Some maps have awesome SB, I enjoy watching it when I am specing and I sometimes even watch that with auto. But those SB mostly fuck me up when I am playing. Maybe I just have bad eyes, but IMO, before we can have osu on NDS or something double screen, having option to enable/disable SB will be good.
forum
osz2 and SB/skin Elements: a Discussion
posted
Total Posts
86
Would it be possible to make it so that storyboard objects that are epilepsy threats could be flagged as such in the osb, then have a toggle to remove epilepsy-inducing storyboard elements?
I don't really mind the Storyboard. That doesn't distract me as much. There are some good, some bad, and some not so much, but I won't delete them. Custom skins I have to play on some maps however...I don't like. Mostly because there are some that lag my PC for every 15 seconds when I start playing them. Sure it won't lag as much if I keep playing it, but I don't see that working as much. =/ And some that affects how I play. If I had to play a map with a bad skin, I won't be able to play it properly because it makes it hard to see and I keep getting a low accuracy because of it. 
Like this map for example. Seeing that osz2 is coming out soon...... I can't delete bad skins on some maps anymore and I have to play them by force. D; "Don't play that map with a bad skin, then." is not a good excuse. >_> When osz2 comes out and If there are maps that are pending and I have happened to play their custom skin that is bad, I'm going to have to ask the mapper that I strongly suggest on removing that. We'll see how it goes when osz2 comes out.
Edit: Fixed a typo error.
Like this map for example. Seeing that osz2 is coming out soon...... I can't delete bad skins on some maps anymore and I have to play them by force. D; "Don't play that map with a bad skin, then." is not a good excuse. >_> When osz2 comes out and If there are maps that are pending and I have happened to play their custom skin that is bad, I'm going to have to ask the mapper that I strongly suggest on removing that. We'll see how it goes when osz2 comes out.Edit: Fixed a typo error.
One last thing to say at any reply after mine,
Customization > Elite gameplay
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
Customization > Elite gameplay
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
This doesn't happen often with storyboards. Most mappers sufficiently dedicated to SB will know better than to make their maps invisible. It is a pretty big problem with skins, backgrounds, and kiai use.
I forsee a mass removal of offending storyboards and skins coming once osz2 is out the door. Ranking requirements will be stricter and penalties will be harsher for BATs ranking bad storyboards.
I forsee a mass removal of offending storyboards and skins coming once osz2 is out the door. Ranking requirements will be stricter and penalties will be harsher for BATs ranking bad storyboards.
Like no one ever wasGuy-kun wrote:
you want to be 'the very best'
Just being curious, who made that formula?Guy-kun wrote:
One last thing to say at any reply after mine,
Customization > Elite gameplay
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
Also, as a mapper, if efforts (skin, SB) make people annoying when "playing" then I will hope they can be turned off, instead of make people less fun.
Storyboarding is imo not as big of a problem as the skin of the map. When osz2 comes out and you won't be able to remove the skin, gameplay is going to get ruined for alot of people. It doesn't matter if we have BATs/GMT's who are here to moderate these stuff, annoying skins/SB's will always get ranked no matter what. The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
Elitism really,Gabi wrote:
Storyboarding is imo not as big of a problem as the skin of the map. When osz2 comes out and you won't be able to remove the skin, gameplay is going to get ruined for alot of people. It doesn't matter if we have BATs/GMT's who are here to moderate these stuff, annoying skins/SB's will always get ranked no matter what. The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
the whole 'I'm so serious I'm going to remove the skin to get a higher score'
In my opinion anyway
[edit]
Implying that it really pisses me off when people feel the need to do it.
Gabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
I am totally late, but I have to say you're a bit wrong there.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
People say that SB make the computer lag.
Oh come on. My PC is, like, 6 years old and it doesn't suffer from any SB, i even use the Shader Effects! It's true that sometimes some SBs are not optimized enough (storyboarding is more complicated than it seems, coding-wise) but there are already some limits for that (like the 800*600 max resolution for Backgrounds)
My osu! runs at 50-60 fps (even without frame limiter). If I play a map with heavy storyboarding (Like your Okami map), the fps drops to a unplayable 25fps, making it ridiculously impossible to even MOVE the cursor.
