Mombei wrote:

From my modding queue

[Normal]
There is not much to say here, so all I can do is give minor suggestions to the map's structure

1. 00:00:136 (1,1) - This looks and plays fine, but technically spinners should have 2 beats of recovery time on normal difficulties 1000ms is fine i think
2. 00:10:977 (2) - You may want to tilt these straight sliders slightly (about 5 degrees) for aesthetic value, but I guess the look you were going for isn't what I'm suggesting here (Other sliders being 00:13:144 (4,2,1,3,1,3,4,3) - Though, you do use tilted sliders consistently after a while so idk sort that out) nah,
   i want them to be straight
3. 00:07:810 (4,1) - The sound this pattern follows starts on 4, so you may want to swap NCs yeah, but the measure starts at where the nc currently is
4. 00:21:310 (1,2) - 00:27:810 (2,3) - 00:31:977 (1,2) - 00:57:310 (1,2,3,4,5) - The ranking criteria suggests against overlapping of sliderheads/tails, though this here is pretty minor i don't think it would make sense in this case

[Hard]
I was unable to detect any mistakes in this difficulty, so I'll have once again to give minor suggestions

1. 00:05:310 (1,2) - This 1/4 gap is differently spaced than a lot of other 4 gaps in the map and instead looks like a 1/8 gap (00:15:310 (5,1) - ) fixed these cases
2. 00:30:310 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I believe that 3-4 messes with the visual spacing of the highlighted section, although everything else is visually consistent and 3-4 may be dismissed because it's part of a different combo 00:30:310 (3,4) - is stacking with (6) though
3. 00:37:310 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - Stacking makes objects close to overlapping and messes with the intended distance between notes (namely 00:37:977 (1,2) ), so I suggest you move 00:37:977 (1) - slightly to the left and rearrange 00:38:310 (2,3,4,5) so it does not stack and can have a more appropriate distance from 00:37:977 (1) (By that I mean that it looks kinda jumpy right now) yeah this looks ugly atm fixed
   

[Welcome]

1. 00:15:310 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - NC spam influences the map's final HP drain (as you may recall was said about that Cry Thunder HR practice map, on a slightly unrelated note), I suggest you, like, don't do it meh its the best way to indicate this is 1/3 sorry
2. 00:18:477 (6) - NC done
3. 00:21:644 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - The "ah"s don't quite qualify as an intensity change that calls for that much of a difference in difficulty (reading, for this pattern). The added rhythm is fine, but arrange it so a 1/4 triple doesn't overlap a 1/2 stack. Even if it's not technically incorrect, it doesn't make contextual sense i don't know, i see this as a simple back-and-forth, the ar is high enough to this is perfectly readable for any player who can do 3.9* decently
4. 00:31:144 (6,1,2) - I understand why 1 is spaced further apart, but why is 2 aswell? 2 should be a little closer to 1 since it doesn't have a snare on it or anything like that makes sense, fixed
5. 00:46:644 (1,2,3,4,5) - Here, instead, there isn't enough emphasis on 2, which is spaced even closer to 1 than it is to 3-4-5 spaced it a bit more, but the 1/8 triples will always be the priority in this diff
6. 00:57:310 (1,2,3) - ^ can't really make a way this plays comfortably while emphasizing the triples here, but i nerfed the jump between 2,3
   
   EDIT; it seems while I was modding you updated the map and this popped up
7. 00:19:644 (8) - unsnapped

I could not point out that many things, nor that important, but I do hope I was of some sort of help.
Thank you for using my queue

On a partially related note, I would appreciate if you gave me some feedback about this mod (not the things I pointed out themselves as much as whether I looked for the right things to point out). I believe to be no good when it comes to maps that are essentially ready for rank already, I would therefore appreciate some guidance by a mapper whom I regard highly. Have a pleasant day

Su1fu7 wrote:

Greeting
Pretty solid map, not too many things to point out, but

General

1. Perhaps you can change offset to -23 to avoid that bs with unsnapped spinners in intro my bad, the spinners were actually unsnapped lol

