It seems, that this implemention is decided already and even the fact, that quite many players don't agree with it won't help at all :[
^^SuperMaay wrote:
GAMEPLAY OVER PRETTINESS
YESCard N'FoRcE wrote:
People say that SB don't let you play correctly.
You only think about scores, do you?
it makes my cursor dont move properlyCard N'FoRcE wrote:
People say that SB make the computer lag.
Oh come on. My PC is, like, 6 years old and it doesn't suffer from any SB, i even use the Shader Effects! It's true that sometimes some SBs are not optimized enough (storyboarding is more complicated than it seems, coding-wise) but there are already some limits for that (like the 800*600 max resolution for Backgrounds)
I'm agreeing with you here.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
I still have to understand the whole fuss about this matter.
People say that Storyboards like Jarto's are badly drawn and distracting.
Well, that's the point? The same thing would happen even if it was a video, but you can disable it so you guys don't give a damn about that.
Also: they're funny.
People say that SB make the computer lag.
Oh come on. My PC is, like, 6 years old and it doesn't suffer from any SB, i even use the Shader Effects! It's true that sometimes some SBs are not optimized enough (storyboarding is more complicated than it seems, coding-wise) but there are already some limits for that (like the 800*600 max resolution for Backgrounds)
People say that SB don't let you play correctly.
You only think about scores, do you?
People is worried about epilepsy.
There's the warning for that, it appears right after you start the map.
People complain about SB using fake hitobjects.
I didn't really see many maps doing that, but i remember a few that were awesome in that aspect ( Megurine Luka - DYE for example)
People complain.
Yet i see lots of this "incriminated storyboarded maps" with posts saying "star" all over the place. Or with people being enthusiast for the work.
I'm a storyboarder myself, all these things people say just make me go "what the hell do you guys want?"
I see replays with people playing with a black BG and really small or no hitbusts at all just to "be able to FC it easily".
If you want my opinion, i want my maps to be enjoyed like i made them: BG, SB, hitsounds, skin and whatever i added.
You don't like that? Delete it, there are more than 20k maps in the database, you can find something else.
You guys still think that "everything should be played by everyone" but that's impossibile to achieve.
tl;dr: yes i want osz2, i've been waiting for it for more than a year.
inb4ragestorm against me.
NoXgor wrote:
There is a problem if the SB makes it lag but with SB load implanted this shouldn't be happing.
And, about storyboards being distracting. Just see it as a additional challenge to the map~
For the most part, yes, I do. But that's because I believe skins and storyboards CAN AND SHOULD be made in a way they don't ruin gameplay. Am I asking for the impossible...?Card N'FoRcE wrote:
People say that SB don't let you play correctly.
You only think about scores, do you?
suppose I have AIDS in my left eye and that I'd die from epilepsy if I played a map with many flashes. Currently, I could still enjoy the map by deleting the storyboard, even if not as much as I would if I played it with the storyboard. However, with osz2, I would no longer be able to play it.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
People is worried about epilepsy.
There's the warning for that, it appears right after you start the map.
oh come on, no one complains about those. In fact, I have only seen fake hitbojects in two maps: Marshmallow and ZUN's Emotional Skyscraper (and I quite like the effect).Card N'FoRcE wrote:
People complain about SB using fake hitobjects.
I didn't really see many maps doing that, but i remember a few that were awesome in that aspect ( Megurine Luka - DYE for example)
Why is that impossible at present? Disregarding skill, of course...Card N'FoRcE wrote:
You guys still think that "everything should be played by everyone" but that's impossibile to achieve.
If there's something I can say about this statement, it's about balancing both. Not just SB; I've been bitched many, many, many times how I've overmapped almost every map I have, and while my mapping didn't really break anything, I am being asked nicely to tone it down just so that it would look 'appropriate', but that would usually mean a lesser score. In terms of gameplay, I still believe that only the best players deserve to Full Combo stuff, but seems like we can't live on that premise alone.SuperMaay wrote:
GAMEPLAY OVER PRETTINESS
I didn't considered other changes in osz2 yet, cause i just simply don't know them yet.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
I still have to understand the whole fuss about this matter.
People say that Storyboards like Jarto's are badly drawn and distracting.
Well, that's the point? The same thing would happen even if it was a video, but you can disable it so you guys don't give a damn about that.
Also: they're funny. Yes they are, i can have fun and laugh a lot watching sb like that, or other cool stuff. However i care much about my acc, and i want to get ss. With SB on i'm usually not able to get it. Then i remove it, get my ss, and put it back in folder to have fun with it again.