My computer isn't really old, only 3 years actually. Even when I had a better OS (XP) I had a lot of lags SB-related.
So yeah, the problem with me isn't "you can't remove the SB anymore", it's "you can't remove the SB anymore and fuck you if you have a shitty computer". Here in my country (at least where I live), "good" computers are ridiculously expensive, costing around US$3500.
Yeah, I hate how people won't appreciate something that took effort and is actually pretty good (e.g. Jarto) and are like LOLDELETE.
On the other hand, if a storyboard somehow stops you from playing, something's not right. I would support deleting SBs in this case, but the above irks me too much so no.
But out of curiosity, how will modders be able to check the folders like they can now with osz2 for something important? Or the mapper themselves if something explodes?
On the other hand, if a storyboard somehow stops you from playing, something's not right. I would support deleting SBs in this case, but the above irks me too much so no.
But out of curiosity, how will modders be able to check the folders like they can now with osz2 for something important? Or the mapper themselves if something explodes?
Who said i'm deleting every SB? o_OGalkan92 wrote:
Don't delete every SB you see (because it's just SB) until it annoys you to the point you can't play. Just stay neutral and try to play with it.ShaggoN wrote:
But if main change is include SB in file and make ppl not able to remove it and put back when they want then... NO! I don't want to see osz2, i'm scared of it.
In most of my cases, i'm removing these things to have fun with map, which annoys me with sb, and it's awesome without sb. In specific cases when i want to get a good score play. I put SB back, to have fun with it in next plays (if i like this SB of courseGuy-kun wrote:
Elitism really,
the whole 'I'm so serious I'm going to remove the skin to get a higher score'
In my opinion anyway
).Came here to make this post pretty much. There should be ability to disable SB elements when there is a legitimate health concern. However, being able to see past "distracting" storyboards and play the map well regardless is a skill, just like any other aspect of playing the game. Besides, sometimes storyboards can add something gameplay-wise to a map. (see maps like NB Rangers: Returns or Disturbia) It'd be really lame to delete SB from maps like that but I'm sure there are people who would... it'd be nice as a mapper to be able to make maps like that knowing that the SB I added won't be deleted.0_o wrote:
Would it be possible to make it so that storyboard objects that are epilepsy threats could be flagged as such in the osb, then have a toggle to remove epilepsy-inducing storyboard elements?
A question about osz2: how would modding work? Would SB and whatnot be freely editable to modders while the map is unranked? Say someone were to delete SB elements while the map was pending, and then the map got ranked. Would they have a limited edition version of the map without SB elements in it?
edit: I guess my last paragraph kind of repeats what NotShinta said a couple posts up... still curious though!
I really can't make a final comment until I know the osz2 specs. All I've heard are comments by staff, there doesn't appear to be an actual list/description of what osz2 will do, except that it will apparently fix all sorts of problems at the cost of the system being proprietary, not a regular ZIP archive.
That being said, I would agree that storyboards are part of the map, and should not be able to be removed. There are enough hoops to jump through by the ranking process to prevent storyboard distraction and lack of epilepsy warnings. The newly implemented SB Load should help reduce the problems for older machines, which I am quite sympathetic to. After all of these efforts, it would be a great shame if the effort was thrown away as something extraneous.
That being said, I would agree that storyboards are part of the map, and should not be able to be removed. There are enough hoops to jump through by the ranking process to prevent storyboard distraction and lack of epilepsy warnings. The newly implemented SB Load should help reduce the problems for older machines, which I am quite sympathetic to. After all of these efforts, it would be a great shame if the effort was thrown away as something extraneous.