Normal

1. I honestly dont think its a good idea to use 1/8 reverses in lowest diff but w/e i guess cant do much, its 90bpm and a relatively complex rhythm over the song
2. 00:27:810 (2,3,1) - i think it would be pretty nice to make something like this to emphasize difference between (3) and (1) a bit more done
3. 00:30:810 (1,2) - you making those two sounds clickable but complitely ignoring pretty much the same sounds at 00:31:644 - and 00:31:810 - . In my opinion using rhythm like this instead of 00:30:810 (1,2,3) - would be a better decision done
4. sound on 00:46:977 (2) - is pretty quiet, maybe change 00:46:644 (1) - to a 1/2 slider? i believe this pattern works better because it makes 00:47:644 (4,1) - more readable & expected imo

Hard

1. 00:15:310 (5) - sliderend should be snapped to 00:15:866 - fixed
2. In my opinion it would be better if you make something like this instead of 00:53:977 (7) - , so flow between 00:53:977 (7,1) - isnt linear and sound on 00:54:644 (1) - have more emphasis

imo that's really going against the general flow of the diff

Welcome

1. 00:25:977 (8,9) - idk maybe its just me but distance between those feels a bit to big, maybe try something like this? but the sound at 9 is more prominent, wouldn't make sense to make the spacing smaller
2. 00:43:310 (3,4) - you can make it looks like this so flow between 00:43:477 (4,1) - isnt linear and therefore 00:43:977 - have a bit more emphasis but (4) isn't a very strong beat, there's no need to have such a harsh flow between them
3. Also ignoring sound on 00:58:560 - feels kinda awkward, maybechange 00:58:477 (6) - to a 1/8 kickslider? there's no sound at 560 though, its just an extension of the blue tick note

Thats all from me, good luck c:

MaridiuS wrote:

school over, exam done, mod here. Let's see if i can point out anythnig lul mod from my queue

[Welcome]
00:10:977 (2,3,4) - hmm just a suggestion but for this sound, it is usually in the song introduced suddenly. So adding a NC and more emphasis might be nice. it was introduced in 00:03:644 (1,2,3) - o.o
00:16:644 (2,3) - ugh is just me or is this sound only on left headphone, but 00:18:477 (1) - is on the right one, therefore place 00:18:477 (1) - on the right side of the grid lol? that's the intention, but since "right side of the grid" isn't really visible in gameplay i just moved the flow to the right
00:34:144 (6,7,8) - It is probably a mistake to stack this like the sudden sound I mentioned ^ here, I think it should be different, mapping different sounds to different styles is the way i'm always going with. why is it a mistake? o.o
00:43:144 - you could add a note here, Following the bass like 00:41:810 (3) - or something but it's silence D:
00:51:310 (7,8) - not sure what their purpose you usually reserve sliders for really important sounds, I don't hear anything important here. yeah, removed (8) and added a note there

[hard]
00:19:644 (3) - uh huh, wow, okay. Maybe blue tick to follow the bass? ahh nvm, so triggered the composer didn't put it on white tick yeah this song is a bit weird
00:17:644 - maybe its a big pause, filling the rhythm with following the kicks might be better I feel like, like you did on welcome. nah, it'd be a bit inconsistent with the rhythm in this diff

Turquoise2 wrote:

henlo modding because i love anime songs

Welcome

00:03:644 (1,2,3) - for some reason this seems off time but its probably just me probably because its actually 1/6 lol
00:09:144 (3) - this should be moved 1/8th of a beat forward following bass
00:10:644 (1,2) - these two should be a bit further away to improve reading nah pretty much the entire map is spaced like this, this is basically introducing it
00:16:644 (2,3) - i think you should reduce stack leniency to 4 to improve reading eh i think this is pretty readable
00:17:644 (4,5) - these shouldn't be stacked because it then reads the same as a 1/2 (or 1/4 in this case(double bpm cancer)) moving 00:18:144 (5) - to x:116 y:376 may be better approach circles are working pretty well here imo
00:28:477 (3) - i think you should move this to x:220 y:165 so that it is more consistent in terms of spacing well its supposed to be about emphasis here
00:30:477 (4) - 1/8th of a beat further following bass
00:31:310 (1) - maybe overlap this with the sliderend instead of sliderhead? just a thought eh emphasis is more well done by doing what i have now
00:58:644 (1,2) - follow the "aa aaa aa" instead and make this 3 sliders cuz this plays weirdly imo imo it works well as it is but i may make the last slider 7/8 and add a note at the end

