1. 00:50:186 - maybe make sv a but higher here - this seems more intense than the previous section
2. 01:11:713 (5,6,1) - kinda uncomfortable flow - you could argue that it's for emphasis of 1, but you haven't done this anywhere else in this section so it's a bit inconsistent
3. 01:25:301 (1,2,3) - maybe unstack a little like 01:27:708 (1,2,3) - and 01:34:944 (5,6,1) - for consistency?
4. 02:23:749 (1) - ctrl+g this for spacing emphasis, also ctrl+g the others if youre doing this obv
5. 02:27:413 (1,3) - i think you could stack these
6. 02:40:238 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing here is similar but the gaps in rhythm are different. consider changing as a misread may happen here.
7. 03:14:009 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,4,5,6) - consider simplifying rhythm to 1/2 and 1/4 in this section so for readability and to fit with the rest of the section - no one will expect these sort of unusual rhythm gaps unless theyve already listened to the song
8. 03:38:777 (5,1) - could also be misread, also spacing is too big for a 1/4 gap imo
9. 03:39:067 (1) - actually shouldnt this be on the red tick after it? vocal starts there and it's for consistency with similar stuff in the upcoming section
10. 03:49:809 (5,6,7,8) - nitpicky but these arent equidistant
11. 04:03:551 (4,1) - even with slider leniency i think this is too big for a 1/4 gap

newton- wrote:

hi, from queue
amazing map, amazing song
also i like your sliders <3

[ challenge]

1. 00:50:186 - maybe make sv a but higher here - this seems more intense than the previous section well instead to adjust the whole section i decided to add a inherted point on 00:42:858 - with 0.60x sv and add another inherted point on 00:50:186 - with 0.80x sv
2. 01:11:713 (5,6,1) - kinda uncomfortable flow - you could argue that it's for emphasis of 1, but you haven't done this anywhere else in this section so it's a bit inconsistent flow doesn't have to be comfortable in some case, this is the part where satan sing so i want to have more sharper angle and non-good flow
3. 01:25:301 (1,2,3) - maybe unstack a little like 01:27:708 (1,2,3) - and 01:34:944 (5,6,1) - for consistency? sure
4. 02:23:749 (1) - ctrl+g this for spacing emphasis, also ctrl+g the others if youre doing this obv I wanna go different direction
5. 02:27:413 (1,3) - i think you could stack these ok fine
6. 02:40:238 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing here is similar but the gaps in rhythm are different. consider changing as a misread may happen here. so i guess i should lower the distance, fixed
7. 03:14:009 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,4,5,6) - consider simplifying rhythm to 1/2 and 1/4 in this section so for readability and to fit with the rest of the section - no one will expect these sort of unusual rhythm gaps unless theyve already listened to the song ok revamped the whole part
8. 03:38:777 (5,1) - could also be misread, also spacing is too big for a 1/4 gap imo adjusted the distance
9. 03:39:067 (1) - actually shouldnt this be on the red tick after it? vocal starts there and it's for consistency with similar stuff in the upcoming section fixed
10. 03:49:809 (5,6,7,8) - nitpicky but these arent equidistant ok fixed
11. 04:03:551 (4,1) - even with slider leniency i think this is too big for a 1/4 gap lower the distance a lot

good luck!

• 00:39:194 (1) - This one should be emphasized more just like rest of them
  
  00:47:896 (2) - Probably the best pronounced ************ I've ever heard
  
  01:35:246 (1,2) - Why are these so close you have a strong sound on 01:35:849 (2) - emphasize it a little bit
  
  03:05:898 (4) - Ctrl+G so you have a better emphasize on 03:06:564 (1) - since its a strong sound and better cause you have the same DS on 3 before it and the forth is practically the same as them.
  
  03:27:564 (1,2) - You can hear a sound on 03:27:898 (1) - and I think the proper way to map it is like this http://prntscr.com/escgxc it sounds much better tho
  
  04:01:809 (3,4) - Bigger DS between these than 04:02:003 (4,1) - these and 04:02:196 (1) - is a important sound and should be emphasized right?
  