Topic Starter
Guy-kun wrote:
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
Guy-kun wrote:
Elitism really,
the whole 'I'm so serious I'm going to remove the skin to get a higher score'
In my opinion anyway
Responsing to the above two claims:
There is more to this than just wanting a higher score.KRZY wrote:
Well, I believe it is a preference matter. Some people, like myself, really likes to play with a black background and simple-toned notes because we simply don't like flashy and decorative stuff. This preference, imo, should be respected and not just ignored by people saying "deal with it." Understand that there are people who have different tastes than yours. Think of it on the same terms as people designing and using custom skins to play.
Also, changed the discussion topic so that it includes skin elements as well as SB elements also since some posts convinced me to think that skin elements as well as SB elements can be a problem.
This is somehow one thing I am totally in agreement with. Though personally some of my maps just don't look right without the SB, it would be on the option of the player to delete them anyway... that doesn't mean everyone else will delete them. If everyone else did, then the SB is just probably that fugly.Gabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
Though if we take into skins into account... meh, I'll be more on the delete-able side of things. Unlike SB, the skin elements actually directly affect gameplay.
mekadon_old
Some SB's cause major lags on some PC's, especially those which have a video-like storyboards like Neko Miko Reimu or Don't Stop Me Now or whatsoever. Even my PC can run at 60fps (VSync) with those SBs with me having a single-core processor and a mere 1GB RAM and an IDE hard drive I still can play it well. (Note even my PC can only use OpenGL)
I don't see any problem with SBs though I have a mild epilepsy, which doesn't cause much problem with me even when playing StrangeProgram or Ritsuen; which I might conclude as a challenge rather than a restriction, though I might have a mild headache after playing them.
Skins however, like what Zekira said, slightly affects gameplay. HP bars, hitcircles, cursors, etc. might change the mood of gameplay on a certain map. e.g. if a map's skin is so goddamn horrible you don't have the will to play the map at all. However, that depends on a specific player as each has different taste on certain things.
IMO the only thing I think is okay to delete in a map is the skin elements. For SBs? I go for 50% of it, since I'm very confident that some people's PC specs are far worse than me.
I don't see any problem with SBs though I have a mild epilepsy, which doesn't cause much problem with me even when playing StrangeProgram or Ritsuen; which I might conclude as a challenge rather than a restriction, though I might have a mild headache after playing them.
Skins however, like what Zekira said, slightly affects gameplay. HP bars, hitcircles, cursors, etc. might change the mood of gameplay on a certain map. e.g. if a map's skin is so goddamn horrible you don't have the will to play the map at all. However, that depends on a specific player as each has different taste on certain things.
IMO the only thing I think is okay to delete in a map is the skin elements. For SBs? I go for 50% of it, since I'm very confident that some people's PC specs are far worse than me.
GUISE I WANT BIGGAR NOTES I CANT SEE/CLICK NOTES
AND SMALLER HP BAR ITS DISTRACTING
I WANT AUTOAIM TOO PLAYING WITH SHIT MOUSE IS HARD
WAIT THATS THEIR ALREADY RANKED IT PLEASE
Quick steps to not looking like a total idiot:
AND SMALLER HP BAR ITS DISTRACTING
I WANT AUTOAIM TOO PLAYING WITH SHIT MOUSE IS HARD
WAIT THATS THEIR ALREADY RANKED IT PLEASE
Quick steps to not looking like a total idiot:
- Ensure you meet reasonable system requirements and have reasonable settings set in osu! and your environment which do not, by themselves, detriment gameplay.
- Report maps which cause problems.
- Don't post in this thread.
What about maximum fps regulation for SBs
and minimum contrast ratio for skins.
Some SBs have glowing/flashing effects at a relatively high fps that are really bad for our eyes and can cause lags.
Also, skins that have have almost minimal contrast from the background, I find ridiculous.
Anyways, I would definitely opt for an option to delete skins/sbs at my leisure.
and minimum contrast ratio for skins.
Some SBs have glowing/flashing effects at a relatively high fps that are really bad for our eyes and can cause lags.
Also, skins that have have almost minimal contrast from the background, I find ridiculous.
Anyways, I would definitely opt for an option to delete skins/sbs at my leisure.
