Wanko wrote:

Not the biggest fan of Camellia but let's try it

SPOILER

Blossom:
00:22:020 - could make a sharp turn here, like you did for this kind of sound before. // id rather keep shape
00:42:332 (3,2) - overlap, not sure if intentional or not // changed
01:04:520 (3) - This sound is kinda stronger than (2) so I'd make it a jump instead, like this maybe http://screenshot.sh/mMijS1JzAN9cD // just unstacked instead
01:11:395 (1) - Could place it like this instead http://screenshot.sh/mK7Be1xLLSImv // eh i like how its placed right now, overlaps are my thing
01:17:645 (1,2,3,4) - really threw me off when playing, I think placing a note at 01:17:723 makes a bit more sense, even if it's not following drums 100%. // think its fine, contrast here is nice
01:34:754 (2) and 01:35:379 (3) - Kinda overmapped imo, would map 01:35:691 and 01:35:848 and make 01:35:926 (2,3) into a slider instead // tbh the entire chorus is over a continuous 1/4 track
01:39:363 (3) - 2 nearly stacked singletaps would work better imo // idk what u mean
01:44:363 (3) - ^ // ^
01:56:082 (4) - Could end it at 01:56:316 and place another slider at 01:56:395 - 01:56:551 // want to keep
02:18:895 (1) - Hmm, move it to x:76 y:44? Think that's more in the middle // changed
02:36:395 (1,2,3) - I don't think this fits too well, http://screenshot.sh/mMiLQRyFTxGS1 maybe? // your suggestion seems a bit unnatural in rhythm imo
02:42:332 (2,3) - could make a triple here // did a triple right before instead
02:46:082 (4) - a bit weird to have that strong sound on a sliderend, when you map it as jump just half a sec later 02:46:707 (3) - http://screenshot.sh/mFcQOZPLXnfjl // im prioritizing melody here
03:09:676 (4,1) - stack them completely // changed
04:25:770 (1) - really throws me off. I know there's a sharp turn on that slider but I'd make it shorter anyway // made it more intuitive
04:30:066 (3,1) - weird spacing? I'd assume it should be the same as 04:32:566 (3,1) // changed
04:51:629 (2,3) - move to x:273 y:368 to avoid overlap // intentional overlap
05:12:488 (2,3,1) - If my ears don't play tricks on me, this part is 1/3 http://screenshot.sh/odR4vzeTxB6BR // its 1/4 lol

Well, that's all... Hope you found it helpful

Kanari wrote:

sb ~ https://puu.sh/vnp1i.zip
the parts where the notes are highlighted may look off while in the editor but they're fine when you actually play the map

the bg was one pixel off so i included a new one for you xD

Battle wrote:

[General]
metadata in description doesn't have feat. nanahira in picture, do you have a source that says feat nanahira?

d

1. 01:37:645 (1) - slidertail follows a kick and sliderhead follows literally no(or a very weak) sound, that plays really weird.
   patterns like this are more suitable imo (but rip patterns)
   e.g. 02:51:238 (1,2) -
2. 01:56:395 - i think you need a clickable object here
3. 02:56:238 (3,1,2,3) - rhythm here could be improved. 02:56:395 (1) - sliderhead follows no(or a very weak) sound
   Try this
4. 04:32:332 (2) - same

1. gimme metadata

1. there are a lot of stacks that are near to being unreadable. this one 04:34:207 (2,3,1) - , for example could be replaced for something like this. tl;dr enable stacking
2. 01:28:114 (4,5,6) - could replace this for a reverse arrow slider? i don't think this part should be that dense
3. 01:38:582 (2,3,4,5,1) - it feels kinda awkward compared to similar instances in the music, such as 01:43:582 (1,2,3,4,1) - or 01:48:582 (1,2,3,4,1) - i think that using a circular motion creates a much more fitting atmosphere
4. 01:56:395 - it feels kinda weird that it's on a slidertail, i think it would be a lot better if you make it clickable, as the sound is prominent enough to do so
5. 02:29:832 (1,2,3) - feels a bit exaggerated in terms of spacing, as music is building up, there should not be spacing changes as big as those i already mentioned.
6. 04:08:113 (5,6,7) - similar xd

Kagetsu wrote:

[General]

1. gimme metadata

http://puu.sh/wfSM1/f0917b72ce.png

[Petals]