  04:08:390 (1) - ^
  
  04:49:952 (5) - You can hear a beat here so map it pls

• Why bitrate audio 128, need 192)

• 00:34:614 (4) - You need to make sure that these shifts are more visible
  01:04:843 (1) - I certainly understand everything, but you need to reduce the speed of the slider to 1.3-1.5, because the music is not very clear that there will be such a sharp shift, and already 2 sliders can be made so fast
  01:12:629 (2,4) - Do blanket?
  01:48:927 (1) - Why note not that tick?
  01:51:728 (2) - ^

Invertable wrote:

Hi NM from my queue

Challenge

Your Audio bit rate is 128 kbs you know what to do fixed (although you don't really have to fix this but it's the best to do so)

• 00:39:194 (1) - This one should be emphasized more just like rest of them sure
  
  00:47:896 (2) - Probably the best pronounced ************ I've ever heard xd
  
  01:35:246 (1,2) - Why are these so close you have a strong sound on 01:35:849 (2) - emphasize it a little bit sure
  
  03:05:898 (4) - Ctrl+G so you have a better emphasize on 03:06:564 (1) - since its a strong sound and better cause you have the same DS on 3 before it and the forth is practically the same as them. ok sure
  
  03:27:564 (1,2) - You can hear a sound on 03:27:898 (1) - and I think the proper way to map it is like this http://prntscr.com/escgxc it sounds much better tho I didn't hear it wtf
  
  04:01:809 (3,4) - Bigger DS between these than 04:02:003 (4,1) - these and 04:02:196 (1) - is a important sound and should be emphasized right? ok sure
  
  04:08:390 (1) - ^ sure
  
  04:49:952 (5) - You can hear a beat here so map it pls fixed

Uhh really hard to mod this map is awesome song is amazing xD I wish to see this ranked or at least loved one day ! GL hopefully this mod was somewhat helpful!

Moge-ko wrote:

00:22:705 (1) - that sharp angle feels kinda weird because all other sharp angled slider on that part have the sharp angle in the middle of the slider. i think it would look better if u make the sharp angle in the middle of that slider I want to emphasize that important sound, no fix
00:27:285 (4) - that slider looks weird cuz all other slider on that part are more curved than that. maybe make it curved like the sliders before? I try to make 00:27:285 (4) - and 00:27:743 (1) - to have a natural flow, no fix
03:39:067 (1) - that note feels out of place ... maybe make the kickslider shorter and put a slider with the sliderend on that note on it? or just simply remove it? not really out of place
03:58:325 (3) - u skipped vocal and drumsound there. Maybe put there a note? or a 1/2 kickslider? sure
04:00:261 (8,1) - u skipped a guitar/vocal sound there it feels kinda out of place. place a note there or a 1/4 slider? (and you mapped that guitar sound there 04:15:938 (4,5,1) - that makes inconsistent)
04:08:196 (4,1) - skipped guitar sound fixed
04:11:293 (4,1) - skipped guitar sound fixed
04:14:390 (4,1) - skipped guitar sound fixed
04:40:005 (5,1) - u skipped a sound between these 2 sliders fixed

makisokk wrote:

Hi
[General]

• Why bitrate audio 128, need 192) fixed in previous mod

[Challenge]

• 00:34:614 (4) - You need to make sure that these shifts are more visible it's visible already dude lol
  01:04:843 (1) - I certainly understand everything, but you need to reduce the speed of the slider to 1.3-1.5, because the music is not very clear that there will be such a sharp shift, and already 2 sliders can be made so fast player need to remember that
  01:12:629 (2,4) - Do blanket? sure
  01:48:927 (1) - Why note not that tick? if it's on 1/4 tick it's not 100% accurate so i need to change some value
  01:51:728 (2) - ^ explained ^

Sorry this is all I can help, good luck with the map

Yahuri wrote:

from meme

F U C K
-nice colorhaxing :v
00:11:713 (1,2,3,4) - could move the 2-3-4 triangle so that 3,4 are equidistant from the tail of 1 sure
00:26:827 - 00:27:743 (1,2,3) - add clap? sure
00:42:400 - there isn't any distinct note here, so i would silence this sliderend fixed
01:30:874 (2) - i think it would be cool if you change the shape of this slider to emphasize the vocal pitch change here 01:31:175 ok lol sure
02:07:261 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - 02:21:917 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - stacking is kinda off, should probably fix it pixel by pixel xd fixed
02:14:589 (1,1,1,1) - move these so that 02:14:016 (1,1) - the head of the short slider perfectly overlaps the red anchor of the long slider? ok sure
02:29:245 - 02:32:909 - 02:40:238 - add finish? you put finish here 02:36:574 sure
03:09:231 (1,2) - move 2 so that its equidistant from the head and tail of 1 fixed
03:43:615 (1,3) - is this supposed to be a blanket? the sliderbody of 3 is too far away from the sliderbody of 1it suppose to line the slider end up
03:49:809 (5,6) - 6 isnt a strong note so i don't think it needs a jump. 03:50:970 (7) - would be ok for a jump though changed the position
04:19:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - it's the same vocal phrase over and over. rather than starting with no movement (stacking) -> movement, i would start with movement. sure

short mod, this map is already pretty clean. good luck!