My only way to have a fluid gameplay is to toggle low-end pc, set 60fps(vsync) and keep the game at 640x480 (800x600 is still decently playable but I can notice the difference).At very least, I can use directX (OpenGL makes me barely able to complete spinners,it just slows down like fuck).Still, SB slow me down.When I find a SB I usually remove it, and leave the background wallpaper unless it's too colorful and makes me hardly see beats.Still, I don't remove simple stuff like vanishing text like "beatmap by dkfjghfkdjhg" as long it doesn't really bother me anyhow.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
We already have restrictions of SB load to ensure performance isn't affected by storyboards (if you find a map that runs very badly please report it so we can take action). Also I'm not reading this discussion, just saying 
.
.Read #3: viewtopic.php?p=610158#p610158LaCreme wrote:
What about maximum fps regulation for SBs
and minimum contrast ratio for skins.
Some SBs have glowing/flashing effects at a relatively high fps that are really bad for our eyes and can cause lags.
Also, skins that have have almost minimal contrast from the background, I find ridiculous.
Anyways, I would definitely opt for an option to delete skins/sbs at my leisure.
Read #3: viewtopic.php?p=610158#p610158[Takuya] wrote:
My only way to have a fluid gameplay is to toggle low-end pc, set 60fps(vsync) and keep the game at 640x480 (800x600 is still decently playable but I can notice the difference).At very least, I can use directX (OpenGL makes me barely able to complete spinners,it just slows down like fuck).Still, SB slow me down.When I find a SB I usually remove it, and leave the background wallpaper unless it's too colorful and makes me hardly see beats.Still, I don't remove simple stuff like vanishing text like "beatmap by dkfjghfkdjhg" as long it doesn't really bother me anyhow.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
No one is, or they'd realize what they're saying has been said years ago.peppy wrote:
Also I'm not reading this discussion, just saying :).
Also, read #--
May I suggest something which would make ALL mappers happy, and even some players much happier...
A few options could be added to the editor which could be ticked by a mapper, which would grant permission for a player to disable certain elements from a map during gameplay?
Such as:
1) Flashing/Strobing lights
2) Kaia time
3) Storyboard
etc...
Then a player selects these options in the song selection menu screen for enabling/disabling these features for the maps that support it. This way, mappers can then decide on what is more important to them when releasing a map...
1) Have their map played by everyone, due to allowing individual game elements to be disabled during the game.
2) Have their map played only as they intended it to be played, which would mean having their map being played by less people and would be less popular (playcount wise, not quality wise) due to this reason.
A few options could be added to the editor which could be ticked by a mapper, which would grant permission for a player to disable certain elements from a map during gameplay?
Such as:
1) Flashing/Strobing lights
2) Kaia time
3) Storyboard
etc...
Then a player selects these options in the song selection menu screen for enabling/disabling these features for the maps that support it. This way, mappers can then decide on what is more important to them when releasing a map...
1) Have their map played by everyone, due to allowing individual game elements to be disabled during the game.
2) Have their map played only as they intended it to be played, which would mean having their map being played by less people and would be less popular (playcount wise, not quality wise) due to this reason.
Would be great hmm.
But i sware i'll drink whole bottle of vodka in one shot if it comes in. XD
But i sware i'll drink whole bottle of vodka in one shot if it comes in. XD
I support this. As both a player and a mapper I understand why you might want to disable SB. I've made a SB before and I know how much effort goes into it, but quite honestly if someone didn't want to use it, why force them? There's really no point and it'd just end up with a lot of unhappy people. I've skinned songs too, so I say the same thing about skinning - if you don't want to use skin elements, I think they should be delete - ableGabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
+1 support (though I doubt this would be implemented)adamskii_uk wrote:
May I suggest something which would make ALL mappers happy, and even some players much happier...
A few options could be added to the editor which could be ticked by a mapper, which would grant permission for a player to disable certain elements from a map during gameplay?
Such as:
1) Flashing/Strobing lights
2) Kaia time
3) Storyboard
etc...