People say that SB make the computer lag.
Oh come on. My PC is, like, 6 years old and it doesn't suffer from any SB, i even use the Shader Effects! It's true that sometimes some SBs are not optimized enough (storyboarding is more complicated than it seems, coding-wise) but there are already some limits for that (like the 800*600 max resolution for Backgrounds) Actually i didn't ever had any lag because of SB either. (Can't say that about kiai btw)
People say that SB don't let you play correctly.
You only think about scores, do you? Not really. Sometimes when there is song that i like a lot, and it's mapped great, oh i love the map and i want to enjoy the play. But annoying SB is not allowing me to enjoy it. I'm lucky that i'm still able to remove it.
People is worried about epilepsy.
There's the warning for that, it appears right after you start the map. Indeed.
People complain about SB using fake hitobjects.
I didn't really see many maps doing that, but i remember a few that were awesome in that aspect ( Megurine Luka - DYE for example) I never complained about fake objects, cause even if i fail on it, it's usually making me laugh cause it's funny.
Don't delete every SB you see (because it's just SB) until it annoys you to the point you can't play. Just stay neutral and try to play with it.ShaggoN wrote:
But if main change is include SB in file and make ppl not able to remove it and put back when they want then... NO! I don't want to see osz2, i'm scared of it.
yeah, I'm pretty sure that goes without saying. The ranking criteria would most certainly change when osz2 is implemented.Zekira wrote:
Just a thought: I think the implementation of this 'feature' in osz2 should also bring about stricter rules about SBing in terms of map playability. Like, strobing effects should be moderated more (but not fully purged) to at least make a epilepsy-prone person to survive for at most 10 minutes of good rest time after playing that map.
Like no one ever wasGuy-kun wrote:
you want to be 'the very best'
Just being curious, who made that formula?Guy-kun wrote:
One last thing to say at any reply after mine,
Customization > Elite gameplay
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
Elitism really,Gabi wrote:
Storyboarding is imo not as big of a problem as the skin of the map. When osz2 comes out and you won't be able to remove the skin, gameplay is going to get ruined for alot of people. It doesn't matter if we have BATs/GMT's who are here to moderate these stuff, annoying skins/SB's will always get ranked no matter what. The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
Gabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
I am totally late, but I have to say you're a bit wrong there.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
People say that SB make the computer lag.
Oh come on. My PC is, like, 6 years old and it doesn't suffer from any SB, i even use the Shader Effects! It's true that sometimes some SBs are not optimized enough (storyboarding is more complicated than it seems, coding-wise) but there are already some limits for that (like the 800*600 max resolution for Backgrounds)
Who said i'm deleting every SB? o_OGalkan92 wrote:
Don't delete every SB you see (because it's just SB) until it annoys you to the point you can't play. Just stay neutral and try to play with it.ShaggoN wrote:
But if main change is include SB in file and make ppl not able to remove it and put back when they want then... NO! I don't want to see osz2, i'm scared of it.
In most of my cases, i'm removing these things to have fun with map, which annoys me with sb, and it's awesome without sb. In specific cases when i want to get a good score play. I put SB back, to have fun with it in next plays (if i like this SB of courseGuy-kun wrote:
Elitism really,
the whole 'I'm so serious I'm going to remove the skin to get a higher score'
In my opinion anyway
Came here to make this post pretty much. There should be ability to disable SB elements when there is a legitimate health concern. However, being able to see past "distracting" storyboards and play the map well regardless is a skill, just like any other aspect of playing the game. Besides, sometimes storyboards can add something gameplay-wise to a map. (see maps like NB Rangers: Returns or Disturbia) It'd be really lame to delete SB from maps like that but I'm sure there are people who would... it'd be nice as a mapper to be able to make maps like that knowing that the SB I added won't be deleted.0_o wrote:
Would it be possible to make it so that storyboard objects that are epilepsy threats could be flagged as such in the osb, then have a toggle to remove epilepsy-inducing storyboard elements?
Guy-kun wrote:
Go somewhere else (like stepmania) if you want elitist opportunities, osu! is more about the community and not throwing away mappers' efforts because you want to be 'the very best'
Guy-kun wrote:
Elitism really,
the whole 'I'm so serious I'm going to remove the skin to get a higher score'
In my opinion anyway
There is more to this than just wanting a higher score.KRZY wrote:
Well, I believe it is a preference matter. Some people, like myself, really likes to play with a black background and simple-toned notes because we simply don't like flashy and decorative stuff. This preference, imo, should be respected and not just ignored by people saying "deal with it." Understand that there are people who have different tastes than yours. Think of it on the same terms as people designing and using custom skins to play.