[Soul] wrote:

Pretty hardcore map though I dont enjoy the swearing that much

Mod

Beginning is good.
00:37:209 (7,2) - Blanket 7 on the end of 2 i don't understand
01:02:553 (1,2) - You could increase the spacing here. sure
02:32:757 (3,2) - Same as 7, 2 but put 3 on top of 2 i don't get the thing
I mean I dont really have much to say about this map. Maybe consider different spikes in DS and emphisis in the music to mesh with the distance of notes. Make sure you overlaps and blankets are clean clean clean.

Hope this helps in anyway.

Soul from the OSUWOT Modding Queue~

Hytex wrote:

just a reminders xdxdxdxdxdddxdxdxdxdxdxxxddxdx
put a timuing pointus here plez b0ss 04:13:080 -
ok have a nice day xdd

e: dude just put a frikin timing pointusu iz stil de sam bpm m88
im jst gong to pt teh bpm coz u cnt rember xdd 155

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[Challenge]
00:06:861 (2,3) - How about ctrl G for emphazise 2? like 00:12:358 (2,3) - sure
00:54:800 (2,3,4) - looks too near, I think 0.9x could be better. sure
01:01:213 (5,6) - why you made antijump? looks too weird since you didn't use antijumps before. changed pattern
01:12:663 (2,3) - 01:13:121 (4,5) - 01:13:579 (6,7) - music makesthispattern, but your pattern looks this i don't really think it looks like that, not sure
02:21:955 (1,1,1,1) - you stacked in here, 02:23:787 (1,1,1) - overlapped? looks little bit weird. stacked
03:40:573 (1,3) - looks not perfect parallel fixed
03:51:798 (2,3) - this DS should be bigger than 03:51:411 (1,2) - adjusted ds

GL

Yohanes wrote:

Hello! sorry I'm late
Actually I have nothing much to say since the map good enough to me
Oh, and I start modding before you applied Neoskylove's mod, some things may not be relevant anymore

Challenge
In my opinion, OD 8,5 is too much for this song. Music is quite calm and the timing is tricky at some places, OD 8 is more than enough sure
- 02:24:245 (1) - looks like a stacking error fixed
- 04:11:347 (4,5,1) - This will actually plays better if you mirror the stream's direction, your current one feels too forced imo http://puu.sh/vcfzX/c967fa53e7.jpg ok sure
- 04:17:927 (2,3,4,5) - It would be more readable & comfortable to play if you curve this a little bit http://puu.sh/vcfGi/24d3cf6cdc.jpg sure
- How about adding another hitclap to make the beats on the stream part like 04:25:669 -, 04:26:057 -, 04:26:444 -, etc stand out more? It will give additional feedback that is more pleasant to hear and not monotonous did add finish
- 04:32:057 (2,3,1,2,1,2,3) - Pretty sure that all of these sliders are snapping error, it should be 1/3 fixed
- 05:09:448 - How about starting this circular pattern with the (3) slider, sure
- 05:10:509 - This pattern with (3) slider, sure
- 05:11:570 - also with the (3) slider, so the spacing is equal to the intensity of the song. I hope you understand what I mean sure
- 05:22:732 (1,2,3) - This last notes are in wrong timing. Besides, I will suggest you to change this to a repeat slider instead so that player can hit those awkward timing with no compromise in accuracy fixed

Hope this helps a little bit
Good Luck!