Then a player selects these options in the song selection menu screen for enabling/disabling these features for the maps that support it. This way, mappers can then decide on what is more important to them when releasing a map...
1) Have their map played by everyone, due to allowing individual game elements to be disabled during the game.
2) Have their map played only as they intended it to be played, which would mean having their map being played by less people and would be less popular (playcount wise, not quality wise) due to this reason.
... Anyway. Just my thoughts on this
There is something wrong with your computer, my old computer was from 2000, had 512 RAM, and a 1GHz processor. It ran DSMN with almost no problem even in full screen without Low-end PC checked. You may just need to reformat (Which I did to my old computer and it helped a lot) or your video card may not be up to par for the game.[Takuya] wrote:
My only way to have a fluid gameplay is to toggle low-end pc, set 60fps(vsync) and keep the game at 640x480 (800x600 is still decently playable but I can notice the difference).At very least, I can use directX (OpenGL makes me barely able to complete spinners,it just slows down like fuck).Still, SB slow me down.When I find a SB I usually remove it, and leave the background wallpaper unless it's too colorful and makes me hardly see beats.Still, I don't remove simple stuff like vanishing text like "beatmap by dkfjghfkdjhg" as long it doesn't really bother me anyhow.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
You have both missed the most important part of your PC specs: the graphics card. This decides whether osu! will run or not, as the biggest pull osu! has is on fill rate. Integrated graphics cards generally can't draw too many pixels to the screen per frame.
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.peppy wrote:
.
Take me for example. I'm using a custom skin for a sole reason of "standart hit300/100/50 are too huge". Seriously, they get in your way pretty often, especially when you're playing hidden. So why would I want to lose an opportunity to use my own skin for every map?
I appreciate when mappers make their own skins which match the map. But even if I like them, if they get in my way when playing, I delete them and redownload when I'm sure that I'm done with the map.
That thing about skins is so true... I can't really stand playing some maps because they got a skin which just gets in the way (like you don't even notice if you hit a 300/100/50/missed, or you get an huge 300), thanks god some maps just try to load the skin and, if you don't have it, then you go with the default one (like many Touhou maps).
This.TKiller wrote:
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.
Take me for example. I'm using a custom skin for a sole reason of "standart hit300/100/50 are too huge". Seriously, they get in your way pretty often, especially when you're playing hidden. So why would I want to lose an opportunity to use my own skin for every map?
I appreciate when mappers make their own skins which match the map. But even if I like them, if they get in my way when playing, I delete them and redownload when I'm sure that I'm done with the map.
How about no.Guy-kun wrote:
Shut up everyone :l
Pretty much this. And custom skinned hits in Taiko piss me off, even when I have taiko forced [I haven't played the newest osu! build so don't yell at me if this has been changed.]TKiller wrote:
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.
Take me for example. I'm using a custom skin for a sole reason of "standart hit300/100/50 are too huge". Seriously, they get in your way pretty often, especially when you're playing hidden. So why would I want to lose an opportunity to use my own skin for every map?
I appreciate when mappers make their own skins which match the map. But even if I like them, if they get in my way when playing, I delete them and redownload when I'm sure that I'm done with the map.
As far as SB's go: I like looking at storyboards, but pretty much any of them that have flashes, strobes, etc., are extremely distracting. No, i'm not bitching because they lag my PC [yeah, I can play on a netbook just fine so people bitching about SB lag should probably stop], or I want a really high score, but some of them are just over-the-top.
And why didn't anybody mention this SB? My eyes are burning. I can appreciate when people take creative liberties, but what the hell. Seriously?
How about it.E-Hooker wrote:
How about no.Guy-kun wrote:
Shut up everyone :l
This argument or discussion is useless, we know nothing will change.
Just because it's useless, doesn't mean that it shouldn't happen.Guy-kun wrote:
How about it.E-Hooker wrote:
How about no.
This argument or discussion is useless, we know nothing will change.
If you think it's useless, then don't post, yeah?