1. there are a lot of stacks that are near to being unreadable. this one 04:34:207 (2,3,1) - , for example could be replaced for something like this. tl;dr enable stacking
2. 01:28:114 (4,5,6) - could replace this for a reverse arrow slider? i don't think this part should be that dense
3. 01:38:582 (2,3,4,5,1) - it feels kinda awkward compared to similar instances in the music, such as 01:43:582 (1,2,3,4,1) - or 01:48:582 (1,2,3,4,1) - i think that using a circular motion creates a much more fitting atmosphere // i tried to make it flow better, doing exactly circular motion is hard here imo
4. 01:56:395 - it feels kinda weird that it's on a slidertail, i think it would be a lot better if you make it clickable, as the sound is prominent enough to do so // fine
5. 02:29:832 (1,2,3) - feels a bit exaggerated in terms of spacing, as music is building up, there should not be spacing changes as big as those i already mentioned.
6. 04:08:113 (5,6,7) - similar xd

yea

FruityEnLoops wrote:

hmmm meta seems wrong :thinking:
iamkwan seems to be wrong

meta from official MP3

Général
Complete name : 06 Petals.mp3
Format : MPEG Audio
File size : 13,5 Mio
Duration : 5mn 46s
Overall bit rate mode : Constant
Overall bit rate : 320 Kbps
Album : Secretale
Part/Position : 1
Part/Total : 1
Track name : Petals
Track name/Position : 06
Track name/Total : 10
Performer : かめりあ & ななひら
Writing library : LAME3.99r
Cover : Yes
Cover type : Cover (front)
Cover MIME : image/jpeg

the artist should be Camellia ft. Nanahira, and camellia should not only be in the tags
gratz on ranking though! i'll be happy to play it!
(plz don't disqualify for this)

Doormat wrote:

just saying, but they provided an official source for the metadata whereas you didn't; I did this can hardly be considered as legitimate or correct. the source they provided shows that Nanahira is the artist, so current metadata is acceptable.

that being said, gl with requalification toybot~

FruityEnLoops wrote:

Doormat wrote:

just saying, but they provided an official source for the metadata whereas you didn't; I did this can hardly be considered as legitimate or correct. the source they provided shows that Nanahira is the artist, so current metadata is acceptable.

that being said, gl with requalification toybot~

So, if you want proof of what i'm saying :
Here's the MP3 : https://puu.sh/wr6Jt/bdb1bacf58.mp3
Source : http://hikarinoakariost.info/c91-confet ... secretale/
Check the ID3 tags.
It's just like the one in the box on my post ^.
This song is an Utaite by Nanahira, and the original creator is Camellia.

Doormat wrote:

you're missing the point. the link you provided is not an official source by the artist, so it doesn't matter if the mp3 claims it is "official" because it can't be proven. the website link that IAmKwan provided, however, is an official source by the artist, so that's why current metadata is acceptable.

please learn about using proper sources before making claims about wrong metadata.

AKIBA-HOBBY wrote:

06.Petals
イラスト：鍵空富焼
作編曲：かめりあ作詞：かめりあ

FruityEnLoops wrote:

k den
http://ec.akbh.jp/products/detail.php?p ... 0000071753

AKIBA-HOBBY wrote:

06.Petals
イラスト：鍵空富焼
作編曲：かめりあ作詞：かめりあ

which translated with google translate gives "Work Arrangement: Camelia Lyrics: Camelia" that's the composer; the vocalist is still nanahira and doesn't prove my point, since it's usually the vocalist that gets credited as the artist

https://www.melonbooks.co.jp/detail/det ... _id=196071
かめりあ (Camellia) is listed in the artist section so are Nanahira, Harunaba, Massive New Knew, etc. should we include them in the artist as well? this link isn't specific enough as to who did which track

https://diverse.direct/confetto/cfcd-0013/
Again, Camellia is listed same as the first link

btw, AKIBA, Melonbooks and diverse direct links are official retailers of secretale official retailer links aren't considered official sources

hikarinoakariost's mp3s are from diverse direct most of the time, but ofc I can't prove it. just saying. and i could easily change the ID3 tags from the .mp3 file; it doesn't mean that it'll be correct though. just saying.

Doormat wrote:

that's the composer; the vocalist is still nanahira and doesn't prove my point, since it's usually the vocalist that gets credited as the artist see at the bottom

so are Nanahira, Harunaba, Massive New Knew, etc. should we include them in the artist as well? this link isn't specific enough as to who did which track just pushing up the fact that Camellia participated in the making of the song

same as the first link

[b]official retailer links aren't considered official sources LOL

and i could easily change the ID3 tags from the .mp3 file; it doesn't mean that it'll be correct though. just saying. that's why I linked where I got the files, if you wanted to verify if I didn't changed the IDT3... idk why would I do that though

Wikipedia wrote:

An artist is a person engaged in an activity related to creating art, practicing the arts, or demonstrating an art.

KittyAdventure wrote:

Nanahira is fine as artist, same case like yf_bmp's map and Janpai's map

p/5458448#p5458448
p/5525872#p5525872

Doormat wrote:

the link you provided is not an official source by the artist

FruityEnLoops wrote:

KittyAdventure wrote:

Nanahira is fine as artist, same case like yf_bmp's map and Janpai's map

p/5458448#p5458448
p/5525872#p5525872

lol, so another song is a source for this one
as doormat would say

Doormat wrote:

the link you provided is not an official source by the artist