1. 00:22:281 (5) - feel like denser rythm like 00:24:113 (5,6) - for those drums would fit better with the rest of the section that all has 3 mapped beats
2. 00:34:648 (4,4) - 2 times simlar combos between downbeats so kinda feel like these hitsound should be similar too for the same feedback while playing
3. 00:35:106 (1,2,3) - vs 00:36:938 (5,6,7) -00:38:770 (5,6,7) - bit inconsistent NC wise for those whisle jumps
4. 01:01:213 (5) - NC would be good here since its kinda the start of the new section in the song
5. 01:15:258 (5,1) - threw me a bitt off while playing since you have similar spacing for 1/2s, well basicly it was a bit of awkhard hold at 01:15:869 (1) - waiting for the note to come, maybe place it a bit of out the flow so you need some movement adjustment for the 1/1 or just adding a circle would work too imo since its the only 1/1 gap in the section
6. 01:27:105 (7,1) - thoughts about control + g the rythm on these? pretty strong tail here and you kinda have a slider without an extended sound and a circle with an extended soudn atm
7. 01:25:302 (1,2,3) - 01:27:708 (1,2,3) - 01:34:944 (5,6,1) - bit inconsistent NC thigny
8. 01:30:422 (1,2,3,4) - really sounds off atm with the whisles to me since the main stuff is on the skipped white ticks, for vocal following aswell I'd try extending 1 and 3 instead and have 1/2s on 2 and 4 so your main feedback is still there
9. 01:42:143 (2,2) - needs similar ending snappings here , both on blue sound best with the music but 1/16 seems optional too for polarity but 1/16 polarity stuff is kinda neglectible imo
10. 01:47:005 (2) - well since you used 1/16 adjustments before this starts 1/16 after the red tick but then slider would work better then just 2 circles
11. 01:48:971 (1) - timing on this stuff should prob all be halved since the music decreases from the 100 bpm stuff so starting at 190 really doesnt make that much sense also unsnapped ends on sliders atm maybe try these points:
    
12. 02:11:278 (1) - starts on 1/16 while the other later on similars start on 1/4 like 02:12:222 (1) - tho kidna similar with these duos 02:12:509 (1,2) - is the odd one out, tho rythm wise this sounded a bit off aswell to me 02:10:963 (1,1) - these and others why not go for full polarity stuff here? like starting 02:11:249 (1) - and 02:12:165 (1) - on the yellows so you have a fconstant 3/8 gap inbetween and the loud whites at the end mapped, sounds alot better to me imo same for the doubles, basicly this rythm for constant 1/8 polarity and halve the slider lenght = 2 circle lenghts sounds and plays a lot smoother imo I'd def try it out atleast to see
    
13. 02:24:703 (1,2,3,4) - 02:21:039 (1,1,2,3) - bit NC consistency here again
14. 02:58:596 (4) - could NC here aswell if you want since you'd NC'd this prob if it was a slider
15. 03:02:870 (1) - timings is a bit off too for this section maybe try this, some points that can be hard this point 03:32:586 (4,5,6) - 1/3 vocals, 03:29:749 (7) - could make 3/4 from blue yellow red if you want to follow the guitar aswell otherwise just vocal you can ignore this
    
    
    for ending spinner and minor adjustment in the pause thingy aswell
    
    
16. aight should be it really cool symmetry on the epic part!

Wishkey wrote:

yow! saw this in pending quick stuff from playing, some timing stuff so I dunno if you wanna test first on a seperate diff maybe

1. 00:22:281 (5) - feel like denser rythm like 00:24:113 (5,6) - for those drums would fit better with the rest of the section that all has 3 mapped beats sure
2. 00:34:648 (4,4) - 2 times simlar combos between downbeats so kinda feel like these hitsound should be similar too for the same feedback while playing ok sure
3. 00:35:106 (1,2,3) - vs 00:36:938 (5,6,7) -00:38:770 (5,6,7) - bit inconsistent NC wise for those whisle jumps I nced 00:36:938 (5,6,7) - and 00:38:770 (5,6,7) as the rest of the map kept the nc pattern like that
4. 01:01:213 (5) - NC would be good here since its kinda the start of the new section in the song sure
5. 01:15:258 (5,1) - threw me a bitt off while playing since you have similar spacing for 1/2s, well basicly it was a bit of awkhard hold at 01:15:869 (1) - waiting for the note to come, maybe place it a bit of out the flow so you need some movement adjustment for the 1/1 or just adding a circle would work too imo since its the only 1/1 gap in the section fixed with a circle
6. 01:27:105 (7,1) - thoughts about control + g the rythm on these? pretty strong tail here and you kinda have a slider without an extended sound and a circle with an extended soudn atm fixed
7. 01:25:302 (1,2,3) - 01:27:708 (1,2,3) - 01:34:944 (5,6,1) - bit inconsistent NC thigny fixed
8. 01:30:422 (1,2,3,4) - really sounds off atm with the whisles to me since the main stuff is on the skipped white ticks, for vocal following aswell I'd try extending 1 and 3 instead and have 1/2s on 2 and 4 so your main feedback is still there ok applied
9. 01:42:143 (2,2) - needs similar ending snappings here , both on blue sound best with the music but 1/16 seems optional too for polarity but 1/16 polarity stuff is kinda neglectible imo not gonna do similar snapping as i try to make satan part to have larger spacing while tenacious d's part has lower spacing (there are some special case :^), like that t's rock part), tho i snapped the slider end to blue tick
10. 01:47:005 (2) - well since you used 1/16 adjustments before this starts 1/16 after the red tick but then slider would work better then just 2 circles actually that does make sense so fixed
11. 01:48:971 (1) - timing on this stuff should prob all be halved since the music decreases from the 100 bpm stuff so starting at 190 really doesnt make that much sense also unsnapped ends on sliders atm maybe try these points: im not sure should i do that, as bpm in this case not really that important
    