It's my opinion that it's useless to try, stop denying me of my opinion.E-Hooker wrote:
Just because it's useless, doesn't mean that it shouldn't happen.Guy-kun wrote:
How about it.
This argument or discussion is useless, we know nothing will change.
If you think it's useless, then don't post, yeah?
This is for discussion.
Then really, stop being so negative, because then you're "denying people of their opinion" as well.
Actually I'm switching a bit now...
I'm more on the untouchable SB elements[/s] side now,
but if possible, [b]a toggle to force own skin when playing please. I have never actually used any custom skins from maps; just delete them and use either the default skin, Okami skin, or Taiko skin. I many of the skins in the maps to be well-made and I can't say anything negative much about them, but the fact remains that it hinders my gameplay.
I'm more on the untouchable SB elements[/s] side now,
but if possible, [b]a toggle to force own skin when playing please. I have never actually used any custom skins from maps; just delete them and use either the default skin, Okami skin, or Taiko skin. I many of the skins in the maps to be well-made and I can't say anything negative much about them, but the fact remains that it hinders my gameplay.
My crappy onepeppy wrote:
You have both missed the most important part of your PC specs: the graphics card. This decides whether osu! will run or not, as the biggest pull osu! has is on fill rate. Integrated graphics cards generally can't draw too many pixels to the screen per frame.
Topic Starter
Guy-kun and strager, you greatly amuse me by trying to deny people the right to post in this thread, thanks, but please do figure out the fact that you have no power whatsoever to do so, and by trying you merely look comical.
Some good points raised in this thread, it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind. There will be additional discussions on this once osz2 is actually implemented I'm sure.
Some good points raised in this thread, it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind. There will be additional discussions on this once osz2 is actually implemented I'm sure.
Which have been discussed a long time ago.KRZY wrote:
Some good points raised in this thread
Because of the discussions a long time ago, and his own objectives and his vision for osu!.KRZY wrote:
it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind.
Which will probably be as stupid as this thread.KRZY wrote:
There will be additional discussions on this once osz2 is actually implemented I'm sure.
You have to realize that you're not discussing anything important. You're making yourselves look pretty stupid, for the most part. (There are exceptions, but there are always exceptions.) If you don't post here, you can avoid that and save some time.
Sometimes I like you, strager.
Sometimes I like you too, peppy.peppy wrote:
Sometimes I like you, strager.
This should be locked on this positive note.
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.strager wrote:
Because of the discussions a long time ago, and his own objectives and his vision for osu!.KRZY wrote:
it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind.
Here are two things that should be added to the list, when osz2 is released:
1) No threads requesting for a practice mode (I wasted many hours/days of my life trying to convice peppy that we needed it) that enables users to go directly to any part of a song, to practice difficult to read sections. I know that we can currently do this in the editor, but we will all lose the ability do to this once osz2 is released.
2) No threads asking for the disabling of storyboards and skins with osz2 maps. Since this has apparently already been mentioned many times before, and has been rejected many times.
Okay, and what will people do with this list? They'll either ignore it, or they'll look for their own opinion/suggestion in the list. In other words, they'll search it.adamskii_uk wrote:
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.
You can do that now.
Pessimism, ho!
The problem with the search feature is that you have to type the EXACT words that were used in the thread, for it to find the thread. Sometimes this can make the threads difficult to find, such as searching for "practice" instead of "rehearse", since I called the thread requesting for a practice mode in osu! "Rehearse MOD", and not "Practice MOD".strager wrote:
Okay, and what will people do with this list? They'll either ignore it, or they'll look for their own opinion/suggestion in the list. In other words, they'll search it.adamskii_uk wrote:
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.
You can do that now.
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=2950&hilit=rehearse
Also, the search feature can sometimes bring up results of over a few hundred posts to search through, if the words are used many times throughout the forum. For example, I searched for the word "practice" and 61 pages of results appeared for it. So the search feature which can be useful at times, isn't always a quick and easy solution to the problem. So I think a sticky thread in this section of the forum would be much more appropriate for informing users on here what features definately wont be added to osu!, no matter how much people try to convince peppy that it's needed.