This is somehow one thing I am totally in agreement with. Though personally some of my maps just don't look right without the SB, it would be on the option of the player to delete them anyway... that doesn't mean everyone else will delete them. If everyone else did, then the SB is just probably that fugly.Gabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
Read #3: viewtopic.php?p=610158#p610158LaCreme wrote:
What about maximum fps regulation for SBs
and minimum contrast ratio for skins.
Some SBs have glowing/flashing effects at a relatively high fps that are really bad for our eyes and can cause lags.
Also, skins that have have almost minimal contrast from the background, I find ridiculous.
Anyways, I would definitely opt for an option to delete skins/sbs at my leisure.
Read #3: viewtopic.php?p=610158#p610158[Takuya] wrote:
My only way to have a fluid gameplay is to toggle low-end pc, set 60fps(vsync) and keep the game at 640x480 (800x600 is still decently playable but I can notice the difference).At very least, I can use directX (OpenGL makes me barely able to complete spinners,it just slows down like fuck).Still, SB slow me down.When I find a SB I usually remove it, and leave the background wallpaper unless it's too colorful and makes me hardly see beats.Still, I don't remove simple stuff like vanishing text like "beatmap by dkfjghfkdjhg" as long it doesn't really bother me anyhow.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
No one is, or they'd realize what they're saying has been said years ago.peppy wrote:
Also I'm not reading this discussion, just saying :).
I support this. As both a player and a mapper I understand why you might want to disable SB. I've made a SB before and I know how much effort goes into it, but quite honestly if someone didn't want to use it, why force them? There's really no point and it'd just end up with a lot of unhappy people. I've skinned songs too, so I say the same thing about skinning - if you don't want to use skin elements, I think they should be delete - ableGabi wrote:
The thing i don't understand is, why would disabling a skin/SB bother anyone but yourself? If i remove the skin/SB of a map i don't like, no one else will be affected in anyway. All of you will still have your SB/Skin elements in your folders, so why should you put this restriction on us?
+1 support (though I doubt this would be implemented)adamskii_uk wrote:
May I suggest something which would make ALL mappers happy, and even some players much happier...
A few options could be added to the editor which could be ticked by a mapper, which would grant permission for a player to disable certain elements from a map during gameplay?
Such as:
1) Flashing/Strobing lights
2) Kaia time
3) Storyboard
etc...
Then a player selects these options in the song selection menu screen for enabling/disabling these features for the maps that support it. This way, mappers can then decide on what is more important to them when releasing a map...
1) Have their map played by everyone, due to allowing individual game elements to be disabled during the game.
2) Have their map played only as they intended it to be played, which would mean having their map being played by less people and would be less popular (playcount wise, not quality wise) due to this reason.
There is something wrong with your computer, my old computer was from 2000, had 512 RAM, and a 1GHz processor. It ran DSMN with almost no problem even in full screen without Low-end PC checked. You may just need to reformat (Which I did to my old computer and it helped a lot) or your video card may not be up to par for the game.[Takuya] wrote:
My only way to have a fluid gameplay is to toggle low-end pc, set 60fps(vsync) and keep the game at 640x480 (800x600 is still decently playable but I can notice the difference).At very least, I can use directX (OpenGL makes me barely able to complete spinners,it just slows down like fuck).Still, SB slow me down.When I find a SB I usually remove it, and leave the background wallpaper unless it's too colorful and makes me hardly see beats.Still, I don't remove simple stuff like vanishing text like "beatmap by dkfjghfkdjhg" as long it doesn't really bother me anyhow.
(My computer is from 2006, 1gb ram (extended from 512mb), ~2.0 GHz)
About skins, I don't really remove them unless they SUCK BADLY or are totally unplayable (First example in my mind: Honey by vocaloids).
However, I'm for NO at osz2 OR yes with noSB/skin mods.
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.peppy wrote:
.
This.TKiller wrote:
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.
Take me for example. I'm using a custom skin for a sole reason of "standart hit300/100/50 are too huge". Seriously, they get in your way pretty often, especially when you're playing hidden. So why would I want to lose an opportunity to use my own skin for every map?
I appreciate when mappers make their own skins which match the map. But even if I like them, if they get in my way when playing, I delete them and redownload when I'm sure that I'm done with the map.
