30:32:267 (10,11) - I think this would be better if it just continued the stream, there isn't really much of a change in the music to prompt the sudden change to a slider
I think the clap emphasizes a lot, whereas the stream melody just fades out31:10:678 (5) - The sound on the sliderend is much stronger than on the sliderhead, 31:11:063 (6) is also rather weak, so making the sliderhead into a circle and then the end into a 1/2 slider would fit better imo, since the sliderend is a held sound as well.
31:51:067 (3) - Again sliderend is stronger than sliderhead, prob just make it into 2 circles
1 1/4 slider and a circle31:54:324 (10) - Same thing, could make 31:53:981 (9) into a repeat slider since the sound on the sliderhead of (10) is very weak.
31:57:238 (10,11) - DS here is larger than the previous jump, even though (11) is on a very weak sound
It's for the pattern, and it's also a little warning for the next part which is a bit intense33:13:299 (3) - Maybe I'm deaf but I don't hear anything here
Deaf to all but the song <3 (yes it's overmapped but feels well with the sound, so I'll keep it)33:14:063 (7) - There's a sound on 33:14:255 that goes unmapped, I think if you made (7) into a 1/2 slider it'd fit nicely, as it is there's a musical clue to start the stream earlier than it's mapped, and with a small jump from the sliderend it'd keep the emphasis on the same tick
2 circles emphasizes well (and the sound you hear isn't as emphasized as the claps)34:26:842 (5) - Sliderstart and end are both strong sounds, might be better as 2 circles, especially since this kind of clashes with the 3 weaker notes before it all being circles.
34:32:509 (1) - ^, the sounds on the slider are both stronger than the ones on the circles before, though the difference isn't as crass as in the previous instance
35:37:225 (15,1) - The strong sounds are on (15) and the end of (1), as it is it goes against the music's emphasis.
disagree, I don't hear it like this (and it would rhythm and plays horrible)35:43:151 (10,1) - ^
^35:38:614 (13,1,2,3) - Assuming you're trying to emphasize the sound on the head of (13) and (1), it would fit better if (1) repeated once and the following two sounds were mapped as a duoble (second note can be a kickslider to keep the rest of the current rhythm), otherwise these feel like random kicksliders that don't emphasize the music
It's just another pattern with 1/4 sliders, it's not a need to map every 1/4 beats35:41:762 (1,2,3) - ^, also NC of this and the previous one is inconsistent
No ?? every big white ticks for NC :335:47:596 (13,1,2,3) - Combines the previous points, the first kickslider doesn't start on the strong sound, and the kicksliders after don't emphasize the 1/2 - 1/2 - 3/4 - 1/4 rhythm properly. These two things repeat pretty much through the whole song up until it changes near the end
^36:20:640 (10,11) - Straight angle jumps are pretty awkward to play as it is, making them kicksliders on top of that doesn't help. Doesn't really need changing if you want to keep it, but it's not that nice to play and could catch people off guard since it doesn't really occur otherwise (well, from the parts that I looked at at least)
I don't think so (at least for this one)36:29:249 (9) - Should be NC'd to be consistent with previous NCs I think
nop36:54:905 (1,2) - (2) isn't really that strong to warrant such a large jump imo
The jump isn't used in order to emphasize the next object37:41:337 (5,6) - Should make these kicksliders imo, you're following the 1/4 rhythm the entire time, so suddenly undermapping like this is a bit confusing
No I especially ignore these ones because there's a more emphasized sond in front of them37:42:800 (7,8) - ^ etc.
38:04:292 (3,4) - There's a triple here, don't really see a reason not to map the last note of it
Not a triplet from the main melody38:15:858 (3,4) - ^ etc.
38:05:376 (9) - NC?
nuuh38:46:252 (3,4,5) - This spacing with that kind of flow is pretty tough to play as it ia, I think you should at least equalize the distance between the 3 to make it a bit easier to follow
Whaat it was supposed to be I'm just blind xD38:53:582 (9,10,1) - Curve the slider the other way, or otherwise make it more like 38:59:036 (7,8,1) in terms of flow, the latter feels much more natural since the next note follows the slidercurve
You shouldn't speak about "natural flow", it's junko, the flow is totally broken xD (in purpose) (and fixed)