Yes you do.adamskii_uk wrote:
I suck at searching.
No I don't suck at searching. However, you DO suck at not insulting people on here, since almost every one of you posts in this thread has been negative towards forum users who post in here.strager wrote:
Yes you do.adamskii_uk wrote:
I suck at searching.
I was merely providing an example of what results other users MAY get when searching for the word "practice", instead of "rehearse". After all, if I hadn't included the word "mod" in my example (ie. practice mod), then you would have come up with 61 pages worth of results like what I did, when searching just for the word "practice".
EDIT: And yes, I know that the "rehearse MOD" thread appeared your search results list when searching for "practice mod", but only because the word "practice" was mentioned in the thread also. Also, it wouldn't have been so easy to find that thread when searching for just "practice" though, since it's an old thread (2+ years) and would have been many pages into the search results.
I'm not complaining about insulting people. You are complaining about people getting the information they want.adamskii_uk wrote:
No I don't suck at searching. However, you DO suck at not insulting people on here, since almost every one of you posts in this thread has been negative towards forum users who post in here.
So what? Who is going to search just "practice"? "I need a feature which lets me practice." You don't need a fucking feature for that. What you do want is a practice mode or mod or an unranked mode.adamskii_uk wrote:
I was merely providing an example of what results other users MAY get when searching for the word "practice", instead of "rehearse". After all, if I hadn't included the word "mod" in my example (ie. practice mod), then you would have come up with 61 pages worth of results like what I did, when searching just for the word "practice".
If you're going to bring in examples, be reasonable with them.
We are getting completely offtopic now. This is the last post I'm going to make in this thread, since I don't want to waste any more of my life with this, since I've got better things to do.strager wrote:
So what? Who is going to search just "practice"? "I need a feature which lets me practice." You don't need a fucking feature for that. What you do want is a practice mode or mod or an unranked mode.adamskii_uk wrote:
I was merely providing an example of what results other users MAY get when searching for the word "practice", instead of "rehearse". After all, if I hadn't included the word "mod" in my example (ie. practice mod), then you would have come up with 61 pages worth of results like what I did, when searching just for the word "practice".
If you're going to bring in examples, be reasonable with them.
I admit, I could have probably come up with a better example, but the whole point I was trying to make is that the search feature only works if you search for the correct word(s), which doesn't always happen. Also, even if you do search for the correct word, or phrase, it could still bring up 60+ pages of results to search and read through. I think most people, including myself, don't want to waste time going through 60+ pages of results to see if something has been discussed already and rejected, when it would be much quicker and easier to have a sticky thread that is easily accessible to everyone on the forum.
So you'd rather have peppy waste his time.
And I wasn't getting off topic at all. You were saying that discussion points were not summarized in a way where people can easily access already-beaten-to-death topics regarding OSZ2. I was saying there's a search feature for that if you have an idea, and a place for discussing new topics if it doesn't come up in a search.
If you're going to present a well-balanced argument, I would expect you to search all 61 pages or (more reasonably) come up with better search terms. Usually, if you don't have good search terms, you don't know what you're talking about anyway.
And I wasn't getting off topic at all. You were saying that discussion points were not summarized in a way where people can easily access already-beaten-to-death topics regarding OSZ2. I was saying there's a search feature for that if you have an idea, and a place for discussing new topics if it doesn't come up in a search.
If you're going to present a well-balanced argument, I would expect you to search all 61 pages or (more reasonably) come up with better search terms. Usually, if you don't have good search terms, you don't know what you're talking about anyway.
I usually don't tl;dr threads, but wow...
Looks like everything has been said, so now we're just "going in circles".
Looks like everything has been said, so now we're just "going in circles".
k I read about half of this pages argument before I got bored
Can we lock this now?
Can we lock this now?
Yeah, you can complain about this if and when it happens, in the meantime you might as well just not think about it.