How about no.Guy-kun wrote:
Shut up everyone :l
Pretty much this. And custom skinned hits in Taiko piss me off, even when I have taiko forced [I haven't played the newest osu! build so don't yell at me if this has been changed.]TKiller wrote:
Storyboards are one thing, but I bet a lot of people would like to hear your very final answer for custom skins.
Take me for example. I'm using a custom skin for a sole reason of "standart hit300/100/50 are too huge". Seriously, they get in your way pretty often, especially when you're playing hidden. So why would I want to lose an opportunity to use my own skin for every map?
I appreciate when mappers make their own skins which match the map. But even if I like them, if they get in my way when playing, I delete them and redownload when I'm sure that I'm done with the map.
How about it.E-Hooker wrote:
How about no.Guy-kun wrote:
Shut up everyone :l
Just because it's useless, doesn't mean that it shouldn't happen.Guy-kun wrote:
How about it.E-Hooker wrote:
How about no.
This argument or discussion is useless, we know nothing will change.
It's my opinion that it's useless to try, stop denying me of my opinion.E-Hooker wrote:
Just because it's useless, doesn't mean that it shouldn't happen.Guy-kun wrote:
How about it.
This argument or discussion is useless, we know nothing will change.
If you think it's useless, then don't post, yeah?
My crappy onepeppy wrote:
You have both missed the most important part of your PC specs: the graphics card. This decides whether osu! will run or not, as the biggest pull osu! has is on fill rate. Integrated graphics cards generally can't draw too many pixels to the screen per frame.
Which have been discussed a long time ago.KRZY wrote:
Some good points raised in this thread
Because of the discussions a long time ago, and his own objectives and his vision for osu!.KRZY wrote:
it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind.
Which will probably be as stupid as this thread.KRZY wrote:
There will be additional discussions on this once osz2 is actually implemented I'm sure.
Sometimes I like you too, peppy.peppy wrote:
Sometimes I like you, strager.
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.strager wrote:
Because of the discussions a long time ago, and his own objectives and his vision for osu!.KRZY wrote:
it's a pity ppy already seems to have made up his mind.
Okay, and what will people do with this list? They'll either ignore it, or they'll look for their own opinion/suggestion in the list. In other words, they'll search it.adamskii_uk wrote:
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.
The problem with the search feature is that you have to type the EXACT words that were used in the thread, for it to find the thread. Sometimes this can make the threads difficult to find, such as searching for "practice" instead of "rehearse", since I called the thread requesting for a practice mode in osu! "Rehearse MOD", and not "Practice MOD".strager wrote:
Okay, and what will people do with this list? They'll either ignore it, or they'll look for their own opinion/suggestion in the list. In other words, they'll search it.adamskii_uk wrote:
I think it would be useful for users on this forum, if peppy (or a MOD) would take the time to create a sticky thread containing a list of things that have been discussed many times before for osu! that have been rejected, due to peppy's vision for osu!. This would then prevent alot of time wasting and frustration for users on this forum.
You can do that now.
Yes you do.adamskii_uk wrote:
I suck at searching.
No I don't suck at searching. However, you DO suck at not insulting people on here, since almost every one of you posts in this thread has been negative towards forum users who post in here.strager wrote:
Yes you do.adamskii_uk wrote:
I suck at searching.
I'm not complaining about insulting people. You are complaining about people getting the information they want.adamskii_uk wrote:
No I don't suck at searching. However, you DO suck at not insulting people on here, since almost every one of you posts in this thread has been negative towards forum users who post in here.
So what? Who is going to search just "practice"? "I need a feature which lets me practice." You don't need a fucking feature for that. What you do want is a practice mode or mod or an unranked mode.adamskii_uk wrote:
I was merely providing an example of what results other users MAY get when searching for the word "practice", instead of "rehearse". After all, if I hadn't included the word "mod" in my example (ie. practice mod), then you would have come up with 61 pages worth of results like what I did, when searching just for the word "practice".
We are getting completely offtopic now. This is the last post I'm going to make in this thread, since I don't want to waste any more of my life with this, since I've got better things to do.strager wrote:
So what? Who is going to search just "practice"? "I need a feature which lets me practice." You don't need a fucking feature for that. What you do want is a practice mode or mod or an unranked mode.adamskii_uk wrote:
I was merely providing an example of what results other users MAY get when searching for the word "practice", instead of "rehearse". After all, if I hadn't included the word "mod" in my example (ie. practice mod), then you would have come up with 61 pages worth of results like what I did, when searching just for the word "practice".
If you're going to bring in examples, be reasonable with them.