saku's overly aesthetic focused mod
00:25:454 (1,2,3) - since there's no emphasis on 3rd beat and it's the same 1/4 it feels weird to have 3's spacing be slightly different from 1,2
01:12:727 (1,2,3) - minor nitpick but overlapping 1 and 3 doesn't with the rest of the maps aesthetic. all other overlaps have aesthetic purpose like 01:28:484 (1,2,3). inconsistent aesthetics make me a sadboy
02:04:999 (1,2,3,4) - i dont understand the justification for giving 4 spatial emphasis when there's no rhythmic significance and it's all in 1/4. Especially because most patterns are like 02:10:909 (1,2,3,4,5) where they're all mapped pretty equivalently.
02:14:696 (1,2,3,4,5) - same pattern as above
02:35:151 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the spacing here is super strange? strong beats are emphasized spatially by having slightly longer jumps but 3,4 is about half the distance of 5,6 an extremely weak beat. I would make 3,4 bigger and 5,6 smaller or maybe just replace the pattern. especially cause all the other patterns after like 02:36:363 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) have pretty close to even spacings
02:40:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i dont like how this one flows. up, down, into zig-zag and then again you have spatial on 5,6 which makes no sense when 4 is the strong beat
02:44:848 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i would give 3,4 more spatial emphasis but up to you
isnt a critique but the spatial emphasis of the jumps in 02:46:060 (1,2,3,4) made me nutt the long jump for 2 emphasizes the weird synth repeat perfectly then 3 which is the weakest beat has a much smaller jump then normal length to 4 is just perfect
02:51:666 (4) and 02:52:272 (2) - overlapping these is really weird and unlike a shared anchor point just looks weird to me. no other instances of this. unlike 02:44:242 (2) and 02:44:848 (1) which is same anchor and looks cool
02:52:121 (1) and 02:52:424 (3) overlap is less weird because same combo but still would not do it. up 2 u
02:49:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same spatial emphasis problem with 3,4 jump and 5,6
02:58:333 (1,2,3,4,5) - 2 is a strong beat and has a minijump whereas 4 isn't really a even a beat but has the megajump
ok im beginning to think that maybe im wrong about spatial emphasis but everyone lectures me on this and it's in pishifat's jump video also
03:15:454 (2) and 03:15:909 (4) is the same deal as 02:52:121 (1) and 02:52:424 (3), overlap is less weird because same combo but still would not do it. up 2 u again
03:21:212 (1) and 03:21:515 (3) ^
03:24:696 (5) - again there's spatial emphasis on virtually no beat
03:25:151 (2) and 03:25:606 (4) makes aesthetic sense because of the way it looks like 2 is coming out of 4 this is cool
03:28:030 (4) - another megajuimp on virtually no beat
03:30:909 (1) and 03:31:212 (3) maybe i just disagree with this aesthetic idk but listing it as an instance
03:32:878 (4) - the megajump again on no beat
03:38:636 (2) and 03:39:090 (4) is another instance
spacing on 03:41:818 (1,2,3,4) also is hot the big jumps are on 2 and 4 which are the most emphasized in song and you seem to map the big jumps on the big beats after this until
04:39:848 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2 and 5 are the smallest beats and the biggest jumps pls fix
04:41:212 (1,2,3,4,5) - again
overall i really like this map just the patterns that ignore the rules of jumps and minor aesthetic fixes. i swear im not making spatial emphasis of jumps up here's the link to the pishi vid i swear to god ive been lectured on this so many times too. maybe im wrong tho
slider art is also god tier
good luck!
00:25:454 (1,2,3) - since there's no emphasis on 3rd beat and it's the same 1/4 it feels weird to have 3's spacing be slightly different from 1,2
01:12:727 (1,2,3) - minor nitpick but overlapping 1 and 3 doesn't with the rest of the maps aesthetic. all other overlaps have aesthetic purpose like 01:28:484 (1,2,3). inconsistent aesthetics make me a sadboy
02:04:999 (1,2,3,4) - i dont understand the justification for giving 4 spatial emphasis when there's no rhythmic significance and it's all in 1/4. Especially because most patterns are like 02:10:909 (1,2,3,4,5) where they're all mapped pretty equivalently.
02:14:696 (1,2,3,4,5) - same pattern as above
02:35:151 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the spacing here is super strange? strong beats are emphasized spatially by having slightly longer jumps but 3,4 is about half the distance of 5,6 an extremely weak beat. I would make 3,4 bigger and 5,6 smaller or maybe just replace the pattern. especially cause all the other patterns after like 02:36:363 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) have pretty close to even spacings
02:40:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i dont like how this one flows. up, down, into zig-zag and then again you have spatial on 5,6 which makes no sense when 4 is the strong beat
02:44:848 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i would give 3,4 more spatial emphasis but up to you
isnt a critique but the spatial emphasis of the jumps in 02:46:060 (1,2,3,4) made me nutt the long jump for 2 emphasizes the weird synth repeat perfectly then 3 which is the weakest beat has a much smaller jump then normal length to 4 is just perfect
02:51:666 (4) and 02:52:272 (2) - overlapping these is really weird and unlike a shared anchor point just looks weird to me. no other instances of this. unlike 02:44:242 (2) and 02:44:848 (1) which is same anchor and looks cool
02:52:121 (1) and 02:52:424 (3) overlap is less weird because same combo but still would not do it. up 2 u
02:49:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same spatial emphasis problem with 3,4 jump and 5,6
02:58:333 (1,2,3,4,5) - 2 is a strong beat and has a minijump whereas 4 isn't really a even a beat but has the megajump
ok im beginning to think that maybe im wrong about spatial emphasis but everyone lectures me on this and it's in pishifat's jump video also
03:15:454 (2) and 03:15:909 (4) is the same deal as 02:52:121 (1) and 02:52:424 (3), overlap is less weird because same combo but still would not do it. up 2 u again
03:21:212 (1) and 03:21:515 (3) ^
03:24:696 (5) - again there's spatial emphasis on virtually no beat
03:25:151 (2) and 03:25:606 (4) makes aesthetic sense because of the way it looks like 2 is coming out of 4 this is cool
03:28:030 (4) - another megajuimp on virtually no beat
03:30:909 (1) and 03:31:212 (3) maybe i just disagree with this aesthetic idk but listing it as an instance
03:32:878 (4) - the megajump again on no beat
03:38:636 (2) and 03:39:090 (4) is another instance
spacing on 03:41:818 (1,2,3,4) also is hot the big jumps are on 2 and 4 which are the most emphasized in song and you seem to map the big jumps on the big beats after this until
04:39:848 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2 and 5 are the smallest beats and the biggest jumps pls fix
04:41:212 (1,2,3,4,5) - again
overall i really like this map just the patterns that ignore the rules of jumps and minor aesthetic fixes. i swear im not making spatial emphasis of jumps up here's the link to the pishi vid i swear to god ive been lectured on this so many times too. maybe im wrong tho
slider art is also god tier
good luck!