hika posts rubs me the wrong way, I'm going to link specific posts eventually (pressed for time here atm) but a lot of what she posts just FEELS SO "LAMIST" to me, I'm willing to accept I'm probably wrong on this one and I'm just being paranoid but it's a read and I have it so that's that. Keeping in null because there's nothing I have beyond my gut.