12. 02:11:278 (1) - starts on 1/16 while the other later on similars start on 1/4 like 02:12:222 (1) - tho kidna similar with these duos 02:12:509 (1,2) - is the odd one out, tho rythm wise this sounded a bit off aswell to me 02:10:963 (1,1) - these and others why not go for full polarity stuff here? like starting 02:11:249 (1) - and 02:12:165 (1) - on the yellows so you have a fconstant 3/8 gap inbetween and the loud whites at the end mapped, sounds alot better to me imo same for the doubles, basicly this rythm for constant 1/8 polarity and halve the slider lenght = 2 circle lenghts sounds and plays a lot smoother imo I'd def try it out atleast to see well i did revamped this part a bit, with your ideas
    
13. 02:24:703 (1,2,3,4) - 02:21:039 (1,1,2,3) - bit NC consistency here again fixed
14. 02:58:596 (4) - could NC here aswell if you want since you'd NC'd this prob if it was a slider fixed
15. 03:02:870 (1) - timings is a bit off too for this section maybe try this, some points that can be hard this point 03:32:586 (4,5,6) - 1/3 vocals, 03:29:749 (7) - could make 3/4 from blue yellow red if you want to follow the guitar aswell otherwise just vocal you can ignore this timing sounds off from your suggestion, did change to 1/3 tho, also i just want to follow the vocal more as it's much clearer to follow
    
    
    for ending spinner and minor adjustment in the pause thingy aswell adjusted the bpm
    
    
16. aight should be it really cool symmetry on the epic part!

GL man! hope it helped a bit, really wanna see this ranked!

Bewww wrote:

Hi there! o/ so most of this is my special preferens(hope i wrote right):

MOD :

SPOILER

00:28:235 (1) - the revers is not enough here, it can be mapped in alot of different ways. like this: try to let the player to get the rhythm first, no fix
or like this:
00:30:067 (1) - same^ ^
01:30:422 (1) - try this overmapped
01:42:482 (1) - make more smooth sure

screen

01:49:650 (3) - what abotu same curve as a 01:50:961 (1) - sure
01:50:961 (1,2,3) -rotate to 15(clockwise + playfield) and move it to x:491 y:239. for better flow ( I realy dislike to play and place objects too much in 1 part of the screen ) ok sure
02:37:986 (4) - its should be symetrical, cause u make symetrical before. us grid for slider-start and slider-end ( but dont touch a red point!) fixed
02:58:138 (1,2,3,1) - seems so randomly, stack it like u stack a 02:58:596 (1) - , then it should looks like ok sure

screen

or try do something to safe a connection with prev. slider 02:57:680 (4) -
03:11:898 (1) - should be same as 03:22:564 (5,1,2,3) - revamped this part
03:33:009 (6) - slider should end here 03:33:675 - or here 03:34:342 - . if u choose 1st option, u should do same singletaps part as here ^ no sound there no fix
03:34:620 (7) - emmm. not on bit? just fix it. timing problem will fix soon
03:38:057 (3) - us same curve as 03:37:476 (1) - ? ok sure

screen

03:43:669 (1,3) - same^ sure
04:00:315 (4) - i realy prefer to do same sapce between objects in patterns except if it not a special style of mappin. so move it here x:305 y:116. so it will be same as 03:59:540 (2,3) - fixed
04:19:282 (1,3,4,6,7,9) - u map just a strng bea there, and it right, but pls this about this -> im not following vocal, no fix

P.S as i said early, if it not enough, or will be usless jsut bothering me in Pm

- Frontier - wrote:

hi. small mods here because i think it'll ranked soon.

