1. 00:08:519 (3) - I think you forgot to disable Whistle on sliderbody here.
   00:09:319 (1) - same
2. 00:12:719 (4,5,6,1) - spacing here looks a bit uneven, note1 should be placed furthest since it's the strongest sound. And note4-5's spacing is too big for the music.
3. 00:14:119 (1,2) - big spacing here doesn't work well imo. Slider 2 has fairly weak sound, a jump here doesn't seem fit. Maybe try somewhere around x320y78
4. 00:56:919 (1,1) - Why do you want to stack these? Personally I feel like unstacking fits better
5. 01:22:419 (2) - This note feels overmapped. Maybe a 1/2 slider here?
6. 02:20:119 (1,1) - same
7. 02:30:119 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - The patterns you made here feel a bit weak for the guitar, maybe stronger flow or bigger spacing?
8. 02:49:819 (4,5,6,7) - Why is this overmapped?
9. 02:53:319 (1,2,3,4,5) - spacing can be bigger here

1. 01:27:019 (1,2) - spacing is weird, maybe move to x=28 y=208 and move slider end to x=128 y=272
2. 02:53:319 (1) - i feel like this should be at the slider end, and not that far away

1. 00:16:819 (7,8) - 00:18:419 (6,7) - 00:21:519 (8,9) - 01:14:519 (11) - 01:19:119 (6,7) - etc. cases like these where it would be more appropriate to have the slider begin from the blue tick 00:16:819 - as the white tick has nothing supporting it https://puu.sh/wDJj5/9fa5442422.jpg
2. 00:20:719 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - not sure what really changed in the music that calls for such a difference in rhythm compared to 00:15:719 - but anyways, the kicks begin from 00:20:919 - so instead of mapping 00:20:819 (3) - you couldve easily done a rhythm like http://puu.sh/wDJqe/4bf3cfde37.jpg that actually works with the triples provided
3. 01:09:619 (1) - 01:14:519 (11) - 01:31:219 (3) - also plenty of times where objects are clicked to nothing, with sliders passing through important beats
4. 01:20:619 - 02:43:819 - 03:54:219 - etc. why is stuff like this skipped? sounds like a continuous drum roll
5. 01:34:519 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - really ambiguous as to what's being followed here. beats like 01:34:619 (5,7) - make it appear that ur following the piano because you skip the drums at 01:34:919 - but then shortly after you map drums 01:35:319 (1,2,3)

1. 01:13:819 (6,7,8,9) - 01:20:219 (1,2,3,4) - 01:26:619 (4,5,6,7) - because of the way you handle rhythm, a lot of circle patterns begin on kicks 01:13:819 (6) - and results in the snare getting barely any emphasis 01:13:919 (7) . cases like 01:20:219 (1,2,3,4) - are pretty questionable since you group the kick drum with the much stronger snares 01:20:319 (2,3,4) - indicating they're similar sounds but.. they arent. should try do more stuff like 01:23:119 (2,3,4,5,6) - where you group similar sounds and place the emphasis on more important beats
2. 01:21:319 (1,2,3) - spacing here looks way too similar to 1/4 patterns 01:19:519 (1,2,3) - making it really unintuitive to read. i guess 02:44:519 (1,2,3) - is a more obvious case where the spacing barely differs from 1/4 rhythms
3. 01:26:619 (4,5,6,7,1,2) - idk wats trying to be achieved with these patterns but having the jump on a kick while stacking the snare is super confusing as there is no clear indication of when you should jump
4. 03:14:719 (3,1) - 03:21:119 (4,1) - these jumps shouldnt really belong in a slow section
5. 03:36:719 (2,3,4,5,6) - poor grouping with this stuff too, the beats are all different intensities except for 03:36:919 (4,5) - so representing them all in the same way is really strange

1. 03:09:319 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 03:22:919 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - the nc spam isn't really necessary, and 03:10:119 (1) - moves into a 1/1 slider while 03:23:719 (1) - is 2/3. should try establish more consistency
2. 03:30:319 (3,4) - 03:43:119 (1,2) - etc. you previously used 1/6 snaps for things like this 02:59:652 (1,2) - but you can't do the same here because the beats end on blue ticks 03:30:419 (4) . instead why not snap to 1/4 at 01:36:452 (1,2) - etc. for consistency, it also makes it more intuitive as all other stacks are snapped to 1/4 02:40:719 (2,3,4,5) . and ye allows u do have duplets at 03:36:019 (1) - 03:37:619 (1) - too
3. 04:25:319 - feels like this was mapped with similar intensity to main chorus sections, but the music definitely doesnt feel that way. should be mapped more like 00:15:719 - imo
4. 00:22:919 - compared to 04:40:519 - basically the same rhythm presented with the same intensity. should try to have them somewhat similar at least, instead of polar opposite difficulties