Hard

00:09:144 (3) - 1/8th following bass & rhythm simplification
00:35:977 (2) - either nc this or un-nc this slider in your welcome diff because c o n s i s t e n c y fixd
00:42:310 (3,4) - 1/8th my friend basssssdsdadsa
00:59:810 i think you should place a note here na lol

Normal

00:08:977 (2,3) - hey mismagius its me ur brother 1/8th bbbbbbaaaassssssssssssssssss
00:14:977 place a note here maybe done
00:33:644 (4) - i think you should make this a 1/4th slider so that it so that that weird high pitched sound is mapped done
00:42:310 (3) - extend by sdafffffff
00:44:977 (3) - should be stacked with 00:45:144 (4) - unless you dont wanna i dont wanna
00:52:977 (2,3) - guess whoggggggsdffffffffaaaaaaaaaaaaabghgawewaehawhaw5343g5
00:55:644 (3,4) - stickety stackity na
00:58:144 (2,3,4,5) - i think you should make this a simpler rhythm lol it used to be but ppl complained lo

ur welcome mister magic us

Monstrata wrote:

Welcome

00:05:310 (1,2) - I would make 00:06:310 - clickable and begin a slider head on00:06:810 - instead. The current rhythm makes a really inaudible note clickable, and neglects an audible note by making it a slider end. But using this rhythm you're mentioning is currently ignoring the blue tick notes, which while not as audible as the clap, are still pretty important. Used an alternative rhythm here which makes all of them clickable, hopefully. The biggest problem is that I avoided using filler rhythm as much as possible in this map to properly emphasize the uncommon rhythm, but can't do that here without skipping important beats.
00:22:977 - Making this clickable sounds better imo, since you use so many triplets. 00:24:310 - etc... Fixed here, but in all cases except this one, such as 00:23:977 (1,2,3) - , I'm using the slider to emphasize the vocals holding out. Without creating some kind of awkward filler note, it just wouldn't work having it as a triple. It's supposed to make the vocals blend with the triples. I'm keeping this as it is for now, but if you feel like this is really a big problem then I'll change
00:48:894 (6) - Sounds overmapped. It's a triplet and a 5plet here I don't think so, listening at high volume and 50% (actually removing the notes and listening to 100% works as well) makes this clear it's a full stream. Maybe 00:48:727 (4) - is at a much lower volume and I can remove it, but (6) definitely feels like it should be there.

Hard

00:05:310 (1,2) - I'd recommend the same rhythm for highest diff. done
00:15:310 (5) - You could probably break this into two sliders and have one on 00:15:644 - instead. You map 1/8 triplets anyways so this rhythm seems too simplified for the density you're expecting players to be able to handle on this diff. done
00:37:310 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - This on the other hand feels way too dense. I would recommend simplifying or using 1/4 repeats instead. Comparing the rhythm here to Normal, its just too much of a spike imo. In any case, i don't recommend two 5-note streams so close together on Hards. Honestly, using repeats here feels really counter-intuitive and hard to sightread considering the SV and spacing... Well, did it for one of the 5plets as I believe the second one should be more emphasized due to starting a new section in the song.

Normal

00:31:144 - You kinda miss out on this note. I would recommend a 1/4 repeat slider instead, for 00:30:810 - . It makes more sense imo since 00:31:644 (4) - is mapped to a slider, but 00:30:810 (1,2) - which follow the same sound, is mapped to circles. done
00:37:310 (1,2) - You can make this denser too i think, since you've introduced 1/4 repeats earlier done

[]

Bizarre song. Give me metadata if you have a source, and call me back when you're ready.

Fatfan Kolek wrote:

00:29:977 (2) - is this clap supposed to be like this? highest diff btw

Mismagius wrote:

yep, all diffs have the clap. remove the notes and compare this sound to the other "claps" in the song, this one is much more intense.