[General]

1. Title is "Beelzeboss (The Final Showdown)". Not "BEELZEBOSS (THE FINAL SHOWDOWN)" < Not all capital letters lol (1 2 3)
   (yeah i saw iamkwan's meta check but i think it's wrong.) can't trust unofficial YouTube channels and music stores
2. Just my opinion but ar9 is kinda slow in rock part. Maybe increase it a bit? too fast for slow part

[Challenge]

1. 00:08:693 (2,3) - you could make it parallel for aesthetics sure xd
2. 00:10:525 (2,3) - ^ sure
3. 00:20:602 (2,2) - not stack properly (if you fix this, fix this too 00:21:823 (4)) fixed
4. 00:52:052 (3,4) - not perfectly blanket. curve (3) a little. fixed
5. 01:28:914 (3,1) - stack? ok sure
6. 01:44:894 (1,1) - i saw you mapped sharp-angle slider in rock part.. but yeah... i don't see any problem here
7. 02:01:784 - Is it necessary to add break here? it's like the transition to rock part, no fix
8. 02:36:459 - Maybe add a note here? I think i heard some sound here. fixed
9. 02:48:062 (2,5) - stack? fixed
10. 03:49:476 (4) - just my opinion but you could try to ctrl+g these. It looks great tho cool, applied
11. 04:03:605 (4) - isn't it 1/2 sound here? like this one,04:08:250 (4,5,1). fixed

GL~

Kondou-Shinichi wrote:

im not good enough to mod this godly map
ill just leave a star

Underforest wrote:

timing

21:56 CookieBite: hi
21:56 CookieBite: can you time
21:56 Underforest: yes
21:56 CookieBite: o
21:56 CookieBite: could you help me to check the timing is correct or not
21:58 CookieBite: @Underforest
22:08 Underforest: sure
22:08 *CookieBite is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1271208 Tenacious D - BEELZEBOSS (THE FINAL SHOWDOWN)]
22:08 CookieBite: use tming diff
22:08 CookieBite: *timimg
22:08 CookieBite: **timing
22:11 CookieBite: @Underforest
22:18 Underforest: 04:34:736 - 04:36:410 - no need for new red lines because not rhythm beats here
22:19 Underforest: other than that, good
22:19 CookieBite: post on forum
22:19 CookieBite: for bn look
22:19 CookieBite: *bn check
22:20 Underforest: k

Mijn Aim Zuigt wrote:

Hi nm

00:26:861 (2) - move this slider a bit to the left to create a triangle with 2 and 3,it looks a bit better imo yea sure

01:10:831 (2) - this slider is ever so slightly off of the other sliders in this section ( 01:10:373 (1,4,5,1) - ) it triggers me I stacked them here so you know what I mean lol ok nice check fixed

01:40:076 (1) - I'm probably autistic but this way this slider will look a bit better Before After the circle is not perfect :w:

03:14:553 (1,2) - these sliders suddenly follow the vocals, while all the other slides in this section seem to be following the guitar actually there are guitar sound on the vocal so im just gonna map it lol

03:37:474 (1,3) - these sliders are also ever-so-slightly off-curve https://puu.sh/vqfFS/ecb2f68b97.jpg fixed

03:45:990 (3,4) - same thing https://puu.sh/vqfJG/7482f16bef.jpg fixed

Pretty good map for the rest

Emilia wrote:

i try

[easy]

1. 00:39:075 (3,1) - this distance is pretty insane and seems kinda uncomfortable to play, suggest reduce distance reduced
2. 01:04:877 (1) - i think shifting this like 1/8th back makes a better compromise to vocal and drum shifted to 1/16
3. 01:06:709 (1) - ^ shifted to 1/16
4. 01:13:579 (6,1) - distance with stack is a little too close for comfort fixed
5. 02:01:784 (1) - i guess this isnt snapped properly, just place it on the red line (it sounds better to me that way) snapped
6. 04:17:732 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - i would say space the kicks apart so its less misleading and easier to read? like this adjusted the spacing
   
   not a lot to talk about because i can trust your consistency in mapping. really nice!

ranking this will probably be easy xd

Weber wrote:

Offset seems really off, really noticeable in auto

minus 40-50 should fix it