Pentori wrote:

some stuff

rhythm

1. 00:16:819 (7,8) - 00:18:419 (6,7) - 00:21:519 (8,9) - 01:14:519 (11) - 01:19:119 (6,7) - etc. cases like these where it would be more appropriate to have the slider begin from the blue tick 00:16:819 - as the white tick has nothing supporting it https://puu.sh/wDJj5/9fa5442422.jpg it is not like your suggestion is better, i am following violin(or whatever it is), hi-hats, etc. also i don't like blue tick sliders here it'll ruin the idea
2. 00:20:719 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - not sure what really changed in the music that calls for such a difference in rhythm compared to 00:15:719 - but anyways, the kicks begin from 00:20:919 - so instead of mapping 00:20:819 (3) - you couldve easily done a rhythm like http://puu.sh/wDJqe/4bf3cfde37.jpg that actually works with the triples provided as above, i am following different instrument, and that tripplets fit perfectly with it
3. 01:09:619 (1) listen closely for(2) it implies a double here, yes it is an overmap but it suits in that case lol - 01:14:519 (11) - it goes through hihat on the head and ends on drum so what in this case is considered not following the sound? 01:31:219 (3) i am doing vocals with it! also plenty of times where objects are clicked to nothing, with sliders passing through important beats
4. 01:20:619 - 02:43:819 - 03:54:219 - etc. why is stuff like this skipped? sounds like a continuous drum roll because it is intentional! i don't want to map it, you know not every sound MUST be represented it is not a mania game mode
5. 01:34:519 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - really ambiguous as to what's being followed here. beats like 01:34:619 (5,7) - make it appear that ur following the piano because you skip the drums at 01:34:919 - but then shortly after you map drums 01:35:319 (1,2,3) but there is no piano after that so leaving a blank place would be a bad choice, thus i mapped drums

placement

1. 01:13:819 (6,7,8,9) - 01:20:219 (1,2,3,4) - 01:26:619 (4,5,6,7) - because of the way you handle rhythm, a lot of circle patterns begin on kicks 01:13:819 (6) - and results in the snare getting barely any emphasis 01:13:919 (7) i am prioritizing vocals and violin, so following every drum is a bad decision in my opinion, btw not everything should be emphasized cases like 01:20:219 (1,2,3,4) - are pretty questionable since you group the kick drum with the much stronger snares 01:20:319 (2,3,4) - indicating they're similar sounds but.. they arent. it plays more naturally that way, also i find this note(1) is emphasizing next drumdrum sounds by using a "stop" movement from previous patterns should try do more stuff like 01:23:119 (2,3,4,5,6) - where you group similar sounds and place the emphasis on more important beats
2. 01:21:319 (1,2,3) - spacing here looks way too similar to 1/4 patterns 01:19:519 (1,2,3) - making it really unintuitive to read. i guess 02:44:519 (1,2,3) - is a more obvious case where the spacing barely differs from 1/4 rhythms that is for emphasis part of a song, you can see i repeat it through the map, or i should just spam fullscreen jumps if it isn't 1/4? players aren't stupid, it is fine
3. 01:26:619 (4,5,6,7,1,2) - idk wats trying to be achieved with these patterns but having the jump on a kick while stacking the snare is super confusing as there is no clear indication of when you should jump vocals here kinda eeeh so i decided to represent drums here, stacking on a snare is actually a good emphasis, also a can hear that these two sounds goes in a pair
4. 03:14:719 (3,1) - 03:21:119 (4,1) - these jumps shouldnt really belong in a slow section can't you hear these loud violin lol, yes it is a slow section but that doesn't mean i can't use jumps to represent something
5. 03:36:719 (2,3,4,5,6) - poor grouping with this stuff too, the beats are all different intensities except for 03:36:919 (4,5) - so representing them all in the same way is really strange as for me it is absolutely ok, sliders here wouldn't fit at all, 5 note stream represents music exactly how i want

consistency

1. 03:09:319 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 03:22:919 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - the nc spam isn't really necessary, and 03:10:119 (1) - moves into a 1/1 slider while 03:23:719 (1) - is 2/3. should try establish more consistency they are not same. nc here is for better readability because of low spacing and it is low to show the music goes down. first 1/3 isn't like that at all
2. 03:30:319 (3,4) - 03:43:119 (1,2) - etc. you previously used 1/6 snaps for things like this 02:59:652 (1,2) - but you can't do the same here because the beats end on blue ticks 03:30:419 (4) . instead why not snap to 1/4 at 01:36:452 (1,2) - etc. for consistency, it also makes it more intuitive as all other stacks are snapped to 1/4 02:40:719 (2,3,4,5) . and ye allows u do have duplets at 03:36:019 (1) - 03:37:619 (1) - too all doublets and implied doublets you mentioned are belongs to different section of a song, and they are different in the song as i can see. stuff in between kiais is 1/4 so it is 1/4. stuff after kiais is 1/6 bcs it is 1/6 and those single notes are for emphasizing crashes. that stuff has no relation between each others.
3. 04:25:319 - feels like this was mapped with similar intensity to main chorus sections, but the music definitely doesnt feel that way. should be mapped more like 00:15:719 - imo nono there are strong vocals, and in section you linked there are not.
4. 00:22:919 - compared to 04:40:519 - basically the same rhythm presented with the same intensity. should try to have them somewhat similar at least, instead of polar opposite difficulties at the start those doublets placed for strong drums sounds, and at the end they are not that strong, actually they are all same at the end so it is a stream.

a lot of points regarding rhythm/placement apply to the entire map, the timestamps are referred to as examples everything done thoroughly, things are not random and rhythm in complex songs like that can be represented variously. we just have like.. completely different views on the mapping field

i do think this needs a lot more work, most of your rhythms are mapped to unsupported beats while u also poorly group certain patterns - it just doesn't feel like you're representing the song properly as for me, and also plenty of other people map follows music properly

theres more i could go on about with aesthetics but that often gets dismissed as being subjective sooo xD